Botham, Stokes and Flintoff are all slightly different: Flintoff became a bowling all-rounder (having started off as a batsman, iirc), Stokes has become a batting all-rounder (having got in more for his bowling, I think?), and Botham was more even between the two and genuinely could have been in the team for either discipline for much of his career.
Stokes and Botham are similar in that each seem(ed) capable of winning matches on their own (even if Willis is unfairly overlooked for Headingly '81, for example); by contrast, while Flintoff won MoM awards (including with the bat, e.g. Trent Bridge (?) '05 where he got a ton almost one-handed) and was charismatic, he never kept Harmison, Jones, Tresco, Vaughan, Pietersen et al in the shade. Also, I would say that Freddie was a bowler of great spells who could break key partnerships or take 3 quick wickets to turn a game, rather than a Great Bowler; a little like Broad, imo. So his impact is not fully reflected in stats.
Perhaps Freddie made the least of his potential and Stokes is currently making the most of his (for which he deserves immense credit).
Way before my time, but apparently Tony Greig deserves to be spoken of in the same category. Gough was never an all-rounder really - Swann was more rounded, for one. Honourable mentions to short-lived all-rounder careers (through flakiness, late development, early death or mortal fear) go to Chris Lewis, Craig White, Ben Holioake and early-career Stuart Broad.
As an aside, one of Flintoff's most-expounded skills was to bowl a "heavy ball" that appeared to cow batsmen with its power rather than speed. I've never understood how the physics of that could work. Surely, once the ball's left the hand, it's all down to weight of ball, velocity and angle of bounce?
The Official Cricket Thread
-
And 1 guest
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:51 pm
In his prime he was a match winner with both bat and ball. Able to swing it both ways and quick enough to hurry good batsmen. There are good reasons he was Englands top wicket taker for a long time.FujiKiwi wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 10:46 am My only memory of Botham is the 1992 World Cup, where he still played well. I was too young to follow him in his prime.
I don't have the stats in front of me, but I wonder if his legend is a bit bigger than his actual achievements. Were his exploits that much greater than Stokes'? I doubt it.
Like Stokes, he was able to grind out runs when the team needed him to, although I would put Stokes ahead of him as a batsman.
Again, wear and tear took its toll on his body but he still earned his place as a medium pace swing bowler whose reputation got him wickets with some rank long hops.
My memory is hazy, but didn't he suffer from back problems that affected his bowling in the early part of his career?Ovals wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 10:55 amFreddie had quite a long period, in his youth, when he wasn't allowed to bowl, to protect his body. I remember watching him play for the under 19s at Southampton, where he played as a batsman and didn't bowl at all. He was a very dominant batsman and peppered the boundary with some huges 6s, including one that cleared the Pavillion.Mahoney wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 10:42 am It's a tough one; he was my hero as a very small kid, but my age means that I actually remember watching Botham mostly as he declined. Plus he never really performed against the best (the West Indies). And while it says nothing about his cricketing ability, he's so dislikable...
He was a better bowler at his best than Stokes, but Stokes' batting at the moment is another level.
It's heresy, but I think I'd go Stokes, Botham, Flintoff.
Haha, I had no idea that Botham had such a bad reputation.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 10:45 amIf likeability is the criteria:Mahoney wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 10:42 am It's a tough one; he was my hero as a very small kid, but my age means that I actually remember watching Botham mostly as he declined. Plus he never really performed against the best (the West Indies). And while it says nothing about his cricketing ability, he's so dislikable...
1) Toothache
2) Flintoff
3) Daylight
4) Stokes
5) Moonlight
6) Bads AIDS
7) Botham
-
Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5962
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
I don't know if anyone else watched the BBC's coverage of old classic tests against the West Indies that was on over the last couple of months or so?
The big takeaway for me is how the hell was Botham ever a ladies man? A slightly tubby bloke with a dodgy haircut - he did staggeringly well for himself.
The big takeaway for me is how the hell was Botham ever a ladies man? A slightly tubby bloke with a dodgy haircut - he did staggeringly well for himself.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Money + fame + confidence.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 3:51 pm I don't know if anyone else watched the BBC's coverage of old classic tests against the West Indies that was on over the last couple of months or so?
The big takeaway for me is how the hell was Botham ever a ladies man? A slightly tubby bloke with a dodgy haircut - he did staggeringly well for himself.
See Trump, D for further examples.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5962
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
My uncle and cousin in Edinburgh are very involved in the cricket scene there - in the Edinburgh area there seems to be a very similar level of participation to England with perhaps more of a middle class slant. Not sure the same is necessarily true in Glasgow. Season is shorter (we'll usually play well into September whereas IIRC the Scottish season very much ends in August).FujiKiwi wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 10:48 amIs cricket played at school in Scotland? I'm just assuming there's more (but still limited) cricket in the big cities and in the lowlands?And 1 guest wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 10:40 am We don't really have one of our own!
I grew up playing cricket (badly) and it was the only sport on TV during the summer.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Yeah, it tails off rapidly in September as it gets to feckin cold.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 4:22 pmMy uncle and cousin in Edinburgh are very involved in the cricket scene there - in the Edinburgh area there seems to be a very similar level of participation to England with perhaps more of a middle class slant. Not sure the same is necessarily true in Glasgow. Season is shorter (we'll usually play well into September whereas IIRC the Scottish season very much ends in August).FujiKiwi wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 10:48 amIs cricket played at school in Scotland? I'm just assuming there's more (but still limited) cricket in the big cities and in the lowlands?And 1 guest wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 10:40 am We don't really have one of our own!
I grew up playing cricket (badly) and it was the only sport on TV during the summer.
However, playing until 9 o’clock at night in Scotland is really common, given how light it stays at night in June and July.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I’d have Tony Greig at No.4. If it wasn’t for his association with the Packer stuff I think his record and reputation would be much enhanced.
Right now, the all time ICC rankings have it as Botham, Grieg, Flintoff, Stokes, in terms of highest ICC points ranking.
At the rate he's going, Stokes could yet end up as a specialist batsman, but if he can keep chipping in 2-3 wickets a match with the occasional fivefer, he'll be above Grieg in another couple of years. The development of his batting ability has been astonishing
For the first few years of his international career, Botham was on a different level even to Stokes - he was averaging nearly 50 with the bat and 21 with the ball for about 5 years. This, combined with some jaw dropping displays (on a par with Stokes) cemented his legend.
Sadly, the latter part of his career (which was certainly affected by injury - not helped by his lifestyle and weight) was no better than adequate.
As others have pointed out, Flintoff only hit the real heights for a couple of years. But *that* over to Ponting remains one of the best I've ever seen and Stokes hasn't yet shown he can reach that level as a bowler.
Stokes is going through an amazing period and is already ahead of Freddy for me. He needs to keep it going for a while yet to be ahead of peak Botham for me even if he ultimately ends up with better career stats.
Sadly, the latter part of his career (which was certainly affected by injury - not helped by his lifestyle and weight) was no better than adequate.
As others have pointed out, Flintoff only hit the real heights for a couple of years. But *that* over to Ponting remains one of the best I've ever seen and Stokes hasn't yet shown he can reach that level as a bowler.
Stokes is going through an amazing period and is already ahead of Freddy for me. He needs to keep it going for a while yet to be ahead of peak Botham for me even if he ultimately ends up with better career stats.
A6D6E6 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2020 9:43 pm For the first few years of his international career, Botham was on a different level even to Stokes - he was averaging nearly 50 with the bat and 21 with the ball for about 5 years. This, combined with some jaw dropping displays (on a par with Stokes) cemented his legend.
Sadly, the latter part of his career (which was certainly affected by injury - not helped by his lifestyle and weight) was no better than adequate.
As others have pointed out, Flintoff only hit the real heights for a couple of years. But *that* over to Ponting remains one of the best I've ever seen and Stokes hasn't yet shown he can reach that level as a bowler.
Stokes is going through an amazing period and is already ahead of Freddy for me. He needs to keep it going for a while yet to be ahead of peak Botham for me even if he ultimately ends up with better career stats.
All true. It has to be said that Botham is in the top 10 of all time in the ICC rankings as a bowler, and I think the only played that makes the top 10 as an all rounder and a specialist
If Stokes can keep going with the bat he could do the same in reverse
England have picked some insane number of bowlers, Stokes playing as a bat only. WI win the toss, put England in, and immediately get Sibley dead LBW.
Root in at 3, Stokes will be in at 4. Curran and Crawley made way for Anderson and Archer. So we've got 5 bowlers even without Stokes, which is, well...
Root in at 3, Stokes will be in at 4. Curran and Crawley made way for Anderson and Archer. So we've got 5 bowlers even without Stokes, which is, well...
-
And 1 guest
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:51 pm
Buttler at 6 is a concern. He could really do with some runs.
Luckily for England, Gabriel's broken himself again. It was a bizarre call to pick him for this Test; he was all over the shop in the 2nd Test and clearly was struggling with injury. With such a short turnaround he was a big risk for this game.
He's just pulled up twice and pulled himself out of the attack. Walking off the field now.
He's just pulled up twice and pulled himself out of the attack. Walking off the field now.
-
ScarfaceClaw
- Posts: 2623
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:11 pm
Cornwall is a fecking unit. I’m guessing he won’t be taking too many sharp singles. Mind you, look at Joe Root and his attempt at one.
-
And 1 guest
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:51 pm
Lovely innings from Pope yesterday. I hope he can go on this morning. Good from Buttler too, albeit against a tired attack on a fairly innocuous surface. Hope the weather allows the game to progress today.
The forecast is slightly more encouraging than it looked earlier.And 1 guest wrote: ↑Sat Jul 25, 2020 8:21 am Lovely innings from Pope yesterday. I hope he can go on this morning. Good from Buttler too, albeit against a tired attack on a fairly innocuous surface. Hope the weather allows the game to progress today.
Gabriel is a miss imo. [Oh he's back no balling and also having Pope dropped!]JM2K6 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 24, 2020 10:42 am Luckily for England, Gabriel's broken himself again. It was a bizarre call to pick him for this Test; he was all over the shop in the 2nd Test and clearly was struggling with injury. With such a short turnaround he was a big risk for this game.
He's just pulled up twice and pulled himself out of the attack. Walking off the field now.
Whilst he was indeed "all over the shop", he also beat the bat many times on the morning of the second day. Sibley and Stokes were lucky to bat through to lunchtime, unparted, after which the wicket became much easier.
With a long tail, fingers crossed that we can go on to consolidate the batting recovery led so classily by Pope yesterday evening.
Last edited by shereblue on Sat Jul 25, 2020 10:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Windies excellent so far. Gabriel stopped bowling no-balls long enough to get over Cornwall's drop and castled Pope instead. Now Roach gets Woakes inside edging onto the stumps.
Now, I love me some Chris Woakes, but I feel now's a good time to point out that England has far too much faith in his current batting form. He scored a brilliant 137* against India, but these are his scores since then: 8, 4, 0, 13, 37*, 37, 32, 5, 1, 2, 6, 0, 32, 0, 0, 1 for an average of 11.86.
That's 10 matches, stretching back to 2018 - not an insubstantial run of games or time.
Now, I love me some Chris Woakes, but I feel now's a good time to point out that England has far too much faith in his current batting form. He scored a brilliant 137* against India, but these are his scores since then: 8, 4, 0, 13, 37*, 37, 32, 5, 1, 2, 6, 0, 32, 0, 0, 1 for an average of 11.86.
That's 10 matches, stretching back to 2018 - not an insubstantial run of games or time.
Buttler gone now. Another excellent ball by Gabriel, caught in the slips.
In isolation, an excellent innings by Jos, but I think a lot of fans will be taking the long view and wondering whether this was bad for England overall - not a big enough score to drag England out of trouble, but big enough to give him a longer run in the side despite his inconsistency and his mediocre keeping.
In isolation, an excellent innings by Jos, but I think a lot of fans will be taking the long view and wondering whether this was bad for England overall - not a big enough score to drag England out of trouble, but big enough to give him a longer run in the side despite his inconsistency and his mediocre keeping.
-
And 1 guest
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:51 pm
Now Buttler goes. Good bowling by these two but England are throwing away a great position.
-
Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Holder with another sharp low catch in the slips. Archer gone.
Windies doing the business this morning.
Windies doing the business this morning.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
-
And 1 guest
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:51 pm
Excellent from Broad but Windies seem to have lost the plot.
-
Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
England end up going beyond 350 anyway, Windies will be disappointed they let that good first hour come undone.
batting after lunch with the new ball is going to be very tough.
England will be expecting to have windies 3/4 down in the next session.
batting after lunch with the new ball is going to be very tough.
England will be expecting to have windies 3/4 down in the next session.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
And they haveInsane_Homer wrote: ↑Sat Jul 25, 2020 12:08 pm England end up going beyond 350 anyway, Windies will be disappointed they let that good first hour come undone.
batting after lunch with the new ball is going to be very tough.
England will be expecting to have windies 3/4 down in the next session.