Stop voting for fucking Tories

Where goats go to escape
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 6620
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

Biffer wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 11:02 am
SaintK wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 9:33 am The Tories may be scummy and sleazy but look like they're going to win Hartlepool quite convincingly
[media] [/media]
What's the deal with the two independent candidates? Looks like they've taken a slab of the Labour vote?
They are former Labour candidates from elsewhere. Williams was foisted on Hartlepool by Labour HQ and not selected locally. As a senior NHS manager (now a local GP) he was partly responsible for a number of service cuts at the local hospital which isn't resonating too well. Add in the £millions the government are promising to invest locally in a Freeport and that will help as well
Lobby
Posts: 1805
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2020 7:34 pm

SaintK wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 11:13 am
Biffer wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 11:02 am
SaintK wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 9:33 am The Tories may be scummy and sleazy but look like they're going to win Hartlepool quite convincingly
[media] [/media]
What's the deal with the two independent candidates? Looks like they've taken a slab of the Labour vote?
They are former Labour candidates from elsewhere. Williams was foisted on Hartlepool by Labour HQ and not selected locally. As a senior NHS manager (now a local GP) he was partly responsible for a number of service cuts at the local hospital which isn't resonating too well. Add in the £millions the government are promising to invest locally in a Freeport and that will help as well
Williams is also a Canterbury born, Cambridge educated, ardent remainer. Probably not the best choice of candidate for an area that voted 70% for Brexit.
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 9400
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

I had to look it up, it turns out that the Sam Lee on the list there is Samantha Lee and not the Sam Lee, English Folk singer, I that I know.
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6474
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

Where's the The Incredible Flying Brick in the poll?
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 6620
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

[media] [/media]
Slick
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

If true, thats an awful message from Amiss.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
robmatic
Posts: 2094
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

Lobby wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 11:23 am
SaintK wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 11:13 am
Biffer wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 11:02 am

What's the deal with the two independent candidates? Looks like they've taken a slab of the Labour vote?
They are former Labour candidates from elsewhere. Williams was foisted on Hartlepool by Labour HQ and not selected locally. As a senior NHS manager (now a local GP) he was partly responsible for a number of service cuts at the local hospital which isn't resonating too well. Add in the £millions the government are promising to invest locally in a Freeport and that will help as well
Williams is also a Canterbury born, Cambridge educated, ardent remainer. Probably not the best choice of candidate for an area that voted 70% for Brexit.
Christ, Labour are useless.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 6620
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

Slick wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 2:21 pm If true, thats an awful message from Amiss.
Amess has since denied it was him who authorised its use...............hmmmmm
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8223
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Slick wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 2:21 pm If true, thats an awful message from Amiss.
How can you doubt it ?, its true on its face.

Just look at how the, 'Town Deals' grants were allocated to Tory run towns, instead of by any rating of how needed they were.

The SNP pointed out how the Internal Markets Bill was rigged too; to take away responsibility from the devolved administrations, who had been able to distribute funds from the EU, & in future, Westminster would have sole control of any replacement funding.
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

fishfoodie wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 3:59 pm
Slick wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 2:21 pm If true, thats an awful message from Amiss.
How can you doubt it ?, its true on its face.

Just look at how the, 'Town Deals' grants were allocated to Tory run towns, instead of by any rating of how needed they were.

The SNP pointed out how the Internal Markets Bill was rigged too; to take away responsibility from the devolved administrations, who had been able to distribute funds from the EU, & in future, Westminster would have sole control of any replacement funding.
We should be grateful to Trump for removing the old-fashioned notion that integrity holds any currency whatsoever.
Slick
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

fishfoodie wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 3:59 pm
Slick wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 2:21 pm If true, thats an awful message from Amiss.
How can you doubt it ?, its true on its face.

Just look at how the, 'Town Deals' grants were allocated to Tory run towns, instead of by any rating of how needed they were.

The SNP pointed out how the Internal Markets Bill was rigged too; to take away responsibility from the devolved administrations, who had been able to distribute funds from the EU, & in future, Westminster would have sole control of any replacement funding.
Because there is an awful lot of bullshit on social media? Your prerogative if you want to unquestionably accept it from one side but not from another I guess.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8223
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Slick wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 4:10 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 3:59 pm
Slick wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 2:21 pm If true, thats an awful message from Amiss.
How can you doubt it ?, its true on its face.

Just look at how the, 'Town Deals' grants were allocated to Tory run towns, instead of by any rating of how needed they were.

The SNP pointed out how the Internal Markets Bill was rigged too; to take away responsibility from the devolved administrations, who had been able to distribute funds from the EU, & in future, Westminster would have sole control of any replacement funding.
Because there is an awful lot of bullshit on social media? Your prerogative if you want to unquestionably accept it from one side but not from another I guess.
Sorry, I wasn't clear; you're right, SM is full of bullshit; but I was saying that the statement that, Ministers don't deal with opposition MPs, is true on it's face; regardless of whether or not he actually made this statement.
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

fishfoodie wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 3:59 pm
Slick wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 2:21 pm If true, thats an awful message from Amiss.
How can you doubt it ?, its true on its face.

Just look at how the, 'Town Deals' grants were allocated to Tory run towns, instead of by any rating of how needed they were.

The SNP pointed out how the Internal Markets Bill was rigged too; to take away responsibility from the devolved administrations, who had been able to distribute funds from the EU, & in future, Westminster would have sole control of any replacement funding.

I'm still angry about that. Most heavily weighted funding criterion was commuting distance to the nearest significant centre of employment by car. Except in Scotland and Wales where it would have been much higher. So parts of the Highlands were rated at the same level as Westminster and the City of London.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I like neeps
Posts: 3585
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

SaintK wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 9:33 am The Tories may be scummy and sleazy but look like they're going to win Hartlepool quite convincingly
[media] [/media]
This is because sleaze and corruption don't matter. Most people don't care. If I'm a Tory MP I want to feather my best, nobody will give a f*ck.

Also Labour don't stand for anything. The Tories will win old home owning towns and they make up Britain. Hartlepool majority white, majority Brexit, majority homeowners, majority 40+. Draw a Tory seat and you'll draw that.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5961
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

I like neeps wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 5:24 pm
SaintK wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 9:33 am The Tories may be scummy and sleazy but look like they're going to win Hartlepool quite convincingly
[media] [/media]
This is because sleaze and corruption don't matter. Most people don't care. If I'm a Tory MP I want to feather my best, nobody will give a f*ck.

Also Labour don't stand for anything. The Tories will win old home owning towns and they make up Britain. Hartlepool majority white, majority Brexit, majority homeowners, majority 40+. Draw a Tory seat and you'll draw that.
How many seats are not majority white? Seems a weird criteria in a country that's 80%+ white.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Lobby
Posts: 1805
Joined: Mon Jul 06, 2020 7:34 pm

Paddington Bear wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 6:11 pm
I like neeps wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 5:24 pm
SaintK wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 9:33 am The Tories may be scummy and sleazy but look like they're going to win Hartlepool quite convincingly
[media] [/media]
This is because sleaze and corruption don't matter. Most people don't care. If I'm a Tory MP I want to feather my best, nobody will give a f*ck.
m
Also Labour don't stand for anything. The Tories will win old home owning towns and they make up Britain. Hartlepool majority white, majority Brexit, majority homeowners, majority 40+. Draw a Tory seat and you'll draw that.
How many seats are not majority white? Seems a weird criteria in a country that's 80%+ white.
According to the 2011 census, London’s population then was just 44% white British, so there will be some seats in London which are not majority white. Overall, there won’t be that many, but the few there are are most likely to be safe Labour seats in the large urban conurbations; London, Birmingham etc.
I like neeps
Posts: 3585
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

Paddington Bear wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 6:11 pm
I like neeps wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 5:24 pm
SaintK wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 9:33 am The Tories may be scummy and sleazy but look like they're going to win Hartlepool quite convincingly
[media] [/media]
This is because sleaze and corruption don't matter. Most people don't care. If I'm a Tory MP I want to feather my best, nobody will give a f*ck.

Also Labour don't stand for anything. The Tories will win old home owning towns and they make up Britain. Hartlepool majority white, majority Brexit, majority homeowners, majority 40+. Draw a Tory seat and you'll draw that.
How many seats are not majority white? Seems a weird criteria in a country that's 80%+ white.
And the majority of the seats are Tory!

It's a good point so seats that are 80%+ white population. Hartlepool is 98% white, Brexit voting and I am going to guess average age is above 40 and home ownership rates are high. That's a Tory seat these days.
robmatic
Posts: 2094
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

I like neeps wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 7:35 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 6:11 pm
I like neeps wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 5:24 pm

This is because sleaze and corruption don't matter. Most people don't care. If I'm a Tory MP I want to feather my best, nobody will give a f*ck.

Also Labour don't stand for anything. The Tories will win old home owning towns and they make up Britain. Hartlepool majority white, majority Brexit, majority homeowners, majority 40+. Draw a Tory seat and you'll draw that.
How many seats are not majority white? Seems a weird criteria in a country that's 80%+ white.
And the majority of the seats are Tory!

It's a good point so seats that are 80%+ white population. Hartlepool is 98% white, Brexit voting and I am going to guess average age is above 40 and home ownership rates are high. That's a Tory seat these days.
So when the UK in general is 80%+ white, has an average age of over 40 and a home-ownership rate of 65% it's no wonder the Tories are electorally successful.
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 9400
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

robmatic wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 6:36 am
I like neeps wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 7:35 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 6:11 pm

How many seats are not majority white? Seems a weird criteria in a country that's 80%+ white.
And the majority of the seats are Tory!

It's a good point so seats that are 80%+ white population. Hartlepool is 98% white, Brexit voting and I am going to guess average age is above 40 and home ownership rates are high. That's a Tory seat these days.
So when the UK in general is 80%+ white, has an average age of over 40 and a home-ownership rate of 65% it's no wonder the Tories are electorally successful.

For contrast, Scotland is 96% white, median age of 40.1 years, over 60% owner-occupied housing.

The people voted against Brexit in every constituency and the Tories struggle to fill a taxi
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Tichtheid wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 7:30 am
robmatic wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 6:36 am
I like neeps wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 7:35 pm

And the majority of the seats are Tory!

It's a good point so seats that are 80%+ white population. Hartlepool is 98% white, Brexit voting and I am going to guess average age is above 40 and home ownership rates are high. That's a Tory seat these days.
So when the UK in general is 80%+ white, has an average age of over 40 and a home-ownership rate of 65% it's no wonder the Tories are electorally successful.

For contrast, Scotland is 96% white, median age of 40.1 years, over 60% owner-occupied housing.

The people voted against Brexit in every constituency and the Tories struggle to fill a taxi
Apparently we've just fallen for some propaganda
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
robmatic
Posts: 2094
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

Tichtheid wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 7:30 am
robmatic wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 6:36 am
I like neeps wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 7:35 pm

And the majority of the seats are Tory!

It's a good point so seats that are 80%+ white population. Hartlepool is 98% white, Brexit voting and I am going to guess average age is above 40 and home ownership rates are high. That's a Tory seat these days.
So when the UK in general is 80%+ white, has an average age of over 40 and a home-ownership rate of 65% it's no wonder the Tories are electorally successful.

For contrast, Scotland is 96% white, median age of 40.1 years, over 60% owner-occupied housing.

The people voted against Brexit in every constituency and the Tories struggle to fill a taxi
I certainly don't think we should conclude that white older homeowners will gravitate automatically towards the Tories.
I like neeps
Posts: 3585
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

robmatic wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 9:56 am
Tichtheid wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 7:30 am
robmatic wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 6:36 am

So when the UK in general is 80%+ white, has an average age of over 40 and a home-ownership rate of 65% it's no wonder the Tories are electorally successful.

For contrast, Scotland is 96% white, median age of 40.1 years, over 60% owner-occupied housing.

The people voted against Brexit in every constituency and the Tories struggle to fill a taxi
I certainly don't think we should conclude that white older homeowners will gravitate automatically towards the Tories.
https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/ge ... he-result/

It is true though, in England anyway.

If you want to predict how a constituency in England will vote look at at age and look at home ownership. If they're high - Tory, if they're low - labour.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9797
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Well, at least the Tories aren't sustaining an artificially high house price bubble and risking future disaster in order to keep their base happy, eh? Eh? Oh.
robmatic
Posts: 2094
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

I like neeps wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 9:59 am
robmatic wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 9:56 am
Tichtheid wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 7:30 am


For contrast, Scotland is 96% white, median age of 40.1 years, over 60% owner-occupied housing.

The people voted against Brexit in every constituency and the Tories struggle to fill a taxi
I certainly don't think we should conclude that white older homeowners will gravitate automatically towards the Tories.
https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/ge ... he-result/

It is true though, in England anyway.

If you want to predict how a constituency in England will vote look at at age and look at home ownership. If they're high - Tory, if they're low - labour.
New Labour were able to capture at least some of those votes.
robmatic
Posts: 2094
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

JM2K6 wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 10:04 am Well, at least the Tories aren't sustaining an artificially high house price bubble and risking future disaster in order to keep their base happy, eh? Eh? Oh.
You are not wrong but high house prices have cross party appeal.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9797
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

robmatic wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 10:34 am
JM2K6 wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 10:04 am Well, at least the Tories aren't sustaining an artificially high house price bubble and risking future disaster in order to keep their base happy, eh? Eh? Oh.
You are not wrong but high house prices have cross party appeal.
For homeowners. Who are more likely to be Tory. And for people in the housing market, landlords, property developers - who are overwhelmingly likely to be Tory.
I like neeps
Posts: 3585
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

robmatic wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 10:33 am
I like neeps wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 9:59 am
robmatic wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 9:56 am

I certainly don't think we should conclude that white older homeowners will gravitate automatically towards the Tories.
https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/ge ... he-result/

It is true though, in England anyway.

If you want to predict how a constituency in England will vote look at at age and look at home ownership. If they're high - Tory, if they're low - labour.
New Labour were able to capture at least some of those votes.
Yes and the financial crisis, rise of technology/rampant globalisation and Brexit happened and then politics totally changed.

The conservatives these days claim to be quite interventionist economically and all about levelling up the north etc etc and right wing culture war-y focus on the identity and community politics they want and clean up. That gets them the old New Labour voters. Labour as we can see from Starmer can't compete on patriotism and don't have a clear economic policy that is much different to what the Tories are saying because they're mostly offering the same thing now.

Labour will start losing their young graduate core to the Greens.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9797
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Does levelling up the North mean anything yet? Or is it still just a catchphrase, like "dead in a ditch"?
robmatic
Posts: 2094
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

JM2K6 wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 10:48 am
robmatic wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 10:34 am
JM2K6 wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 10:04 am Well, at least the Tories aren't sustaining an artificially high house price bubble and risking future disaster in order to keep their base happy, eh? Eh? Oh.
You are not wrong but high house prices have cross party appeal.
For homeowners. Who are more likely to be Tory. And for people in the housing market, landlords, property developers - who are overwhelmingly likely to be Tory.
I don't know if you remember the housing market in the early Noughties but it was bonkers (10%-20% increases every year) and that was entirely a Labour project.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9797
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

robmatic wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 11:04 am
JM2K6 wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 10:48 am
robmatic wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 10:34 am

You are not wrong but high house prices have cross party appeal.
For homeowners. Who are more likely to be Tory. And for people in the housing market, landlords, property developers - who are overwhelmingly likely to be Tory.
I don't know if you remember the housing market in the early Noughties but it was bonkers (10%-20% increases every year) and that was entirely a Labour project.
I'm not talking about 20 years ago. I'm talking about now. Home ownership has dropped quite a bit in that time. And I'm not sure we can say it was entirely a Labour project, given what we know about the mortgage market, how it was driven, and why it crashed.
robmatic
Posts: 2094
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

I like neeps wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 11:00 am
robmatic wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 10:33 am
I like neeps wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 9:59 am

https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/ge ... he-result/

It is true though, in England anyway.

If you want to predict how a constituency in England will vote look at at age and look at home ownership. If they're high - Tory, if they're low - labour.
New Labour were able to capture at least some of those votes.
Yes and the financial crisis, rise of technology/rampant globalisation and Brexit happened and then politics totally changed.

The conservatives these days claim to be quite interventionist economically and all about levelling up the north etc etc and right wing culture war-y focus on the identity and community politics they want and clean up. That gets them the old New Labour voters. Labour as we can see from Starmer can't compete on patriotism and don't have a clear economic policy that is much different to what the Tories are saying because they're mostly offering the same thing now.

Labour will start losing their young graduate core to the Greens.
UK politics would be much healthier if there were an effective left. I don't mean as lite Tories or as 70s throwback leftists, I'm sure there is some clear ground that they could occupy on economic issues.
User avatar
Hal Jordan
Posts: 4154
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
Location: Sector 2814

JM2K6 wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 11:03 am Does levelling up the North mean anything yet? Or is it still just a catchphrase, like "dead in a ditch"?
It means Jenrick is in control of allocating funds for votes.
I like neeps
Posts: 3585
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

JM2K6 wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 11:09 am
robmatic wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 11:04 am
JM2K6 wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 10:48 am

For homeowners. Who are more likely to be Tory. And for people in the housing market, landlords, property developers - who are overwhelmingly likely to be Tory.
I don't know if you remember the housing market in the early Noughties but it was bonkers (10%-20% increases every year) and that was entirely a Labour project.
I'm not talking about 20 years ago. I'm talking about now. Home ownership has dropped quite a bit in that time. And I'm not sure we can say it was entirely a Labour project, given what we know about the mortgage market, how it was driven, and why it crashed.
Labour controlled the global housing market. Didn't you know that? Everyone knows the 2008 GFC was caused only by Labour. Personally I cannot believe they had such influence over the US Investment Banks, various sovereign nations and the global housing bond market. But they did! It's incredible really.
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

JM2K6 wrote: Wed May 05, 2021 11:03 am Does levelling up the North mean anything yet? Or is it still just a catchphrase, like "dead in a ditch"?
Or Northern Powerhouse?

Yeah, seems so.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I like neeps
Posts: 3585
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/bad ... ssion=true

Actually quite a good article in the Speccie about the quite frankly ridiculous childcare costs in the UK. When children, houses and rent are so expensive no wonder people aren't having kids.
User avatar
sturginho
Posts: 2432
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:51 pm

Election day today, don't forget to put an x next to your local tory
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8223
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

sturginho wrote: Thu May 06, 2021 10:45 am Election day today, don't forget to put an x next to your local tory
Image

How much do you have to lead, for your typical Tory Candidate ?
User avatar
ScarfaceClaw
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:11 pm

I like neeps wrote: Thu May 06, 2021 8:22 am https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/bad ... ssion=true

Actually quite a good article in the Speccie about the quite frankly ridiculous childcare costs in the UK. When children, houses and rent are so expensive no wonder people aren't having kids.
That brings back memories...
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

:lol: :lol:

Who was that on the childcare in London again?
User avatar
FalseBayFC
Posts: 3554
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2020 3:19 pm

I like neeps wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 5:24 pm
SaintK wrote: Tue May 04, 2021 9:33 am The Tories may be scummy and sleazy but look like they're going to win Hartlepool quite convincingly
[media] [/media]
This is because sleaze and corruption don't matter. Most people don't care. If I'm a Tory MP I want to feather my best, nobody will give a f*ck.

Also Labour don't stand for anything. The Tories will win old home owning towns and they make up Britain. Hartlepool majority white, majority Brexit, majority homeowners, majority 40+. Draw a Tory seat and you'll draw that.
So the trick is to be a sleazy corrupt government that gives the impression of doing a good job. The Tory voting majority remind me so much of white people in apartheid South Africa. Insular, stupid, bigoted, nationalistic. Completely ready for a pivot further right like the rest of Europe seem to be doing. The UK PM sits in the same category as Bolsanaro, Trump and Putin. Very worrying.
Post Reply