The Official Cricket Thread
-
- Posts: 1106
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 9:50 am
It is quite frightening that England could have had Wood and Archer bowling in tandem.
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
Seeing a seriously fast bowler destroying the tail is a great Test spectacle (unless it happens to your team).
If only Wood could stay fit.
If only Wood could stay fit.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
90mph plus bowling is truly one of the great spectacles in sport.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11156
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
In keeping with the spirit of the series, the batsmen oblige by giving their wickets away!Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2023 2:34 pmAli is an absolute liability, as is Bairstow’s keeping. Looks ominousTorquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2023 2:25 pmBig problems for Eng now with Robinson off and Moeen getting slaughtered. Root on next over?
Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2023 3:55 pm 90mph plus bowling is truly one of the great spectacles in sport.
Imagine what it must have been like in the 70s and 80s facing the West Indies on dry tracks.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11156
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Archer is a perma-sick note so that really is theoretical.Thor Sedan wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2023 3:45 pm It is quite frightening that England could have had Wood and Archer bowling in tandem.
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11156
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
Sabina or Perth in the old days!Kawazaki wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2023 4:46 pmPaddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2023 3:55 pm 90mph plus bowling is truly one of the great spectacles in sport.
Imagine what it must have been like in the 70s and 80s facing the West Indies on dry tracks.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
No or poor quality helmets as well. Genuinely terrifyingKawazaki wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2023 4:46 pmPaddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2023 3:55 pm 90mph plus bowling is truly one of the great spectacles in sport.
Imagine what it must have been like in the 70s and 80s facing the West Indies on dry tracks.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11156
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
As I repeatedly point out, the likes of Zaheer and Lloyd were both tall men who batted with no helmets, wore glasses and faced the quickest bowlers the world has seen. Ditto helmetless "Magic" Khan who simply smiled at the Windies express men and plundered them for runs. The advent of the helmet was a necessary safety intervention (although not mandatory.......) but since it's arrival, batting techniques have plummeted against genuine quicks. Batsmen no longer keep their eyes on the ball. The old ability to bend inside or outside the line of a bumper has gone. And with it, we see far more batters hit facing equivalent short balls than before. Whilst this doesn't matter physically (rather that than Gatting v Marshall), it means they get out to the short stuff more often and that has been a real theme this series.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2023 5:11 pmNo or poor quality helmets as well. Genuinely terrifyingKawazaki wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2023 4:46 pmPaddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2023 3:55 pm 90mph plus bowling is truly one of the great spectacles in sport.
Imagine what it must have been like in the 70s and 80s facing the West Indies on dry tracks.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Yeah I agree with this. Old cricket is far more watchable and recognisable than old football and rugby (if you stuck the West Indians of the 80s into a modern test they’d still be good without having to adjust their game radically. Someone like Barry John or George Best would of course still be top class now but they’d have to adjust everything about how they played). Probably the two biggest changes are ground fielding, if anything slip fielding generally seems better back in the day, and how people play short pitched bowling.Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 7:17 amAs I repeatedly point out, the likes of Zaheer and Lloyd were both tall men who batted with no helmets, wore glasses and faced the quickest bowlers the world has seen. Ditto helmetless "Magic" Khan who simply smiled at the Windies express men and plundered them for runs. The advent of the helmet was a necessary safety intervention (although not mandatory.......) but since it's arrival, batting techniques have plummeted against genuine quicks. Batsmen no longer keep their eyes on the ball. The old ability to bend inside or outside the line of a bumper has gone. And with it, we see far more batters hit facing equivalent short balls than before. Whilst this doesn't matter physically (rather that than Gatting v Marshall), it means they get out to the short stuff more often and that has been a real theme this series.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2023 5:11 pmNo or poor quality helmets as well. Genuinely terrifying
Re: getting out to the short ball, the risk/reward has changed. If you take it on, you’re probably not going to get badly hurt, and you’ve got a much more powerful bat and the boundary is in from the fence, giving you a much better chance of hitting it for 4/6 than was true 40 odd years ago.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- OomStruisbaai
- Posts: 15455
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
- Location: Longest beach in SH
That bring us to the short ball tactic previous test. Batting without a helmet forced you to play the hook and pull well.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 9:26 amYeah I agree with this. Old cricket is far more watchable and recognisable than old football and rugby (if you stuck the West Indians of the 80s into a modern test they’d still be good without having to adjust their game radically. Someone like Barry John or George Best would of course still be top class now but they’d have to adjust everything about how they played). Probably the two biggest changes are ground fielding, if anything slip fielding generally seems better back in the day, and how people play short pitched bowling.Torquemada 1420 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 7:17 amAs I repeatedly point out, the likes of Zaheer and Lloyd were both tall men who batted with no helmets, wore glasses and faced the quickest bowlers the world has seen. Ditto helmetless "Magic" Khan who simply smiled at the Windies express men and plundered them for runs. The advent of the helmet was a necessary safety intervention (although not mandatory.......) but since it's arrival, batting techniques have plummeted against genuine quicks. Batsmen no longer keep their eyes on the ball. The old ability to bend inside or outside the line of a bumper has gone. And with it, we see far more batters hit facing equivalent short balls than before. Whilst this doesn't matter physically (rather that than Gatting v Marshall), it means they get out to the short stuff more often and that has been a real theme this series.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Jul 06, 2023 5:11 pm
No or poor quality helmets as well. Genuinely terrifying
Re: getting out to the short ball, the risk/reward has changed. If you take it on, you’re probably not going to get badly hurt, and you’ve got a much more powerful bat and the boundary is in from the fence, giving you a much better chance of hitting it for 4/6 than was true 40 odd years ago.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
We’re not getting close here, are we
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Follow-on beckons......
-
- Posts: 1106
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 9:50 am
-
- Posts: 1106
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 9:50 am
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Where is Bazball now
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Yup. And that average is heavily boosted by the 77 he scored before he had to do any keeping.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Apologies to the table on the West Coast Main Line I have just punched, but FUCK ME is there any danger of us putting any thought into our cricket this series? Just a massive fuck you from the side to everyone who is emotionally invested in it
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
And now Woakes has been hit on the head.
It's the 90s all over again! Win other series, shit our pants in The Ashes.
It's the 90s all over again! Win other series, shit our pants in The Ashes.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Aus could end up with a 100 run lead
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
He can barely walk.
-
- Posts: 1106
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 9:50 am
3 x 4s in a row from the big bat of the Ginger PoachThor Sedan wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:19 pmDanger of wounded animals and all that.
- clydecloggie
- Posts: 1198
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:31 am
- clydecloggie
- Posts: 1198
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:31 am
It's the quintessential cameo but is it really what's needed just now? It's a hard and true pitch, sun's shining - maybe hang around and support Stokes for an hour or so?
Wood isn't a batsman who can hang around, he doesn't have the defence for it. He's a hitter. And he's not batted for a long time. All of a sudden we're up to nearly 200 and within sight of their score.clydecloggie wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 1:02 pmIt's the quintessential cameo but is it really what's needed just now? It's a hard and true pitch, sun's shining - maybe hang around and support Stokes for an hour or so?
No guarantee an injured Stokes can carry the innings, either. Although if the Aussies drop him like that...
edit: Woakes and Ali have a lot more blame to carry for their shots. They can bat properly and can hang around.