I’m talking about spending the money shielding the elderly not treating them. Other countries managed.
Even changing that part way through was beyond their dull brains.
The lying cunt managed to write a biography of Churchill, & supposedly holds him as a hero; & yet managed to completely miss the numerous, onerous restrictions that his hero placed on people freedoms during WW II.yermum wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 4:18 pmbut at the same time we love freedom too much to follow the rules...Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 22, 2020 1:33 pmBoris Johnson: "There is nothing more frustrating for the vast majority, the law-abiding majority that do comply. Then the sight of a few brazenly defying the rules."
I' m talking about the outsourcing of Coronavirus related jobs to new private providers/bidders, not long stablished health care providers.Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 12:17 pmeldanielfire wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 11:32 amPHE is trash, but The Government has been hugely flawed in this awarding contracts to clueless friends rather than those in the business. It's no coincidence that posters here pointed out the most COVID infected area of Australia got that way through a private contracts where other states used the public sector and didn't.Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 9:33 am The problem with initial testing wasn’t that PHE was sidelined it was they resisted at PHE all private sector help .... that lasted months .
PHE totally at fault .
And yet private providers did fine in Germany and Switzerland.
That's the issue. At one end we have moronic anti-maskers who oppose any intervention regardless of death rates from pure denial, then we have the extremist "we should have never left lockdown ever" types. Sadly extremist opinion always gets over represented in media. Most people are sympathetic to their governments making difficult decisions in a first time event in our lifetimes.Carter's Choice wrote: ↑Fri Sep 18, 2020 10:16 pm Reports in the Australian media today that the UK is entering a 2nd wave. Stay safe boets
Interestingly, these reports are in the same media that has been demanding that Australian states ease restrictions for months. So I guess governments are damned either way?
Agreed. Just shows how many useless pricks there are in politics.Biffer wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 10:11 amAlso true of politicians. Last time I checked there were 5 out of 650 MPs at Westminster who had a STEM degree.robmatic wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:26 amWe are not really being helped by the media.CM11 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 8:14 am
I don't disagree.
Unfortunately we panicked people so much (rightly so) that they are fixated on numbers and aren't really factoring in the increased ability to catch cases so we get headlines like 'most cases since April!!!!!!!' without much explanation that it's not comparable.
I've known quite a few journalists and most of them are pretty clueless when it comes to numbers, unfortunately.
Just checked and it’s changed a fair amount, it’s twenty something now. But that’s still shockingly low.
LInk? I assume Rule 1 is still a law on this forum.Glaston wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 2:56 pmI did think something similar but thought maybe I was being a bit mean.
I dont understand what is going on overall. Its like some people have forgotten the last 7 months and couldnt care less about the consequnces.
Looking at the younger generation here.
Wash hands, wear a mask, social distance. If you do that it, shouldnt spread .
Came across a Twitch stream of Swedish girls in Italy just totally not giving a monkeys
Yeah yeah, lol Swedish girls on Twitch
It was a random thing
I'm O positive. I'm kinda hoping this is trueEnzedder wrote: ↑Sat Sep 19, 2020 7:34 pm Well shit - wanna poor more fear onto me?
A new study of more than one million people suggests those with a certain blood type are less at risk of contracting Covid-19 than others.
The study of 1.05 million participants over four months, published on medrxiv.org, has found people with O-type blood may be less susceptible to contracting coronavirus.
The results have not been peer reviewed.
The study is based on research results from personal genomics and biotechnology company 23andMe, which conducted the work this year. So probably means I am safe. Phew
It found people with O-type blood appear to be at a lower risk of being infected and also are less likely to have a severe case of the disease.
So you think people wearing a mask will not spread infection only because they believe it? FFS!
eldanielfire wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 7:28 amSo you think people wearing a mask will not spread infection only because they believe it? FFS!
She pretty much wreaked her reputation with Jordan Peterson. But she is always desperate for conflict. I suspect because she doesn't read deeply into many topics, she can't facilitate a deeper informative discussion when there is nothing to argue about.
Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 7:34 ameldanielfire wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 7:28 amSo you think people wearing a mask will not spread infection only because they believe it? FFS!
Erm, the meaning of placebo was cleared up a while ago. Try and keep up.
A friend in need is a friend indeedBimbowomxn wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 7:34 ameldanielfire wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 7:28 amSo you think people wearing a mask will not spread infection only because they believe it? FFS!
Erm, the meaning of placebo was cleared up a while ago. Try and keep up.
Yasy..................you win again
You prefaced your post with "Thread"Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 11:45 am
An odd response to an alternate view.
Unless you think we will have a successful vaccine fairly soon another approach to “lockdowns” is going to have to be taken.
That all makes sense really, though I did worry about some of the mask-free idiots shouting into riders’ faces on some of the climbs. I suppose I needn’t have worried since all the riders will have been briefed about placebos and stuff.yermum wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 5:03 pm A Colleague of mine that works with a pro cycling team told me that they had less illness and stomach issues than any other three week tours.
Usually by the third week half the riders and the support staff have the shits or are coming down with illness.
She put it down to mask usage, infection control and social distancing. Obviously placebo is a powerful thing.
yermum wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 5:03 pm A Colleague of mine that works with a pro cycling team told me that they had less illness and stomach issues than any other three week tours.
Usually by the third week half the riders and the support staff have the shits or are coming down with illness.
She put it down to mask usage, infection control and social distancing. Obviously placebo is a powerful thing.
Saint wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:11 pm Even if masks were shown to do nothing other than provide a permanent reminder to do the social distancing thing they're worthwhile. The only real risk is if they provide a false sense of security - but fortunately the data shows that if both parties are wearing a mask then there's a significant reduction in transmission
It means "I am posting a twitter link that's actually a thread worth reading, not just the single tweet".
Almost sounds like the start of a scam ?
Maybe. This’ll get Bimboh frothing in his y-fronts, but she’s getting in contact with the Police to report this fool.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 8:08 pmAlmost sounds like the start of a scam ?
You know:
"I've Covid, & don't want to infect you; so why don't you leave the stuff outside, & once I put it in the car, I'll come back & leave an envelope with the money in your letterbox ...."
Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:24 pmSaint wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:11 pm Even if masks were shown to do nothing other than provide a permanent reminder to do the social distancing thing they're worthwhile. The only real risk is if they provide a false sense of security - but fortunately the data shows that if both parties are wearing a mask then there's a significant reduction in transmission
The data shows nothing of the sort in practical terms. Plenty of high and early mask use where high cases have appeared.
Saint wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 9:20 pmBimbowomxn wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:24 pmSaint wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:11 pm Even if masks were shown to do nothing other than provide a permanent reminder to do the social distancing thing they're worthwhile. The only real risk is if they provide a false sense of security - but fortunately the data shows that if both parties are wearing a mask then there's a significant reduction in transmission
The data shows nothing of the sort in practical terms. Plenty of high and early mask use where high cases have appeared.
Early mask usage has come in areas where there has been high cases. You’re mistaking the cause for the high correlation
There's far more to it than that. I'm fed up of people talking about this stuff as if there's a single cause/effect/cure. It's provable that wearing a mask, even a basic mask, reduces the propagation of viruses particles. Bug that doesn't make wearing a mask a method by itself to stop virus propagation.Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 9:34 pmSaint wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 9:20 pmBimbowomxn wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:24 pm
The data shows nothing of the sort in practical terms. Plenty of high and early mask use where high cases have appeared.
Early mask usage has come in areas where there has been high cases. You’re mistaking the cause for the high correlation
I’m pointing out there’s plenty of places with early adoption and tight mask policies that are in worse places than more laissez faire approaches. If masks worked we wouldn’t see this.
Southeast Asia shits on your cornflakes Bimboh.Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 9:34 pmSaint wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 9:20 pmBimbowomxn wrote: ↑Wed Sep 23, 2020 6:24 pm
The data shows nothing of the sort in practical terms. Plenty of high and early mask use where high cases have appeared.
Early mask usage has come in areas where there has been high cases. You’re mistaking the cause for the high correlation
I’m pointing out there’s plenty of places with early adoption and tight mask policies that are in worse places than more laissez faire approaches. If masks worked we wouldn’t see this.