NAMA NAMA NAMA

Where goats go to escape
.OverThere
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:27 pm

Camroc2 wrote: Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:15 pm
CM11 wrote: Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:12 pm Would love some more detail on the hospital admissions. ICU is pretty much at its lowest, which is great. So are the hospital admissions observation/precautionary? We've had a fair few over the last week or two but no lengthy stays.
I imagine it is precautionary when patients develop any sort of chest problem.
Cam, do you remember the good old days. They used to shove everyone into hospital. They used to then piss around for a week before deciding that person is sick because of covid. So different now.
Munster man!!!!!
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Aug 03, 2020 1:32 pm

I hope the fuck this governament sort out their shit, mainly start pulling the same way and grow a fucking pair of balls.
dob
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:17 pm

CM11 wrote: Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:15 pm Ok, I'll buy dangling a bit of action isn't new but there's way more substance/interesting dialogue in the older movies. I guess it's primarily down to it being easier to film realistic action scenes for the most part.
Wrong login, Duff.
HGMTSP
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2020 9:25 pm

Woulf toast.

Cowan, Enda & Springer took one look at the arrangements re dinner & buggered off.

Several more non Pol heads to roll.
Duff Paddy
Posts: 289
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:55 am

Munster man!!!!! wrote: Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:25 pm I hope the fuck this governament sort out their shit, mainly start pulling the same way and grow a fucking pair of balls.
I’d like to win the lotto this weekend too
Duff Paddy
Posts: 289
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:55 am

HGMTSP wrote: Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:36 pm Woulf toast.

Cowan, Enda & Springer took one look at the arrangements re dinner & buggered off.

Several more non Pol heads to roll.
I reckon he’ll dig in. The judiciary aren’t responsible to the public or the media in this country. Two big scalps already gone and but the mob is insatiable. A proper witch hunt. In the future we’ll just see them do a Cummings because it’s obvious the mob will never he happy.
Duff Paddy
Posts: 289
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:55 am

Camroc2 wrote: Wed Aug 26, 2020 10:17 pm You can legitimately give out about our "direct provision" system for refugees, but at least it means we don't end up with cases like this :

https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-gl ... t-53904251
That’s frankly sick. The Tory boys have a lot to answer for. Food banks in a country as wealthy as the UK is shameful.
User avatar
EnergiseR
Posts: 284
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:49 pm

Spent 20 minutes last night deleting IT, NYT, etc etc apps and all the news pages from Facebook. Will just use that for messages from distant friends. See how it goes but I am done with the IT trolling me and the fringes on facebag ranting about their shitty lives
ticketlessinseattle
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:00 pm

lads it sucks that we lost the EU Trade Commissioner Post but Hogan is the one that shot himself in the foot, reloaded and shot the other one ; if he had got out in front of the story earlier, did a complete mea culpa, not blamed the hotel, confessed to everything I think he would have made it. Plenty on here including myself laughed our arses off at Dominic Cummings and Boris and the attitude of the people in power vs the general public - I'm not a fan but Darragh Calleary seemed to have understood what he did and realised that's its unacceptable to tell the public one thing and do the complete opposite ; I don't know if many on here have lost their jobs or businesses due to the pandemic- if you're one of these people, someone who has lost an old fella, mother and can't attend their funeral then what kind of reaction do you expect ? plenty of people out there be they in jail, fired etc can say they only made a mistake ; sometimes you can get away with it, sometimes you cant.

and to be clear, I wish Hogan had been able to manage the narrative better and retained the post and Sinn Fein have no moral high ground on this one. Time to move on....to the next foot shooting event
User avatar
EnergiseR
Posts: 284
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:49 pm

Bullshit. It's about proportionality. You don't lose that position at this moment because of somebody flootering around the place.
ticketlessinseattle
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:00 pm

EnergiseR wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 9:17 am Bullshit. It's about proportionality. You don't lose that position at this moment because of somebody flootering around the place.
agreed, he's some fcukin ejit
User avatar
The sun god
Posts: 176
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 6:40 am
Location: It's nice in Nice.

Is it no wonder the fucking Brits shit on us for 800 years. Our leaders are spineless, mob appeasing wimps.
I wonder who the lesbian shinner types will blame when the economy goes tits up after we get a Royal Fcuking post transition.
ticketlessinseattle
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:00 pm

that crazy man Cormac Lucey had an interesting article about a UK government study about QALYs (quality adjusted life years) gained in the UK by implementing the lockdown (530,000 directly and 30,000 due to avoided road deaths) vs lost (41k reduced access to A&E) 73,000 postponement of surgeries....assorted others adding up to 600,000 lost ; basically about the same number of lives lost vs gained.

I await a similar discussion on prime time

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... age-48.pdf
Duff Paddy
Posts: 289
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:55 am

ticketlessinseattle wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 9:43 am that crazy man Cormac Lucey had an interesting article about a UK government study about QALYs (quality adjusted life years) gained in the UK by implementing the lockdown (530,000 directly and 30,000 due to avoided road deaths) vs lost (41k reduced access to A&E) 73,000 postponement of surgeries....assorted others adding up to 600,000 lost ; basically about the same number of lives lost vs gained.

I await a similar discussion on prime time

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... age-48.pdf
From an economic point of view I see how locking down a young population to protect the over 80’s doesn’t make much sense
User avatar
CM11
Posts: 973
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:24 am

https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/out ... 82114.html

I presume this worker has already been fired and awaits public execution (which seems proportional to what's happened with Hogan and Co.)

Or will they garner sympathy for being pressurised into working due to being low paid? Hmmmmm.
User avatar
HighKingLeinster
Posts: 250
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:19 pm

CM11 wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 10:10 am https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/out ... 82114.html

I presume this worker has already been fired and awaits public execution (which seems proportional to what's happened with Hogan and Co.)

Or will they garner sympathy for being pressurised into working due to being low paid? Hmmmmm.
Arragh Joe shure it wasnt her fault. the fatcats wouldnt pay her any sick leave and shure she had no choice but to do a bih of graft. We're penalisin hard workers so that fat prick Hogan can galivant around the country
Image
Duff Paddy
Posts: 289
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:55 am

CM11 wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 10:10 am https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/out ... 82114.html

I presume this worker has already been fired and awaits public execution (which seems proportional to what's happened with Hogan and Co.)

Or will they garner sympathy for being pressurised into working due to being low paid? Hmmmmm.
Now that is genuinely criminal - knowing you’re infected and going to work amongst the most vulnerable cohort of people in our society. What the hell was she thinking - the guards should be involved there that is beyond negligent that is willfull endangerment
User avatar
CM11
Posts: 973
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:24 am

Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 11:31 am
CM11 wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 10:10 am https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/out ... 82114.html

I presume this worker has already been fired and awaits public execution (which seems proportional to what's happened with Hogan and Co.)

Or will they garner sympathy for being pressurised into working due to being low paid? Hmmmmm.
Now that is genuinely criminal - knowing you’re infected and going to work amongst the most vulnerable cohort of people in our society. What the hell was she thinking - the guards should be involved there that is beyond negligent that is willfull endangerment
Yep. But halfway down the page on the independent site, not being shouted from the rooftops.
User avatar
EnergiseR
Posts: 284
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:49 pm

The three horsewomen of the apocalypse in the IT won't go after her so she is safe. Bit of online grumbling about her probably being foreign by lads who also vote Shinner will be the height of it. We are through the looking glass and have been for a while. We would have needed a strong leader who went after the media representation of governance but we got Leo and mushy Micheál. I was looking at a review of the new film on Disney + about the gorilla and one of the reviews from Denise read something like 'You have made enough money and should give this channel free to all the homeless kids'. This is where we are and I bet you any money Una and Kitty and all the other gimps agree with the bold Denise
Duff Paddy
Posts: 289
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:55 am

I’d be a lot happier with political leadership that never went on twitter. I know they think they need to be on social media. They really don’t. They could completely avoid it and it would make fuck all difference to them.
User avatar
CM11
Posts: 973
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:24 am

Agreed. Think Leo thought he'd be able to convince enough young people he was down with the kids but it's really doing nothing positive for him.
User avatar
Holy Moly
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:05 am

Lazy journalists seem to gleam commentary and public opinion from Twitter, so maybe some politicians think they need to provide narrative. Unfortunately it's an absolute cesspit of entrails with the shinner bots and their echo chamber completely dominating any political discourse, there's no escaping it.
User avatar
HighKingLeinster
Posts: 250
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:19 pm

So my sister in law sent her 6 year old back to school today. within an hour the school phoned to say he had a cough and needed to go home (cough is related to an issue from a few months ago and not Covid).

They phoned the doctor who confirmed that it was unlikely to be Covid and he should attend school. however he would not provide a note stating this. they phoned the school and said that the doctor was willing to speak to the principal if they phoned but could/would not provide a note. principal refused to phone and said child would not be allowed back without a doctors note.

Farcical
Image
Duff Paddy
Posts: 289
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:55 am

HighKingLeinster wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 3:26 pm So my sister in law sent her 6 year old back to school today. within an hour the school phoned to say he had a cough and needed to go home (cough is related to an issue from a few months ago and not Covid).

They phoned the doctor who confirmed that it was unlikely to be Covid and he should attend school. however he would not provide a note stating this. they phoned the school and said that the doctor was willing to speak to the principal if they phoned but could/would not provide a note. principal refused to phone and said child would not be allowed back without a doctors note.

Farcical
Principal is being a stupid fucker as he knows the GP can’t put it in writing without a covid test.
User avatar
lilyw
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:53 pm

Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 3:33 pm
HighKingLeinster wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 3:26 pm So my sister in law sent her 6 year old back to school today. within an hour the school phoned to say he had a cough and needed to go home (cough is related to an issue from a few months ago and not Covid).

They phoned the doctor who confirmed that it was unlikely to be Covid and he should attend school. however he would not provide a note stating this. they phoned the school and said that the doctor was willing to speak to the principal if they phoned but could/would not provide a note. principal refused to phone and said child would not be allowed back without a doctors note.

Farcical
Principal is being a stupid fucker as he knows the GP can’t put it in writing without a covid test.
So why should the principal go out on a limb if the medical professional won't? I'm pretty sure that the insurance company would jump down his throat if he started to do that.
User avatar
HighKingLeinster
Posts: 250
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:19 pm

lilyw wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 3:36 pm
Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 3:33 pm
HighKingLeinster wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 3:26 pm So my sister in law sent her 6 year old back to school today. within an hour the school phoned to say he had a cough and needed to go home (cough is related to an issue from a few months ago and not Covid).

They phoned the doctor who confirmed that it was unlikely to be Covid and he should attend school. however he would not provide a note stating this. they phoned the school and said that the doctor was willing to speak to the principal if they phoned but could/would not provide a note. principal refused to phone and said child would not be allowed back without a doctors note.

Farcical
Principal is being a stupid fucker as he knows the GP can’t put it in writing without a covid test.
So why should the principal go out on a limb if the medical professional won't? I'm pretty sure that the insurance company would jump down his throat if he started to do that.
its both of them refusing to use common sense. in fairness in these days of lynchings and litigation i can see why. meanwhile sister in law is left in limbo as the kid doesnt qualify for a test. Smarter kids then him will figure out that a well timed cough in school will get them a free ride home
Image
Duff Paddy
Posts: 289
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:55 am

lilyw wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 3:36 pm
Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 3:33 pm
HighKingLeinster wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 3:26 pm So my sister in law sent her 6 year old back to school today. within an hour the school phoned to say he had a cough and needed to go home (cough is related to an issue from a few months ago and not Covid).

They phoned the doctor who confirmed that it was unlikely to be Covid and he should attend school. however he would not provide a note stating this. they phoned the school and said that the doctor was willing to speak to the principal if they phoned but could/would not provide a note. principal refused to phone and said child would not be allowed back without a doctors note.

Farcical
Principal is being a stupid fucker as he knows the GP can’t put it in writing without a covid test.
So why should the principal go out on a limb if the medical professional won't? I'm pretty sure that the insurance company would jump down his throat if he started to do that.
Go out on a limb? Children spend half their life with minor ailments of one form of the other, if you took your definition of going out on a limb they would never be allowed to return to school. The overwhelming probability is that this isn’t covid, and even if it was, the risk of it causing problems for anyone in the school is extremely low.
Duff Paddy
Posts: 289
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:55 am

What insurance issue is there? Has their insuranxe company changed their terms and conditions? The principal is making a presumptive diagnosis that they aren’t qualified to make. The person who is qualified is saying that it’s unlikely to be Covid. We need some common sense to get the country moving not arse covering.
.OverThere
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:27 pm

Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 3:48 pm What insurance issue is there? Has their insuranxe company changed their terms and conditions? The principal is making a presumptive diagnosis that they aren’t qualified to make. The person who is qualified is saying that it’s unlikely to be Covid. We need some common sense to get the country moving not arse covering.
The law states that children must be in education by 6
Demand home education from Dept of Ed., as the school is not providing.
They can either accept or deny, but they know they are exposed legally if they deny.
If the letter is properly written then they would probably inform the school to make the arrangements for one on one teaching.

These sorts of arrangements already exist, but it is normally provided to children who are so disruptive in a school, they are suspended/expelled.
Not sure whether it exists for disabled, but there must be something.
User avatar
EnergiseR
Posts: 284
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:49 pm

Unfortunately very predictable HKL. The next while is going to be a disaster zone and I don't see how it is unpicked. My kids got a video off the principal today for their return and near the end of the 15 mins he started crying he was that overwhelmed. Now granted he is a total wuss but it was all 'You come through Zone 3 if you are in Pods 3,5,9 and Zone 2,3,7 if in Pods 12-15. Zone 1 is closed. Your teacher is in their own group and has tape around their desk. Do not enter the taped area or look at it. When leaving the school flaps your arms and try and not touch the pylons'.
My young fella made a mildly humourous point when he said 'why don't they just call them classes rather than pods'
User avatar
lilyw
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:53 pm

Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 3:48 pm What insurance issue is there? Has their insuranxe company changed their terms and conditions? The principal is making a presumptive diagnosis that they aren’t qualified to make. The person who is qualified is saying that it’s unlikely to be Covid. We need some common sense to get the country moving not arse covering.
So the doctor can cover his arse by saying "unlikely" but the principal has to make a definitive decision affecting the health of every other child in the school & his staff. The doctor is paid to make a judgement - let him make one.
User avatar
HighKingLeinster
Posts: 250
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:19 pm

EnergiseR wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 4:23 pm Unfortunately very predictable HKL. The next while is going to be a disaster zone and I don't see how it is unpicked. My kids got a video off the principal today for their return and near the end of the 15 mins he started crying he was that overwhelmed. Now granted he is a total wuss but it was all 'You come through Zone 3 if you are in Pods 3,5,9 and Zone 2,3,7 if in Pods 12-15. Zone 1 is closed. Your teacher is in their own group and has tape around their desk. Do not enter the taped area or look at it. When leaving the school flaps your arms and try and not touch the pylons'.
My young fella made a mildly humourous point when he said 'why don't they just call them classes rather than pods'
Shame he didnt dress up like a character from planet of the apes and scare them about the forbidden zone (staff room)
Image
User avatar
Camroc2
Posts: 358
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:01 pm

lilyw wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 4:47 pm
Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 3:48 pm What insurance issue is there? Has their insuranxe company changed their terms and conditions? The principal is making a presumptive diagnosis that they aren’t qualified to make. The person who is qualified is saying that it’s unlikely to be Covid. We need some common sense to get the country moving not arse covering.
So the doctor can cover his arse by saying "unlikely" but the principal has to make a definitive decision affecting the health of every other child in the school & his staff. The doctor is paid to make a judgement - let him make one.
No.

The doctors opinion is an informed opinion, and he can be held responsible for it even though it is not in writing.

The Teachers opinion is just that - their opinion, and doesn't amount to a hill of beans.
User avatar
Camroc2
Posts: 358
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:01 pm

93 cases, no deaths
User avatar
EnergiseR
Posts: 284
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:49 pm

He did a continuous 15 minute shoot like the 1917 film. He must have spent the last 5 months choreographing it. He would turn with alacrity and stare at the camera as walking down the corridor and say 'And DON'T touch there'. There would be a random window ledge. He must have said five times some.thing like 'And nobody is allowed in the toilets on a Tuesday but you won't need to worry about that' or 'Each bubble has 6 pods to the dozen but that's something your teacher can worry about'. The whole yards has been permanently destroyed as they have marked out separate play areas. All the previous hop scotch and play areas are painted over. It's sad and not even a few dead kids to show for it
User avatar
Leinsterman
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:29 pm

He sounds a prat. Could they not have used the first day or two back in the school to brief the kids and get them up to speed?
That's what they're doing just up the road.
Duff Paddy
Posts: 289
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:55 am

Camroc2 wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 4:59 pm 93 cases, no deaths
Getting ridiculous now
Duff Paddy
Posts: 289
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:55 am

lilyw wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 4:47 pm
Duff Paddy wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 3:48 pm What insurance issue is there? Has their insuranxe company changed their terms and conditions? The principal is making a presumptive diagnosis that they aren’t qualified to make. The person who is qualified is saying that it’s unlikely to be Covid. We need some common sense to get the country moving not arse covering.
So the doctor can cover his arse by saying "unlikely" but the principal has to make a definitive decision affecting the health of every other child in the school & his staff. The doctor is paid to make a judgement - let him make one.
That’s not arse covering. That’s using his clinical experience to give an informed opinion. It’s not black and white, even a covid test is not 100% accurate. Making a child who is unlikely to have Covid undergo a test just to satisfy the over cautious approach of the principal is clearly an unreasonable position as if it became commonplace in all our schools then our schools system would see huge levels of unsustainable absenteeism. I don’t think the principal has the right to exclude this student, or the right to force the student to undergo a covid test when the child’s GP doesn’t feel it is merited.
User avatar
HighKingLeinster
Posts: 250
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:19 pm

Yeah our little one was slightly under the weather last week. Creche took her and just asked us to phone her GP. GP said she was grand and creche were happy enough.

Common sense prevailed
Image
User avatar
EnergiseR
Posts: 284
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:49 pm

Leinsterman wrote: Thu Aug 27, 2020 5:07 pm He sounds a prat. Could they not have used the first day or two back in the school to brief the kids and get them up to speed?
That's what they're doing just up the road.
He's alright really. Just misjudged this but tbf to him I guarantee he would have been hammered by the PA if he didn't do the video
Post Reply