The Brexit Thread

Where goats go to escape
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

tabascoboy wrote: Sun Jun 05, 2022 7:48 am
Fucking morons who voted for more border controls don't like border controls... :bimbo:
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8223
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Insane_Homer wrote: Sun Jun 05, 2022 5:57 pm Hannan and Shapps abandoning HMS Brexshit this weekend.
All just more theater.

Look at what they did in the last session, & what they're planning to do in the next few weeks.

- Raab attacking an Independent Judiciary, & tearing up Human Rights Legislation
- Mad Nadine attacking any vestige of a Free, Fair, & Media Independent
- Patel doing a bloody good job of creating a Police State, & tearing up any pretense of adhering to International agreements on the treatment of Refugees.
- JRM setting up a ticking time bomb to remove 1,500 pieces of Legislation that brought the UK into sync with the EU.

And now they are going to pull the pin on the NIP grenade !

This has been a concerted campaign to destroy any possibility of the UK ever rejoining the EU, or EEA, or SM in any way for a couple of decades !!

This has the fingerprints of Bannon & Scummings all over it; if we can't win, we'll burn it all down.
dpedin
Posts: 2975
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

fishfoodie wrote: Sun Jun 05, 2022 9:03 pm
Insane_Homer wrote: Sun Jun 05, 2022 5:57 pm Hannan and Shapps abandoning HMS Brexshit this weekend.
All just more theater.

Look at what they did in the last session, & what they're planning to do in the next few weeks.

- Raab attacking an Independent Judiciary, & tearing up Human Rights Legislation
- Mad Nadine attacking any vestige of a Free, Fair, & Media Independent
- Patel doing a bloody good job of creating a Police State, & tearing up any pretense of adhering to International agreements on the treatment of Refugees.
- JRM setting up a ticking time bomb to remove 1,500 pieces of Legislation that brought the UK into sync with the EU.

And now they are going to pull the pin on the NIP grenade !

This has been a concerted campaign to destroy any possibility of the UK ever rejoining the EU, or EEA, or SM in any way for a couple of decades !!

This has the fingerprints of Bannon & Scummings all over it; if we can't win, we'll burn it all down.
This!
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8223
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

The cunts are going to do it !
UK bill proposal would override Northern Ireland Protocol

The UK government will introduce a bill that will allow future ministers to fundamentally override the Northern Ireland Protocol by emphasising the UK internal market over the EU single market, RTÉ News understands.

If it became law the bill would overturn many of the principles of the Protocol, in that it would potentially do away with any checks on goods entering Northern Ireland from Great Britain and instead favour in-market surveillance.
...
Several sources briefed on the bill say its provisions could have serious implications for the food and drink industry in Northern Ireland and its all-Ireland dimension, but also for the regulatory arrangements for industrial goods.
...
Under a dual regulatory regime that was not co-designed with the EU, such grain would not be recognised as produced to EU standard, and that would therefore put a question mark over the circulation of Northern Irish dairy products in the Republic.

Industry sources say this could put at risk some 800 million litres of milk from Northern Ireland which is processed annually in the south.
https://www.rte.ie/news/2022/0607/13034 ... uk-market/

Someone needs to let the wealthy Unionist farmers know that if this happens, there won't be any border checks to stop dairy products coming into the EU from NI; there'll just be a complete ban on an Irish business, (and really it's only about a half dozen that do), buying any milk from NI.

If that happens, they'll have a choice of being ruined, or slaughtering the herds it took them decades to build.
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6474
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8223
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

tabascoboy wrote: Thu Jun 09, 2022 7:45 pm
The UK will demand a crown shaped charger port !
dpedin
Posts: 2975
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-61729892

Nothing to do with Brexit of course!
dpedin
Posts: 2975
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

This could be interesting next week?

Tories deliberately kicking off a war with EU again as an attempt to deflect from all their other shit. Nothing better for them than to get the racists and Brexit Ultras all wired up. Between this, Rwanda, imperial measures and creating strikes with marxist(?) trade unions they are going full steam ahead with the recipe that won them the last election - right wing racism, jingoism and getting the wagons into a circle to fight off the foreigners. This aint going to end well for anyone and national strikes over the summer and a trade war with the EU will be a complete disaster followed by a country full of folk unable to heat their houses next winter. To keep the Blonde Bumblecunt in power they are happy to take us all down with them and create division and mayhem in the process.

With the NI Protocol/GFA hopefully the big boys - the EU and the US - will enter the fray and tell the Blonde Bumblecunt and his mad bunch of Brexit Ultras where to get off.

https://news.sky.com/story/legislation- ... l-12632360
User avatar
Hal Jordan
Posts: 4154
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
Location: Sector 2814

Arron Banks loses his SLAPP case against Carole Cadwalladr. Oh dear, how sad, never mind.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 6620
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

Hal Jordan wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 9:30 am Arron Banks loses his SLAPP case against Carole Cadwalladr. Oh dear, how sad, never mind.
Quite!!!
The multimillionaire Brexit backer Arron Banks has lost his libel action against the Observer and Guardian journalist Carole Cadwalladr, which was criticised as an attack on free speech.

Banks, who funded the pro-Brexit Leave.EU campaign group, sued Cadwalladr personally over two instances in which she said the businessman was lying about his relationship with the Russian state – one in a Ted Talk and the other in a tweet.

Her lawyer Gavin Millar QC had argued the case was an attempt to silence the journalist’s reporting on “matters of the highest public interest”, namely campaign finance, foreign money and the use of social media messaging and personal data in the context of the EU referendum.
I like neeps
Posts: 3585
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

dpedin wrote: Sun Jun 12, 2022 11:36 am This could be interesting next week?

Tories deliberately kicking off a war with EU again as an attempt to deflect from all their other shit. Nothing better for them than to get the racists and Brexit Ultras all wired up. Between this, Rwanda, imperial measures and creating strikes with marxist(?) trade unions they are going full steam ahead with the recipe that won them the last election - right wing racism, jingoism and getting the wagons into a circle to fight off the foreigners. This aint going to end well for anyone and national strikes over the summer and a trade war with the EU will be a complete disaster followed by a country full of folk unable to heat their houses next winter. To keep the Blonde Bumblecunt in power they are happy to take us all down with them and create division and mayhem in the process.

With the NI Protocol/GFA hopefully the big boys - the EU and the US - will enter the fray and tell the Blonde Bumblecunt and his mad bunch of Brexit Ultras where to get off.

https://news.sky.com/story/legislation- ... l-12632360
The NI protocol isn't working though because the DUP refuse to sit in the Assembly whilst it exists. As bad as the Tories them lot but not sure what the solution is because we need a functioning assembly in NI.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

EnergiseR2 wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 11:02 am
Hal Jordan wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 9:30 am Arron Banks loses his SLAPP case against Carole Cadwalladr. Oh dear, how sad, never mind.
Yeah that is very enjoyable of a Monday morning

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/202 ... xit-russia
:bimbo: must be so happy, makes my day. :thumbup:
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
Marylandolorian
Posts: 1247
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 2:47 pm
Location: Amerikanuak

Brussels believes any unilateral change may breach international law. It could launch legal action or eventually review the terms of the free trade deal it agreed with Britain.

EU officials have said that Britain will not be allowed to join its 95 billion euro Horizon Europe research programme until outstanding disputes, notably Northern Ireland, are resolved.

U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi has also said there will be no U.S.-UK trade deal if London scraps the protocol
https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/britai ... 022-06-12/
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6474
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街



/Continued
on these islands and between the U.K. and EU.” Acc to statement he said: “it marks a particular low point in the UK’s approach to Brexit, especially as Secretary Truss has not engaged with negotiations with the EU in any meaningful way since Feb.”. ‘Minister Coveney repeated that the protocol is the negotiated solution, ratified by Westminster, to the hard Brexit pursued by the U.K. government.’. ‘The UK’s unilateral approach is not in the best interest of NI and does not have the consent or support of the majority of people or business in Northern Ireland. Far from fixing problems, this legislation will create a whole new set of uncertainties and damage relationships .’
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5961
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Is it almost exactly a year since the UK last unilaterally amended the protocol, to similar howls, before everyone quietly accepted it, realised it was necessary and moved on?
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
dpedin
Posts: 2975
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

I like neeps wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 10:03 am
dpedin wrote: Sun Jun 12, 2022 11:36 am This could be interesting next week?

Tories deliberately kicking off a war with EU again as an attempt to deflect from all their other shit. Nothing better for them than to get the racists and Brexit Ultras all wired up. Between this, Rwanda, imperial measures and creating strikes with marxist(?) trade unions they are going full steam ahead with the recipe that won them the last election - right wing racism, jingoism and getting the wagons into a circle to fight off the foreigners. This aint going to end well for anyone and national strikes over the summer and a trade war with the EU will be a complete disaster followed by a country full of folk unable to heat their houses next winter. To keep the Blonde Bumblecunt in power they are happy to take us all down with them and create division and mayhem in the process.

With the NI Protocol/GFA hopefully the big boys - the EU and the US - will enter the fray and tell the Blonde Bumblecunt and his mad bunch of Brexit Ultras where to get off.

https://news.sky.com/story/legislation- ... l-12632360
The NI protocol isn't working though because the DUP refuse to sit in the Assembly whilst it exists. As bad as the Tories them lot but not sure what the solution is because we need a functioning assembly in NI.
Majority of Assembly MLAs write letter to Blonde Bumblecunt that they want to retain the NI Protocol and are opposed to the NI Protocol amendments. 52 of the 90 sign letter - 58% about the same as he got in VONC last week. Looks like UK will ignore the democratic will of the people and side with the minority DUP.
_Os_
Posts: 2678
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2021 10:19 pm

Paddington Bear wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 2:44 pm Is it almost exactly a year since the UK last unilaterally amended the protocol, to similar howls, before everyone quietly accepted it, realised it was necessary and moved on?
That's not what happened:
https://www.rte.ie/news/analysis-and-co ... -brussels/

As Frost said at the time the UK would "continue to operate the Protocol on the current basis", he did this by extending grace periods indefinitely. Frost also wrote a command paper on the NI protocol last year, which if it brought about any change in UK law on the protocol is only happening now. The EU reaction was to halt (not end) legal action against the UK and continue to try and negotiate, there's been no negotiations since early 2022.

What the UK is doing now is a return to the 2020 Internal Market Bill's original intention (before it was defeated in the Lords and had parts relating to the NI protocol and WA removed), the UK is setting about changing the NI Protocol in UK law with something at least as strong as the original Internal Market Bill.

As with everything Brexit this is an internal Tory party feud, and in this instance also about the leadership ambitions of Truss. If it was about trying to permanently resolve anything there would be a negotiation, but the point is to keep extracting political capital from Brexit, so the Tories cannot allow Brexit to end.

The direction of Brexit is obvious when people like David Davis say it has failed because it was a "Remainer's Brexit". The equation is still the same on NI though, if a border in the Irish Sea is rejected, then it's either a border in the island of Ireland or the whole of the UK aligned with the EU. Most people in NI do not support the border in the island of Ireland option, and if the UK tried to choose that option without actually having a border (this is what the UK seems to want), then the UK would be risking the TCA with the EU.
petej
Posts: 2457
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:41 am
Location: Gwent

Paddington Bear wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 2:44 pm Is it almost exactly a year since the UK last unilaterally amended the protocol, to similar howls, before everyone quietly accepted it, realised it was necessary and moved on?
Did we actually amend the protocol? I thought we gave ourselves the ability to amend it but the government waved their willies around, threatened to a bit and did nothing but it excited their brexitty base. The main aim is to be seen to be doing something, promise jam tomorrow and get the Mick's and bimbo's of the uk all excited.
_Os_
Posts: 2678
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2021 10:19 pm

dpedin wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 3:19 pm
I like neeps wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 10:03 am
dpedin wrote: Sun Jun 12, 2022 11:36 am This could be interesting next week?

Tories deliberately kicking off a war with EU again as an attempt to deflect from all their other shit. Nothing better for them than to get the racists and Brexit Ultras all wired up. Between this, Rwanda, imperial measures and creating strikes with marxist(?) trade unions they are going full steam ahead with the recipe that won them the last election - right wing racism, jingoism and getting the wagons into a circle to fight off the foreigners. This aint going to end well for anyone and national strikes over the summer and a trade war with the EU will be a complete disaster followed by a country full of folk unable to heat their houses next winter. To keep the Blonde Bumblecunt in power they are happy to take us all down with them and create division and mayhem in the process.

With the NI Protocol/GFA hopefully the big boys - the EU and the US - will enter the fray and tell the Blonde Bumblecunt and his mad bunch of Brexit Ultras where to get off.

https://news.sky.com/story/legislation- ... l-12632360
The NI protocol isn't working though because the DUP refuse to sit in the Assembly whilst it exists. As bad as the Tories them lot but not sure what the solution is because we need a functioning assembly in NI.
Majority of Assembly MLAs write letter to Blonde Bumblecunt that they want to retain the NI Protocol and are opposed to the NI Protocol amendments. 52 of the 90 sign letter - 58% about the same as he got in VONC last week. Looks like UK will ignore the democratic will of the people and side with the minority DUP.
The DUP oppose the GFA. Their Brexit positioning only makes sense if their desired outcome is a return to a hard border on the island of Ireland. They've been incredibly stupid throughout the Brexit process, and are now losing support in their heartland areas.

It's not wise of the Tories to follow their lead.
I like neeps
Posts: 3585
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

dpedin wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 3:19 pm
I like neeps wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 10:03 am
dpedin wrote: Sun Jun 12, 2022 11:36 am This could be interesting next week?

Tories deliberately kicking off a war with EU again as an attempt to deflect from all their other shit. Nothing better for them than to get the racists and Brexit Ultras all wired up. Between this, Rwanda, imperial measures and creating strikes with marxist(?) trade unions they are going full steam ahead with the recipe that won them the last election - right wing racism, jingoism and getting the wagons into a circle to fight off the foreigners. This aint going to end well for anyone and national strikes over the summer and a trade war with the EU will be a complete disaster followed by a country full of folk unable to heat their houses next winter. To keep the Blonde Bumblecunt in power they are happy to take us all down with them and create division and mayhem in the process.

With the NI Protocol/GFA hopefully the big boys - the EU and the US - will enter the fray and tell the Blonde Bumblecunt and his mad bunch of Brexit Ultras where to get off.

https://news.sky.com/story/legislation- ... l-12632360
The NI protocol isn't working though because the DUP refuse to sit in the Assembly whilst it exists. As bad as the Tories them lot but not sure what the solution is because we need a functioning assembly in NI.
Majority of Assembly MLAs write letter to Blonde Bumblecunt that they want to retain the NI Protocol and are opposed to the NI Protocol amendments. 52 of the 90 sign letter - 58% about the same as he got in VONC last week. Looks like UK will ignore the democratic will of the people and side with the minority DUP.
Sure but in the terms of the GFA you need unionist parties in government and they reject the protocol. Minority opinion or not, you have a constitutional crisis.
_Os_
Posts: 2678
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2021 10:19 pm

I like neeps wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:06 pm Sure but in the terms of the GFA you need unionist parties in government and they reject the protocol. Minority opinion or not, you have a constitutional crisis.
To protect the GFA, the UK government has decided to support the position of the second largest party (DUP). The DUP being same party that opposes the GFA.

If the UK government imposes a solution most in NI don't want, which is some form of border in the island of Ireland (the logical outcome of no border in the Irish Sea, which is why the DUP don't want a border in the Irish Sea). Then NI will not have a government, because Nationalist parties will walk out. Does the UK government then support Sinn Fein (the largest party) to preserve the GFA after they refuse to form a government? It seems unlikely given Johnson until recently made a point of visiting NI and refusing to speak to Sinn Fein.

The reason this is all dumb from the DUP (and the UK government which supports them, Frost when he was Brexit minister even met with the Loyalist Communities Council, which is an umbrella group for all the Loyalist paramilitaries, this group has withdrawn their support for the GFA). Is because it's a simple majority for a united Ireland to happen, if the shit storm they seem to want actually happens, there won't be a GFA2 that's any better for them.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5961
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

petej wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 3:28 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 2:44 pm Is it almost exactly a year since the UK last unilaterally amended the protocol, to similar howls, before everyone quietly accepted it, realised it was necessary and moved on?
Did we actually amend the protocol? I thought we gave ourselves the ability to amend it but the government waved their willies around, threatened to a bit and did nothing but it excited their brexitty base. The main aim is to be seen to be doing something, promise jam tomorrow and get the Mick's and bimbo's of the uk all excited.
There doesn’t appear to be anyone in a position of influence demanding the end of the extended grace periods and the rigorous implementation of the protocol as written, put it that way.

My prediction is that the Tories will announce something to great fanfare in their side of the press. Their opponents will howl and howl. The proposals will turn out to be much less explosive in reality than either side has briefed. Nancy Pelosi will issue a statement that can best be summarised as ‘sad face’ and the trade deal which will never happen will continue to never happen. And most of us will have forgotten this particular incident within a few weeks.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8223
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Paddington Bear wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:46 pm
petej wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 3:28 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 2:44 pm Is it almost exactly a year since the UK last unilaterally amended the protocol, to similar howls, before everyone quietly accepted it, realised it was necessary and moved on?
Did we actually amend the protocol? I thought we gave ourselves the ability to amend it but the government waved their willies around, threatened to a bit and did nothing but it excited their brexitty base. The main aim is to be seen to be doing something, promise jam tomorrow and get the Mick's and bimbo's of the uk all excited.
There doesn’t appear to be anyone in a position of influence demanding the end of the extended grace periods and the rigorous implementation of the protocol as written, put it that way.

My prediction is that the Tories will announce something to great fanfare in their side of the press. Their opponents will howl and howl. The proposals will turn out to be much less explosive in reality than either side has briefed. Nancy Pelosi will issue a statement that can best be summarised as ‘sad face’ and the trade deal which will never happen will continue to never happen. And most of us will have forgotten this particular incident within a few weeks.
Don't give up your day job.

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/b ... 220012.pdf
_Os_
Posts: 2678
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2021 10:19 pm

Paddington Bear wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:46 pm There doesn’t appear to be anyone in a position of influence demanding the end of the extended grace periods and the rigorous implementation of the protocol as written, put it that way.
There's some problems with this.

1. It depends on the UK not wanting to improve its relationship with the EU which means at a minimum improving the TCA, which means building trust with the EU. The EU has only suspended legal action against the UK, it hasn't agreed with the UK or ended its legal action, there hasn't been enough negotiation for that to happen (because the Tories don't want negotiations or a solution).

2. The Tories are riding the tiger again, it's starting to look like the May years again. Internally the ERG is dictating quite a lot now (the Times reported Johnson opposed Truss on this, and instead backed Gove/Sunak who also opposed her, then he caved and supported Truss). Externally the DUP are dictating their policy on NI and by extension their Brexit policy, the DUP have said this doesn't go far enough and there needs to be action for them to form an NI government, they are still saying "no" to forming a government. Because both the ERG and the DUP gain politically from this situation, neither want it resolved. The ERG is the same ERG who endorsed this deal, every Tory candidate had to pledge their support for it to stand for election, those who refused (the ERG's opponents) were purged. The DUP oppose the GFA and will always do whatever they can to undermine it.

3. It all depends on the EU not reacting, which is something the Tories have no control over. The same Tories who've got absolutely everything wrong on Brexit from "the German car manufacturers will demand a deal" on.
I like neeps
Posts: 3585
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

_Os_ wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:30 pm
I like neeps wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:06 pm Sure but in the terms of the GFA you need unionist parties in government and they reject the protocol. Minority opinion or not, you have a constitutional crisis.
To protect the GFA, the UK government has decided to support the position of the second largest party (DUP). The DUP being same party that opposes the GFA.

If the UK government imposes a solution most in NI don't want, which is some form of border in the island of Ireland (the logical outcome of no border in the Irish Sea, which is why the DUP don't want a border in the Irish Sea). Then NI will not have a government, because Nationalist parties will walk out. Does the UK government then support Sinn Fein (the largest party) to preserve the GFA after they refuse to form a government? It seems unlikely given Johnson until recently made a point of visiting NI and refusing to speak to Sinn Fein.

The reason this is all dumb from the DUP (and the UK government which supports them, Frost when he was Brexit minister even met with the Loyalist Communities Council, which is an umbrella group for all the Loyalist paramilitaries, this group has withdrawn their support for the GFA). Is because it's a simple majority for a united Ireland to happen, if the shit storm they seem to want actually happens, there won't be a GFA2 that's any better for them.
They can't force said party into a government and therefore there would be elections every six months and a totally powerless assembly.

The DUP are clearly idiots. The conservative party are also clearly idiots. But there's a clear problem if you have unionists refuse to go into government and elections twice per year.

Agree with your point above that the DUP nor Tories want a solution they want the forever wars. So unless the ERG lose their seats or the unionists in NI vote for a less hard-line party it won't be resolved.
Last edited by I like neeps on Mon Jun 13, 2022 5:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8223
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

An example of how, this is not just minor tweaks, but wanton vandalism, & specifically designed to provoke Dublin, & Brussels

Read this carefully.
(3) Regulations under this Act may not create or facilitate border arrangements
between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland which feature at the
border—
(a) physical infrastructure (including border posts), or
(b) checks and controls,

which did not exist before exit day.
Now at first glance you may say; well we never planned on building any border posts, so what's the big deal ?

But that's not whats happening. The DUP took control over the DoA in NI, & Poots was the Minister, & he was conspicuous by his inaction on putting into place the border controls the NIP is all about, to the point where his Officials were afraid that they were breaking the law by not proceeding.

So now, this Bill is actually making it, illegal, for anyone to put in place the infrastructure necessary to do the inspections that the UK agreed to !
_Os_
Posts: 2678
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2021 10:19 pm

I like neeps wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 5:41 pm They can't force said party into a government and therefore there would be elections every six months and a totally powerless assembly.

The DUP are clearly idiots. The conservative party are also clearly idiots. But there's a clear problem if you have unionists refuse to go into government and elections twice per year.
If that's what the DUP wants and thinks that will strengthen the argument for NI remaining part of the UK and make it much more easier arguing for the Union. Then they must go for it.

If you search their social media, it's not hard finding out what they're about. Up to Unionists if they support that and think it helps them.

I like neeps
Posts: 3585
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

_Os_ wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 5:51 pm
I like neeps wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 5:41 pm They can't force said party into a government and therefore there would be elections every six months and a totally powerless assembly.

The DUP are clearly idiots. The conservative party are also clearly idiots. But there's a clear problem if you have unionists refuse to go into government and elections twice per year.
If that's what the DUP wants and thinks that will strengthen the argument for NI remaining part of the UK and make it much more easier arguing for the Union. Then they must go for it.

If you search their social media, it's not hard finding out what they're about. Up to Unionists if they support that and think it helps them.

I agree.

Anyway this plan is stupid it won't get the Tories anymore support and none of the brexit press want to report on it. You can't campaign and celebrate that you "will get/did get brexit done" and then try and win support on renegotiations.
dpedin
Posts: 2975
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

I like neeps wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:06 pm
dpedin wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 3:19 pm
I like neeps wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 10:03 am

The NI protocol isn't working though because the DUP refuse to sit in the Assembly whilst it exists. As bad as the Tories them lot but not sure what the solution is because we need a functioning assembly in NI.
Majority of Assembly MLAs write letter to Blonde Bumblecunt that they want to retain the NI Protocol and are opposed to the NI Protocol amendments. 52 of the 90 sign letter - 58% about the same as he got in VONC last week. Looks like UK will ignore the democratic will of the people and side with the minority DUP.
Sure but in the terms of the GFA you need unionist parties in government and they reject the protocol. Minority opinion or not, you have a constitutional crisis.
I think we all know that!

However the support from the majority of the democratically elected MLAs, who were only voted for weeks ago by the NI population, for the NIP hardly makes the 'necessity' case the UK Gov are suggesting! Given it is the implementation of the NIP which the UK Gov helped write, voted for and won a GE on the back off and is fully supported by the majority of NI elected officials, NI business leaders and organisations it is going to be very difficult for the UK Gov to win any legal argument for its current draft legislation. The Tories have set a dangerous precedent in NI in siding with the DUP nutters and using their failure to form an assembly as an argument for breaking an international treaty and international law - just think the fun other dodgy Govs can have in using the same argument! Putin for one will be thinking he can use the same UK Gov argument for his 'liberation' of the Russian minority in the Dombas. Utter madness.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8223
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

dpedin wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 6:58 pm
I like neeps wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 4:06 pm
dpedin wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 3:19 pm

Majority of Assembly MLAs write letter to Blonde Bumblecunt that they want to retain the NI Protocol and are opposed to the NI Protocol amendments. 52 of the 90 sign letter - 58% about the same as he got in VONC last week. Looks like UK will ignore the democratic will of the people and side with the minority DUP.
Sure but in the terms of the GFA you need unionist parties in government and they reject the protocol. Minority opinion or not, you have a constitutional crisis.
I think we all know that!

However the support from the majority of the democratically elected MLAs, who were only voted for weeks ago by the NI population, for the NIP hardly makes the 'necessity' case the UK Gov are suggesting! Given it is the implementation of the NIP which the UK Gov helped write, voted for and won a GE on the back off and is fully supported by the majority of NI elected officials, NI business leaders and organisations it is going to be very difficult for the UK Gov to win any legal argument for its current draft legislation. The Tories have set a dangerous precedent in NI in siding with the DUP nutters and using their failure to form an assembly as an argument for breaking an international treaty and international law - just think the fun other dodgy Govs can have in using the same argument! Putin for one will be thinking he can use the same UK Gov argument for his 'liberation' of the Russian minority in the Dombas. Utter madness.
Will they stop fucking with the NIP, if Sinn Fein, refuse to enter Stormont without the NIP ?

I don't fucking think so !
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4196
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

Lot of folks here making the mistake of thinking "DUP = unionism". DUP are only one of the unionist parties.
_Os_
Posts: 2678
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2021 10:19 pm

Uncle fester wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 7:49 pm Lot of folks here making the mistake of thinking "DUP = unionism". DUP are only one of the unionist parties.
The UUP's position has been all over the place. They originally supported Remain then later switched to support Brexit (I definitely remember some pro-Remain stuff from them at some point). They supported the NI Protocol, finding technical ways to improve it but not rejecting it. Then they were part of the joint unionist letter rejecting the Protocol outright. I think the point you're making is all unionist parties oppose the Protocol, but with the UUP it seems to be more that they're chasing a constituency that may no longer exist they seem to want attract moderate unionist voters but can't find any, so get desperate and chase the same voters the DUP and TUV are chasing and fail there too (because they're not the DUP or TUV).

In the NI election they lost vote share and won the lowest amount of seats they ever have in a Stormont election. Alliance ate their lunch.
Last edited by _Os_ on Mon Jun 13, 2022 8:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6474
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

Well Truss wants to discuss this with the Tea-Sock so hope's not lost yet

User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8223
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

The Governments, legal argument of, “necessity”, is fucked !
The State must also establish, as the government accepts, that it has not substantially contributed to the situation of necessity.
Uh Oh !
Anderson links to a digest of the applicable law which sets out the four conditions that all have to be met together:

– the State’s act is to safeguard an essential interest against a peril; (1)
– the peril shall be grave and imminent; (2)
– the course of action followed shall be the only way available; and (3)
– no other essential interest shall be seriously impaired as a result of the breach. (4)
1. What fucking Peril ?
2. What fucking, imminent, Peril ?
3. Article 16 ????
4. Well there's just the 60% of the population that disagree ! ... and the EU, Ireland, the US .....

https://davidallengreen.com/2022/06/the ... -no-sense/

In summary; they went shopping for a Lionel Hutz, & they found one; but that doesn't make the opinion they bought, any more correct.
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6474
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

fishfoodie wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 12:09 am The Governments, legal argument of, “necessity”, is fucked !
The State must also establish, as the government accepts, that it has not substantially contributed to the situation of necessity.
Uh Oh !
Anderson links to a digest of the applicable law which sets out the four conditions that all have to be met together:

– the State’s act is to safeguard an essential interest against a peril; (1)
– the peril shall be grave and imminent; (2)
– the course of action followed shall be the only way available; and (3)
– no other essential interest shall be seriously impaired as a result of the breach. (4)
1. What fucking Peril ?
2. What fucking, imminent, Peril ?
3. Article 16 ????
4. Well there's just the 60% of the population that disagree ! ... and the EU, Ireland, the US .....

https://davidallengreen.com/2022/06/the ... -no-sense/

In summary; they went shopping for a Lionel Hutz, & they found one; but that doesn't make the opinion they bought, any more correct.
The peril of needing forms to move sausages from GB to N Ireland, clearly
Rhubarb & Custard
Posts: 2097
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm

fishfoodie wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 12:09 am

In summary; they went shopping for a Lionel Hutz, & they found one; but that doesn't make the opinion they bought, any more correct.
Word is they literally found one after shopping globally for anyone who'd put up a legal argument they felt they could use, and the only one they found was a weirdo Trump fan

It's not even 8 out of 10 lawyers don't like the reasoning Truss is relying on, it's much, much worse than that
User avatar
Hal Jordan
Posts: 4154
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
Location: Sector 2814

tabascoboy wrote: Mon Jun 13, 2022 8:57 pm Well Truss wants to discuss this with the Tea-Sock so hope's not lost yet

The Irish had Thin Lizzy, we get Thick Lizzy.

(Stolen)

I see Commercial barrister (and Conservative Councillor, curiously never mentioned by him or when being introduced) Steven Barrett is spouting shite all over the place about international law, which he has no experience of. It's the equivalent of an electrician being held out as an authority on plumbing.
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
dpedin
Posts: 2975
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

Biffer wrote: Tue Jun 14, 2022 2:44 pm


Just trying to be helpful!
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

Gammonaty apoplectic this morning that the Rwanda flight didn't go ahead, because apparently that's what they voted for (hint, they didn't). While also spewing mass ignorance of what the EHCR is (It's not an EU court), why it was setup & by his party, their esteemed leaders hero (Churchill) and that his grandfather (James Fawcett, lefty lawyer) was the president(for 9 years) of said org.

Meanwhile is 2016....
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/b ... on-8033527
Passionate Boris Johnson defends European Convention on Human Rights
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Post Reply