Official NPR post a picture of yourself fred

[Gumboot]

[ASMO]

20210531_121623.jpg (846.93 KiB) Viewed 1861 times

[Mr Bungle]

Quality inverted sideburns. We used to call them policeman grips, such was their popularity with NZ Police back in the 80s/90s.

[Gumboot]

Yeah I remember the policeman's grip

[notfatcat]

[Globus]

Whoa! Where are the written statements of agreement from all?

My visage has been posted many times. Plus details of my actual name and address.

I didn't moan then and I still won't bother.

[ASMO]

Whoa! Where are the written statements of agreement from all?

My visage has been posted many times. Plus details of my actual name and address.

I didn't moan then and I still won't bother.

If someone posts a picture of themself, no permission needed, they have by posting it given explicit agreement.

It is all here https://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... e-internet

I want to use my own images on the internet

If you have created the images yourself, you are generally free to use them as you wish.

However, there are some instances where you may not do what you like which includes situations where:

you are an employee working for a business or individual, and create images during the course of your employment (you would need the employer’s permission);
you take a photo of a work that is protected by copyright (for example, taking a photo of a painting at a modern art gallery) – this could result in your photo itself being an infringement of copyright;
you have agreed that the copyright in images you have created will belong to someone else;
you have been commissioned to take photos by a third party for private and domestic purposes (for example, wedding photographs) and you do not have their permission to put them on the internet;
you have granted an exclusive licence to someone else; or
you have agreed to the terms of a non-disclosure agreement, embargo or other contract which restricts or prohibits such action

I want to stop someone using the image I created in a way I do not approve of or have not approved

If somebody is making use of your images without your permission, there are a number of options open to you as the copyright owner.

Although you do not have to, it is usually sensible to try to resolve the matter with the party you think has infringed your copyright. This may save you time and money, and it may be necessary to show a court that you have tried to solve the matter with the other party. Mediation is one way of resolving an issue before starting court proceedings. The IPO offers a mediation service which can help to resolve intellectual property disputes – including copyright – without going to court.

If you cannot resolve the matter with the other party, then going to court may be the right solution. But it would be a good idea to seek legal advice at an early stage.

Besides infringing your copyright, it is also possible that somebody may infringe your ‘moral rights’, which are legal rights enforceable by the authors of copyright works.

When people use your images, they should do so respectfully, even if they have your permission to use them. If you have ‘asserted’ your ‘moral right’ to be credited for creating the photo, then that user should acknowledge you as the creator.

Such an assertion is often made by written contract or may be embedded in the image with metadata.

As the creator, you will also have the moral right to object if people alter your work in a way that is negative to your reputation (known as “derogatory treatment”). If you take the matter to court, you would usually need to establish evidence that your reputation may have been harmed.

[Globus]

Nicely forensic Asmo as a cut and paste. No beef with that. Seen it, or something similar.

Not the point. At which stage do you decide what is permissable or not?

If you and others decide on full unpublished forum principles which may or not sit in line, you are acting as judge and jury which, for me is not acceptable.

I don't like willy nilly censorship.

[Thor Sedan]

Nicely forensic Asmo as a cut and paste. No beef with that. Seen it, or something similar.

Not the point. At which stage do you decide what is permissable or not?

If you and others decide on full unpublished forum principles which may or not sit in line, you are acting as judge and jury which, for me is not acceptable.

I don't like willy nilly censorship.

Wait....what?

Posting pictures of yourself = permissible.
Posting pictures of someone else who has told you it is fine to post a picture of them - permissible
Posting pictures of someone else who has not given you permission to do so - not permissible

This isn't willy nilly censorship - this is a widely accepted protocol.

[Globus]

Nicely forensic Asmo as a cut and paste. No beef with that. Seen it, or something similar.

Not the point. At which stage do you decide what is permissable or not?

If you and others decide on full unpublished forum principles which may or not sit in line, you are acting as judge and jury which, for me is not acceptable.

I don't like willy nilly censorship.

Wait....what?

Posting pictures of yourself = permissible.
Posting pictures of someone else who has told you it is fine to post a picture of them - permissible
Posting pictures of someone else who has not given you permission to do so - not permissible

This isn't willy nilly censorship - this is a widely accepted protocol.

Have a word with the Press. You don't know what a "widely accepted protocol" is.
If it does exist, it's not enshrined in law, as the law makers won't go anywhere near it to avoid accusations of censorship.

[Zapp Bannigan]

You posted a picture from a cabal that you did not attend.
A current poster on here complained as he was in that photo.
The photo was removed.
The thread was subsequently deleted.
Live with it.

[Slick]

You posted a picture from a cabal that you did not attend.
A current poster on here complained as he was in that photo.
The photo was removed.
The thread was subsequently deleted.
Live with it.

I don’t think it’s clicked who Zapp is yet

[JM2K6]

you are acting as judge and jury which, for me is not acceptable.

If the moderation of a private forum is not acceptable to you, you have the option to leave. It's your choice: accept it, or fuck off. Of course moderators act as judge and jury, it's a fucking chat forum not a high court!

[notfatcat]

If it was my forum he'd be shoot on sight. Not necessarily suggesting that should be the policy here though.

[Globus]

you are acting as judge and jury which, for me is not acceptable.

If the moderation of a private forum is not acceptable to you, you have the option to leave. It's your choice: accept it, or fuck off. Of course moderators act as judge and jury, it's a fucking chat forum not a high court!

You are an infant. Is there enough heating in your basement flat?

You are going nowhere. I'm attacking principles not appalling ideology.

By the way. Been in High Court with a judge who was known as a hanging judge from South Africa.

Instead of a reasoned debate, this has turned, via posters like you, into an attack on the poster, not the thread.

[Globus]

If it was my forum he'd be shoot on sight. Not necessarily suggesting that should be the policy here though.

Do give me the logic for that approach. Kindly join the others in the sandpit.

[Slick]

You see this is why, despite honourable mentions to QP, Missy, Dozy and others, Globus for me is the biggest loon we have had.

Over a decade of this nonsense again and again and again.

[Globus]

.

[Globus]

You see this is why, despite honourable mentions to QP, Missy, Dozy and others, Globus for me is the biggest loon we have had.

Over a decade of this nonsense again and again and again.

"Slick" seems inappropriate as a moniker for you. Anything but.

Do go on. It helps your postcount. Not sure I've read or commentated on someting you have engaged in.

In short you get the colour "bland". Try and wriggle out of that.

[JM2K6]

you are acting as judge and jury which, for me is not acceptable.

If the moderation of a private forum is not acceptable to you, you have the option to leave. It's your choice: accept it, or fuck off. Of course moderators act as judge and jury, it's a fucking chat forum not a high court!

You are an infant. Is there enough heating in your basement flat?

You are going nowhere. I'm attacking principles not appalling ideology.

By the way. Been in High Court with a judge who was known as a hanging judge from South Africa.

Instead of a reasoned debate, this has turned, via posters like you, into an attack on the poster, not the thread.

And there you go again, ignoring the substance of the replies to you. All you've got is this ridiculous gimmick of trying to act superior to everyone. You're nobody here, globus - you don't have any high ground to hold over any of us. Either you stop acting like forum moderation is some great conspiracy against you (and stop being so insanely weird about respecting other people's right to privacy), or accept that perhaps these forums aren't for you. There's no higher authority to appeal to, no badge to wave, no old contacts to tap up to get this fixed. It's on you to adapt or belt up (or leave).

Over to you.

[Insane_Homer]

You are an infant. Is there enough heating in your basement flat?

Instead of a reasoned debate, this has turned, via posters like you, into an attack on the poster, not the thread.

The self inflicted uppercut

[notfatcat]

If it was my forum he'd be shoot on sight. Not necessarily suggesting that should be the policy here though.

Do give me the logic for that approach. Kindly join the others in the sandpit.

I don't tell ASMO what to do with his creation as I trust him to do what he thinks is best. That's my logic.

[Globus]

If the moderation of a private forum is not acceptable to you, you have the option to leave. It's your choice: accept it, or fuck off. Of course moderators act as judge and jury, it's a fucking chat forum not a high court!

You are an infant. Is there enough heating in your basement flat?

You are going nowhere. I'm attacking principles not appalling ideology.

By the way. Been in High Court with a judge who was known as a hanging judge from South Africa.

Instead of a reasoned debate, this has turned, via posters like you, into an attack on the poster, not the thread.

And there you go again, ignoring the substance of the replies to you. All you've got is this ridiculous gimmick of trying to act superior to everyone. You're nobody here, globus - you don't have any high ground to hold over any of us. Either you stop acting like forum moderation is some great conspiracy against you (and stop being so insanely weird about respecting other people's right to privacy), or accept that perhaps these forums aren't for you. There's no higher authority to appeal to, no badge to wave, no old contacts to tap up to get this fixed. It's on you to adapt or belt up (or leave).

Over to you.

I simply am not interested in your opinion. If you think moderators are the lords and masters of this universe and you bow down in their presence, that's a problem for you to solve, not me.

[Globus]

If it was my forum he'd be shoot on sight. Not necessarily suggesting that should be the policy here though.

Do give me the logic for that approach. Kindly join the others in the sandpit.

I don't tell ASMO what to do with his creation as I trust him to do what he thinks is best. That's my logic.

Never, ever told Asmo to do anything. I think the last post to him was thanks for the "spoiler" button.

[ASMO]

Moderators by definition have control of what is and is not acceptable here. They act with my blessing as I completely trust their judgement. As this is a privately run forum which I pay for out of my own pocket, I do get some say in what is and is not acceptable here. For the record, if someone willingly wants to post a picture of themselves on a thread titled the same, they are completely free to do so, the only proviso is that if anyone else wants to use that image they need their permission to do so.

This is not censorship, this is my house, my rules just as you dictate what goes on with your property. If those rules do not suit you, there is nothing keeping you here, free to come, equally free to go.

[JM2K6]

You are an infant. Is there enough heating in your basement flat?

You are going nowhere. I'm attacking principles not appalling ideology.

By the way. Been in High Court with a judge who was known as a hanging judge from South Africa.

Instead of a reasoned debate, this has turned, via posters like you, into an attack on the poster, not the thread.

And there you go again, ignoring the substance of the replies to you. All you've got is this ridiculous gimmick of trying to act superior to everyone. You're nobody here, globus - you don't have any high ground to hold over any of us. Either you stop acting like forum moderation is some great conspiracy against you (and stop being so insanely weird about respecting other people's right to privacy), or accept that perhaps these forums aren't for you. There's no higher authority to appeal to, no badge to wave, no old contacts to tap up to get this fixed. It's on you to adapt or belt up (or leave).

Over to you.

I simply am not interested in your opinion. If you think moderators are the lords and masters of this universe and you bow down in their presence, that's a problem for you to solve, not me.

Yeah, that's your problem - you're not willing to listen to anyone, because you're a gigantic narcissist.

The moderators and the owner of this board are the masters of this board. Like it or not.

[Happyhooker]

Post pic of yourself, fine.

Post pic of others, get agreement with them beforehand.

How is this difficult to understand?

"Censorship" fucking puerile idiot

[notfatcat]

Do give me the logic for that approach. Kindly join the others in the sandpit.

I don't tell ASMO what to do with his creation as I trust him to do what he thinks is best. That's my logic.

Never, ever told Asmo to do anything. I think the last post to him was thanks for the "spoiler" button.

I didn't said you had. I was explaining the logic of my post, as you yourself requested.

[Kiwias]

Seems strangely appropriate here. I give permission to myself to post this photo of myself.

[Thor Sedan]

Nicely forensic Asmo as a cut and paste. No beef with that. Seen it, or something similar.

Not the point. At which stage do you decide what is permissable or not?

If you and others decide on full unpublished forum principles which may or not sit in line, you are acting as judge and jury which, for me is not acceptable.

I don't like willy nilly censorship.

Wait....what?

Posting pictures of yourself = permissible.
Posting pictures of someone else who has told you it is fine to post a picture of them - permissible
Posting pictures of someone else who has not given you permission to do so - not permissible

This isn't willy nilly censorship - this is a widely accepted protocol.

Have a word with the Press. You don't know what a "widely accepted protocol" is.
If it does exist, it's not enshrined in law, as the law makers won't go anywhere near it to avoid accusations of censorship.

Tell me where I am wrong with my original post?

Posting pictures of yourself = permissible - am I wrong?
Posting pictures of someone else who has told you it is fine to post a picture of them - permissible - am I wrong?
Posting pictures of someone else who has not given you permission to do so - not permissible - am I wrong?

This internet forum is not the press - which I am sure are governed by a completely different set of rules.

If YOU post a picture of YOURSELF - that is essentially the best case of permission you can give.
If YOU post a picture of someone else FROM THIS forum - and did not ask to post the picture and they ask you to take it down - you must take it down. This is not even open for discussion.

And if for some bizarre reason you post a picture of a famous person on this forum - and they somehow find out about it and don't want to be associated with this forum - then you have to take that picture down if requested to.

This feels like you are throwing a tantrum because you made an error - got called out on it - and are now embarrassed by your oversight.

[Globus]

Do grow up. You are getting obsessive. In one so naive that's not good.

It's an accusation of me much loved by certain posters on here.

If you join the band, I can play quite a few instruments. I can then have a go at drumming you out.

[Thor Sedan]

Do grow up. You are getting obsessive. In one so naive that's not good.

It's an accusation of me much loved by certain posters on here.

If you join the band, I can play quite a few instruments. I can then have a go at drumming you out.

Is this for me?

If so - interesting that you tell me to grow up when you are complaining against a logical argument because you feel a bit silly that you got called out for your own mistake.

Admitting when you are wrong is the cornerstone of 'growing up'.

[Globus]

Do grow up. You are getting obsessive. In one so naive that's not good.

It's an accusation of me much loved by certain posters on here.

If you join the band, I can play quite a few instruments. I can then have a go at drumming you out.

Is this for me?

If so - interesting that you tell me to grow up when you are complaining against a logical argument because you feel a bit silly that you got called out for your own mistake.

Admitting when you are wrong is the cornerstone of 'growing up'.

You'll do. Being "wrong" is just a view or opinion of others who have a different vista.

I'm happy to go out on a limb and expose those who attack me when they themselves have more to answer for than myself.

[Globus]

Oh. While I remember "Cornerstone" was the name my employers used in an attempt to have a national estate agency.

The concept was ill founded and I was "sent to Coventry" for my views at board level. I got reinstated when the concept failed miserably.

The financial loss was only beaten by an attempted move into international banking.

Against my advice at the time. The write-down in the books was cunningly disguised.

I await your next observation. I want this place to thrive.

[Thor Sedan]

You'll do. Being "wrong" is just a view or opinion of others who have a different vista.

I'm happy to go out on a limb and expose those who attack me when they themselves have more to answer for than myself.

Dude - you posted a photo of someone on the forum without them approving it. You being wrong in this case isn't an opinion from someone with a different view - you're wrong because you made a mistake.

Now in your embarrassment you are acting out. Take a step back and just be a little bit more humble.

[Globus]

Not "The Management" but my wife has a stunning resemblance to Cynthia Rhodes.

[Globus]

You'll do. Being "wrong" is just a view or opinion of others who have a different vista.

I'm happy to go out on a limb and expose those who attack me when they themselves have more to answer for than myself.

Dude - you posted a photo of someone on the forum without them approving it. You being wrong in this case isn't an opinion from someone with a different view - you're wrong because you made a mistake.

Now in your embarrassment you are acting out. Take a step back and just be a little bit more humble.

Too problematical! "When you are as great as I am, it's hard to be humble".

I'm used to the "slings and arrows of outrageous fortunes".

[ASMO]

You'll do. Being "wrong" is just a view or opinion of others who have a different vista.

I'm happy to go out on a limb and expose those who attack me when they themselves have more to answer for than myself.

Dude - you posted a photo of someone on the forum without them approving it. You being wrong in this case isn't an opinion from someone with a different view - you're wrong because you made a mistake.

Now in your embarrassment you are acting out. Take a step back and just be a little bit more humble.

Too problematical! "When you are as great as I am, it's hard to be humble".

I'm used to the "slings and arrows of outrageous fortunes".

[Line6 HXFX]

I once posted a pic of the view from my flat, on a post a pic of your backyard thread (on PR), and someone had my address up quicker than a Tory running away from responsibility, for their bullshit.
I once had a image shack account and someone posted a pic of me from it, that I made public mistakingly, and in no way did I give anyone permission to post on forums.

Frankly I am not interested in any of you cunts to the extent I would track down where you live or find and post images of you.
None of you are that interesting tbh.
Wouldn't do it if you were.
But hey ho, I am not a person or real, with genuine concerns and real world responsibilities, and am just a dehuman.lbecause Henry etc said so.

PS) He and his coterie of twats were very quiet when my address they found, and was posted was revealed to be precisely in the town where I said I was from.

[Globus]

Good man Asmo! Thought you might hit me with something like that.

I really, really want this place you have created to grow. It is a rugby site but most rugby players have skills in other sports and it's revealed in discussions about cricket, sailing and even the dreaded "Wendyball".

I acknowlege that I'm provocative. Usually it's to flush out all sorts.