We might have more big hit and card potential but that doesn't necessarily mean a more secure defence when manu and Farrell go looking for big hits.
RWC QF3 - England ‘the moveable force’ vs Fiji ‘the stoppable object’
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
The Mail expecting Smith at FB at the weekend.
Potentially
Faz
May (?)
Tuilagi
Marchant
Daly (?)
Smith
They were less certain on wings, but suggesting May/Daly
Potentially
Faz
May (?)
Tuilagi
Marchant
Daly (?)
Smith
They were less certain on wings, but suggesting May/Daly
May and Daly when we have talent like radwan and arundell.Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2023 3:40 pm The Mail expecting Smith at FB at the weekend.
Potentially
Faz
May (?)
Tuilagi
Marchant
Daly (?)
Smith
They were less certain on wings, but suggesting May/Daly
I just don't understand the thinking behind that lineup. If we're going defensive, go defensive. If we're trying to attack, let's do that. This feels like a right mish mash with no clear thinking.
Have Fiji done much kicking? Maybe the idea is that we can play Smith because they aren't kicking a lot. Not that he's terrible in the air or anything, but Steward is rather handy on that front.
Have Fiji done much kicking? Maybe the idea is that we can play Smith because they aren't kicking a lot. Not that he's terrible in the air or anything, but Steward is rather handy on that front.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
If true, its a terrible back 3. May and Daly have both lost all the pace that was their main selling point. May's positioning has always been a bit suspect and has only got worse, and Daly has been absolute dogshit since coming back into the England team. Smith has potential at Fullback but has only really played there against Chile, and to make a success of it needs support from a pair of experienced and in-form wingers.Raggs wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2023 4:23 pm I just don't understand the thinking behind that lineup. If we're going defensive, go defensive. If we're trying to attack, let's do that. This feels like a right mish mash with no clear thinking.
Have Fiji done much kicking? Maybe the idea is that we can play Smith because they aren't kicking a lot. Not that he's terrible in the air or anything, but Steward is rather handy on that front.
As you say, when added to Farrell and Tuilagi it just shows a completely incoherent and confused approach.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5963
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
I read something a couple of weeks ago about baiting them into playing a kicking game. Maybe reading too much into itRaggs wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2023 4:23 pm I just don't understand the thinking behind that lineup. If we're going defensive, go defensive. If we're trying to attack, let's do that. This feels like a right mish mash with no clear thinking.
Have Fiji done much kicking? Maybe the idea is that we can play Smith because they aren't kicking a lot. Not that he's terrible in the air or anything, but Steward is rather handy on that front.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
Scrum half, fly half and full back hoist the box kicks and up and unders all day long, wingers and Marchant chase, Tuilagi waits to blitz on the second line of defence. Wait for mistakes. Kick to corner to maul off the lineout, kick for 3.Raggs wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2023 4:23 pm I just don't understand the thinking behind that lineup. If we're going defensive, go defensive. If we're trying to attack, let's do that. This feels like a right mish mash with no clear thinking.
Have Fiji done much kicking? Maybe the idea is that we can play Smith because they aren't kicking a lot. Not that he's terrible in the air or anything, but Steward is rather handy on that front.
Rinse and repeat.
Sounds like the Saffa game plan. I call this the "Check the scoreboard tactic"Hal Jordan wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2023 7:20 amScrum half, fly half and full back hoist the box kicks and up and unders all day long, wingers and Marchant chase, Tuilagi waits to blitz on the second line of defence. Wait for mistakes. Kick to corner to maul off the lineout, kick for 3.Raggs wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2023 4:23 pm I just don't understand the thinking behind that lineup. If we're going defensive, go defensive. If we're trying to attack, let's do that. This feels like a right mish mash with no clear thinking.
Have Fiji done much kicking? Maybe the idea is that we can play Smith because they aren't kicking a lot. Not that he's terrible in the air or anything, but Steward is rather handy on that front.
Rinse and repeat.
Have to agree, this sounds a disastrous idea. Smith has had some success, but not much, in making me eat my words, but I fear a bit for him at 15 against Fiji. The whole backline seems a little slow and weak in defence, you would have to think that if Fiji get behind them, which they will do, it's a canter to the line.Lobby wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2023 4:34 pmIf true, its a terrible back 3. May and Daly have both lost all the pace that was their main selling point. May's positioning has always been a bit suspect and has only got worse, and Daly has been absolute dogshit since coming back into the England team. Smith has potential at Fullback but has only really played there against Chile, and to make a success of it needs support from a pair of experienced and in-form wingers.Raggs wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2023 4:23 pm I just don't understand the thinking behind that lineup. If we're going defensive, go defensive. If we're trying to attack, let's do that. This feels like a right mish mash with no clear thinking.
Have Fiji done much kicking? Maybe the idea is that we can play Smith because they aren't kicking a lot. Not that he's terrible in the air or anything, but Steward is rather handy on that front.
As you say, when added to Farrell and Tuilagi it just shows a completely incoherent and confused approach.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
Do you know what, would never have considered it a month or two ago, but I don't hate the idea of Smith at FB if the options are him or Steward (really I'd rather a better FB). He does at least have the speed and agility to get in a position to attempt a tackle when the line has been broken. So many times recently Steward's lack of agility and pace has been exposed. He's often not in the right post code to make a tackle. Being good under the high ball and being able to truck it up a bit just isn't enough at this level.Slick wrote: ↑Thu Oct 12, 2023 9:31 amHave to agree, this sounds a disastrous idea. Smith has had some success, but not much, in making me eat my words, but I fear a bit for him at 15 against Fiji. The whole backline seems a little slow and weak in defence, you would have to think that if Fiji get behind them, which they will do, it's a canter to the line.Lobby wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2023 4:34 pmIf true, its a terrible back 3. May and Daly have both lost all the pace that was their main selling point. May's positioning has always been a bit suspect and has only got worse, and Daly has been absolute dogshit since coming back into the England team. Smith has potential at Fullback but has only really played there against Chile, and to make a success of it needs support from a pair of experienced and in-form wingers.Raggs wrote: ↑Wed Oct 11, 2023 4:23 pm I just don't understand the thinking behind that lineup. If we're going defensive, go defensive. If we're trying to attack, let's do that. This feels like a right mish mash with no clear thinking.
Have Fiji done much kicking? Maybe the idea is that we can play Smith because they aren't kicking a lot. Not that he's terrible in the air or anything, but Steward is rather handy on that front.
As you say, when added to Farrell and Tuilagi it just shows a completely incoherent and confused approach.
Clearly Smith at FB is risky and not something you'd be attempting if things were going well, but there is at least some attacking threat / playmaking ability there that was absent before.
May and Daly on the wings is pretty depressing, because there actually are wings in the league who consistently out perform them domestically. I get the credit in the bank thing, but we're selecting a team for 2023, not 2019 FFS
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5963
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
Hopefully it brings back fond memories of the neutrals on the Eng Fiji thread on PR thread during the 2015 World Cup.
That one was a lot of fun
That one was a lot of fun
-
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:08 pm
Yes. Plenty of England won't be supporting England.
-
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
Borthwick must be saving Ford's legs for the final.
Earl is not an 8, Vinupola is not a great option on the bench. Zach who?
Last edited by inactionman on Fri Oct 13, 2023 11:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
I am so glad Ren and Stimpy aren't really a thing today, my son would latch onto that bloody song and drive me madder than Ren.
The one consolation we can take is that we appear to have finally moved on from Youngs, although obviously the shirt is just being kept warm until his spiritual (and actual) successor JVP returns.
The one consolation we can take is that we appear to have finally moved on from Youngs, although obviously the shirt is just being kept warm until his spiritual (and actual) successor JVP returns.
-
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2023 12:25 am
- Location: Middle England
Really does depend on what version of Fiji turn up and/or what they have left in the tank. England will bumble, stumble, and fumble about, irregardless. If Fiji are fairly disciplined - foul play, defensive effort, set piece, stuff like 22 exits, etc - and enough ball sticks in hand then it will be an interesting match.
Nobody wins if you're an England fan though. Likely Borthwick stays in place anyway, but a win and that becomes pretty certain
Nobody wins if you're an England fan though. Likely Borthwick stays in place anyway, but a win and that becomes pretty certain
I feel sorry for the touchables like Mitchell and Smith as they will be blamed if it falls over.
Edit: if I was Scotland or Wales i would be checking out any talented unselected England youth players as England are going to be a dull mess.
I honestly don't get the Farrell for Ford switch, I thought Ford brought a degree of sanity to the English backs. Smith to FB is just silly, he might do ok v Fiji but he is not a FB. Tuilagi still a defensive liability along with both May and Daly. However I cant see Fiji coping with English forwards power and their kicking game and will end up trying to run the ball from everywhere which will not work. England will win easily unless ....
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5963
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Borthwick isn’t going anywhere regardless.el capitan wrote: ↑Fri Oct 13, 2023 12:47 pm Really does depend on what version of Fiji turn up and/or what they have left in the tank. England will bumble, stumble, and fumble about, irregardless. If Fiji are fairly disciplined - foul play, defensive effort, set piece, stuff like 22 exits, etc - and enough ball sticks in hand then it will be an interesting match.
Nobody wins if you're an England fan though. Likely Borthwick stays in place anyway, but a win and that becomes pretty certain
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- Torquemada 1420
- Posts: 11158
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: Hut 8
No carthorse Steward? I kinda see a rationale for that in that Fiji are quick......... but then so are most other oppositions' backs. If Eng are going to kick everything, has Borthwick just removed a key weapon?
Can't blame you for not paying attention, but Steward's form has nosedived, Smith's impact from the bench has bailed England's attack out time and again, and the greatest fly half the world has ever seen cannot be dropped. So here we are.
Of course a properly selected squad would've had a live alternative at 15 in good form who actually plays there regularly but these things are beyond Borthwick.
Of course a properly selected squad would've had a live alternative at 15 in good form who actually plays there regularly but these things are beyond Borthwick.
Agree on Stewards form. The greatest fly half the world has ever seen must train like a dream because it is a surprising number of coaches (jones, gatland, borthwick, lancaster) have played him as a lone playmaker then realised it doesn't work. McCall has always had additional playmaker types in that sarries backline like goode and lozowski or a controlling scrumhalf like Wigglesworth. Dropping an out of form Steward to fit in a 2nd playmaker makes sense.JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 15, 2023 10:03 am Can't blame you for not paying attention, but Steward's form has nosedived, Smith's impact from the bench has bailed England's attack out time and again, and the greatest fly half the world has ever seen cannot be dropped. So here we are.
Of course a properly selected squad would've had a live alternative at 15 in good form who actually plays there regularly but these things are beyond Borthwick.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
-
- Posts: 1010
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:08 pm
Thank christ I've found a non ITV stream to watch.