President Biden and US politics catchall

Where goats go to escape
_Os_
Posts: 2678
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2021 10:19 pm

FalseBayFC wrote: Thu Sep 16, 2021 1:20 pm Oh great! Another cold war. As long as they keep out of Africa this time. That was a bit of a fuck up. Tens of millions dead in a couple of decades.
There has to be two sides to have a Cold War.

You can go through every African country's imports/exports, the top three is always China/EU/other African countries. Doesn't look like much prospect of the EU joining this new Cold War the US seems to want. So the prospects of dragging us into it are low.

The logic can be applied to Asia also, China/HK make up 20%-40% of the imports/exports for all those countries. Unsurprisingly not many of them seem keen on fighting China. The clever ones like the Aussies, will get the US and whoever else to pay for their military and give them good deals. Whilst continuing the massive trade with China/HK, and all the other countries in the region that are also all Chinese connected economies. So the US provides the defence, and China their economy. The calculations for the nations in the region are really about accommodating China, because that's who they economically depend on. With everything China has done they would already be in sanctions up to their eyeballs if anyone could do that and not end up significantly worse off themselves, the same goes for even officially recognising Taiwan it's a state only a handful of places that are so insignificant they don't matter can even officially say is a state. It's all a bit silly.

It's really about the US losing hegemony in that region. If China continues on its current trajectory they'll take Taiwan in the 2030s, no one will be able/willing to stop them so no one will. And even if China is stopped from taking Taiwan once, there's still a China with a massive population/economy that will be regionally dominant just because it's in the region and the US is not, and still a China that has taking Taiwan as its primary objective, so stopping them once just means having to stop them again the time after.
Gumboot
Posts: 8028
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:17 am

_Os_ wrote: Thu Sep 16, 2021 6:22 pmIf China continues on its current trajectory they'll take Taiwan in the 2030s, no one will be able/willing to stop them so no one will. And even if China is stopped from taking Taiwan once, there's still a China with a massive population/economy that will be regionally dominant just because it's in the region and the US is not, and still a China that has taking Taiwan as its primary objective, so stopping them once just means having to stop them again the time after.
Disagree. I don't think you've taken into account the probable Taiwanese response to a PRC attack, or just what a vibrant, robust and hard-earned democracy the 'renegade province' now is. Their very well equipped and trained military are not about to capitulate without one helluva fight. And the Taiwanese have shown through recent free and fair election results that they are in no mood to take any shit (other than the usual endless sabre-rattling) from Beijing. And that's all before taking into account the international support Taiwan would undoubtedly receive. China won't attack any time in the foreseeable future, imho.
User avatar
TB63
Posts: 4014
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:11 pm
Location: Tinopolis

User avatar
laurent
Posts: 2128
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:36 am

Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Sep 16, 2021 4:59 pm
laurent wrote: Thu Sep 16, 2021 2:49 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Sep 16, 2021 2:21 pm

Except we're not breaking a treaty and we're supporting our ally. France would have done exactly the same as we have done and the same people now crying salt tears would be crowing again at us. The fact that the Orsay is happy to chuck stones around their glasshouse doesn't mean we need to dignify it.
You are as the US/UK reactor use Enriched Uranium.

Both the UK and US government Went behind Naval group and Lockheed Martin to Fuck this contract (5 years in).
Naval group will lose a lot but Lockheed martin stand to lose even more.
Contract was 35 Billion Euros, 8 for Naval Group. Lockheed Martin the remainder
Australia approached us. And don't get self-righteous about it, you know damn well France would have done exactly the same and has done much dodgier stuff in the past.
No they would not.
Not a single one of the Nuclear power exported this kind of technology until now.
https://www.meta-defense.fr/en/2021/09/ ... e-pandore/

Naval group was selling modified Barracuda class subs these are Nuclear subs in French arsenals yet the Aussies were getting Diesels, Guess why?
_Os_
Posts: 2678
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2021 10:19 pm

Gumboot wrote: Thu Sep 16, 2021 9:36 pm
_Os_ wrote: Thu Sep 16, 2021 6:22 pmIf China continues on its current trajectory they'll take Taiwan in the 2030s, no one will be able/willing to stop them so no one will. And even if China is stopped from taking Taiwan once, there's still a China with a massive population/economy that will be regionally dominant just because it's in the region and the US is not, and still a China that has taking Taiwan as its primary objective, so stopping them once just means having to stop them again the time after.
Disagree. I don't think you've taken into account the probable Taiwanese response to a PRC attack, or just what a vibrant, robust and hard-earned democracy the 'renegade province' now is. Their very well equipped and trained military are not about to capitulate without one helluva fight. And the Taiwanese have shown through recent free and fair election results that they are in no mood to take any shit (other than the usual endless sabre-rattling) from Beijing. And that's all before taking into account the international support Taiwan would undoubtedly receive. China won't attack any time in the foreseeable future, imho.
Taking Taiwan is China's primary strategic objective, the main Taiwanese island is 50km from the Chinese coast, not far. Military action will be the last resort for them, I doubt it'll even come to military action. But I'll do a rundown of their military quickly.

Russia ended up selling them Sukhoi Su-35S fighters, it wasn't a big sale and very obvious China are going to reverse engine the bits they want (the engines probably), it was a token sale of about 20 units because the Russians decided they could either give it up now and get some cash or the Chinese would have superseded the tech in 5 years anyway. Chinese aircraft tech is minimum what Russia has, then there's all the tech they've stolen (the Z10 Chinese attack helicopter is clearly a stolen Rooivalk or Eurotiger), then there's some collaborations they've had (the Israeli Lavi and Chinese J10 look the same, there's a reason Russia and China don't oppose Israel). They also now have some stuff they've made like the semi-stealth J20, that can be armed with beyond visual range air-to-air missiles that have an estimated range of 200km, in any invasion of Taiwan the battle space will be so crowded that even semi-stealth will be good enough to get something through Taiwanese/US air defence. Right now today they're probing Taiwanese airspace all the time.

Their missile inventory has the DF series of ballistic anti-shipping missiles. They could fire them from the Gobi desert unmolested at targets beyond Japan and still have range to spare, they have an accuracy of 100m so they'll be used in saturation attacks on carrier groups. For targeting they've been launching Yaogan spy satellites in batches of 3 since the 2000s, there must be getting on for over 100 of the things up by now. There's a whole variety of shorter range cruise missile type anti-shipping missiles. The point with the missiles is, China is on the land and is good at manufacturing shit, it doesn't matter how good a ship's countermeasures are if it's overwhelmed uses up all those countermeasures and is still overwhelmed.

As for "the international support Taiwan would undoubtedly receive", the minimum buy in for nations hosting US bases and allowing those bases to be used, is a lot of missiles raining down on them (most of the US bases in Japan are right next to heavily populated areas), so that's mass civilian causalities win or lose. The worst case for Japan if they get involved and lose, is losing some of their very small islands near Taiwan. For South Korea though, the potential downside is much more severe, worst case for them is a land war against NK and China. Even Taiwan isn't going to fight for long if they think they'll lose, it'll hardly do them any favours "fighting hard" if they're not going to win.

And the main point in all this is, it's their primary objective 50km from the Chinese coast (smaller islands are close enough to swim to from China, they'll be gobbled up long before Taiwan proper is). There is no plan capable of preventing China taking something 50km away forever. No one else has it as their primary objective so no one else is going to risk whatever they're prepared to risk.

The Aussie plan does seem to be US defence and Chinese economy. Good luck with that and the war with China that'll definitely never happen.
Gumboot
Posts: 8028
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:17 am

Yeah I do know where Taiwan is. Lived there for 20 years, first arrived in 1986 when Chiang Ching-kuo was president and martial law was in place - had to be very careful about certain topics of conversation...

The Tiananmen Square Massacre was quite unnerving from our close vantage point across the narrow Strait, esp. when reports started coming through that PLA troops and tank convoys were mobilizing towards the Fujian coast as Beijing hunted down the remaining democracy activists who were on the run, and sought to divert their populace's attention from their domestic brutality by, you guessed it, more sabre-rattling at Taiwan.

That was as close to open conflict as things have got since I was there.

As for military action being Beijing's 'last resort'...nah, it's their only resort. Taiwan has never been part of China, and I don't think it ever will be.
User avatar
Marylandolorian
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 2:47 pm
Location: Amerikanuak

Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Sep 16, 2021 12:43 pm This whining from the French is pretty unseemly - it's not like they always play above board on defence or anything else and had the positions been reversed we be getting a lot of smug comments about how Brits need to better understand diplomacy, their place in the world etc etc. Suck it up.
I heard that the main reason the Aussies stopped the deal was because the French didn’t want to move the torpedo tubes from the bow to the stern.
User avatar
Calculon
Posts: 1784
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:25 pm

French foreign minister speaks

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-58610234
The fact that for the first time in the history of relations between the United States and France we are recalling our ambassador for consultations is a serious political act, which shows the magnitude of the crisis that exists now between our countries," he told France 2.

He said the ambassadors were being recalled to "re-evaluate the situation".

But he said France had seen "no need" to recall its ambassador to the UK, as he accused the country of "constant opportunism".

"Britain in this whole thing is a bit like the third wheel," he said.
:lol:
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

Marylandolorian wrote: Fri Sep 17, 2021 12:13 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Thu Sep 16, 2021 12:43 pm This whining from the French is pretty unseemly - it's not like they always play above board on defence or anything else and had the positions been reversed we be getting a lot of smug comments about how Brits need to better understand diplomacy, their place in the world etc etc. Suck it up.
I heard that the main reason the Aussies stopped the deal was because the French didn’t want to move the torpedo tubes from the bow to the stern.
Aft facing torpedoes make a lot more sense than forward facing ones.
User avatar
Marylandolorian
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 2:47 pm
Location: Amerikanuak

It’ll be fine, macron found a way.“ le bon coin “ is a bit like EBay

For sale

Image
Lemoentjie
Posts: 642
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am

Sjoe, just caught up on all of that. The French Government are acting like children! Wow
tc27
Posts: 2532
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Calculon wrote: Sun Sep 19, 2021 7:21 am French foreign minister speaks

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-58610234
The fact that for the first time in the history of relations between the United States and France we are recalling our ambassador for consultations is a serious political act, which shows the magnitude of the crisis that exists now between our countries," he told France 2.

He said the ambassadors were being recalled to "re-evaluate the situation".

But he said France had seen "no need" to recall its ambassador to the UK, as he accused the country of "constant opportunism".

"Britain in this whole thing is a bit like the third wheel," he said.
:lol:
Aside from doing the behind the scenes brokering of the deal with the Americans and making it viable (as the yanks cant export their reactors) and in all likelihood gaining an export customer for it the next generation of SSN design the UK is hardly being involved at all.
User avatar
Calculon
Posts: 1784
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:25 pm

Yeah, I guess aukus will sort out the details of which defense contractors get what cut in the next few years.
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4196
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

Gumboot wrote: Thu Sep 16, 2021 9:36 pm
_Os_ wrote: Thu Sep 16, 2021 6:22 pmIf China continues on its current trajectory they'll take Taiwan in the 2030s, no one will be able/willing to stop them so no one will. And even if China is stopped from taking Taiwan once, there's still a China with a massive population/economy that will be regionally dominant just because it's in the region and the US is not, and still a China that has taking Taiwan as its primary objective, so stopping them once just means having to stop them again the time after.
Disagree. I don't think you've taken into account the probable Taiwanese response to a PRC attack, or just what a vibrant, robust and hard-earned democracy the 'renegade province' now is. Their very well equipped and trained military are not about to capitulate without one helluva fight. And the Taiwanese have shown through recent free and fair election results that they are in no mood to take any shit (other than the usual endless sabre-rattling) from Beijing. And that's all before taking into account the international support Taiwan would undoubtedly receive. China won't attack any time in the foreseeable future, imho.
Xi Jinping is 68. In 2030's he'll be pushing 80 and he has successfully eliminated all possible competition for his seat, which means there's no clear line of succession and chucks out the previous system of rule + succession by consensus.

China could be consumed with "internal issues" when it comes to that changeover.
convoluted
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 5:00 pm

Rinkals wrote: Tue Jun 29, 2021 7:34 am ... On Fox News and other pro-Trump outlets, there have been unprecedented attacks on the Military Leadership in the last few days and I've read opinions that view this as part of an attempt to drive a wedge between the rank-and-file and Command. The feeling is that the January 6th could have succeeded but that the Generals failed to support it. .....
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Have you seen the surveillance tapes of the STORMING OF THE CAPITOL that Pelosi and the Biden admin tried so hard to hide until a judge forced their release yesterday??
They ''white supremacist insurrection terrorists" looked nothing more than rambling middle-aged tourists taking selfies and looking a little lost as they milled around in the foyers and corridors, intermingling in most friendly manner with the Capitol police.

This, the alleged Pearl Harbour and Gettysburg rolled into one.

They attacked with shot and shell ...
Yelling "Shashow" as they fell ...

In reality, they didn't even roll any Jaffas down the aisles.

The only aggro, and the scenes repeatedly rammed down your gullible throats by the complicit MSM, came from the masked and planted FBI agents and experienced Antifa thugs whose allocated task was to con you buffoons into a false narrative that the Dems hoped would eliminate Trump once and for all.

Pelosi, in charge of security at the Capitol, refused offers prior to Jan 6 of a solid national guard presence. That was to deliberately leave the Capitol all but undefended in order to make it as easy as possible for the plants to smash their way in and encourage the Trumpies to follow them inside.

Release yesterday of the hours and hours of surveillance tape that the Dems had tried so hard to suppress blows the whole "Jan 6 Insurrection" farce out of the water.
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

Pass the Kool Aid.
Slick
Posts: 11918
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

I do so enjoy your posts.

Just to be clear, are we saying that the election was rigged and the Capitol business was planned and executed by the Dems?
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
User avatar
Marylandolorian
Posts: 1248
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 2:47 pm
Location: Amerikanuak

Slick wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 5:32 pm I do so enjoy your posts.

Just to be clear, are we saying that the election was rigged and the Capitol business was planned and executed by the Dems?
You forgot antifa , on January 6 they were the worst.
convoluted
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 5:00 pm

Slick wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 5:32 pm I do so enjoy your posts.

Just to be clear, are we saying that the election was rigged and the Capitol business was planned and executed by the Dems?
Absolutely we are, and I've said so from each of their beginnings.
And 'we' suggests that you have finally seen the light??
convoluted
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 5:00 pm

... and put forward for us the name of even one 'armed Trump white supremacist insurrectionist terrorist' who has been charged as being such.
Go on.

All they have is a bunch of people charged with trespass and absolutely nothing else.
Slick
Posts: 11918
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

convoluted wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 6:22 pm
Slick wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 5:32 pm I do so enjoy your posts.

Just to be clear, are we saying that the election was rigged and the Capitol business was planned and executed by the Dems?
Absolutely we are, and I've said so from each of their beginnings.
And 'we' suggests that you have finally seen the light??
I wouldn’t necessarily read that into it.

I think you’re just a troll, and quite an entertaining one to be fair, but the scary thing is that there are actually people out there like this
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
convoluted
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 5:00 pm

... but ... but ... but ... the insurrectionists assassinated one of the Capitol police officers !!!!
Executed him by bashing his head in with a fire extinguisher, they did.

You know, that Capitol police officer who phoned a family member that night while in perfectly fine condition, only to later die of a stroke, as verified by the coroner.
convoluted
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 5:00 pm

Slick wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 6:28 pm
convoluted wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 6:22 pm
Slick wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 5:32 pm I do so enjoy your posts.

Just to be clear, are we saying that the election was rigged and the Capitol business was planned and executed by the Dems?
Absolutely we are, and I've said so from each of their beginnings.
And 'we' suggests that you have finally seen the light??
I wouldn’t necessarily read that into it.

I think you’re just a troll, and quite an entertaining one to be fair, but the scary thing is that there are actually people out there like this
Hmmm.
And all this time it's been me thinking that it's you lot who are the trolls, because surely nobody outside of the North Korean populace could be so easily led around by the nose.
convoluted
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 5:00 pm

convoluted wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 6:35 pm ... but ... but ... but ... the insurrectionists assassinated one of the Capitol police officers !!!!
Executed him by bashing his head in with a fire extinguisher, they did.

You know, that Capitol police officer who phoned a family member that night while in perfectly fine condition, only to later die of a stroke, as verified by the coroner.
And given that the surveillance cameras captured every nook and cranny of the building during the STORMING, where is the bit of tape depicting that heinous act ????
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

Slick wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 6:28 pm
convoluted wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 6:22 pm
Slick wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 5:32 pm I do so enjoy your posts.

Just to be clear, are we saying that the election was rigged and the Capitol business was planned and executed by the Dems?
Absolutely we are, and I've said so from each of their beginnings.
And 'we' suggests that you have finally seen the light??
I wouldn’t necessarily read that into it.

I think you’re just a troll, and quite an entertaining one to be fair, but the scary thing is that there are actually people out there like this
I suspect that the reason you think he's trolling and doesn't actually believe the tripe he's posting is because you don't believe anybody could be that thick.

I'm sorry to disillusion you.
User avatar
TB63
Posts: 4014
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:11 pm
Location: Tinopolis



Deluded.. :crazy:
User avatar
TB63
Posts: 4014
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:11 pm
Location: Tinopolis






Zinggggg.. :clap:
User avatar
Plim
Posts: 252
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:46 pm

I had no idea this thread had become so entertaining. I’ll be sure to pop in more often. 👍
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

It's been very quiet of late, despite the revelations concerning John Eastman's memo outlining how Pence could use GOP votes against certifying the Election to halt Biden's inauguration.
.
  • VP Pence, presiding over the joint session (or Senate Pro Tempore Grassley, if Pence recuses himself), begins to open and count the ballots, starting with Alabama (without conceding that the procedure, specified by the Electoral Count Act, of going through the States alphabetically is required).
  • When he gets to Arizona, he announces that he has multiple slates of electors, and so is going to defer decision on that until finishing the other States. This would be the first break with the procedure set out in the Act.
  • At the end, he announces that because of the ongoing disputes in the 7 States, there are no electors that can be deemed validly appointed in those States. That means the total number of “electors appointed” – the language of the 12th Amendment -- is 454. This reading of the 12th Amendment has also been advanced by Harvard Law Professor Laurence Tribe (here). A “majority of the electors appointed” would therefore be 228. There are at this point 232 votes for Trump, 222 votes for Biden. Pence then gavels President Trump as re-elected.
  • Howls, of course, from the Democrats, who now claim, contrary to Tribe’s prior position, that 270 is required. So Pence says, fine. Pursuant to the 12th Amendment, no candidate has achieved the necessary majority. That sends the matter to the House, where the “the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote . . . .” Republicans currently control 26 of the state delegations, the bare majority needed to win that vote. President Trump is re-elected there as well.
  • One last piece. Assuming the Electoral Count Act process is followed and, upon getting the objections to the Arizona slates, the two houses break into their separate chambers, we should not allow the Electoral Count Act constraint on debate to control. That would mean that a prior legislature was determining the rules of the present one — a constitutional no-no (as Tribe has forcefully argued). So someone – Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, etc. – should demand normal rules (which includes the filibuster). That creates a stalemate that would give the state legislatures more time to weigh in to formally support the alternate slate of electors, if they had not already done so.
  • The main thing here is that Pence should do this without asking for permission – either from a vote of the joint session or from the Court. Let the other side challenge his actions in court, where Tribe (who in 2001 conceded the President of the Senate might be in charge of counting the votes) and others who would press a lawsuit would have their past position -- that these are non-justiciable political questions – thrown back at them, to get the lawsuit dismissed. The fact is that the Constitution assigns this power to the Vice President as the ultimate arbiter. We should take all of our actions with that in mind.
Link

It might have worked.

At the very least, it would probably have resulted in protracted court cases for a few years and kept Biden out of the WH.

I don't see Trump being charged or indicted, though: he has far too much support.
User avatar
Enzedder
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:55 pm
Location: Hamilton NZ

Oh yes, we have top quality politicians coming through.

This one is ready

https://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/national ... hp&pc=U531
Image
I drink and I forget things.
GogLais
Posts: 2472
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 7:06 pm
Location: Wirral/Cilgwri

Enzedder wrote: Thu Oct 14, 2021 5:35 am Oh yes, we have top quality politicians coming through.

This one is ready

https://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/national ... hp&pc=U531
Image
That reminds me that I’ve thought that one solution to rising sea levels would be to lower the sea bed. And you could use the dredged material to build dykes so it doubles the effectiveness.
User avatar
TB63
Posts: 4014
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:11 pm
Location: Tinopolis

What a prick!..

User avatar
sturginho
Posts: 2432
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:51 pm

Such a classy guy
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8223
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

The shitgibbon doesn't get that Powell didn't have bone spurs. He went to Vietnam !

If you want a good laugh; go read his attempt to assert, "executive privilege", to block the release of documents to Jan 6th Committee

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/ ... ege-jan-6/

I think he's pissed off, & ripped off, every decent lawyer in the Country, & now he has to use Eric to write his appeals ! :crazy:
User avatar
Hal Jordan
Posts: 4154
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
Location: Sector 2814

Bannon getting contempt proceedings from the Committee. He always looks one strenuous but unexpected burst of physical activity away from a fatal heart attack.
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4196
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

TB63 wrote: Wed Oct 20, 2021 9:04 am What a prick!..

This is my biggest problem with his supporters. The man is so lacking in the basics of human decency so anybody supporting him is by default endorsing that behaviour. If it was a few isolated incidents, there would be some excuse but it's just a constant flood of prime w@nkerishness.
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

Image

No justice, indeed.
:lolno:

He's fuckin' off his rocker.
Slick
Posts: 11918
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Just watched that 4 hours on the Capitol on BBC… brutal. Have to say I didn’t quite realise how far it got and how close it was to a bloodbath.

Trump is true human waste.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6474
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

It had to happen :facepalm:

Post Reply