Hopefully not.Biffer wrote: ↑Wed Jun 07, 2023 5:20 pmDoes my mate's new company torture and assassinate people?Jim Lahey wrote: ↑Wed Jun 07, 2023 12:36 pm My exception with golfers, and most pro athletes, is that I don't believe there is an ounce of sincerity in them. They do things to earn more money (like we all do in our jobs).
Footballers and football fans understand this. Benzema and CR7 going to Saudi wasn't met with mass moral outrage, nor was Iniesta or Xavi going to the Middle East. Messi and Neymar both took the petrodollar by going to PSG, playing in a shit league but on big money. Football just gets on with it, confident in the fact that another generation of superstars will make their way through the establishment before taking the brown envelopes. Even the pre-Qatari World Cup human rights hysteria was quickly forgotten about once the football began. It was a cracking tournament on the pitch, shocking initial decision to hold it there in the first place tbf, but spectators quickly forget and adapt. The same will happen with golf.
Rory taking a stand against the Saudis was good PR for Brand Rory. He already makes a ton of money and was philosopher king designate of mainstream golf as a result, and probably garnered a reasonable amount of sponsorship for his good deeds, ontop of his general tournament earnings.
I think to put yourself on a moral high ground because of your decision when others decided to cash-in to the highest bidder, and then do your upmost to bring down the highest bidder, is a bit wankerish. If you and your work colleague get courted by a flashy new company that offers bigger salaries, your mate bites and you don't because you don't like the new company's industry/background, then a reasonable person makes peace with their decision and doesn't publically lambast their ex colleague for their decision imo. Whenever the new company starts poaching a decent proportion of the talent, then you either go with the tide, keep doing your thing regardless (albeit in a smaller pool), or do something else. But to bitch and whinge because the tide is going in a different direction to what you want isn't a good look.
I know the Saudis are wankers, everyone does tbf. But he was never going to stop them. Footy, which is a much bigger sport that means a hell of a lot more, to more people, couldn't keep the oil barons out. What exactly did the golfers think that they could achieve in a much more niche sport? Money will always be king in pro sport.
If we are going to blur the lines between politics and sport then you go down a very sketchy path.
Look we all give the Saudis our money when we fill up our cars, travel on planes, buy plastic shit etc., so lets not grandstand when some golfers siphon some money back from them. This whole "they are corrupt and kill people" shit is a bit shrill. The US government tortures and kills plenty of folk, and invades countries from time to time, or strangles the economies of others that it doesn't like with sanctions. The Brits, the EU as well.
I can see the argument against all this as it is uprooting the establishment of golf, rightly or wrongly. I don't get the argument that because the money is coming from Saudi that the whole concept is evil.