How predictable is this?sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 12:43 pm How predictable. Right wing yobs pick a fight with the police faces when the police respond.
Just waiting for a spokesperson (presumably Yaxley-Lennon once he gets far enough away) to brand the Met woke.
Stop voting for fucking Tories
Agreed, I suspect there will be many more chants of this nature.Ymx wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 3:02 pmHow predictable is this?sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 12:43 pm How predictable. Right wing yobs pick a fight with the police faces when the police respond.
Just waiting for a spokesperson (presumably Yaxley-Lennon once he gets far enough away) to brand the Met woke.
Very predictable.
Someone get food poisoning at a caf near Paddington?
-
- Posts: 8664
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Sadly, very. Although I'd point out that however horrible their rhetoric, they're not actually attacking anyone.Ymx wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 3:02 pmHow predictable is this?sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 12:43 pm How predictable. Right wing yobs pick a fight with the police faces when the police respond.
Just waiting for a spokesperson (presumably Yaxley-Lennon once he gets far enough away) to brand the Met woke.
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
In more positive news, the Restore Trust Tufton Street mob have been given short shrift at the National Trust AGM once more, but no doubt they'll be back again and again until circumstances go in their favour, and that's that...
Give them some timesockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 4:04 pmSadly, very. Although I'd point out that however horrible their rhetoric, they're not actually attacking anyone.Ymx wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 3:02 pmHow predictable is this?sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 12:43 pm How predictable. Right wing yobs pick a fight with the police faces when the police respond.
Just waiting for a spokesperson (presumably Yaxley-Lennon once he gets far enough away) to brand the Met woke.
Why is it you dislike and distrust Muslims so much?
They are no different to any other religious group imho.
I have a general dislike and distrust of Islam, somewhat môre so than my dislike and distrust of Christianity. Largely based on personal experienceC69 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:28 pmWhy is it you dislike and distrust Muslims so much?Calculon wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:02 pmGive them some timesockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 4:04 pm
Sadly, very. Although I'd point out that however horrible their rhetoric, they're not actually attacking anyone.
They are no different to any other religious group imho.
And if you're referring to those, probable, Muslims in the video clip, I do dislike them and distrust them. Mainly cos they're calling for the ethnic cleansing of Jews.
Last edited by Calculon on Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 8664
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
We need to be wary of Islamaphobia, but come on. Over the last 20 years there's only one religious group carrying out terror attacks in the West and there's all sorts of troubling polling out there about levels of support of incidents like the Charlie Hebdo attacks and beheading of the French teacher who tried to use pictures of Mohammad to cover the concept of intolerance. Islam is far more problematic for us than say Sikhism or Judaism.C69 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:28 pmWhy is it you dislike and distrust Muslims so much?Calculon wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:02 pmGive them some timesockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 4:04 pm
Sadly, very. Although I'd point out that however horrible their rhetoric, they're not actually attacking anyone.
They are no different to any other religious group imho.
Of course things are different in other parts of the world. e.g. Buddhist monks accused of participating in violent anti-Muslim mobs in Burma.
What about them? The Jews and Buddhist I've known have been OK, one of my closest friends is half Jewish, not met any of the other one.
Don’t be ridiculousC69 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:28 pmWhy is it you dislike and distrust Muslims so much?Calculon wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:02 pmGive them some timesockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 4:04 pm
Sadly, very. Although I'd point out that however horrible their rhetoric, they're not actually attacking anyone.
They are no different to any other religious group imho.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
What Slick said. No other religion has 21st century fundamentalism.
I don't think you understand what fundamentalism is
hint its not the same as extremism.
-
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm
Perhaps, but of the major religions to exist in the Occident it'd be fair to say Islam is the most misogynistic, most homophobic..., and this despite the actual wordings of their particular pleadings to a sky fairy
Perhaps some of the genesis for this lies at the hands of Christians and illegals wars and failures of the West.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:49 pmWe need to be wary of Islamaphobia, but come on. Over the last 20 years there's only one religious group carrying out terror attacks in the West and there's all sorts of troubling polling out there about levels of support of incidents like the Charlie Hebdo attacks and beheading of the French teacher who tried to use pictures of Mohammad to cover the concept of intolerance. Islam is far more problematic for us than say Sikhism or Judaism.
Of course things are different in other parts of the world. e.g. Buddhist monks accused of participating in violent anti-Muslim mobs in Burma.
Iraq, Libya an s Afghanistan.
Remember a million dead in Iraq and Bush asserted God told him his actions were just FFS. Blair and Bush doing the work of Jesus father.
Gtfo if you think they were doing the work of Christ but they stated they were.
Same as the HAMAS scum now.
All of which was caused Bin Laden deciding to stage a spectacular attack on the US mostly because it was an ally of a Saudi regime he hated .C69 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 7:31 pmPerhaps some of the genesis for this lies at the hands of Christians and illegals wars and failures of the West.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:49 pmWe need to be wary of Islamaphobia, but come on. Over the last 20 years there's only one religious group carrying out terror attacks in the West and there's all sorts of troubling polling out there about levels of support of incidents like the Charlie Hebdo attacks and beheading of the French teacher who tried to use pictures of Mohammad to cover the concept of intolerance. Islam is far more problematic for us than say Sikhism or Judaism.
Of course things are different in other parts of the world. e.g. Buddhist monks accused of participating in violent anti-Muslim mobs in Burma.
Iraq, Libya an s Afghanistan.
Remember a million dead in Iraq and Bush asserted God told him his actions were just FFS. Blair and Bush doing the work of Jesus father.
Gtfo if you think they were doing the work of Christ but they stated they were.
Same as the HAMAS scum now.
Arguably the disastrous interventions in the middle east drove some to extremism but hard-line attitudes have always existed - the polling is pretty stark.
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Oklahoma city bombing and the 2011 Norway attacks, to pick just two, were carried out by Muslims?sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:49 pmWe need to be wary of Islamaphobia, but come on. Over the last 20 years there's only one religious group carrying out terror attacks in the West and there's all sorts of troubling polling out there about levels of support of incidents like the Charlie Hebdo attacks and beheading of the French teacher who tried to use pictures of Mohammad to cover the concept of intolerance. Islam is far more problematic for us than say Sikhism or Judaism.
Of course things are different in other parts of the world. e.g. Buddhist monks accused of participating in violent anti-Muslim mobs in Burma.
Or the Christchurch mosque shootings?
4 crazy Christians? 5? Completely dwarfed by the number of violent terrorist acts committed in the name of Islam in the last 25 years.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 8:04 pmOklahoma city bombing and the 2011 Norway attacks, to pick just two, were carried out by Muslims?sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:49 pmWe need to be wary of Islamaphobia, but come on. Over the last 20 years there's only one religious group carrying out terror attacks in the West and there's all sorts of troubling polling out there about levels of support of incidents like the Charlie Hebdo attacks and beheading of the French teacher who tried to use pictures of Mohammad to cover the concept of intolerance. Islam is far more problematic for us than say Sikhism or Judaism.
Of course things are different in other parts of the world. e.g. Buddhist monks accused of participating in violent anti-Muslim mobs in Burma.
Or the Christchurch mosque shootings?
Stuff it, I’m going to do something less annoying.
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
My point being is that this is demonstrably untrue.Over the last 20 years there's only one religious group carrying out terror attacks in the West
Yes, you did find just 2.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 8:04 pmOklahoma city bombing and the 2011 Norway attacks, to pick just two, were carried out by Muslims?sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:49 pmWe need to be wary of Islamaphobia, but come on. Over the last 20 years there's only one religious group carrying out terror attacks in the West and there's all sorts of troubling polling out there about levels of support of incidents like the Charlie Hebdo attacks and beheading of the French teacher who tried to use pictures of Mohammad to cover the concept of intolerance. Islam is far more problematic for us than say Sikhism or Judaism.
Of course things are different in other parts of the world. e.g. Buddhist monks accused of participating in violent anti-Muslim mobs in Burma.
Or the Christchurch mosque shootings?
This is a mental line of argument
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
This is an extremely one eyed take on things. You get that, right?sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:49 pmWe need to be wary of Islamaphobia, but come on. Over the last 20 years there's only one religious group carrying out terror attacks in the West and there's all sorts of troubling polling out there about levels of support of incidents like the Charlie Hebdo attacks and beheading of the French teacher who tried to use pictures of Mohammad to cover the concept of intolerance. Islam is far more problematic for us than say Sikhism or Judaism.
Of course things are different in other parts of the world. e.g. Buddhist monks accused of participating in violent anti-Muslim mobs in Burma.
-
- Posts: 8664
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
I don't accept that terror attacks against the civillian populations of countries are excused like that. If the issues are with politicians and the armed forces they command, target them. Indiscriminate slaughter of people who have no say isn't a retaliation for military incompetence.C69 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 7:31 pmPerhaps some of the genesis for this lies at the hands of Christians and illegals wars and failures of the West.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:49 pmWe need to be wary of Islamaphobia, but come on. Over the last 20 years there's only one religious group carrying out terror attacks in the West and there's all sorts of troubling polling out there about levels of support of incidents like the Charlie Hebdo attacks and beheading of the French teacher who tried to use pictures of Mohammad to cover the concept of intolerance. Islam is far more problematic for us than say Sikhism or Judaism.
Of course things are different in other parts of the world. e.g. Buddhist monks accused of participating in violent anti-Muslim mobs in Burma.
Iraq, Libya an s Afghanistan.
Remember a million dead in Iraq and Bush asserted God told him his actions were just FFS. Blair and Bush doing the work of Jesus father.
Gtfo if you think they were doing the work of Christ but they stated they were.
Same as the HAMAS scum now.
Casting it as Christian vs. Muslim is reaching. Bush said it about one theatre and his words as a president of the US hold some weight, but none of the rest of the coalition nations made any such expressions. If it were Christianity vs. Islam you might expect the terrorists to specifically target Christians/churches when launching their attacks, but, no, they're pretty indiscriminate when pursuing mass targets rather than specific individuals ( for such ghastly crimes as drawing their pedo prophet).
-
- Posts: 8664
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
There's only one religious group that might kill me in my own country or in any near neighbours. I don't really care if you think that's one-eyed.Simian wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 8:54 pmThis is an extremely one eyed take on things. You get that, right?sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:49 pmWe need to be wary of Islamaphobia, but come on. Over the last 20 years there's only one religious group carrying out terror attacks in the West and there's all sorts of troubling polling out there about levels of support of incidents like the Charlie Hebdo attacks and beheading of the French teacher who tried to use pictures of Mohammad to cover the concept of intolerance. Islam is far more problematic for us than say Sikhism or Judaism.
Of course things are different in other parts of the world. e.g. Buddhist monks accused of participating in violent anti-Muslim mobs in Burma.
-
- Posts: 8664
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Fine. Outside of America one religious group is responsible for the overwhelming majority of terror attacks in the West. To the extent that attacks carried out by any other are statistically negligible.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 8:20 pmMy point being is that this is demonstrably untrue.Over the last 20 years there's only one religious group carrying out terror attacks in the West
sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 9:06 pmFine. Outside of America one religious group is responsible for the overwhelming majority of terror attacks in the West. To the extent that attacks carried out by any other are statistically negligible.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 8:20 pmMy point being is that this is demonstrably untrue.Over the last 20 years there's only one religious group carrying out terror attacks in the West
Anders Breviks attack is not statistically negligible 77 people died
That post is spectacularly inaccurate, there are no excuses. To deny the rhetoric of both Bush and Blair stating their actions were drien by God is spectacularly forgetful or dishones.I will give you the benefit of the doubt.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 9:01 pmI don't accept that terror attacks against the civillian populations of countries are excused like that. If the issues are with politicians and the armed forces they command, target them. Indiscriminate slaughter of people who have no say isn't a retaliation for military incompetence.C69 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 7:31 pmPerhaps some of the genesis for this lies at the hands of Christians and illegals wars and failures of the West.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:49 pm
We need to be wary of Islamaphobia, but come on. Over the last 20 years there's only one religious group carrying out terror attacks in the West and there's all sorts of troubling polling out there about levels of support of incidents like the Charlie Hebdo attacks and beheading of the French teacher who tried to use pictures of Mohammad to cover the concept of intolerance. Islam is far more problematic for us than say Sikhism or Judaism.
Of course things are different in other parts of the world. e.g. Buddhist monks accused of participating in violent anti-Muslim mobs in Burma.
Iraq, Libya an s Afghanistan.
Remember a million dead in Iraq and Bush asserted God told him his actions were just FFS. Blair and Bush doing the work of Jesus father.
Gtfo if you think they were doing the work of Christ but they stated they were.
Same as the HAMAS scum now.
Casting it as Christian vs. Muslim is reaching. Bush said it about one theatre and his words as a president of the US hold some weight, but none of the rest of the coalition nations made any such expressions. If it were Christianity vs. Islam you might expect the terrorists to specifically target Christians/churches when launching their attacks, but, no, they're pretty indiscriminate when pursuing mass targets rather than specific individuals ( for such ghastly crimes as drawing their pedo prophet).
God and George W Bush drove Tony Blair to invade Iraq, ex-PM's biographer claims
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/68710 ... rt-Inquiry
and
Prime Minister Tony Blair has indicated that God influenced his deliberations when he committed British troops to fight alongside American forces in Iraq.
The remarks, which surprised some antiwar campaigners, were made in an Independent Television talk show to be broadcast Saturday night. A transcript was released by the ITV station on Friday.
Mr. Blair has made no secret of his Christian faith, but he has not previously ascribed policy decisions to his religion. In the past, he refused to answer persistent questions by an interviewer about whether he had prayed with President Bush.
In the interview on the widely followed "Parkinson" show, Mr. Blair was asked about sending troops to Iraq, ITV said.
"That decision has to be taken and has to be lived with," he said, according to the ITV transcript, "and in the end there is a judgment that -- well, I think if you have faith about these things, then you realize that judgment is made by other people."
Asked to explain what he meant, he replied, "If you believe in God, it's made by God as well."
"This is not just a matter of a policy here or a thing there, but of their lives and in some case their death," he said. "The only way you can take a decision like that is to try to do the right thing, according to your conscience, and for the rest of it you leave it to the judgment that history will make."
https://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/04/worl ... -iraq.html
Bush was much more clear about his Christianity and the actions
'God told me to invade Iraq', Bush told advisers
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/god-tol ... -1.1183264
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
You do realize that Bush's war and the resultant chaos is directly responsible for the rise of ISIS?sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 9:01 pmI don't accept that terror attacks against the civillian populations of countries are excused like that. If the issues are with politicians and the armed forces they command, target them. Indiscriminate slaughter of people who have no say isn't a retaliation for military incompetence.C69 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 7:31 pmPerhaps some of the genesis for this lies at the hands of Christians and illegals wars and failures of the West.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 5:49 pm
We need to be wary of Islamaphobia, but come on. Over the last 20 years there's only one religious group carrying out terror attacks in the West and there's all sorts of troubling polling out there about levels of support of incidents like the Charlie Hebdo attacks and beheading of the French teacher who tried to use pictures of Mohammad to cover the concept of intolerance. Islam is far more problematic for us than say Sikhism or Judaism.
Of course things are different in other parts of the world. e.g. Buddhist monks accused of participating in violent anti-Muslim mobs in Burma.
Iraq, Libya an s Afghanistan.
Remember a million dead in Iraq and Bush asserted God told him his actions were just FFS. Blair and Bush doing the work of Jesus father.
Gtfo if you think they were doing the work of Christ but they stated they were.
Same as the HAMAS scum now.
Casting it as Christian vs. Muslim is reaching. Bush said it about one theatre and his words as a president of the US hold some weight, but none of the rest of the coalition nations made any such expressions. If it were Christianity vs. Islam you might expect the terrorists to specifically target Christians/churches when launching their attacks, but, no, they're pretty indiscriminate when pursuing mass targets rather than specific individuals ( for such ghastly crimes as drawing their pedo prophet).
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Assassination of British MP's?yermum wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 9:27 pmsockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 9:06 pmFine. Outside of America one religious group is responsible for the overwhelming majority of terror attacks in the West. To the extent that attacks carried out by any other are statistically negligible.
Anders Breviks attack is not statistically negligible 77 people died
Jo Cox was killed by a little Englander.
To claim that the only source of terror attacks in the west was Islamic is clearly hyperbole and you belatedly seem to be walking it back.
-
- Posts: 8664
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
As I said, reaching. Casting Blair saying if you believe in God then he'll be among those to judge the decision to go to war is far, far cry from saying you're invading a nation in the name of Christianity.
From your Express link:
I didn't deny what Bush said. It remains that he didn't speak for every nation involved (frankly he didn't speak for his own nation, the neocon hawks wanted to break open the middle east for disaster capitalism, particuarly Iraq's state owned oil industry) and while I can understand those on the ground in the Middle East who've seen relatives killed perhaps not caring all that much about the distinction, those who've carried out attacks here in Europe were not typically Iraqis or Afghanis.
From your Express link:
That is not doing something in the name of Christianity.He said: "He saw himself as the man who would free the West of a terrible dictator who was persecuting Iraqis and threatening the stability of the entire region.
"He wanted to be the man who would go down in history as the person who led the war against Saddam and brought peace and stability to the Middle East."
I didn't deny what Bush said. It remains that he didn't speak for every nation involved (frankly he didn't speak for his own nation, the neocon hawks wanted to break open the middle east for disaster capitalism, particuarly Iraq's state owned oil industry) and while I can understand those on the ground in the Middle East who've seen relatives killed perhaps not caring all that much about the distinction, those who've carried out attacks here in Europe were not typically Iraqis or Afghanis.
-
- Posts: 8664
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
We were originally talking about the threat offered by Islam differentiating it from other religious groups here. As far as I know, Jo Cox was not murdered by anyone in the name of a faith. Which makes the incident somewhat irrelevant.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 9:54 pmAssassination of British MP's?yermum wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 9:27 pmsockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Nov 11, 2023 9:06 pm
Fine. Outside of America one religious group is responsible for the overwhelming majority of terror attacks in the West. To the extent that attacks carried out by any other are statistically negligible.
Anders Breviks attack is not statistically negligible 77 people died
Jo Cox was killed by a little Englander.
To claim that the only source of terror attacks in the west was Islamic is clearly hyperbole and you belatedly seem to be walking it back.
Not walking back so much as accepting that when I initially wrote I was primarily thinking of Europe as the West.