no. commonly used by older refereesin the 80s. is mentioned in tom brown's schooldays and many other
F**ked up Facts
-
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:09 pm
Full back Sorry That's a pastis ...Happyhooker wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:12 pmyou'd think a canadian would be wary of putting up pictures of prematurely aged/weighty fly halves/full backs
-
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:09 pm
that's gone straight over my head, sorrylaurent wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:21 pmFull back Sorry That's a pastis ...Happyhooker wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:12 pmyou'd think a canadian would be wary of putting up pictures of prematurely aged/weighty fly halves/full backs
Cornish pastis?Happyhooker wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:40 pmthat's gone straight over my head, sorrylaurent wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:21 pmFull back Sorry That's a pastis ...Happyhooker wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:12 pm
you'd think a canadian would be wary of putting up pictures of prematurely aged/weighty fly halves/full backs
-
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:09 pm
Ha, ha... I was looking for a good pic of him, too, when I threw the above up. I suspect he's sucking in his cut something fierce here.Happyhooker wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:12 pmyou'd think a canadian would be wary of putting up pictures of prematurely aged/weighty fly halves/full backs
-
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:09 pm
i trained with him and played in 2 games alongside him and he was famously a fat cunt.Niegs wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 10:12 pmHa, ha... I was looking for a good pic of him, too, when I threw the above up. I suspect he's sucking in his cut something fierce here.Happyhooker wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:12 pmyou'd think a canadian would be wary of putting up pictures of prematurely aged/weighty fly halves/full backs
this was in the late 80s
Saying he was a “fat cunt” or “fat” and a “cunt”?Happyhooker wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 11:09 pm
i trained with him and played in 2 games alongside him and he was famously a fat cunt.
this was in the late 80s
Don’t click if this is that disturbing to you, but many people in the Victorian era had family photos taken with a deceased family member, often a child.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-36389581
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-36389581
Yes, Bill McLaren used to say "the whistle blows for no side". Or similar.
51 0 in WembleyHappyhooker wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:40 pmthat's gone straight over my head, sorrylaurent wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:21 pmFull back Sorry That's a pastis ...Happyhooker wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 9:12 pm
you'd think a canadian would be wary of putting up pictures of prematurely aged/weighty fly halves/full backs
-
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:09 pm
Nah, a bit up himself but a decent enough blokeNiegs wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 11:48 pmSaying he was a “fat cunt” or “fat” and a “cunt”?Happyhooker wrote: ↑Wed Apr 14, 2021 11:09 pm
i trained with him and played in 2 games alongside him and he was famously a fat cunt.
this was in the late 80s
- clydecloggie
- Posts: 1200
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:31 am
Never heard it used in Glasgow either.
Thanks for reminding me about that smirking little git Castaignede running rings around us.
A votre service.
The 51 Score is important to all french alcoholics
I’ve seen it used a few times. The first time, I’m sure, was in a newspaper (?The Scotsman, as we took it at home back then) in a report on Scotland’s GS win back in 1990.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
Well I had to check that one. Reminds me of the four colour theorem - in any map, however complicated, no more than four colours are required to ensure that no two adjacent regions have the same colour.
What’s with the travel into all by heading due south thing? I’m often slow on riddles but I see LA to the south...
Edit: okay, I see it... can access each state by traveling south from a portion of it. For Oklahoma that must be a very small opportunity?
Edit: okay, I see it... can access each state by traveling south from a portion of it. For Oklahoma that must be a very small opportunity?
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:31 am
1 (and 2) Austerity in the UK is to blame for 135 thousand deaths, before Covid even hit and during Covid, tens of thousands of infected people were forced to go into work as there was zero support for them if they didn.t..spreading the disease wildly..
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... ppr-report
3) Boris desperately wanted a "Brexit" ventilator (a ventilator provided by Dyson and Caterpillar and Brexit entrepreneurs) and completely ignored other established ventilator suppliers, many of which not just went to the wall, the ventilators they supplied had to be taken from the front line for lack of parts and servicing.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... ppr-report
3) Boris desperately wanted a "Brexit" ventilator (a ventilator provided by Dyson and Caterpillar and Brexit entrepreneurs) and completely ignored other established ventilator suppliers, many of which not just went to the wall, the ventilators they supplied had to be taken from the front line for lack of parts and servicing.
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:31 am
There is more evidence that we (human beings) created the universe than God.
If in 200 thousand years it is possible that the human race can create a big bang, (bare in mind how far technology has advanced in just a hundred years), then it is extremely likely that the big bang that created us is man made.
We are the only things in the universe you can point a stick at that will shortly (time is relative) have the technology to create a big bang.
Who created the first one, if all we are doing is replicating big bangs..who knows.
Who cares.
The big bang that created us was most likely man made.
I called this theory hillbilly2 theory.
It hit me when I was sat in the bath reading a brief history of time around 2002.
Four years later a article in the daily Express said that " scientists are worried about creating a big bang in a particle accelerator".
If in 200 thousand years it is possible that the human race can create a big bang, (bare in mind how far technology has advanced in just a hundred years), then it is extremely likely that the big bang that created us is man made.
We are the only things in the universe you can point a stick at that will shortly (time is relative) have the technology to create a big bang.
Who created the first one, if all we are doing is replicating big bangs..who knows.
Who cares.
The big bang that created us was most likely man made.
I called this theory hillbilly2 theory.
It hit me when I was sat in the bath reading a brief history of time around 2002.
Four years later a article in the daily Express said that " scientists are worried about creating a big bang in a particle accelerator".
Less likely man made, but made by intelligent life, yes. If this universe is man made, we would also need to figure out how to bypass the Carlow of time within this universe.Line6 HXFX wrote: ↑Sat Apr 24, 2021 11:13 am There is more evidence that we (human beings) created the universe than God.
If in 200 thousand years it is possible that the human race can create a big bang, (bare in mind how far technology has advanced in just a hundred years), then it is extremely likely that the big bang that created us is man made.
We are the only things in the universe you can point a stick at that will shortly (time is relative) have the technology to create a big bang.
Who created the first one, if all we are doing is replicating big bangs..who knows.
Who cares.
The big bang that created us was most likely man made.
I called this theory hillbilly2 theory.
It hit me when I was sat in the bath reading a brief history of time around 2002.
Four years later a article in the daily Express said that " scientists are worried about creating a big bang in a particle accelerator".
More likely it’s a simulation.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:31 am
So why less likely?Biffer wrote: ↑Sat Apr 24, 2021 6:33 pmLess likely man made, but made by intelligent life, yes. If this universe is man made, we would also need to figure out how to bypass the Carlow of time within this universe.Line6 HXFX wrote: ↑Sat Apr 24, 2021 11:13 am There is more evidence that we (human beings) created the universe than God.
If in 200 thousand years it is possible that the human race can create a big bang, (bare in mind how far technology has advanced in just a hundred years), then it is extremely likely that the big bang that created us is man made.
We are the only things in the universe you can point a stick at that will shortly (time is relative) have the technology to create a big bang.
Who created the first one, if all we are doing is replicating big bangs..who knows.
Who cares.
The big bang that created us was most likely man made.
I called this theory hillbilly2 theory.
It hit me when I was sat in the bath reading a brief history of time around 2002.
Four years later a article in the daily Express said that " scientists are worried about creating a big bang in a particle accelerator".
More likely it’s a simulation.
We are hurtling towards the sun at a rate of knots, if we have the technology to reset the entire thing, have the tech to create a big bang, that will esentialky create life on earth in our future and in 30 thousand, 50 thousand or 140 thousand years..why wouldn't we?
I (unlike Christians or religionists) have actual evidence for my theory, I can point at technology that is all around you.
The wheels on your car.
From the BBC today -
Neutron stars are dead stars that are incredibly dense. A teaspoonful of material from a neutron star is estimated to weigh around four billion tonnes.
Chris Jack, 67 test All Black - "I was voted most useless and laziest cunt in the English Premiership two years on the trot"
I tried, very hard, to disprove this. Failure. It's truly amazing.
I read an interesting sci fi novel that postulated our universe was created as a by product of another universes exotic power/propulsion system their ships used to explore the 'real universe.Line6 HXFX wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 11:21 amSo why less likely?Biffer wrote: ↑Sat Apr 24, 2021 6:33 pmLess likely man made, but made by intelligent life, yes. If this universe is man made, we would also need to figure out how to bypass the Carlow of time within this universe.Line6 HXFX wrote: ↑Sat Apr 24, 2021 11:13 am There is more evidence that we (human beings) created the universe than God.
If in 200 thousand years it is possible that the human race can create a big bang, (bare in mind how far technology has advanced in just a hundred years), then it is extremely likely that the big bang that created us is man made.
We are the only things in the universe you can point a stick at that will shortly (time is relative) have the technology to create a big bang.
Who created the first one, if all we are doing is replicating big bangs..who knows.
Who cares.
The big bang that created us was most likely man made.
I called this theory hillbilly2 theory.
It hit me when I was sat in the bath reading a brief history of time around 2002.
Four years later a article in the daily Express said that " scientists are worried about creating a big bang in a particle accelerator".
More likely it’s a simulation.
We are hurtling towards the sun at a rate of knots, if we have the technology to reset the entire thing, have the tech to create a big bang, that will esentialky create life on earth in our future and in 30 thousand, 50 thousand or 140 thousand years..why wouldn't we?
I (unlike Christians or religionists) have actual evidence for my theory, I can point at technology that is all around you.
The wheels on your car.
Simulation theory is a pretty robust explanation for our universe though - would not surprise me at all.
When you say 140,000 years do you mean 14 billion?Line6 HXFX wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 11:21 amSo why less likely?Biffer wrote: ↑Sat Apr 24, 2021 6:33 pmLess likely man made, but made by intelligent life, yes. If this universe is man made, we would also need to figure out how to bypass the Carlow of time within this universe.Line6 HXFX wrote: ↑Sat Apr 24, 2021 11:13 am There is more evidence that we (human beings) created the universe than God.
If in 200 thousand years it is possible that the human race can create a big bang, (bare in mind how far technology has advanced in just a hundred years), then it is extremely likely that the big bang that created us is man made.
We are the only things in the universe you can point a stick at that will shortly (time is relative) have the technology to create a big bang.
Who created the first one, if all we are doing is replicating big bangs..who knows.
Who cares.
The big bang that created us was most likely man made.
I called this theory hillbilly2 theory.
It hit me when I was sat in the bath reading a brief history of time around 2002.
Four years later a article in the daily Express said that " scientists are worried about creating a big bang in a particle accelerator".
More likely it’s a simulation.
We are hurtling towards the sun at a rate of knots, if we have the technology to reset the entire thing, have the tech to create a big bang, that will essentially create life on earth in our future and in 30 thousand, 50 thousand or 140 thousand years..why wouldn't we?
I (unlike Christians or religionists) have actual evidence for my theory, I can point at technology that is all around you.
The wheels on your car.