I’d be ok with the Saders getting rid of SB actually, if they could get someone with a bit of experience to replace him.Gumboot wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 9:50 amYou're running a bit short on locks, though...
It’s not his hair… it’s just the surname.
I’d be ok with the Saders getting rid of SB actually, if they could get someone with a bit of experience to replace him.Gumboot wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 9:50 amYou're running a bit short on locks, though...
This is utterly immaterial. And the strawman argument "why should a team be penalised for one player's action?". Errr....... because it's a team game. The greatest accountability is to your own team mates and so the greatest deterrent from repeating the kind of cretin stuff we saw from Barrett today and Latu last week.OomStruisbaai wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 9:01 am This game is the example why the 20 min red card should be introduce. The NH farts against it obviously don't watch this. It gave the Saders a chance to win it.
Now you shoot very low. Try againTorquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 10:05 amThis is utterly immaterial. And the strawman argument "why should a team be penalised for one player's action?". Errr....... because it's a team game. The greatest accountability is to your own team mates and so the greatest deterrent from repeating the kind of cretin stuff we saw from Barrett today and Latu last week.OomStruisbaai wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 9:01 am This game is the example why the 20 min red card should be introduce. The NH farts against it obviously don't watch this. It gave the Saders a chance to win it.
How would you know, you NH wanker? Was decimal currency even a thing when you were here last?Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 11:22 am FM. There isn't an Aus side that would pick up a single scoring point against any NZ team in this comp.
Disagree, I can see Reds and Brumbies giving most teams a stir up.Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 11:22 am FM. There isn't an Aus side that would pick up a single scoring point against any NZ team in this comp.
That's fair enough from Robertson. Better technically might mean, for example, using those big lethal shoulders to drive into a guy's midsection rather than his head.Gumboot wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 8:28 pm Interesting, but not surprising, that Robertson's blaming Barrett's red card on some sort of faulty tackling technique.
"He's got to be better technically." Yeah, nah.
Looked to me like Barrett deliberately targeted Hodgman's head and intended to hurt him. He has form, and I hope the filthy cunt cops a lengthy ban.
But Barrett looked like he actually aimed for Hodgman's head, with malicious intent. If so, and I'm struggling to see how it could've been otherwise, you could argue that his technique was perfect.Jimmy Smallsteps wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 8:36 pmThat's fair enough from Robertson. Better technically might mean, for example, using those big lethal shoulders to drive into a guy's midsection rather than his head.Gumboot wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 8:28 pm Interesting, but not surprising, that Robertson's blaming Barrett's red card on some sort of faulty tackling technique.
"He's got to be better technically." Yeah, nah.
Looked to me like Barrett deliberately targeted Hodgman's head and intended to hurt him. He has form, and I hope the filthy cunt cops a lengthy ban.
If I was a coach and my teams captain had a bit of a habit of being a dumb cunt then perhaps I might choose to describe that as a technical issue publicly, just to be diplomatic.Gumboot wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 8:47 pmBut Barrett looked like he actually aimed for Hodgman's head, with malicious intent. If so, and I'm struggling to see how it could've been otherwise, you could argue that his technique was perfect.Jimmy Smallsteps wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 8:36 pmThat's fair enough from Robertson. Better technically might mean, for example, using those big lethal shoulders to drive into a guy's midsection rather than his head.Gumboot wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 8:28 pm Interesting, but not surprising, that Robertson's blaming Barrett's red card on some sort of faulty tackling technique.
"He's got to be better technically." Yeah, nah.
Looked to me like Barrett deliberately targeted Hodgman's head and intended to hurt him. He has form, and I hope the filthy cunt cops a lengthy ban.
Oh absolutely, but I think in this case it sounds bloody ridiculous.Guy Smiley wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 8:51 pmIf I was a coach and my teams captain had a bit of a habit of being a dumb cunt then perhaps I might choose to describe that as a technical issue publicly, just to be diplomatic.
I think a lot of coaches do that.
Until he got red carded in that Bledisloe game I liked to call him the Best Barrett.Gumboot wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 9:01 pmOh absolutely, but I think in this case it sounds bloody ridiculous.Guy Smiley wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 8:51 pmIf I was a coach and my teams captain had a bit of a habit of being a dumb cunt then perhaps I might choose to describe that as a technical issue publicly, just to be diplomatic.
I think a lot of coaches do that.
Anyhoo, is Scott Barrett our dirtiest lock since Filthy Frank back in the 70s?
That Perth red in 2019 was quite similar, although Hooper was lower to the ground iirc. The same "technical issues" as yesterday, though - no attempt to wrap his arms, and a lowered shoulder driven directly into the opponent's head.Guy Smiley wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 9:05 pmUntil he got red carded in that Bledisloe game I liked to call him the Best Barrett.
Now, without googling, I’m pretty sure the eldest sister is the Best Barrett.
It definitely looks as if Razor's experiment in making the filthiest prick in the squad the captain in the expectation that this role will force him to become a cleaner player has failed.Gumboot wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 9:01 pmOh absolutely, but I think in this case it sounds bloody ridiculous.Guy Smiley wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 8:51 pmIf I was a coach and my teams captain had a bit of a habit of being a dumb cunt then perhaps I might choose to describe that as a technical issue publicly, just to be diplomatic.
I think a lot of coaches do that.
Anyhoo, is Scott Barrett our dirtiest lock since Filthy Frank back in the 70s?
No. But slavery was.MungoMan wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 12:12 pmHow would you know, you NH wanker? Was decimal currency even a thing when you were here last?Torquemada 1420 wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 11:22 am FM. There isn't an Aus side that would pick up a single scoring point against any NZ team in this comp.
The tackle was seatbelt, should have been given. Yellow 5 is offside too as he enters the tackle area and is the arm that prevents the grounding.
Vaa'i back into lock.Enzedder wrote: Wed Apr 20, 2022 4:49 am All games are in Melbourne this weekend.
Chiefs up against the Tahs at 8pm Friday NZ Time
Gallagher Chiefs to face Waratahs (Super Round Melbourne)
1. Aidan Ross
2. Samisoni Taukei’aho
3. Angus Ta’avao
4. Josh Lord
5. Tupou Vaa’i
6. Luke Jacobson
7. Sam Cane ©
8. Pita Gus Sowakula
9. Cortez Ratima
10. Bryn Gatland
11. Quinn Tupaea
12. Rameka Poihipi
13. Alex Nankivell
14. Jonah Lowe
15. Chase Tiatia
Reserves: 16. Bradley Slater 17. Ollie Norris 18. George Dyer 19. Naitoa Ah Kuoi 20. Samipeni Finau 21. Xavier Roe 22. Rivez Reihana 23. Inga Finau*