Nuclear was my reference really, insulation is unarguable. I think this chart demonstrates it pretty well:petej wrote: ↑Thu Oct 20, 2022 12:15 pmWorth reminding you that Blair/Brown did restart nuclear discussion and programs from it's slumber and did a lot on renewables and insulation (go look at the collapse of that under call me dave) and the roots of our predicament pre date them (look at what Sweden has done in heating instead of gas).Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Oct 20, 2022 11:14 amYes I was referencing their governments and entourage more than them on a personal level. As a non-exhaustive/non-researched list, the whole government becoming secondary to a Blair/Brown psychodrama, things like the introduction of Alastair Campbell and the rise of the SPAD into the actual machinery of government, sending regiments to Iraq without protective equipment and a general sense of short termism (the roots of our energy predicament go back to this time, constitutional reform from the back of a fag packet, spin spin spin etc) would be my starting points.JM2K6 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 20, 2022 10:59 am
I'm curious about this. Do you have any examples in mind? Both leaders clearly had a strong sense of duty, and Labour certainly did plenty to try and improve things for the whole of British society rather than just the rich, but I won't pretend I remember specifics of whether cabinet members were just there for themselves and to seek & maintain power above all else.
(This isn't a gotcha post!)
Things have got worse, massively so, under Boris and Truss, but I would say the Thick of It is and was so funny because it was a very accurate parody of the attitudes of the Labour Government at the time. For large parts of the cabinet and wider government nothing was important bar publicity and tomorrow's headlines.
Nuclear was hard and life seemed easy, so we didn't do it. Like with so many of our fuck ups as a nation, with more State grasp other worlds were possible...