Stop voting for fucking Tories
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6475
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
So we now have a Health Secretary who appears clinically obese...
For a couple of weeks or a month at best maybe until the cost of living increases other than energy start biting in the autumn.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
The shite she trotted out about "This country was built by people with the strength and determination ... to get us through all the storms we face" made me feel we're going to get another (checks calendar) 27 months of tired old bollocks harking back to a fantasy version of WW2 now only maintained in the minds of boomers who watch The Dambusters every weekend.
Mind you she had just met the Queen, so who knows. Maybe Liz suggested she put that bit in.
Mind you she had just met the Queen, so who knows. Maybe Liz suggested she put that bit in.
If that can be maintained it's a landslide Tory defeat.
I'm in two minds. On the one hand Tory core support is very large (I've posted about this before, the short version is, for many English people supporting the Tories is core to their identity, this isn't as true with Labour for example under Corbyn they sunk to 20%-ish in polls), so they could add a few % and then have half a chance in a GE. On the other hand opposition is very entrenched against the Tories now, Sunak throwing money everywhere didn't really boost Tory support after mid-2020, Labour support started growing from mid-2021 and the Tories declined.
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
I don't think we should fat shame her.tabascoboy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 4:22 pm So we now have a Health Secretary who appears clinically obese...
We should shame her for being an utterly uncaring person who suppressed multiple reports (9?) into the effect of Tory benefits policy causing hardship up to and including death of claimants, and generally being a terrible human being.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
I was struck by her saying she was going to; "get Britain working again.”.Hal Jordan wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 6:32 pm The shite she trotted out about "This country was built by people with the strength and determination ... to get us through all the storms we face" made me feel we're going to get another (checks calendar) 27 months of tired old bollocks harking back to a fantasy version of WW2 now only maintained in the minds of boomers who watch The Dambusters every weekend.
Mind you she had just met the Queen, so who knows. Maybe Liz suggested she put that bit in.
It's just such a staggeringly moronic thing to say on so many levels.
Doesn't she know you have what Economists consider Full Employment, & that those same Economists, & Business leaders of every type are struggling to recruit people, & there are hundreds, & hundreds of thousands of Vacancies ?
Does she realize that any promises to fix the NHS, or invest in infrastructure are totally fucking meaningless, if there's no-one to fill positions in the NHS, or drive rock trucks, or lay bricks, etc, etc.
And if she gives a shit about leveling up, or helping people out of poverty; then the problem isn't that people aren't working; it's that the people who are working aren't getting a living wage, or there isn't enough people with the skills to fill the vacancies; & these people don't exist, because the Tories have done a shit job at delivering training, & education; & have let the economy rely on foreign labour, & then gone for the hardest possible Brexit, & fucked businesses.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
It’ll be ffykin disgraceful if whatever solution they come up with is given to the rich and poor.
It's almost enough to make you vote yes.tabascoboy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 4:22 pm So we now have a Health Secretary who appears clinically obese...
She is also a strong anti-abortionist, not quite as extreme and vocal as Rees-Mogg, but not really what want a Health Secretaryh to stand forHal Jordan wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 7:48 pmI don't think we should fat shame her.tabascoboy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 4:22 pm So we now have a Health Secretary who appears clinically obese...
We should shame her for being an utterly uncaring person who suppressed multiple reports (9?) into the effect of Tory benefits policy causing hardship up to and including death of claimants, and generally being a terrible human being.
Her name suggests she is of strong Irish Catholic stock, the anti abortion and anti same sex equality stances aren't surprising, if repugnant.
Catholicism doesn't have exclusive rights on the bigotry, of course
-
- Posts: 3586
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
Hopefully they try it. The tide has turned in the US against Republicans in a number of states because of these policies and the Tories could mobilise the female vote for labour with going after abortion.SaintK wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 7:51 amShe is also a strong anti-abortionist, not quite as extreme and vocal as Rees-Mogg, but not really what want a Health Secretaryh to stand forHal Jordan wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 7:48 pmI don't think we should fat shame her.tabascoboy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 4:22 pm So we now have a Health Secretary who appears clinically obese...
We should shame her for being an utterly uncaring person who suppressed multiple reports (9?) into the effect of Tory benefits policy causing hardship up to and including death of claimants, and generally being a terrible human being.
Looks like we have a very right wing, idealogically Gov driven by ERG and some pretty dodgy fundamentalists then. The most worrying thing to me is the appointment of economic advisors from Taxpayers Alliance and Institute of Economic Affairs. We know these guys are going to follow the Britannia Unchained philosophy and their disaster capitalist model as outlined by JRM's father. Both TA and IEA keep their funding sources close to their chests but it is widely expected that some very dark and dodgy money from extreme right wing US players is involved probably including the likes of Theil et al, who by the way was a great admirer of JRM Snr's books. With the likes of Truss as PM and her author buddy Kwarteng as Chancellor advised by IEA and TA advisors the coup is now complete. Expect tax cuts, decimated public services, destruction of the civil service leadership, selling off of NHS, trade war with EU, deregulation on a massive scale, inflation, interest rates raises which will cause of housing collapse, recession and then a depression and mass unemployment. They have put in place the zealots and the compliant idiots who will do as they are told and who will happily drive through the disaster. To these guys all these things are necessary for the 'green roots' of true capitalism to sprout and grow and for the Sovereign Individual to flourish, although there will be some 'collateral damage' ie most of us, along the way.
The Blonde Bumblecunt was the useless idiot who they used to gain power and get the foothold in Gov. Once it was clear he wasn't going to deliver much more than he had and probably was a bit reluctant to lead the country into the planned disaster (it would have harmed his legacy which was his key objective) then they got rid of him. He was expendable in the wider master plan. However I suspect his reference to Cincinnatus was more about having to come back and rescue the Tory party from these zealots, his reference to the change in the rules was again a reference to him being shafted by his right wing colleagues who broke their promises and ditched him to get the more pliable and driven Truss in power. Even he recognises they will go too far and cause irreparable damage to the UK and he will get dragged into the resulting turmoil.
We have a very very dangerous couple of years to navigate, this winter will be a struggle, and once again we are depending upon the saner and more responsible Tories, are their any left, in parliament to control this bunch of economic and social terrorists. I don't hold out much hope for them rising to the challenge. The nutters are following the plan as described in the Sovereign Individual and Britannia Unchained, don't say you weren't warned. Buckle up!
The Blonde Bumblecunt was the useless idiot who they used to gain power and get the foothold in Gov. Once it was clear he wasn't going to deliver much more than he had and probably was a bit reluctant to lead the country into the planned disaster (it would have harmed his legacy which was his key objective) then they got rid of him. He was expendable in the wider master plan. However I suspect his reference to Cincinnatus was more about having to come back and rescue the Tory party from these zealots, his reference to the change in the rules was again a reference to him being shafted by his right wing colleagues who broke their promises and ditched him to get the more pliable and driven Truss in power. Even he recognises they will go too far and cause irreparable damage to the UK and he will get dragged into the resulting turmoil.
We have a very very dangerous couple of years to navigate, this winter will be a struggle, and once again we are depending upon the saner and more responsible Tories, are their any left, in parliament to control this bunch of economic and social terrorists. I don't hold out much hope for them rising to the challenge. The nutters are following the plan as described in the Sovereign Individual and Britannia Unchained, don't say you weren't warned. Buckle up!
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Pie give the Yanks a State of the Nation
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5963
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
I suppose we should all pretend not to remember that Pie was happy shilling for the Russian state until it became socially embarrassing.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11158
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Yup. Pointed out on FB that she's the ideal candidate for Health Sectabascoboy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 4:22 pm So we now have a Health Secretary who appears clinically obese...
a) She's totally unhealthy.
b) She's a hardcore Catholic who does not believe in abortion and voted against abortion rights in NI. She thinks anyone seeing a GP for multiple abortions should have mandatory referral to mental health and the abortion window cut to 12 weeks. And she's now in charge of the nation's womens' health? I assume Gary Glitter is pencilled in for head of child welfare?
-
- Posts: 3586
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
She isn't though - if she wanted to make changes to abortion law it would be in an act of parliament and that would either be voted down or electorally very punishing. So it just won't happen...Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 10:24 amYup. Pointed out on FB that she's the ideal candidate for Health Sectabascoboy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 4:22 pm So we now have a Health Secretary who appears clinically obese...
a) She's totally unhealthy.
b) She's a hardcore Catholic who does not believe in abortion and voted against abortion rights in NI. She thinks anyone seeing a GP for multiple abortions should have mandatory referral to mental health and the abortion window cut to 12 weeks. And she's now in charge of the nation's womens' health? I assume Gary Glitter is pencilled in for head of child welfare?
From what I can gather Walker's Pie character appeared on Russia Today for several months in early 2016.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 9:45 am I suppose we should all pretend not to remember that Pie was happy shilling for the Russian state until it became socially embarrassing.
He's described himself as being naïve because RT offered him total control of his content where others didn't. He said it was a bit like Steve Coogan working for Sky
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5963
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Tichtheid wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 10:40 amFrom what I can gather Walker's Pie character appeared on Russia Today for several months in early 2016.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 9:45 am I suppose we should all pretend not to remember that Pie was happy shilling for the Russian state until it became socially embarrassing.
He's described himself as being naïve because RT offered him total control of his content where others didn't. He said it was a bit like Steve Coogan working for Sky
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 10:59 amsmug pictureTichtheid wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 10:40 amFrom what I can gather Walker's Pie character appeared on Russia Today for several months in early 2016.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 9:45 am I suppose we should all pretend not to remember that Pie was happy shilling for the Russian state until it became socially embarrassing.
He's described himself as being naïve because RT offered him total control of his content where others didn't. He said it was a bit like Steve Coogan working for Sky
The part about Coogan is an opinion, is the first part factually incorrect?
I honestly don't know because I've only been aware of Pie for three years or so.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5963
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Sky are not comparable to Russia Today, pretty blindingly obvious.Tichtheid wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:01 amPaddington Bear wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 10:59 amsmug pictureTichtheid wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 10:40 am
From what I can gather Walker's Pie character appeared on Russia Today for several months in early 2016.
He's described himself as being naïve because RT offered him total control of his content where others didn't. He said it was a bit like Steve Coogan working for Sky
The part about Coogan is an opinion, is the first part factually incorrect?
I honestly don't know because I've only been aware of Pie for three years or so.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:02 amSky are not comparable to Russia Today, pretty blindingly obvious.
Is the first part about how long he appeared on RT and how long ago correct?
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5963
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
No idea, I'm not his agentTichtheid wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:03 amPaddington Bear wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:02 amSky are not comparable to Russia Today, pretty blindingly obvious.
Is the first part about how long he appeared on RT and how long ago correct?
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Perhaps not but you were desperate to discredit him because of the association with RT, or at least it read that way.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:07 amNo idea, I'm not his agentTichtheid wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:03 amPaddington Bear wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:02 am
Sky are not comparable to Russia Today, pretty blindingly obvious.
Is the first part about how long he appeared on RT and how long ago correct?
He appeared on RT six years ago so he can't criticise the Tories.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5963
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
More he took Russian State money so he can fuck right off when talking about integrity and the current state we're inTichtheid wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:11 amPerhaps not but you were desperate to discredit him because of the association with RT, or at least it read that way.
He appeared on RT six years ago so he can't criticise the Tories.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:17 amMore he took Russian State money so he can fuck right off when talking about integrity and the current state we're in
If Putin himself said that Johnson was a liar and had been sacked for it multiple times it would still be true, wouldn't it?
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6475
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
Well not strictly true since she did at least tweet
Listening to PMQ's Truss' plans sound even more crazy.
We have put ourselves in an incredibly uncompetitive environment with Brexit yet she seems to think we are going to succeed with a few tax cuts to attract massive investment in a hugely competitive global market.
The maddest thing of all is that we are in this crisis now, it is an immediate threat, but this plan of hers, which might make more sense in better times, won't deliver anything for years to come. What is she expecting? Giant international firms to locate to a country on the fringes of the EU, employ workers that don't exist and tax receipts and spending to come flooding in to get us out of this, all in the next few weeks?
It's fucking crazy.
We have put ourselves in an incredibly uncompetitive environment with Brexit yet she seems to think we are going to succeed with a few tax cuts to attract massive investment in a hugely competitive global market.
The maddest thing of all is that we are in this crisis now, it is an immediate threat, but this plan of hers, which might make more sense in better times, won't deliver anything for years to come. What is she expecting? Giant international firms to locate to a country on the fringes of the EU, employ workers that don't exist and tax receipts and spending to come flooding in to get us out of this, all in the next few weeks?
It's fucking crazy.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
She's done a lot more than write a poorly argued book with him, Google the unredacted leaked Tory whip's blackmail list from 2017.
A lot of the UK media is deep into some crazy manufacturing consent bullshit. They're not reporting a lot of the facts, and when they are they're saying bad things are actually good (Truss has installed her close personal friend as deputy PM for example). All her cabinet selections are pure nepotism, none of it shows any political ability, there's no positions given to some opponents to keep them happier for longer. There's already some talk of 12 Tory MPs preparing to send in no confidence letters, around 90 Tory MPs turned up to wave Johnson goodbye.
As for all the libertarian freaks and the rest of your post. No doubt they've fully taken over the UK government now. Problem for them is, in the UK libertarianism is just an excuse for rich people to not pay taxes (seems to be going that way in the US also?). It's bullshit and has no support from the public in the UK, polls instead show most people want nationalisation of various utilities/services. Most people in the UK want a bigger state. Not many believe Truss when she says cutting taxes will fix everything and make everyone wealthy. Truss and the Britain Unchained crowd have no plan to deliver the high skilled jobs they talk about or "level up", or any of it. Which maybe means the libertarian freakshow will limit their destruction to mass corruption as has now become normal, they gobbled up billions during the Covid crisis, looks like they're going to gobble up more billions during the energy crisis. Tends to be how corruption works, it's self perpetuating and grows in scale.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11158
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
No. It won't. But does not alter her complete inappropriateness for the role.I like neeps wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 10:32 am She isn't though - if she wanted to make changes to abortion law it would be in an act of parliament and that would either be voted down or electorally very punishing. So it just won't happen...
I don't see this government lasting long. That's two weak leaders in succession who have picked their cabinets based on rewards/personal loyalty rather than on building a broad base within the parliamentary party. There are no 'big beasts' left in the cabinet who will do the hard yards for Truss._Os_ wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 12:08 pm
A lot of the UK media is deep into some crazy manufacturing consent bullshit. They're not reporting a lot of the facts, and when they are they're saying bad things are actually good (Truss has installed her close personal friend as deputy PM for example). All her cabinet selections are pure nepotism, none of it shows any political ability, there's no positions given to some opponents to keep them happier for longer. There's already some talk of 12 Tory MPs preparing to send in no confidence letters, around 90 Tory MPs turned up to wave Johnson goodbye.
At PMQ's, Ann-Marie Trevelyen (who I've met several times in her previous trade role and was fucking useless) was name checked but was too busy on her phone to realise Truss was speaking directly to her.robmatic wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 12:37 pmI don't see this government lasting long. That's two weak leaders in succession who have picked their cabinets based on rewards/personal loyalty rather than on building a broad base within the parliamentary party. There are no 'big beasts' left in the cabinet who will do the hard yards for Truss._Os_ wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 12:08 pm
A lot of the UK media is deep into some crazy manufacturing consent bullshit. They're not reporting a lot of the facts, and when they are they're saying bad things are actually good (Truss has installed her close personal friend as deputy PM for example). All her cabinet selections are pure nepotism, none of it shows any political ability, there's no positions given to some opponents to keep them happier for longer. There's already some talk of 12 Tory MPs preparing to send in no confidence letters, around 90 Tory MPs turned up to wave Johnson goodbye.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
-
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
Would that also apply to Boris, and the ERG in general?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 11:17 am
More he took Russian State money so he can fuck right off when talking about integrity and the current state we're in