.........andd this about Starmer
He claims Starmer is trying to prejudge the police inquiry. And he criticises Starmer for not prosecuting Jimmy Savile when he was DPP.
.........andd this about Starmer
He claims Starmer is trying to prejudge the police inquiry. And he criticises Starmer for not prosecuting Jimmy Savile when he was DPP.
Calling it correctly mind. That followed Theresa May sticking a couple of sharp digs between the lying cunt's ribstabascoboy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:55 pm Ian Blackford pushing his luck with the Speaker, and goooonnnee
Blackford ends his response saying Johnson has misled the house.
The Speaker, Sir Lindsay Hoyle, asks him to withdraw the charge. MPs are not allowed to accuse each other of lying.
Blackford repeats his charge. He says Johnson has “lied and misled” the house.
Hoyle asks him again to withdraw. Blackford says the PM may have inadvertently misled the house.
Johnson responds, saying Blackford is wrong.
Hoyle asks Blackford to clarify that he did withdraw the claim. This time Blackford is clear that he is not withdrawing. Hoyle says he must suspend Blackford, but Blackford is leaving anyway.
Breaking: Scotland Yard just said they've been handed more than **300** photographs as part of their partygate probe. Wow.
“Either my right honourable friend had not read the rules. Or didn’t understand what they meant, and others around him. Or they didn’t think the rules applied to Number 10. Which was it?”
Blackford was great there I must saySaintK wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:03 pmCalling it correctly mind. That followed Theresa May sticking a couple of sharp digs between the lying cunt's ribstabascoboy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:55 pm Ian Blackford pushing his luck with the Speaker, and goooonnneeBlackford ends his response saying Johnson has misled the house.
The Speaker, Sir Lindsay Hoyle, asks him to withdraw the charge. MPs are not allowed to accuse each other of lying.
Blackford repeats his charge. He says Johnson has “lied and misled” the house.
Hoyle asks him again to withdraw. Blackford says the PM may have inadvertently misled the house.
Johnson responds, saying Blackford is wrong.
Hoyle asks Blackford to clarify that he did withdraw the claim. This time Blackford is clear that he is not withdrawing. Hoyle says he must suspend Blackford, but Blackford is leaving anyway.
He said what needs to be repeatedly said as we have no way apparently to censure a PM who lies whether inadvertently or more likely not and force them to retract them subsequentlySlick wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:41 pmBlackford was great there I must saySaintK wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:03 pmCalling it correctly mind. That followed Theresa May sticking a couple of sharp digs between the lying cunt's ribstabascoboy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 3:55 pm Ian Blackford pushing his luck with the Speaker, and goooonnneeBlackford ends his response saying Johnson has misled the house.
The Speaker, Sir Lindsay Hoyle, asks him to withdraw the charge. MPs are not allowed to accuse each other of lying.
Blackford repeats his charge. He says Johnson has “lied and misled” the house.
Hoyle asks him again to withdraw. Blackford says the PM may have inadvertently misled the house.
Johnson responds, saying Blackford is wrong.
Hoyle asks Blackford to clarify that he did withdraw the claim. This time Blackford is clear that he is not withdrawing. Hoyle says he must suspend Blackford, but Blackford is leaving anyway.
The, "Update", was about as damning as it could be, under the circumstances; so you'd hope this is the beginning of the end.tc27 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:29 pm Fucking hell that was awful..surely we must hit the 54 letters following that.
I loved the absolute killer line from Theresa May.
“Either my right honourable friend had not read the rules. Or didn’t understand what they meant, and others around him. Or they didn’t think the rules applied to Number 10. Which was it?”
And anyway, can't they think about more than one thing at a time?tabascoboy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:53 pm There was a delicious moment earlier when a Tory lickspittle decried why the House was wasting time on this when there were more important issues to discuss - the Speaker then had to gently remind her that the PM himself called to address the Commons and for this debate on this issue...
Suzanne Webb. My other half has had professional dealings with her, doesn't have much good to say.tabascoboy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 4:53 pm There was a delicious moment earlier when a Tory lickspittle decried why the House was wasting time on this when there were more important issues to discuss - the Speaker then had to gently remind her that the PM himself called to address the Commons and for this debate on this issue...
Don't think there is a political long game. Does any Tory really want to clear up after the Boris shit show? Could we limp on with a zombie government for a while.salanya wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:11 pm Only catching some of the coverage.
But this speaker is such a limp dick. Boris either lies or deflects: he is not answering a single question properly. Yet he doesn't seem to be called up on it.
Not sure what the best political long game is, but right now it must be clear that this man can not be the prime minister of this country.
Covid has so far managed to hide what an utter laughing stock, and how ineffectual he is, on the world stage. Fun times aheadHal Jordan wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:31 pm I'm sure he's hoping the news cycle will move on whilst he's on his trip to have bunga bunga parties with Eastern European sex slaves.
I mean, his trip to show the UK's global standing in his leadership over the Ukraine crisis.
What sort of cretins voted for the bumbling moron?Slick wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:39 pmCovid has so far managed to hide what an utter laughing stock, and how ineffectual he is, on the world stage. Fun times aheadHal Jordan wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:31 pm I'm sure he's hoping the news cycle will move on whilst he's on his trip to have bunga bunga parties with Eastern European sex slaves.
I mean, his trip to show the UK's global standing in his leadership over the Ukraine crisis.
The blonde slug m issed his call to Vlad as he was so busy deflecting and lying to to the House this afternoonSlick wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:39 pmCovid has so far managed to hide what an utter laughing stock, and how ineffectual he is, on the world stage. Fun times aheadHal Jordan wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:31 pm I'm sure he's hoping the news cycle will move on whilst he's on his trip to have bunga bunga parties with Eastern European sex slaves.
I mean, his trip to show the UK's global standing in his leadership over the Ukraine crisis.
Is that true?SaintK wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:47 pmThe blonde slug m issed his call to Vlad as he was so busy deflecting and lying to to the House this afternoonSlick wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:39 pmCovid has so far managed to hide what an utter laughing stock, and how ineffectual he is, on the world stage. Fun times aheadHal Jordan wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:31 pm I'm sure he's hoping the news cycle will move on whilst he's on his trip to have bunga bunga parties with Eastern European sex slaves.
I mean, his trip to show the UK's global standing in his leadership over the Ukraine crisis.
Dunno. Not meC69 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:44 pmWhat sort of cretins voted for the bumbling moron?Slick wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:39 pmCovid has so far managed to hide what an utter laughing stock, and how ineffectual he is, on the world stage. Fun times aheadHal Jordan wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:31 pm I'm sure he's hoping the news cycle will move on whilst he's on his trip to have bunga bunga parties with Eastern European sex slaves.
I mean, his trip to show the UK's global standing in his leadership over the Ukraine crisis.
That's a positive. Makes it less likely that important information be revealed to Putin.
Ultimately, that's probably for the best.SaintK wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:47 pmThe blonde slug m issed his call to Vlad as he was so busy deflecting and lying to to the House this afternoonSlick wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:39 pmCovid has so far managed to hide what an utter laughing stock, and how ineffectual he is, on the world stage. Fun times aheadHal Jordan wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 5:31 pm I'm sure he's hoping the news cycle will move on whilst he's on his trip to have bunga bunga parties with Eastern European sex slaves.
I mean, his trip to show the UK's global standing in his leadership over the Ukraine crisis.
Nah, compost is expensiveinactionman wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 6:07 pmUltimately, that's probably for the best.
There's not a single situation on the face of the earth he couldn't make worse.
what !
The Met Police said today their investigation would not take more than a year, but did not give an exact timeframe for when it would wrap up.
Police investigation 'won't take longer than a year'
More lines now from the Met Police commander leading its investigation into parties, which Boris Johnson repeatedly urged MPs to wait for when facing tough criticism in the Commons earlier.
The Met has been handed more than 300 photos, Commander Catherine Roper told the media.
She also said:
Her team would start contacting people soon to ask them questions and expected that people would "tell the truth"
The investigation will not last "more than a year" and she wants to fast-track it
The police asked Sue Gray to hold back information on events they are looking into because it would otherwise make it harder to interview people and have them provide "their account from their own memory"
Police officers on duty at Downing Street could be questioned if appropriate
That's what I was afraid of ...tabascoboy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 6:35 pmThe Met Police said today their investigation would not take more than a year, but did not give an exact timeframe for when it would wrap up.
Police investigation 'won't take longer than a year'
More lines now from the Met Police commander leading its investigation into parties, which Boris Johnson repeatedly urged MPs to wait for when facing tough criticism in the Commons earlier.
The Met has been handed more than 300 photos, Commander Catherine Roper told the media.
She also said:
Her team would start contacting people soon to ask them questions and expected that people would "tell the truth"
The investigation will not last "more than a year" and she wants to fast-track it
The police asked Sue Gray to hold back information on events they are looking into because it would otherwise make it harder to interview people and have them provide "their account from their own memory"
Police officers on duty at Downing Street could be questioned if appropriate
My attention may have wandered but I though she said something like weeks rather than months on the telly.tabascoboy wrote: ↑Mon Jan 31, 2022 6:35 pmThe Met Police said today their investigation would not take more than a year, but did not give an exact timeframe for when it would wrap up.
Police investigation 'won't take longer than a year'
More lines now from the Met Police commander leading its investigation into parties, which Boris Johnson repeatedly urged MPs to wait for when facing tough criticism in the Commons earlier.
The Met has been handed more than 300 photos, Commander Catherine Roper told the media.
She also said:
Her team would start contacting people soon to ask them questions and expected that people would "tell the truth"
The investigation will not last "more than a year" and she wants to fast-track it
The police asked Sue Gray to hold back information on events they are looking into because it would otherwise make it harder to interview people and have them provide "their account from their own memory"
Police officers on duty at Downing Street could be questioned if appropriate