Am I allowed to warm them up first?tabascoboy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 8:19 pm So, Johnson vs Cummings: it's like trying to decide whether you'd rather eat dogshit or catshit .
Stop voting for fucking Tories
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
It's the battle of the sociopaths.tabascoboy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 8:19 pm So, Johnson vs Cummings: it's like trying to decide whether you'd rather eat dogshit or catshit .
Clearly.Slick wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 10:02 amThey think differently and have different priorities to you?
I've never voted Tory so I'm not defending them, but comments about only imbeciles voting for them is a bit daft really. I'd have thought the majority of Tory voters are pretty well educated.
Although honest, moral governance with decent oversight, transparency and effective checks and balances should be a priority for everyone voting to elect officials.
Apparently not.
As regards education, we have a similar situation here in South Africa, where a demonstrably corrupt ANC Government is able to command the loyalty of the majority of the electorate, but, outside of the Private education system and a few flagship Government Schools, education is substandard.
So unless you are claiming that the UK education system is similarly weak, I'm not sure it is relevant.
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
To be honest, it's pawn who has outlived his usefulness vs. Cummings' horrendous backers. Whoever wins, we lose.tabascoboy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 8:19 pm So, Johnson vs Cummings: it's like trying to decide whether you'd rather eat dogshit or catshit .
Gove has been conspicuous in his absence, too.
According to one or two news snippets, Gove has some rather more pressing engagements like finding somewhere to live. Sounds as if Mrs Gove is in the process of giving him the heave-ho!!Hal Jordan wrote: ↑Sat Apr 24, 2021 8:03 amTo be honest, it's pawn who has outlived his usefulness vs. Cummings' horrendous backers. Whoever wins, we lose.tabascoboy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 8:19 pm So, Johnson vs Cummings: it's like trying to decide whether you'd rather eat dogshit or catshit .
Gove has been conspicuous in his absence, too.
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am
PR meant that France couldn't have a strong defence strategy against the Germans in 1940s. France actually had a better army than the Germans. It works well when times are good, but not in bad times. Look at the EU rescue fund (which still hasn't been approved and may never be).Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 9:13 amThe whole point of PR is that it prevents Governments from governing. Governing anywhere other than the uncontentious middle anyway. This means you are never going to get dynamic, innovative politics but it's a price worth paying because politicians are self serving ***ts and until we find a better system, we need to curtail their powers. There's a reason Germany has been so stable for so long.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:05 pm
PR being Britain’s salvation is always an interesting one. We have a left wing who descend into 15 different factions over what to serve for breakfast, and a right who are pretty effective at coalescing around candidates they don’t love but prefer to the left.
An unbreakable Tory led coalition including various ‘hang the pedos’, ‘farmers’ alliance’ and ‘flat tax now’ parties seems the most likely outcome to me.
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6474
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
The best outcome is that both Johnson and Cummings lose...and we win.Hal Jordan wrote: ↑Sat Apr 24, 2021 8:03 amTo be honest, it's pawn who has outlived his usefulness vs. Cummings' horrendous backers. Whoever wins, we lose.tabascoboy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 8:19 pm So, Johnson vs Cummings: it's like trying to decide whether you'd rather eat dogshit or catshit .
Gove has been conspicuous in his absence, too.
That's an incredible take for sure.Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 24, 2021 10:32 amPR meant that France couldn't have a strong defence strategy against the Germans in 1940s. France actually had a better army than the Germans. It works well when times are good, but not in bad times. Look at the EU rescue fund (which still hasn't been approved and may never be).Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 9:13 amThe whole point of PR is that it prevents Governments from governing. Governing anywhere other than the uncontentious middle anyway. This means you are never going to get dynamic, innovative politics but it's a price worth paying because politicians are self serving ***ts and until we find a better system, we need to curtail their powers. There's a reason Germany has been so stable for so long.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 7:05 pm
PR being Britain’s salvation is always an interesting one. We have a left wing who descend into 15 different factions over what to serve for breakfast, and a right who are pretty effective at coalescing around candidates they don’t love but prefer to the left.
An unbreakable Tory led coalition including various ‘hang the pedos’, ‘farmers’ alliance’ and ‘flat tax now’ parties seems the most likely outcome to me.
-
- Posts: 792
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2020 12:09 pm
It gave me a well needed laughJM2K6 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 24, 2021 3:17 pmThat's an incredible take for sure.Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 24, 2021 10:32 amPR meant that France couldn't have a strong defence strategy against the Germans in 1940s. France actually had a better army than the Germans. It works well when times are good, but not in bad times. Look at the EU rescue fund (which still hasn't been approved and may never be).Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 9:13 am
The whole point of PR is that it prevents Governments from governing. Governing anywhere other than the uncontentious middle anyway. This means you are never going to get dynamic, innovative politics but it's a price worth paying because politicians are self serving ***ts and until we find a better system, we need to curtail their powers. There's a reason Germany has been so stable for so long.
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am
I think you've misunderstood me. I support PR.JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 24, 2021 3:17 pmThat's an incredible take for sure.Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 24, 2021 10:32 amPR meant that France couldn't have a strong defence strategy against the Germans in 1940s. France actually had a better army than the Germans. It works well when times are good, but not in bad times. Look at the EU rescue fund (which still hasn't been approved and may never be).Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 23, 2021 9:13 am
The whole point of PR is that it prevents Governments from governing. Governing anywhere other than the uncontentious middle anyway. This means you are never going to get dynamic, innovative politics but it's a price worth paying because politicians are self serving ***ts and until we find a better system, we need to curtail their powers. There's a reason Germany has been so stable for so long.
-
- Posts: 3585
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
Oh boy Johnson's fixer Eddie Lister as is corrupt as they come.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11155
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
I think you've misunderstood their point!Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 24, 2021 6:24 pmI think you've misunderstood me. I support PR.JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 24, 2021 3:17 pmThat's an incredible take for sure.Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Sat Apr 24, 2021 10:32 am
PR meant that France couldn't have a strong defence strategy against the Germans in 1940s. France actually had a better army than the Germans. It works well when times are good, but not in bad times. Look at the EU rescue fund (which still hasn't been approved and may never be).
Bet he had a speed dial for Jenrick's phone number!I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 7:10 am
Oh boy Johnson's fixer Eddie Lister as is corrupt as they come.
There were a lot of unanswered questions concerning Lister's activities when he was chief fixer for the blonde slug at County Hall
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
So Liz Truss says that the Bumblecunt definately paid for the flat renovation himself; but was a little vague about where the money came from.
Will it even take 24 hrs for this to be shown to be a lie ?
Will it even take 24 hrs for this to be shown to be a lie ?
Eh? You said Tory voters are all imbeciles, I said that most of them are actually pretty well educated, you talked about South Africa. I’ve no idea what you are on aboutRinkals wrote: ↑Sat Apr 24, 2021 6:16 amClearly.
Although honest, moral governance with decent oversight, transparency and effective checks and balances should be a priority for everyone voting to elect officials.
Apparently not.
As regards education, we have a similar situation here in South Africa, where a demonstrably corrupt ANC Government is able to command the loyalty of the majority of the electorate, but, outside of the Private education system and a few flagship Government Schools, education is substandard.
So unless you are claiming that the UK education system is similarly weak, I'm not sure it is relevant.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
-
- Posts: 3585
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/ar ... ng-britain
The Tories do better amongst groups with lower educational "achievement" Slick.
A not insignificant part probably is that university degree awards have exploded recently and young people prefer Labour because they haven't bought a house yet. But interesting nevertheless.
It's funny we think the red wall (old homeowners) are working class but grads living in the south east renting aren't.
The Tories do better amongst groups with lower educational "achievement" Slick.
A not insignificant part probably is that university degree awards have exploded recently and young people prefer Labour because they haven't bought a house yet. But interesting nevertheless.
It's funny we think the red wall (old homeowners) are working class but grads living in the south east renting aren't.
You guys are very naive if you think “a fixer” is a straight arrow.SaintK wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 10:09 amBet he had a speed dial for Jenrick's phone number!I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 7:10 am
Oh boy Johnson's fixer Eddie Lister as is corrupt as they come.
There were a lot of unanswered questions concerning Lister's activities when he was chief fixer for the blonde slug at County Hall
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6474
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
For now a still unsubstantiated claim, but even if there's a verifiable recording no doubt it would still be brushed off at No 10 and Tory HQ.
That link won't open but I think it's from after the last GE when the Torys obviously had a surge from across the spectrum due to Brexit. Certainly since everyone started going to uni things have changed, but I'd still be surprised if traditionally Tory supporters were not better educated.I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 7:13 pm https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/ar ... ng-britain
The Tories do better amongst groups with lower educational "achievement" Slick.
A not insignificant part probably is that university degree awards have exploded recently and young people prefer Labour because they haven't bought a house yet. But interesting nevertheless.
It's funny we think the red wall (old homeowners) are working class but grads living in the south east renting aren't.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Think this explains voting patterns by age fairly effectively. Fwiw young people often have views on welfare, taxation etc that are pretty right wing, it's just that people without capital to conserve won't vote for a party that is seen as the defender of that principle.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Ah I see. The problem is people expecting those in power to not be corrupt, rather than the problem being the people in power being corrupt. Got it.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 7:40 pmYou guys are very naive if you think “a fixer” is a straight arrow.SaintK wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 10:09 amBet he had a speed dial for Jenrick's phone number!I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 7:10 am
Oh boy Johnson's fixer Eddie Lister as is corrupt as they come.
There were a lot of unanswered questions concerning Lister's activities when he was chief fixer for the blonde slug at County Hall
Surely there has been a bit of an inversion though, as Labour are now the party of the urban middle-classes who probably are better educated and working class people aren't voting for them.Slick wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 9:46 amThat link won't open but I think it's from after the last GE when the Torys obviously had a surge from across the spectrum due to Brexit. Certainly since everyone started going to uni things have changed, but I'd still be surprised if traditionally Tory supporters were not better educated.I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 7:13 pm https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/ar ... ng-britain
The Tories do better amongst groups with lower educational "achievement" Slick.
A not insignificant part probably is that university degree awards have exploded recently and young people prefer Labour because they haven't bought a house yet. But interesting nevertheless.
It's funny we think the red wall (old homeowners) are working class but grads living in the south east renting aren't.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
The class divide has essentially died as a voting indicator, no? Home ownership, age and views on Brexit are the big determiners now.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
-
- Posts: 3585
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
Home ownership should determine class more than education now.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:08 am The class divide has essentially died as a voting indicator, no? Home ownership, age and views on Brexit are the big determiners now.
Working class people who got on the housing ladder 10+ years ago is in a better financial position than a middle class urban graduate in London who is renting.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
I get the point, but not convinced that people like myself and most of my mates have stopped being middle class because we can't get on the housing ladder right now, at least through the traditional definition of class.I like neeps wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:20 amHome ownership should determine class more than education now.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:08 am The class divide has essentially died as a voting indicator, no? Home ownership, age and views on Brexit are the big determiners now.
Working class people who got on the housing ladder 10+ years ago is in a better financial position than a middle class urban graduate in London who is renting.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11155
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
No. You haven't.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:25 amI get the point, but not convinced that people like myself and most of my mates have stopped being middle class because we can't get on the housing ladder right now, at least through the traditional definition of class.I like neeps wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:20 amHome ownership should determine class more than education now.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:08 am The class divide has essentially died as a voting indicator, no? Home ownership, age and views on Brexit are the big determiners now.
Working class people who got on the housing ladder 10+ years ago is in a better financial position than a middle class urban graduate in London who is renting.
No, you haven’t. I didn’t say anything you read in my post.
In the last election Labour did much better with people holding a degree than the Tories. The Tories however did much much better with the less well educated.robmatic wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:03 amSurely there has been a bit of an inversion though, as Labour are now the party of the urban middle-classes who probably are better educated and working class people aren't voting for them.Slick wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 9:46 amThat link won't open but I think it's from after the last GE when the Torys obviously had a surge from across the spectrum due to Brexit. Certainly since everyone started going to uni things have changed, but I'd still be surprised if traditionally Tory supporters were not better educated.I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 7:13 pm https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/ar ... ng-britain
The Tories do better amongst groups with lower educational "achievement" Slick.
A not insignificant part probably is that university degree awards have exploded recently and young people prefer Labour because they haven't bought a house yet. But interesting nevertheless.
It's funny we think the red wall (old homeowners) are working class but grads living in the south east renting aren't.
Yes, university education is an important class marker. So, Labour did better with the middle classes and the Tories did better with the working class.Lobby wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:35 amIn the last election Labour did much better with people holding a degree than the Tories. The Tories however did much much better with the less well educated.robmatic wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:03 amSurely there has been a bit of an inversion though, as Labour are now the party of the urban middle-classes who probably are better educated and working class people aren't voting for them.Slick wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 9:46 am
That link won't open but I think it's from after the last GE when the Torys obviously had a surge from across the spectrum due to Brexit. Certainly since everyone started going to uni things have changed, but I'd still be surprised if traditionally Tory supporters were not better educated.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
So given the non-denial denial from the turd himself; & the; "reportable donations", will be recorded in the normal time; I think we can take it as read, that Liz was indeed lying, & money started out with a donor, & was funneled thru the bumblecunts bank account, to the contractors.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Sun Apr 25, 2021 1:39 pm So Liz Truss says that the Bumblecunt definately paid for the flat renovation himself; but was a little vague about where the money came from.
Will it even take 24 hrs for this to be shown to be a lie ?
Gen X being shat on as well but nobody gives a fuck about us as usual.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 9:51 am
Think this explains voting patterns by age fairly effectively. Fwiw young people often have views on welfare, taxation etc that are pretty right wing, it's just that people without capital to conserve won't vote for a party that is seen as the defender of that principle.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Because of the huge changes in the educational system in recent decades, you are also far more likely to have few qualifications if you are old, and older people tend to vote Conservative.robmatic wrote: ↑Mon Apr 26, 2021 11:44 amYes, university education is an important class marker. So, Labour did better with the middle classes and the Tories did better with the working class.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11155
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
This is true but when was the UK last worthy to be considered a functioning democracy? I mean in the true spirit of the term democracy and not what it represents now. Sandie might have a point here i.e. we long passed any semblance of representation of the people resulting in the people becoming so disinterested that this scale of corruption was inevitable. To me, it seems to be a steady but inexorable decline that could only be arrested by something drastic which is not what Brits do.
"We can't possibly be the monster. We are English you know" [/Peter Cushing. Horror Express.]
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11155
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
You'd have to weight adjust those figures to account for a degree now being equivalent to a mediocre A Level from the 70s.
Today.Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 27, 2021 7:52 amThis is true but when was the UK last worthy to be considered a functioning democracy? I mean in the true spirit of the term democracy and not what it represents now. Sandie might have a point here i.e. we long passed any semblance of representation of the people resulting in the people becoming so disinterested that this scale of corruption was inevitable. To me, it seems to be a steady but inexorable decline that could only be arrested by something drastic which is not what Brits do.
"We can't possibly be the monster. We are English you know" [/Peter Cushing. Horror Express.]
All the money you made will never buy back your soul