Russia registers first corona vaccine
In ten years working in academic research, I don't think I've ever read a paper from a Russian research group in a Russian institute.
Plenty of excellent Russian scientists based around the world, though. Such as Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov, who won the Nobel prize for physics in 2010 for work they did in Manchester university.
Plenty of excellent Russian scientists based around the world, though. Such as Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov, who won the Nobel prize for physics in 2010 for work they did in Manchester university.
Still no reason or justification. And you’ve rubbished every other suggestion of a method without telling us yours.Amethyst wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:37 pmSo far the best that anyone has come up with is that the UK should replace Russia in the top 5 (I disagree with that). There seems to be consensus that the other countries mentioned by me should be top of he list. So it's not a bullshit list as only the position of Russia seems to be challenged.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
huh..fishfoodie wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 5:24 pmCertainly world leaders at creating biological weapons; & the skills are transferableLemoentjie wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 5:03 pm Russia boasts many brilliant minds, despite some of the more decadent ones being lured by dollars to American and British universities. It's no surprise that they are world leaders in creating a COVID-19 vaccine. Well done to Russia.
wet-socks wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 11:28 pmhuh..fishfoodie wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 5:24 pmCertainly world leaders at creating biological weapons; & the skills are transferableLemoentjie wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 5:03 pm Russia boasts many brilliant minds, despite some of the more decadent ones being lured by dollars to American and British universities. It's no surprise that they are world leaders in creating a COVID-19 vaccine. Well done to Russia.
I've worked with plenty of Russian scientists of the years and they're decent enough. Funny bunch though - their battles amongst each other make the inter-Saffa shitfights on PR look like child's play.
In fact the only murderer/murderee I know was when one of them decided to kill his wife, who was also a scientist at work. 'Got off' on an insanity plea, though he only seemed mid-range on the Russian craziness spectrum to me.
In fact the only murderer/murderee I know was when one of them decided to kill his wife, who was also a scientist at work. 'Got off' on an insanity plea, though he only seemed mid-range on the Russian craziness spectrum to me.
Plum
Exactly, which is a prime example why everything is a bit of a mystery as far as Russia is concerned. They tend to keep very much "in-house"Nols wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 10:04 pm In ten years working in academic research, I don't think I've ever read a paper from a Russian research group in a Russian institute.
Plenty of excellent Russian scientists based around the world, though. Such as Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov, who won the Nobel prize for physics in 2010 for work they did in Manchester university.
Should be banned for racism.Quade wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 4:06 am I've worked with plenty of Russian scientists of the years and they're decent enough. Funny bunch though - their battles amongst each other make the inter-Saffa shitfights on PR look like child's play.
In fact the only murderer/murderee I know was when one of them decided to kill his wife, who was also a scientist at work. 'Got off' on an insanity plea, though he only seemed mid-range on the Russian craziness spectrum to me.
Amethyst wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:56 amShould be banned for racism.Quade wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 4:06 am I've worked with plenty of Russian scientists of the years and they're decent enough. Funny bunch though - their battles amongst each other make the inter-Saffa shitfights on PR look like child's play.
In fact the only murderer/murderee I know was when one of them decided to kill his wife, who was also a scientist at work. 'Got off' on an insanity plea, though he only seemed mid-range on the Russian craziness spectrum to me.
I agree - ban Wikipedia while you're at it:
Modern Slavic nations and ethnic groups are considerably diverse both genetically and culturally, and relations between them – even within the individual groups – range from "ethnic solidarity to mutual feelings of hostility".[10]
Plum
By that reasoning you should have North Korea in your top five as well.Amethyst wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:54 amExactly, which is a prime example why everything is a bit of a mystery as far as Russia is concerned. They tend to keep very much "in-house"Nols wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 10:04 pm In ten years working in academic research, I don't think I've ever read a paper from a Russian research group in a Russian institute.
Plenty of excellent Russian scientists based around the world, though. Such as Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov, who won the Nobel prize for physics in 2010 for work they did in Manchester university.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am
This is part of the constant Russophobia. We're talking about a country that put the first man in space, the first woman in space, the first satellite in space, invented the solar cell, discovered viruses, invented the LED.Lobby wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:23 am Given the alacrity with which (we are told) Russia was attempting to hack into UK universities developing vaccines, and their long history of relying on espionage rather than innovation in science and technology, part of me wonders if the Russian vaccine is in fact a modified version of the Oxford (or any other) vaccine.
The truth is that the West doesn't want Russia to be seen as its equal, for various reasons. If anything, you'd expect the West to be stealing from Russian research.
Выход, агент Лимон
You're such a shit troll.Amethyst wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:54 amExactly, which is a prime example why everything is a bit of a mystery as far as Russia is concerned. They tend to keep very much "in-house"Nols wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 10:04 pm In ten years working in academic research, I don't think I've ever read a paper from a Russian research group in a Russian institute.
Plenty of excellent Russian scientists based around the world, though. Such as Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov, who won the Nobel prize for physics in 2010 for work they did in Manchester university.
What was the last majot breakthrough of note that came out of Russian labs/industry? Anything since the collapse of the USSR?Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:11 amThis is part of the constant Russophobia. We're talking about a country that put the first man in space, the first woman in space, the first satellite in space, invented the solar cell, discovered viruses, invented the LED.Lobby wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:23 am Given the alacrity with which (we are told) Russia was attempting to hack into UK universities developing vaccines, and their long history of relying on espionage rather than innovation in science and technology, part of me wonders if the Russian vaccine is in fact a modified version of the Oxford (or any other) vaccine.
The truth is that the West doesn't want Russia to be seen as its equal, for various reasons. If anything, you'd expect the West to be stealing from Russian research.
Выход, агент Лимон
You do know that this isn't like discussing your favourite type of footwear don't you? Opinions are worthless. These things can be objectively assessed.Amethyst wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 7:58 pmYou are just a sour puss because I didn't list the UK in the top 5. Which of those 5 top countries I've mentioned should be replaced by the UK (there, I've made it easy for you)? And name any other country that should be included in that top 5 instead, come on softcock.
You'll find that out the day they nuke you to oblivion.Nols wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:21 amWhat was the last majot breakthrough of note that came out of Russian labs/industry? Anything since the collapse of the USSR?Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:11 amThis is part of the constant Russophobia. We're talking about a country that put the first man in space, the first woman in space, the first satellite in space, invented the solar cell, discovered viruses, invented the LED.Lobby wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:23 am Given the alacrity with which (we are told) Russia was attempting to hack into UK universities developing vaccines, and their long history of relying on espionage rather than innovation in science and technology, part of me wonders if the Russian vaccine is in fact a modified version of the Oxford (or any other) vaccine.
The truth is that the West doesn't want Russia to be seen as its equal, for various reasons. If anything, you'd expect the West to be stealing from Russian research.
Выход, агент Лимон
Like having 50 universities in the world top 100 opposed to none. Well done.A6D6E6 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:33 amYou do know that this isn't like discussing your favourite type of footwear don't you? Opinions are worthless. These things can be objectively assessed.Amethyst wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 7:58 pmYou are just a sour puss because I didn't list the UK in the top 5. Which of those 5 top countries I've mentioned should be replaced by the UK (there, I've made it easy for you)? And name any other country that should be included in that top 5 instead, come on softcock.
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:00 pm
what are the chances of a lot of volunteers being in Xinjiang province ?!fishfoodie wrote: ↑Tue Aug 11, 2020 4:43 pmI wonder how many political prisoners volunteered for vaccine trials in China & Russia
Fauci is calling bullsh1t on the Russian vaccine - not sure how orange shitgibbon feels about that
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/dr-fa ... 2020-08-12
That could indeed be a way to measure it. Happy with it?Amethyst wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:52 amLike having 50 universities in the world top 100 opposed to none. Well done.A6D6E6 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:33 amYou do know that this isn't like discussing your favourite type of footwear don't you? Opinions are worthless. These things can be objectively assessed.Amethyst wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 7:58 pm
You are just a sour puss because I didn't list the UK in the top 5. Which of those 5 top countries I've mentioned should be replaced by the UK (there, I've made it easy for you)? And name any other country that should be included in that top 5 instead, come on softcock.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
You aren't even trying any more.Amethyst wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:52 amLike having 50 universities in the world top 100 opposed to none. Well done.A6D6E6 wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:33 amYou do know that this isn't like discussing your favourite type of footwear don't you? Opinions are worthless. These things can be objectively assessed.Amethyst wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 7:58 pm
You are just a sour puss because I didn't list the UK in the top 5. Which of those 5 top countries I've mentioned should be replaced by the UK (there, I've made it easy for you)? And name any other country that should be included in that top 5 instead, come on softcock.
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am
Of course he would. So predictable. Also university rankings done by Western countries or bodies cannot be used as bias-free ranking systems.ticketlessinseattle wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:57 am
Fauci is calling bullsh1t on the Russian vaccine
- Hellraiser
- Posts: 2089
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am
Do they still use lead water pipes in South Africa?
Ceterum censeo delendam esse Muscovia
I am surprised that you didn’t include supersonic aircraft in your list of Russian ‘achievements’. I’m sure you believe that because the TU-144 debuted 3 months before Concorde, this proves that the Russians didn’t makes use of the 90,000 technical documents they stole from the British and French teams working on Concorde.Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:11 amThis is part of the constant Russophobia. We're talking about a country that put the first man in space, the first woman in space, the first satellite in space, invented the solar cell, discovered viruses, invented the LED.Lobby wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:23 am Given the alacrity with which (we are told) Russia was attempting to hack into UK universities developing vaccines, and their long history of relying on espionage rather than innovation in science and technology, part of me wonders if the Russian vaccine is in fact a modified version of the Oxford (or any other) vaccine.
The truth is that the West doesn't want Russia to be seen as its equal, for various reasons. If anything, you'd expect the West to be stealing from Russian research.
Выход, агент Лимон
Still needed to get the product in the air. Shit design anyway which went up in flames over a French suburb..Lobby wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 12:41 pmI am surprised that you didn’t include supersonic aircraft in your list of Russian ‘achievements’. I’m sure you believe that because the TU-144 debuted 3 months before Concorde, this proves that the Russians didn’t makes use of the 90,000 technical documents they stole from the British and French teams working on Concorde.Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:11 amThis is part of the constant Russophobia. We're talking about a country that put the first man in space, the first woman in space, the first satellite in space, invented the solar cell, discovered viruses, invented the LED.Lobby wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 9:23 am Given the alacrity with which (we are told) Russia was attempting to hack into UK universities developing vaccines, and their long history of relying on espionage rather than innovation in science and technology, part of me wonders if the Russian vaccine is in fact a modified version of the Oxford (or any other) vaccine.
The truth is that the West doesn't want Russia to be seen as its equal, for various reasons. If anything, you'd expect the West to be stealing from Russian research.
Выход, агент Лимон
- redderneck
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:45 pm
If only they fucken would.Amethyst wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 5:54 amExactly, which is a prime example why everything is a bit of a mystery as far as Russia is concerned. They tend to keep very much "in-house"Nols wrote: ↑Wed Aug 12, 2020 10:04 pm In ten years working in academic research, I don't think I've ever read a paper from a Russian research group in a Russian institute.
Plenty of excellent Russian scientists based around the world, though. Such as Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov, who won the Nobel prize for physics in 2010 for work they did in Manchester university.
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am
But that's another counter-argument: the best Russian research isn't done at universities, it's done by government (usually military) institutes. Of course they're not going to release their findings to a British academic journal.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8219
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Amethyst wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 1:26 pmStill needed to get the product in the air. Shit design anyway which went up in flames over a French suburb..Lobby wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 12:41 pmI am surprised that you didn’t include supersonic aircraft in your list of Russian ‘achievements’. I’m sure you believe that because the TU-144 debuted 3 months before Concorde, this proves that the Russians didn’t makes use of the 90,000 technical documents they stole from the British and French teams working on Concorde.Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:11 am
This is part of the constant Russophobia. We're talking about a country that put the first man in space, the first woman in space, the first satellite in space, invented the solar cell, discovered viruses, invented the LED.
The truth is that the West doesn't want Russia to be seen as its equal, for various reasons. If anything, you'd expect the West to be stealing from Russian research.
Выход, агент Лимон
Twice; & the Russians got that, honour first too !
Rumour had it; that the design was so Russian, when it came to the aircraft interior; that passengers would have ended up with severe hearing damage at the end of flights.
Interesting video from the West. It does seem to be a totally different plane though, debunking the bullshit that it was a Concorde ripoff. Bigger, higher passenger capacity (different interior design), more powerful engines (Russian's own), specific design to give the heavier aircraft more lift, lots of changes and improvements in general before release for commercial flights. Notably, first crash in testing phase seems to be caused by pilot/crew error. All in all another fine world first achievement by the Ruskies.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:45 pmAmethyst wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 1:26 pmStill needed to get the product in the air. Shit design anyway which went up in flames over a French suburb..Lobby wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 12:41 pm
I am surprised that you didn’t include supersonic aircraft in your list of Russian ‘achievements’. I’m sure you believe that because the TU-144 debuted 3 months before Concorde, this proves that the Russians didn’t makes use of the 90,000 technical documents they stole from the British and French teams working on Concorde.
Twice; & the Russians got that, honour first too !
Rumour had it; that the design was so Russian, when it came to the aircraft interior; that passengers would have ended up with severe hearing damage at the end of flights.
Aeroflot are pretty good as well.Amethyst wrote: ↑Fri Aug 14, 2020 7:05 amInteresting video from the West. It does seem to be a totally different plane though, debunking the bullshit that it was a Concorde ripoff. Bigger, higher passenger capacity (different interior design), more powerful engines (Russian's own), specific design to give the heavier aircraft more lift, lots of changes and improvements in general before release for commercial flights. Notably, first crash in testing phase seems to be caused by pilot/crew error. All in all another fine world first achievement by the Ruskies.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:45 pm
Twice; & the Russians got that, honour first too !
Rumour had it; that the design was so Russian, when it came to the aircraft interior; that passengers would have ended up with severe hearing damage at the end of flights.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
It was eventually acknowledged by Tupolev that much of the basic research regarding the delta wing, the drooping nose, etc came from KGB espionage. What they couldn't copy were the control systems - so rather brazenly they actually attempted to purchase them from the UK manufacturer, and were denied after government intervention (theoretically the same systems could have been retro-engineered for military aircraft). There's speculation that the lack of these control systems played a major part in the crashAmethyst wrote: ↑Fri Aug 14, 2020 7:05 amInteresting video from the West. It does seem to be a totally different plane though, debunking the bullshit that it was a Concorde ripoff. Bigger, higher passenger capacity (different interior design), more powerful engines (Russian's own), specific design to give the heavier aircraft more lift, lots of changes and improvements in general before release for commercial flights. Notably, first crash in testing phase seems to be caused by pilot/crew error. All in all another fine world first achievement by the Ruskies.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Thu Aug 13, 2020 6:45 pm
Twice; & the Russians got that, honour first too !
Rumour had it; that the design was so Russian, when it came to the aircraft interior; that passengers would have ended up with severe hearing damage at the end of flights.