Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 9:15 pm
Just rewatched the game. Some thoughts:
- What was Wales' gameplan? Just constant kicking to Steward and then hope something turned up. Bizarre but I suppose in Zammit's try it kind of worked.
- If we accept the framing of rebuilding/developing a team, there is clear progress over three games. Wales are toothless, as a caveat, however the defensive system starts to look pretty well oiled. Clearly designed to bend but not break, with huge emphasis on contesting the breakdown. The back row were obviously front and centre of that but just about everyone close to a ruck was hitting the ruck hard and trying to get hands on the ball. We won tonnes of turnovers and a few pens, but it also completely gummed up Welsh ball every time they attacked, meaning Wales then tried to hit a well formed defensive set and ended up either losing the ball or kicking it away. England's workrate in defence was pretty phenomenal and the whole thing seems joined up in a way it absolutely was not against Scotland.
- Less well oiled was the attack, albeit you can start to see Evans' mark on it. The team seems caught between a dynamic attacking philosophy that Evans embodies, the percentages rugby of Borthwick which dictates that slow ball goes to the boot, and the Sinfield philosophy that attack is simply defence by other means. This meant we hesitated at a few key points where other sides would have broken through and quite possibly scored. You can see everyone not quite sure whether to run an attacking line or get in position to chase a kick, making the whole thing a little tentative. With that said, the Watson try was an excellent team try involving a well designed play excellently executed by quite a wide cast of characters, and represents the best strike move we've run since the win over the Boks in November '21.
This clash between kicking and running means that whereas in defence we were wonderfully cohesive and coordinated, in attack often going forward meant people were isolated and either lost the ball, conceded a penalty or it became a mess. A few nascent opportunities got shut down in positions where Ireland, France and Scotland would have at least got within 5 metres of the line in the subsequent phases.
This split-second decision making attacking style does not suit a process and system fly half like Farrell, and the answer of who runs this sort of game best is pretty obvious - George Ford. It was noticeable that Faz was at his best in attack working in conjunction with Malins, who obviously train together all the time.
- Our tactical kicking was very good, certainly not faultless (both Faz and JVP stuck one out on the full, Slade and Faz kicked away an overlap each) but it left us playing the game we wanted to in the areas of the pitch we needed to. One of the reasons it wasn't the most exciting game ever played is because we saw clearly we were going to win the kicking battle hands down. Steward took everything, every kick was returned with interest and 1/2p/Zammit etc were on the back foot, smashed straight after taking the ball and unable to generate a reply. Not Baabaas stuff but ten minutes could go by without Wales even hinting at an opportunity, which away in Cardiff you'd take every day.
- Goal kicking cost us a bonus point IMO. If we'd nailed the penalty to go 18-10 up I think we'd have then moved through the gears. As it was we played it safe to close out Borthwick's first "proper" win. Italy deserve better than that perspective but it 100% will have been preying on all their minds that lose yesterday and we're staring down the barrel of a 1 win tournament, the decision to stick to winning the tactical kicking battle was understandable.
- Our discipline is night and day to Eddie's era, I noticed the silly one in our own half for three points as the only egregious pen. Makes a huge difference
- Compete at lineouts! When Maro did go up the Welsh lineout disintegrated, at the very least it throws the opposition and you make a barely discernible gain at a maul from not competing.
Overall, I remain reasonably satisfied. The defensive system is clicking, and hopefully another fortnight of drilling it will have it ready for the ferocious challenge France will pose to it. The attack shows promise but is the wrong system for the 10 we have, either change the system or change the 10. Given his goal kicking post-ankle injuries I'd opt for the latter sadly, if we're going to compete in the final two games we have to kick everything, and with the world cup in mind it will likely light a fairly serious fire under his arse.
Bar making Faz captain, Borthwick is nailing the selection calls, Watson another example. I hope he has the courage to stick with Ludlam/Willis/Dombrandt as it is starting to work superbly.