RWC R2 Scotland v Tonga 24/9

Where goats go to escape
charltom
Posts: 715
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:43 pm

Fonz wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 5:33 pm Scotland should be pleased with this overall I think. Not a perfect performance but let’s be honest it’s hard for Tier 1 teams to really get their tail up against a Tier 2 side. They’ve stretched their legs a bit and have had some nice passages of play. Mission accomplished IMO
Lots of loose stuff and the line-out has been very inconsistent.

Much to improve.
Slick
Posts: 11920
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Fonz wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 5:33 pm Scotland should be pleased with this overall I think. Not a perfect performance but let’s be honest it’s hard for Tier 1 teams to really get their tail up against a Tier 2 side. They’ve stretched their legs a bit and have had some nice passages of play. Mission accomplished IMO
Yeah, I agree. We don’t do massively dominant performances against anyone and Tonga have been pretty awful to play against, so not disappointed
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
User avatar
ScarfaceClaw
Posts: 2623
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:11 pm

TheNatalShark wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 5:35 pm The bunker will come back and say it is actually a yellow for Scotland
And a Tongan penalty try.
Slick
Posts: 11920
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Right, let’s finish with a nice try and move on please
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
User avatar
Bloutoria
Posts: 166
Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2023 9:00 am
Location: Pretoria

Apparently you sound like Bulls supporters now
Blackmac
Posts: 3231
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 4:04 pm

He was the joint tackler, Dickson you twat.
charltom
Posts: 715
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:43 pm

Nice Darcy.
Biffer
Posts: 9142
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Nicely done wee darcy.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Slick
Posts: 11920
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Totally over rated 😂
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Biffer
Posts: 9142
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Bloutoria wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 5:38 pm Apparently you sound like Bulls supporters now
What, do they all think Tory is a prick as well?
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Big D
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:55 am

Important try. The betting line was -22.
Blackmac
Posts: 3231
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 4:04 pm

Slick wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 5:38 pm Right, let’s finish with a nice try and move on please
You were saying. 😂
Slick
Posts: 11920
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Slick wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 5:38 pm Right, let’s finish with a nice try and move on please
I should basically be coach
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Slick
Posts: 11920
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Blackmac wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 5:41 pm
Slick wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 5:38 pm Right, let’s finish with a nice try and move on please
You were saying. 😂
😂 thought I’d lost that one
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Slick
Posts: 11920
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

EnergiseR2 wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 5:41 pm Nice. Probably should have had a few more but Tonga never collapsed fully
Yeah agree, in fact just texted the same to my mum.

Not sure Ireland will be quaking in their boots but job done and a few glimmers of decent stuff
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
TheNatalShark
Posts: 1180
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm

More frustrated with the reffing decisions than anything Scotland did or didn't do. They allowed the game to descend into Tongans trying to play whackamole with Scotland's heads.

Be lucky if Ritchie is the only one that spends time on the sidelines.

Dempsey continues to be consistently good for Scotland. At the end a few too many selfish or isolated plays to be worked on. Turner perhaps a little lucky in the first half not being pinged for some throws, but play the ref.
Blackmac
Posts: 3231
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 4:04 pm

TheNatalShark wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 5:48 pm More frustrated with the reffing decisions than anything Scotland did or didn't do. They allowed the game to descend into Tongans trying to play whackamole with Scotland's heads.

Be lucky if Ritchie is the only one that spends time on the sidelines.

Dempsey continues to be consistently good for Scotland. At the end a few too many selfish or isolated plays to be worked on. Turner perhaps a little lucky in the first half not being pinged for some throws, but play the ref.
Dempsey has been our stand out forward since he pulled on a shirt. Exceptional player.
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 10890
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

Bloutoria wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 5:35 pm Vd Merwe would look great in our backline.
Who would pass the ball to him?
User avatar
Niegs
Posts: 3392
Joined: Thu Aug 13, 2020 3:20 pm

Fonz wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:52 pm
I don’t see how this will solve anything. People aren’t hitting high because the rules permit it, they’re hitting high because it’s inherently advantageous in this sport. In fact, I can’t see how this won’t mean MORE cards and endlessly bickering about how much sanction every single contact should warrant.
I think he said they tried to use sanctions to force a change in behaviour, but it's clear that hasn't worked. You're right, there will be likely more cards (pen at least) in the teething period. But if I'm critical of that first approach, the sanctions haven't been near hard enough to cause players to really stop taking gambles with high shots / being reckless. I think they might actually see widespread change if they sanctioned forceful, mitigation-free head shots the same as they do punching, stomping, tip tackles... which you don't really see any more.
User avatar
ASMO
Posts: 5423
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:08 pm

Niegs wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 6:30 pm
Fonz wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:52 pm
I don’t see how this will solve anything. People aren’t hitting high because the rules permit it, they’re hitting high because it’s inherently advantageous in this sport. In fact, I can’t see how this won’t mean MORE cards and endlessly bickering about how much sanction every single contact should warrant.
I think he said they tried to use sanctions to force a change in behaviour, but it's clear that hasn't worked. You're right, there will be likely more cards (pen at least) in the teething period. But if I'm critical of that first approach, the sanctions haven't been near hard enough to cause players to really stop taking gambles with high shots / being reckless. I think they might actually see widespread change if they sanctioned forceful, mitigation-free head shots the same as they do punching, stomping, tip tackles... which you don't really see any more.
Start sanctioning teams with points deductions for persistant offending.
User avatar
Yr Alban
Posts: 2013
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:10 pm
Location: Gogledd Cymru

Frustrated. Good win in the end, but should have been much easier. Our lineout continues to be an issue, and there were a bunch of unforced errors that Ireland would make us pay for.

That the first head shot didn’t result in a red card just defies belief. It’s 100% deliberate. He uses his legs to drive upwards directly into the head with his shoulder. No attempt to tackle whatsoever. It was far worse than the one at the end, which was upgraded. One can only assume that the bunker went in with the full intention of finding a reason not to upgrade it, so as not to ‘spoil the game’. So Tonga spent 10 minutes with 14, and we spent an entire half without our captain. South Africa will be the team to benefit from the late red, not Scotland.

It’s all academic anyway. We aren’t going to beat Ireland and we certainly aren’t going to deny them a LBP even if we do. At least our ranking position won’t take much of a hit given they and SA are #1 and #2.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
FalconJock
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 8:46 am

Niegs wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 6:30 pm
Fonz wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 4:52 pm
I don’t see how this will solve anything. People aren’t hitting high because the rules permit it, they’re hitting high because it’s inherently advantageous in this sport. In fact, I can’t see how this won’t mean MORE cards and endlessly bickering about how much sanction every single contact should warrant.
I think he said they tried to use sanctions to force a change in behaviour, but it's clear that hasn't worked. You're right, there will be likely more cards (pen at least) in the teething period. But if I'm critical of that first approach, the sanctions haven't been near hard enough to cause players to really stop taking gambles with high shots / being reckless. I think they might actually see widespread change if they sanctioned forceful, mitigation-free head shots the same as they do punching, stomping, tip tackles... which you don't really see any more.
Then surely the soloution might be to start the sanctions at a higher level so that the minimum amount of matches a player misses starts at 6 after all mitigations are applied or if certain teams have more reds then the entry levels increases or mitigating factors can be removed so that coaching behaviour changes occur?

Sorry, not too well thought out but if World Rugby are serious about reducing tackle height then they've tried the informing and warning aspects and that hasn't worked so perhaps its now time for harsh punishments.
Slick
Posts: 11920
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Townsend pretty furious in the press conference about both this one and the Kriel one
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
User avatar
Yr Alban
Posts: 2013
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:10 pm
Location: Gogledd Cymru

Slick wrote: Sun Sep 24, 2023 9:19 pm Townsend pretty furious in the press conference about both this one and the Kriel one
Not surprising really. Two really big calls, both against Scotland. Let’s say that Zander Fagerson commits the same offence as the Tongan at the end of the first half. Does anyone seriously think he isn’t getting a red card?
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 9401
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

I’m re-watching the game, by the time Ritchie got his jaw battered by the Tongan winger’s shoulder just over the half hour mark, there had already been four off the ball hits from behind or high/late tackles

Only three of the five were penalised and watching the Ritchie one again it is a fucking joke that it wasn’t upgraded to red. There was no late change of height from Ritchie and Kata drove his shoulder up and into Ritchie’s face.
User avatar
Yr Alban
Posts: 2013
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:10 pm
Location: Gogledd Cymru

Tichtheid wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 7:51 am I’m re-watching the game, by the time Ritchie got his jaw battered by the Tongan winger’s shoulder just over the half hour mark, there had already been four off the ball hits from behind or high/late tackles

Only three of the five were penalised and watching the Ritchie one again it is a fucking joke that it wasn’t upgraded to red. There was no late change of height from Ritchie and Kata drove his shoulder up and into Ritchie’s face.
It really is amazing. He crouches down and uses his legs to drive his shoulder into Ritchie’s head. It’s 100% deliberate. I fail to see how Ritchie’s body position (which didn’t change) makes any difference whatsoever. It’s a blatant red card. It didn’t affect the outcome of the match and probably won’t affect the outcome of the pool, but the message being sent here is that you can do what you like when you’re playing Scotland and get away with it.

Doesn’t just apply to violent conduct either, as shown by the fact that SA were required to stay onside against Ireland.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
I like neeps
Posts: 3586
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

Tonga are just headhunters and world rugby are not serious about protecting the head. No wonder they'll get destroyed in the upcoming law suits.
dpedin
Posts: 2979
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

Yr Alban wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 8:04 am
Tichtheid wrote: Mon Sep 25, 2023 7:51 am I’m re-watching the game, by the time Ritchie got his jaw battered by the Tongan winger’s shoulder just over the half hour mark, there had already been four off the ball hits from behind or high/late tackles

Only three of the five were penalised and watching the Ritchie one again it is a fucking joke that it wasn’t upgraded to red. There was no late change of height from Ritchie and Kata drove his shoulder up and into Ritchie’s face.
It really is amazing. He crouches down and uses his legs to drive his shoulder into Ritchie’s head. It’s 100% deliberate. I fail to see how Ritchie’s body position (which didn’t change) makes any difference whatsoever. It’s a blatant red card. It didn’t affect the outcome of the match and probably won’t affect the outcome of the pool, but the message being sent here is that you can do what you like when you’re playing Scotland and get away with it.

Doesn’t just apply to violent conduct either, as shown by the fact that SA were required to stay onside against Ireland.
Having re watched the incident in the cold light of day it is definitely a red card. The Tongan player had no intention of anything other than an illegal tackle and even if Ritchie did drop a little it doesn't negate the Tongan was entering the tackle illegally and with intent to cause harm. The Tongan led with his shoulder with his arm by his side and went from low to high with shoulder with no intention whatsoever of trying to wrap his arms or to tackle at anything like a legal hight. It was clear contact to the head and the tackler has a responsibility to tackle properly and to avoid hitting neck or head area. I have no idea what the feck the bunker was thinking about but this was as clear a red as it is possible to be. Ritchie out for 12 days minimum subject to protocol.
Post Reply