S/Lt_Phillips wrote: ↑Tue Jan 17, 2023 2:15 pm
Yr Alban wrote: ↑Tue Jan 17, 2023 2:09 pm
S/Lt_Phillips wrote: ↑Tue Jan 17, 2023 2:05 pm
Are we the only country that's used the 3-year-dormancy rule so far (Dempsey)?
Anyway, I think I'd rather have Maitland back on the field, although tbf I don't know much about McConnachie.
Namibia are using it to get Byron McGuigan. That’s the only one I’ve heard so far, but to be fair I may have heard it just because he used to be with us
Ah yes, right enough. I have to say I'm a little surprised we're not being castigated for it as we do whenever we 'poach' someone through the granny or residency rules. Although I've not been on the other place for a good while, they may be frothing about Dempsey/McConnachie over there?
I think the general shrug of the shoulders is a natural reaction to the fact that it only impacts players who don't have an international future with their first country, therefore not in reality taking talent away from any one nation. The fact that it's England with a lot of wing stocks makes it even less likely to provoke any ire, but in any case the vast majority of these cases are going to be players moving from Big Country to Smaller Country - far more pronounced than going from one T1 side (England) to another T1 side (Scotland). There's probably a decent amount of goodwill towards players who are wanting to restart their international careers after being passed over for an extended period of time and aren't seen as exploiting loopholes.
Basically - the system did its job, they got a shot at international rugby (usually with the country that developed them), and for whatever reason they're surplus to requirements, so it's not a major blow if they rock up for someone else after a few years. Quite different to most other types of poaches.