They are former Labour candidates from elsewhere. Williams was foisted on Hartlepool by Labour HQ and not selected locally. As a senior NHS manager (now a local GP) he was partly responsible for a number of service cuts at the local hospital which isn't resonating too well. Add in the £millions the government are promising to invest locally in a Freeport and that will help as well
Stop voting for fucking Tories
Williams is also a Canterbury born, Cambridge educated, ardent remainer. Probably not the best choice of candidate for an area that voted 70% for Brexit.SaintK wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 11:13 amThey are former Labour candidates from elsewhere. Williams was foisted on Hartlepool by Labour HQ and not selected locally. As a senior NHS manager (now a local GP) he was partly responsible for a number of service cuts at the local hospital which isn't resonating too well. Add in the £millions the government are promising to invest locally in a Freeport and that will help as well
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6474
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
Where's the The Incredible Flying Brick in the poll?
Christ, Labour are useless.Lobby wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 11:23 amWilliams is also a Canterbury born, Cambridge educated, ardent remainer. Probably not the best choice of candidate for an area that voted 70% for Brexit.SaintK wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 11:13 amThey are former Labour candidates from elsewhere. Williams was foisted on Hartlepool by Labour HQ and not selected locally. As a senior NHS manager (now a local GP) he was partly responsible for a number of service cuts at the local hospital which isn't resonating too well. Add in the £millions the government are promising to invest locally in a Freeport and that will help as well
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
How can you doubt it ?, its true on its face.
Just look at how the, 'Town Deals' grants were allocated to Tory run towns, instead of by any rating of how needed they were.
The SNP pointed out how the Internal Markets Bill was rigged too; to take away responsibility from the devolved administrations, who had been able to distribute funds from the EU, & in future, Westminster would have sole control of any replacement funding.
We should be grateful to Trump for removing the old-fashioned notion that integrity holds any currency whatsoever.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 3:59 pmHow can you doubt it ?, its true on its face.
Just look at how the, 'Town Deals' grants were allocated to Tory run towns, instead of by any rating of how needed they were.
The SNP pointed out how the Internal Markets Bill was rigged too; to take away responsibility from the devolved administrations, who had been able to distribute funds from the EU, & in future, Westminster would have sole control of any replacement funding.
Because there is an awful lot of bullshit on social media? Your prerogative if you want to unquestionably accept it from one side but not from another I guess.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 3:59 pmHow can you doubt it ?, its true on its face.
Just look at how the, 'Town Deals' grants were allocated to Tory run towns, instead of by any rating of how needed they were.
The SNP pointed out how the Internal Markets Bill was rigged too; to take away responsibility from the devolved administrations, who had been able to distribute funds from the EU, & in future, Westminster would have sole control of any replacement funding.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Sorry, I wasn't clear; you're right, SM is full of bullshit; but I was saying that the statement that, Ministers don't deal with opposition MPs, is true on it's face; regardless of whether or not he actually made this statement.Slick wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 4:10 pmBecause there is an awful lot of bullshit on social media? Your prerogative if you want to unquestionably accept it from one side but not from another I guess.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 3:59 pmHow can you doubt it ?, its true on its face.
Just look at how the, 'Town Deals' grants were allocated to Tory run towns, instead of by any rating of how needed they were.
The SNP pointed out how the Internal Markets Bill was rigged too; to take away responsibility from the devolved administrations, who had been able to distribute funds from the EU, & in future, Westminster would have sole control of any replacement funding.
fishfoodie wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 3:59 pmHow can you doubt it ?, its true on its face.
Just look at how the, 'Town Deals' grants were allocated to Tory run towns, instead of by any rating of how needed they were.
The SNP pointed out how the Internal Markets Bill was rigged too; to take away responsibility from the devolved administrations, who had been able to distribute funds from the EU, & in future, Westminster would have sole control of any replacement funding.
I'm still angry about that. Most heavily weighted funding criterion was commuting distance to the nearest significant centre of employment by car. Except in Scotland and Wales where it would have been much higher. So parts of the Highlands were rated at the same level as Westminster and the City of London.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 3586
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
This is because sleaze and corruption don't matter. Most people don't care. If I'm a Tory MP I want to feather my best, nobody will give a f*ck.
Also Labour don't stand for anything. The Tories will win old home owning towns and they make up Britain. Hartlepool majority white, majority Brexit, majority homeowners, majority 40+. Draw a Tory seat and you'll draw that.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5963
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
How many seats are not majority white? Seems a weird criteria in a country that's 80%+ white.I like neeps wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 5:24 pmThis is because sleaze and corruption don't matter. Most people don't care. If I'm a Tory MP I want to feather my best, nobody will give a f*ck.
Also Labour don't stand for anything. The Tories will win old home owning towns and they make up Britain. Hartlepool majority white, majority Brexit, majority homeowners, majority 40+. Draw a Tory seat and you'll draw that.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
According to the 2011 census, London’s population then was just 44% white British, so there will be some seats in London which are not majority white. Overall, there won’t be that many, but the few there are are most likely to be safe Labour seats in the large urban conurbations; London, Birmingham etc.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 6:11 pmHow many seats are not majority white? Seems a weird criteria in a country that's 80%+ white.I like neeps wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 5:24 pmThis is because sleaze and corruption don't matter. Most people don't care. If I'm a Tory MP I want to feather my best, nobody will give a f*ck.
m
Also Labour don't stand for anything. The Tories will win old home owning towns and they make up Britain. Hartlepool majority white, majority Brexit, majority homeowners, majority 40+. Draw a Tory seat and you'll draw that.
-
- Posts: 3586
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
And the majority of the seats are Tory!Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 6:11 pmHow many seats are not majority white? Seems a weird criteria in a country that's 80%+ white.I like neeps wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 5:24 pmThis is because sleaze and corruption don't matter. Most people don't care. If I'm a Tory MP I want to feather my best, nobody will give a f*ck.
Also Labour don't stand for anything. The Tories will win old home owning towns and they make up Britain. Hartlepool majority white, majority Brexit, majority homeowners, majority 40+. Draw a Tory seat and you'll draw that.
It's a good point so seats that are 80%+ white population. Hartlepool is 98% white, Brexit voting and I am going to guess average age is above 40 and home ownership rates are high. That's a Tory seat these days.
So when the UK in general is 80%+ white, has an average age of over 40 and a home-ownership rate of 65% it's no wonder the Tories are electorally successful.I like neeps wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 7:35 pmAnd the majority of the seats are Tory!Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 6:11 pmHow many seats are not majority white? Seems a weird criteria in a country that's 80%+ white.I like neeps wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 5:24 pm
This is because sleaze and corruption don't matter. Most people don't care. If I'm a Tory MP I want to feather my best, nobody will give a f*ck.
Also Labour don't stand for anything. The Tories will win old home owning towns and they make up Britain. Hartlepool majority white, majority Brexit, majority homeowners, majority 40+. Draw a Tory seat and you'll draw that.
It's a good point so seats that are 80%+ white population. Hartlepool is 98% white, Brexit voting and I am going to guess average age is above 40 and home ownership rates are high. That's a Tory seat these days.
robmatic wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 6:36 amSo when the UK in general is 80%+ white, has an average age of over 40 and a home-ownership rate of 65% it's no wonder the Tories are electorally successful.I like neeps wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 7:35 pmAnd the majority of the seats are Tory!Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 6:11 pm
How many seats are not majority white? Seems a weird criteria in a country that's 80%+ white.
It's a good point so seats that are 80%+ white population. Hartlepool is 98% white, Brexit voting and I am going to guess average age is above 40 and home ownership rates are high. That's a Tory seat these days.
For contrast, Scotland is 96% white, median age of 40.1 years, over 60% owner-occupied housing.
The people voted against Brexit in every constituency and the Tories struggle to fill a taxi
Apparently we've just fallen for some propagandaTichtheid wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 7:30 amrobmatic wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 6:36 amSo when the UK in general is 80%+ white, has an average age of over 40 and a home-ownership rate of 65% it's no wonder the Tories are electorally successful.I like neeps wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 7:35 pm
And the majority of the seats are Tory!
It's a good point so seats that are 80%+ white population. Hartlepool is 98% white, Brexit voting and I am going to guess average age is above 40 and home ownership rates are high. That's a Tory seat these days.
For contrast, Scotland is 96% white, median age of 40.1 years, over 60% owner-occupied housing.
The people voted against Brexit in every constituency and the Tories struggle to fill a taxi
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I certainly don't think we should conclude that white older homeowners will gravitate automatically towards the Tories.Tichtheid wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 7:30 amrobmatic wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 6:36 amSo when the UK in general is 80%+ white, has an average age of over 40 and a home-ownership rate of 65% it's no wonder the Tories are electorally successful.I like neeps wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 7:35 pm
And the majority of the seats are Tory!
It's a good point so seats that are 80%+ white population. Hartlepool is 98% white, Brexit voting and I am going to guess average age is above 40 and home ownership rates are high. That's a Tory seat these days.
For contrast, Scotland is 96% white, median age of 40.1 years, over 60% owner-occupied housing.
The people voted against Brexit in every constituency and the Tories struggle to fill a taxi
-
- Posts: 3586
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/ge ... he-result/robmatic wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 9:56 amI certainly don't think we should conclude that white older homeowners will gravitate automatically towards the Tories.
It is true though, in England anyway.
If you want to predict how a constituency in England will vote look at at age and look at home ownership. If they're high - Tory, if they're low - labour.
New Labour were able to capture at least some of those votes.I like neeps wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 9:59 amhttps://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/ge ... he-result/
It is true though, in England anyway.
If you want to predict how a constituency in England will vote look at at age and look at home ownership. If they're high - Tory, if they're low - labour.
-
- Posts: 3586
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
Yes and the financial crisis, rise of technology/rampant globalisation and Brexit happened and then politics totally changed.robmatic wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 10:33 amNew Labour were able to capture at least some of those votes.I like neeps wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 9:59 amhttps://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/ge ... he-result/
It is true though, in England anyway.
If you want to predict how a constituency in England will vote look at at age and look at home ownership. If they're high - Tory, if they're low - labour.
The conservatives these days claim to be quite interventionist economically and all about levelling up the north etc etc and right wing culture war-y focus on the identity and community politics they want and clean up. That gets them the old New Labour voters. Labour as we can see from Starmer can't compete on patriotism and don't have a clear economic policy that is much different to what the Tories are saying because they're mostly offering the same thing now.
Labour will start losing their young graduate core to the Greens.
I don't know if you remember the housing market in the early Noughties but it was bonkers (10%-20% increases every year) and that was entirely a Labour project.JM2K6 wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 10:48 amFor homeowners. Who are more likely to be Tory. And for people in the housing market, landlords, property developers - who are overwhelmingly likely to be Tory.
I'm not talking about 20 years ago. I'm talking about now. Home ownership has dropped quite a bit in that time. And I'm not sure we can say it was entirely a Labour project, given what we know about the mortgage market, how it was driven, and why it crashed.robmatic wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 11:04 amI don't know if you remember the housing market in the early Noughties but it was bonkers (10%-20% increases every year) and that was entirely a Labour project.
UK politics would be much healthier if there were an effective left. I don't mean as lite Tories or as 70s throwback leftists, I'm sure there is some clear ground that they could occupy on economic issues.I like neeps wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 11:00 amYes and the financial crisis, rise of technology/rampant globalisation and Brexit happened and then politics totally changed.robmatic wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 10:33 amNew Labour were able to capture at least some of those votes.I like neeps wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 9:59 am
https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/ge ... he-result/
It is true though, in England anyway.
If you want to predict how a constituency in England will vote look at at age and look at home ownership. If they're high - Tory, if they're low - labour.
The conservatives these days claim to be quite interventionist economically and all about levelling up the north etc etc and right wing culture war-y focus on the identity and community politics they want and clean up. That gets them the old New Labour voters. Labour as we can see from Starmer can't compete on patriotism and don't have a clear economic policy that is much different to what the Tories are saying because they're mostly offering the same thing now.
Labour will start losing their young graduate core to the Greens.
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
-
- Posts: 3586
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
Labour controlled the global housing market. Didn't you know that? Everyone knows the 2008 GFC was caused only by Labour. Personally I cannot believe they had such influence over the US Investment Banks, various sovereign nations and the global housing bond market. But they did! It's incredible really.JM2K6 wrote: ↑Wed May 05, 2021 11:09 amI'm not talking about 20 years ago. I'm talking about now. Home ownership has dropped quite a bit in that time. And I'm not sure we can say it was entirely a Labour project, given what we know about the mortgage market, how it was driven, and why it crashed.
-
- Posts: 3586
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/bad ... ssion=true
Actually quite a good article in the Speccie about the quite frankly ridiculous childcare costs in the UK. When children, houses and rent are so expensive no wonder people aren't having kids.
Actually quite a good article in the Speccie about the quite frankly ridiculous childcare costs in the UK. When children, houses and rent are so expensive no wonder people aren't having kids.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
- ScarfaceClaw
- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:11 pm
That brings back memories...I like neeps wrote: ↑Thu May 06, 2021 8:22 am https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/bad ... ssion=true
Actually quite a good article in the Speccie about the quite frankly ridiculous childcare costs in the UK. When children, houses and rent are so expensive no wonder people aren't having kids.
- FalseBayFC
- Posts: 3554
- Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2020 3:19 pm
So the trick is to be a sleazy corrupt government that gives the impression of doing a good job. The Tory voting majority remind me so much of white people in apartheid South Africa. Insular, stupid, bigoted, nationalistic. Completely ready for a pivot further right like the rest of Europe seem to be doing. The UK PM sits in the same category as Bolsanaro, Trump and Putin. Very worrying.I like neeps wrote: ↑Tue May 04, 2021 5:24 pmThis is because sleaze and corruption don't matter. Most people don't care. If I'm a Tory MP I want to feather my best, nobody will give a f*ck.
Also Labour don't stand for anything. The Tories will win old home owning towns and they make up Britain. Hartlepool majority white, majority Brexit, majority homeowners, majority 40+. Draw a Tory seat and you'll draw that.