RWC R2 Scotland v Tonga 24/9

Where goats go to escape
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 11158
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Biffer wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:30 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:28 pm Whatever else in terms of the quality of decision making, bunker system or no, we are seeing no evidence of players modifying behaviour. Just more reds and injuries.
Needs bigger punishments before that changes.

Notable that last night was extremely physical, brutal, and punishing but no high tackles.
I'm doubtful that will alter anything. These reds are costing sides games and in the most important comp there is.
Slick
Posts: 11920
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Paddington Bear wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:32 pm
sockwithaticket wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:30 pm
ASMO wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:29 pm

Referees need to grow a pair and make a decision instead of contracting it out to the bunker
Predicted it as soon as they brought the bunker system in, we're only going to see on field reds for stuff like obvious punches or head butts from now on.
Does it matter? Assuming they don’t cock up the call here
Exactly, we get better decisions without the waiting around and theatrics from Irish
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
User avatar
C69
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:42 pm

Biffer wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:30 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:28 pm Whatever else in terms of the quality of decision making, bunker system or no, we are seeing no evidence of players modifying behaviour. Just more reds and injuries.
Needs bigger punishments before that changes.

Notable that last night was extremely physical, brutal, and punishing but no high tackles.
There were a few t that were missed tbh.
However they were marginal.
Point taken
sockwithaticket
Posts: 8665
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am

Slick wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:29 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:28 pm Whatever else in terms of the quality of decision making, bunker system or no, we are seeing no evidence of players modifying behaviour. Just more reds and injuries.
Quite. No option but to drop the tackle height now
We could try longer bans too. When the average is 2 - 3 week, depending on whether or not the player has already been through the nonsense 'tackle school' - there's really not a huge amount of deterrent.

Farrell got 4 weeks for his 4th offence FFS.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5963
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

PCPhil wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:32 pm
Biffer wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:30 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:28 pm Whatever else in terms of the quality of decision making, bunker system or no, we are seeing no evidence of players modifying behaviour. Just more reds and injuries.
Needs bigger punishments before that changes.

Notable that last night was extremely physical, brutal, and punishing but no high tackles.
Great point.
Tbh a lot of this is just Tonga, they love dumb rugby and have done for as long as I’ve watched them
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
Niegs
Posts: 3392
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 3:20 pm

Paddington Bear wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:32 pm
sockwithaticket wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:30 pm
ASMO wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:29 pm

Referees need to grow a pair and make a decision instead of contracting it out to the bunker
Predicted it as soon as they brought the bunker system in, we're only going to see on field reds for stuff like obvious punches or head butts from now on.
Does it matter? Assuming they don’t cock up the call here
It probably doesn’t matter in terms of the right penalty, but I wonder if it affects the psychology / severity of saying THAT will not be tolerated, he’s off?

Certainly lessens the drama from a viewer perspective. :)
Slick
Posts: 11920
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:33 pm
Biffer wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:30 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:28 pm Whatever else in terms of the quality of decision making, bunker system or no, we are seeing no evidence of players modifying behaviour. Just more reds and injuries.
Needs bigger punishments before that changes.

Notable that last night was extremely physical, brutal, and punishing but no high tackles.
I'm doubtful that will alter anything. These reds are costing sides games and in the most important comp there is.
Yup, until they actually are forced to start coaching it differently by lowering the height teams are obviously deciding it’s worth the risk
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Big D
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:55 am

Just rewound to the yellow card tackle. How the hell did Dickson not call a pen in real time. He is right there.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5963
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Niegs wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:34 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:32 pm
sockwithaticket wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:30 pm

Predicted it as soon as they brought the bunker system in, we're only going to see on field reds for stuff like obvious punches or head butts from now on.
Does it matter? Assuming they don’t cock up the call here
It probably doesn’t matter in terms of the right penalty, but I wonder if it affects the psychology / severity of saying THAT will not be tolerated, he’s off?

Certainly lessens the drama from a viewer perspective. :)
Which is, in fairness, the point. The baying for cards was clearly influencing refs and taking forever
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Biffer
Posts: 9142
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:33 pm
Biffer wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:30 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:28 pm Whatever else in terms of the quality of decision making, bunker system or no, we are seeing no evidence of players modifying behaviour. Just more reds and injuries.
Needs bigger punishments before that changes.

Notable that last night was extremely physical, brutal, and punishing but no high tackles.
I'm doubtful that will alter anything. These reds are costing sides games and in the most important comp there is.
I think it will

1. longer suspensions are likely to lead to a need for even bigger squads. Clubs can’t afford that now so pressure from above to change tackle height
2. Players who get banned will get either penalty clauses in contracts or they won’t get contracts at all. Can’t pay expensive players to sit on the pine nowadays.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
sockwithaticket
Posts: 8665
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am

Paddington Bear wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:32 pm
sockwithaticket wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:30 pm
ASMO wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:29 pm

Referees need to grow a pair and make a decision instead of contracting it out to the bunker
Predicted it as soon as they brought the bunker system in, we're only going to see on field reds for stuff like obvious punches or head butts from now on.
Does it matter? Assuming they don’t cock up the call here
I think it was better for the decision to be made at the time with the officials talking through the process. Even if it wasn't 100% right (and neither has the bunker been so far) the audience were at least privy to the rationale. The TMO making the decision and then just announcing to the ref whehter something stays yellow or red, is much more opaque.
User avatar
Niegs
Posts: 3392
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 3:20 pm

Slick wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:29 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:28 pm Whatever else in terms of the quality of decision making, bunker system or no, we are seeing no evidence of players modifying behaviour. Just more reds and injuries.
Quite. No option but to drop the tackle height now
Prep yourself as soon as the WC is over. Was listening to Dr Ross Tucker’s podcast a couple of weeks ago and he hinted at a WR announcement he wasn’t allowed to reveal. His co-host didn’t dig but I bet it’s a global tackle height drop (sternum would be my guess, if it happens).
User avatar
Niegs
Posts: 3392
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 3:20 pm

Paddington Bear wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:35 pm
Niegs wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:34 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:32 pm

Does it matter? Assuming they don’t cock up the call here
It probably doesn’t matter in terms of the right penalty, but I wonder if it affects the psychology / severity of saying THAT will not be tolerated, he’s off?

Certainly lessens the drama from a viewer perspective. :)
Which is, in fairness, the point. The baying for cards was clearly influencing refs and taking forever
Very good point.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 11158
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Niegs wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:39 pm
Slick wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:29 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:28 pm Whatever else in terms of the quality of decision making, bunker system or no, we are seeing no evidence of players modifying behaviour. Just more reds and injuries.
Quite. No option but to drop the tackle height now
Prep yourself as soon as the WC is over. Was listening to Dr Ross Tucker’s podcast a couple of weeks ago and he hinted at a WR announcement he wasn’t allowed to reveal. His co-host didn’t dig but I bet it’s a global tackle height drop (sternum would be my guess, if it happens).
Great if it happens. Sick of this unwanted import from Sumoball.
User avatar
Nols
Posts: 340
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:06 pm

ASMO wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:25 pm How is that not just a straight red, about as clear cut as they get
I read elsewhere that barring an obvious punch/gouge etc, refs have been directed to use the bunker.
Saw it mentioned and doubted it, but the person saying it was pretty sure. I haven't seen the official guidelines to that effect, though.
KingBlairhorn
Posts: 1857
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 9:53 am

Lol, how have they given that as a yellow?
Biffer
Posts: 9142
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

That’s a fucking joke.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5963
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

LOL
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Slick
Posts: 11920
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

😂
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 9401
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

Yellow

Fuck off
Simian
Posts: 718
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2022 12:53 pm

That’s absolutely mental
User avatar
Yr Alban
Posts: 2013
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:10 pm
Location: Gogledd Cymru

How the fuck is there any mitigation there? It’s the most obvious straight red I’ve seen in forever.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
Blackmac
Posts: 3231
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 4:04 pm

Unbelievable. No credibility in that decision at all. Ritchie dropped his height as soon as he received the ball and took a couple of steps before he was hit. Disgraceful decision,
User avatar
Fonz
Posts: 282
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:46 am
Location: Florida

Niegs wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:39 pm
Slick wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:29 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:28 pm Whatever else in terms of the quality of decision making, bunker system or no, we are seeing no evidence of players modifying behaviour. Just more reds and injuries.
Quite. No option but to drop the tackle height now
Prep yourself as soon as the WC is over. Was listening to Dr Ross Tucker’s podcast a couple of weeks ago and he hinted at a WR announcement he wasn’t allowed to reveal. His co-host didn’t dig but I bet it’s a global tackle height drop (sternum would be my guess, if it happens).
I don’t see how this will solve anything. People aren’t hitting high because the rules permit it, they’re hitting high because it’s inherently advantageous in this sport. In fact, I can’t see how this won’t mean MORE cards and endlessly bickering about how much sanction every single contact should warrant.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 11158
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Looks like there is a different threshold for headshots. If it's against a Scot, it's okay?
Blackmac
Posts: 3231
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 4:04 pm

We lose our captain for 45 minutes and they lose a man for 10.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5963
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Colossally dumb rugby from Scotland, are you England in disguise
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Big D
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:55 am

Our own worst enemy.
User avatar
PCPhil
Posts: 2422
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:06 am
Location: Where rivers meet

Citing commissioner was entirely independent. A Mr Seames O'rourke.
“It was a pet, not an animal. It had a name, you don't eat things with names, this is horrific!”
User avatar
sturginho
Posts: 2432
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:51 pm

One for you Torq
User avatar
OomStruisbaai
Posts: 15460
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 12:38 pm
Location: Longest beach in SH

Whittaker try
User avatar
S/Lt_Phillips
Posts: 516
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:31 pm

What was Harris doing there?
Left hand down a bit
Big D
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:55 am

Not sure what Ben White was playing at taking the quick throw in . Was never going to be a good outcome.
I like neeps
Posts: 3586
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

Whitehouse is a grade a cock.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

Yr Alban wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:50 pm How the fuck is there any mitigation there? It’s the most obvious straight red I’ve seen in forever.
This! Wtf are they sniffing
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Big D
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:55 am

Whitehouse and Dickson are terrible referees.
Slick
Posts: 11920
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Fonz wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:52 pm
Niegs wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:39 pm
Slick wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:29 pm

Quite. No option but to drop the tackle height now
Prep yourself as soon as the WC is over. Was listening to Dr Ross Tucker’s podcast a couple of weeks ago and he hinted at a WR announcement he wasn’t allowed to reveal. His co-host didn’t dig but I bet it’s a global tackle height drop (sternum would be my guess, if it happens).
I don’t see how this will solve anything. People aren’t hitting high because the rules permit it, they’re hitting high because it’s inherently advantageous in this sport. In fact, I can’t see how this won’t mean MORE cards and endlessly bickering about how much sanction every single contact should warrant.
That’s the point, coaches have decided it’s worth the risk to keep hitting that high. Lower the permitted height and it won’t be near the head even if it’s slightly illegal
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Big D
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:55 am

Great kick by Piatau. Nothing to be done there.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 11158
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Blackmac wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:52 pm We lose our captain for 45 minutes and they lose a man for 10.
Dupont feels your pain.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5963
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Should have taken the 3 there!
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Post Reply