The Official English Rugby Thread

Where goats go to escape
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

inactionman wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:41 pm I wonder what the odds are for George Ford getting a season ending injury in his next game out.
Maximum conspiracy theory would be v Leinster in the Heineken Cup.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

Interesting to see if they go with Ford or continue to blood Marcus @ 10 now.

Form says Ford should be the obvious starter but Marcus needs unhindered time as the first choice if he's going to be the choice to the next WC.

I really don't see any reason to mix/match them - stick with one (except maybe against Italy).
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Slick
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

SaintK wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:39 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:17 pm Absolutely did not see that coming.

No doubt his family have taken a pasting from keyboard warriors
Quite! He doen't deserve all the shit and personal abuse that comes with his selection.
Sarries will delighted mind you.
I really, really hope it's not that. I hate the game at the moment.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
tc27
Posts: 2532
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Anyone whos directly abusing him or his family is well over the mark obviously.

Think its ok to criticise his performance and selection online though.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 6620
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:57 pm Interesting to see if they go with Ford or continue to blood Marcus @ 10 now.

Form says Ford should be the obvious starter but Marcus needs unhindered time as the first choice if he's going to be the choice to the next WC.

I really don't see any reason to mix/match them - stick with one (except maybe against Italy).
Ford been playing very well for Sale
Smith not so much for Quins
Liking the way Fin Smith is running the Saints back line again this season
All depends on the game plan Borthwick's going to play
User avatar
Raggs
Posts: 3698
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:51 pm

Ford, Smith and Smith in the squad?

Need to sort out the midfield without Farrell.

Sucks that he and his family have received abuse.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5961
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

SaintK wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:39 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:17 pm Absolutely did not see that coming.

No doubt his family have taken a pasting from keyboard warriors
Quite! He doen't deserve all the shit and personal abuse that comes with his selection.
Sarries will delighted mind you.
Yep. Bloke gave his all and never leant in to the pantomime villain stuff as he could have done. Sad he feels this is necessary
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
inactionman
Posts: 3065
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am

Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:57 pm Interesting to see if they go with Ford or continue to blood Marcus @ 10 now.

Form says Ford should be the obvious starter but Marcus needs unhindered time as the first choice if he's going to be the choice to the next WC.

I really don't see any reason to mix/match them - stick with one (except maybe against Italy).
I'd think it would be Ford, much as I rate Smith. I'd not be too unhappy either way.

I take the point about giving Smith some time at 10, however we're at the start of a 4 year WC cycle and there's a fair few 6Ns to compete in first. Ford would only be 34 come the next WC so should still be in the mix.
sockwithaticket
Posts: 8664
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am

Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:57 pm Interesting to see if they go with Ford or continue to blood Marcus @ 10 now.

Form says Ford should be the obvious starter but Marcus needs unhindered time as the first choice if he's going to be the choice to the next WC.

I really don't see any reason to mix/match them - stick with one (except maybe against Italy).
Ford will be 34 at the next world cup. Certainly that's getting on, but not an unselectable age, particularly for a fly half.

I don't think Borthwick will select Smith at 10 unless left without other viable choices.
inactionman
Posts: 3065
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am

I'm sure the crap he got on media (press and social) hasn't helped, but I'm hoping this is more just a chance to step back for a bit after many, many years of high-intensity rugby.

He's 32 and has been doing this for, what, 12 years or so, including through the beastings Eddie Jones handed out. I'd think a year or two out and maybe a return nearer the next WC (if he plans on reaching it? He'll be 36) would make sense.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5961
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

tc27 wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 4:00 pm Anyone whos directly abusing him or his family is well over the mark obviously.

Think its ok to criticise his performance and selection online though.
Of course. I among a lot of others have been exceptionally critical of Ben Youngs’ last five years or so in an England shirt, I haven’t gone after him as a person though
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5961
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:57 pm Interesting to see if they go with Ford or continue to blood Marcus @ 10 now.

Form says Ford should be the obvious starter but Marcus needs unhindered time as the first choice if he's going to be the choice to the next WC.

I really don't see any reason to mix/match them - stick with one (except maybe against Italy).
30 caps for England now, not so much blooding as increasingly blind hope at this stage
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
tc27
Posts: 2532
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 4:40 pm
tc27 wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 4:00 pm Anyone whos directly abusing him or his family is well over the mark obviously.

Think its ok to criticise his performance and selection online though.
Of course. I among a lot of others have been exceptionally critical of Ben Youngs’ last five years or so in an England shirt, I haven’t gone after him as a person though
.

Theres a fairly clear line that far to many people cross (making negative or even threatening comments directly to the player online or in person) but there's a little bit of a suggestion in the media today that any kind of criticism of a players performance or selection is unacceptable and is causing players MH issues.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5961
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

tc27 wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 6:15 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 4:40 pm
tc27 wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 4:00 pm Anyone whos directly abusing him or his family is well over the mark obviously.

Think its ok to criticise his performance and selection online though.
Of course. I among a lot of others have been exceptionally critical of Ben Youngs’ last five years or so in an England shirt, I haven’t gone after him as a person though
.

Theres a fairly clear line that far to many people cross (making negative or even threatening comments directly to the player online or in person) but there's a little bit of a suggestion in the media today that any kind of criticism of a players performance or selection is unacceptable and is causing players MH issues.
Yeah sport is in a funny space full stop on this. I remember Jonny Bairstow and the media hitting the roof when he got called fat by Aussie fans in the last away Ashes. He was/is fat! He’s a pro sportsman! Taking some shit, particularly at the games, is part and parcel of the job.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Rhubarb & Custard
Posts: 2097
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm

Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 4:41 pm
Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:57 pm Interesting to see if they go with Ford or continue to blood Marcus @ 10 now.

Form says Ford should be the obvious starter but Marcus needs unhindered time as the first choice if he's going to be the choice to the next WC.

I really don't see any reason to mix/match them - stick with one (except maybe against Italy).
30 caps for England now, not so much blooding as increasingly blind hope at this stage
A bit like Farrell then, only he's up to 100 and something caps of blind hope he'll stop being a pumpkin. Positives to both for sure, but plenty that hasn't worked, and really too much that hasn't worked
Slick
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

tc27 wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 6:15 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 4:40 pm
tc27 wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 4:00 pm Anyone whos directly abusing him or his family is well over the mark obviously.

Think its ok to criticise his performance and selection online though.
Of course. I among a lot of others have been exceptionally critical of Ben Youngs’ last five years or so in an England shirt, I haven’t gone after him as a person though
.

Theres a fairly clear line that far to many people cross (making negative or even threatening comments directly to the player online or in person) but there's a little bit of a suggestion in the media today that any kind of criticism of a players performance or selection is unacceptable and is causing players MH issues.
Agree, supporters having a debate is all part of sport, it would be fairly shit without that, but actually directing criticism or threats directly (either in person or social media) is just pathetic.

On the bolded bit, I read Alex Lowe in the Times going on about that whilst forgetting that his fellow ST journo, Stuart Barnes, has been a vociferous critic of Farrell. The fact that Barnes is completely unreadable doesn't excuse it.

Also, anyone seen the video doing the rounds of the Sale supporter screaming "CUNT" at Farrell with his 3 year old daughter on his shoulders. It still honestly surprises me to see something like that in rugby
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Rhubarb & Custard
Posts: 2097
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm

Slick wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2023 1:17 pm
tc27 wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 6:15 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 4:40 pm

Of course. I among a lot of others have been exceptionally critical of Ben Youngs’ last five years or so in an England shirt, I haven’t gone after him as a person though
.

Theres a fairly clear line that far to many people cross (making negative or even threatening comments directly to the player online or in person) but there's a little bit of a suggestion in the media today that any kind of criticism of a players performance or selection is unacceptable and is causing players MH issues.
Agree, supporters having a debate is all part of sport, it would be fairly shit without that, but actually directing criticism or threats directly (either in person or social media) is just pathetic.

On the bolded bit, I read Alex Lowe in the Times going on about that whilst forgetting that his fellow ST journo, Stuart Barnes, has been a vociferous critic of Farrell. The fact that Barnes is completely unreadable doesn't excuse it.

Also, anyone seen the video doing the rounds of the Sale supporter screaming "CUNT" at Farrell with his 3 year old daughter on his shoulders. It still honestly surprises me to see something like that in rugby
Frankly it seems odd that exists in life not just rugby

Or maybe it was being shouted at his daughter, and as an endearment? Highly unlikely, but I know John Oliver does a story on how one just doesn't hear the C word based in America and then on a visit back to the UK a stranger looked down on his new born child and said something to the effect 'oh he's a lovely little cunt ain't he', and Oliver was shocked to hear it, shocked to hear it directed at a child, and then realised actually it's just a normal word for lots of people.
Line6 HXFX
Posts: 1148
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:31 am

Rugby is resenta'tainment, just like the shit the daily mail churns out, but much much worse as at least they are purported to have some professional journalistic standards..sports journalists are completely unrestrained...and then you all lose your knickers when it all turns nasty and a bit "reactionary"?

No wonder the players are fucking bored of it.
Slick
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2023 1:36 pm
Slick wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2023 1:17 pm
tc27 wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 6:15 pm
.

Theres a fairly clear line that far to many people cross (making negative or even threatening comments directly to the player online or in person) but there's a little bit of a suggestion in the media today that any kind of criticism of a players performance or selection is unacceptable and is causing players MH issues.
Agree, supporters having a debate is all part of sport, it would be fairly shit without that, but actually directing criticism or threats directly (either in person or social media) is just pathetic.

On the bolded bit, I read Alex Lowe in the Times going on about that whilst forgetting that his fellow ST journo, Stuart Barnes, has been a vociferous critic of Farrell. The fact that Barnes is completely unreadable doesn't excuse it.

Also, anyone seen the video doing the rounds of the Sale supporter screaming "CUNT" at Farrell with his 3 year old daughter on his shoulders. It still honestly surprises me to see something like that in rugby
Frankly it seems odd that exists in life not just rugby

Or maybe it was being shouted at his daughter, and as an endearment? Highly unlikely, but I know John Oliver does a story on how one just doesn't hear the C word based in America and then on a visit back to the UK a stranger looked down on his new born child and said something to the effect 'oh he's a lovely little cunt ain't he', and Oliver was shocked to hear it, shocked to hear it directed at a child, and then realised actually it's just a normal word for lots of people.
Nah it's very obvious and snarly
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Rhubarb & Custard
Posts: 2097
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm

Slick wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2023 2:01 pm
Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2023 1:36 pm
Slick wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2023 1:17 pm

Agree, supporters having a debate is all part of sport, it would be fairly shit without that, but actually directing criticism or threats directly (either in person or social media) is just pathetic.

On the bolded bit, I read Alex Lowe in the Times going on about that whilst forgetting that his fellow ST journo, Stuart Barnes, has been a vociferous critic of Farrell. The fact that Barnes is completely unreadable doesn't excuse it.

Also, anyone seen the video doing the rounds of the Sale supporter screaming "CUNT" at Farrell with his 3 year old daughter on his shoulders. It still honestly surprises me to see something like that in rugby
Frankly it seems odd that exists in life not just rugby

Or maybe it was being shouted at his daughter, and as an endearment? Highly unlikely, but I know John Oliver does a story on how one just doesn't hear the C word based in America and then on a visit back to the UK a stranger looked down on his new born child and said something to the effect 'oh he's a lovely little cunt ain't he', and Oliver was shocked to hear it, shocked to hear it directed at a child, and then realised actually it's just a normal word for lots of people.
Nah it's very obvious and snarly
Very likely it's a ronseal moment, thus it would seem odd in life. But some people do use the word somewhat differently, mind the person saying to Oliver's baby probably didn't have aggression in their voice, and my guess is the person shouting at Farrell and his child did.

My own standards would be I cannot see why it's acceptable to shout even just wanker at the referee or a player, people are there with their kids and it's not appropriate even if you are happy with some of the more colourful turns of phrase. Rubbish or wrong would seem to be apt if you must shout a negative
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5961
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2023 2:14 pm
Slick wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2023 2:01 pm
Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2023 1:36 pm

Frankly it seems odd that exists in life not just rugby

Or maybe it was being shouted at his daughter, and as an endearment? Highly unlikely, but I know John Oliver does a story on how one just doesn't hear the C word based in America and then on a visit back to the UK a stranger looked down on his new born child and said something to the effect 'oh he's a lovely little cunt ain't he', and Oliver was shocked to hear it, shocked to hear it directed at a child, and then realised actually it's just a normal word for lots of people.
Nah it's very obvious and snarly
Very likely it's a ronseal moment, thus it would seem odd in life. But some people do use the word somewhat differently, mind the person saying to Oliver's baby probably didn't have aggression in their voice, and my guess is the person shouting at Farrell and his child did.

My own standards would be I cannot see why it's acceptable to shout even just wanker at the referee or a player, people are there with their kids and it's not appropriate even if you are happy with some of the more colourful turns of phrase. Rubbish or wrong would seem to be apt if you must shout a negative
Also a massive difference to saying something to a mate and yelling something at someone. It’s definitely a cultural difference between us and the States that we tend to insult our mates
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
petej
Posts: 2457
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2021 10:41 am
Location: Gwent

Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 4:05 pm
SaintK wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:39 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:17 pm Absolutely did not see that coming.

No doubt his family have taken a pasting from keyboard warriors
Quite! He doen't deserve all the shit and personal abuse that comes with his selection.
Sarries will delighted mind you.
Yep. Bloke gave his all and never leant in to the pantomime villain stuff as he could have done. Sad he feels this is necessary
I do wonder how much of this is to actually stop him from being selected when out of form and not playing as well as others?

I don't think Borthwick or Jones have done him any favours by selecting him regardless of form or how the team was playing without him over the last 4 years. Giving him the captaincy was always a mistake.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 6620
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

petej wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2023 5:55 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 4:05 pm
SaintK wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:39 pm
Quite! He doen't deserve all the shit and personal abuse that comes with his selection.
Sarries will delighted mind you.
Yep. Bloke gave his all and never leant in to the pantomime villain stuff as he could have done. Sad he feels this is necessary
I do wonder how much of this is to actually stop him from being selected when out of form and not playing as well as others?

I don't think Borthwick or Jones have done him any favours by selecting him regardless of form or how the team was playing without him over the last 4 years. Giving him the captaincy was always a mistake.
What?
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Good to see McCall coming out and saying today that this started in the mainstream media. The same guys who are clutching their pearls and going ‘oohhhhhhh, damn that social media’ in the last couple of days.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 9400
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

Sale lucky to not be down to 13 here, Hill was stupid there.

Quins taking full advantage
Oxbow
Posts: 1230
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:45 pm

Jonny Hill still as dumb as ever, should have got at least a yellow for that.
Rhubarb & Custard
Posts: 2097
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm

Biffer wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2023 4:50 pm Good to see McCall coming out and saying today that this started in the mainstream media. The same guys who are clutching their pearls and going ‘oohhhhhhh, damn that social media’ in the last couple of days.
He should give examples, or it just sounds like you can't criticise performance and touch the precious one. Which isn't to say some writes haven't gone OTT, I can't say I read most of them. Because he has all too often stank the place out in some very limited England performances, even allowing for he does offer a good number of positives
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 6620
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

Tichtheid wrote: Fri Dec 01, 2023 8:58 pm Sale lucky to not be down to 13 here, Hill was stupid there.

Quins taking full advantage
Quins well worth the win.
Smith was very good, particularly the accuracy of his kicking to the backfield giving them excellent field posotion. Quins forwards fully turned up for a change and laid a very solid platform.
That's the second time this season that Sale have failed to turn up after long trips South
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5961
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

petej wrote: Thu Nov 30, 2023 5:55 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 4:05 pm
SaintK wrote: Wed Nov 29, 2023 3:39 pm
Quite! He doen't deserve all the shit and personal abuse that comes with his selection.
Sarries will delighted mind you.
Yep. Bloke gave his all and never leant in to the pantomime villain stuff as he could have done. Sad he feels this is necessary
I do wonder how much of this is to actually stop him from being selected when out of form and not playing as well as others?

I don't think Borthwick or Jones have done him any favours by selecting him regardless of form or how the team was playing without him over the last 4 years. Giving him the captaincy was always a mistake.
He led the side well in France and grew into the role.

Just caught the game from last night. Best Quins have played for ages. Hill really is a prat. Now off to freeze my bollocks off in Barnet
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
sockwithaticket
Posts: 8664
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am

Glaws are trash. Getting pumped by a mediocre Bristol team.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 6620
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

sockwithaticket wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2023 2:36 pm Glaws are trash. Getting pumped by a mediocre Bristol team.
Glaws playing as if they've been on the piss all week. Bar a couple of handling errors Bristol would have had 40 at half time
User avatar
Stranger
Posts: 1255
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:55 pm

Glaws look awful
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5961
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Gloucester now attacking nicely
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5961
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Phenomenal shithousery that
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 6620
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

Saints............................yay!!!
New defence coach has made a significant difference
Oxbow
Posts: 1230
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:45 pm

Out all afternoon so missed this, great result though.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5961
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Lawes led a ferocious Saints defensive effort. Sarries were crap
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Ovals
Posts: 1491
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:52 pm

Paddington Bear wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2023 6:58 pm Lawes led a ferocious Saints defensive effort. Sarries were crap
Lawes was immense - really going to miss him in an England shirt - tough to find a replacement close to his quality.

Cracking game though and well deserved win for the Saints - they are head and shoulders improved from last season.
Rhubarb & Custard
Posts: 2097
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm

Ovals wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2023 8:41 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2023 6:58 pm Lawes led a ferocious Saints defensive effort. Sarries were crap
Lawes was immense - really going to miss him in an England shirt - tough to find a replacement close to his quality.

Cracking game though and well deserved win for the Saints - they are head and shoulders improved from last season.
Tend to feel for England he's one of those you'd select for the individual but maybe not select for the team if he's being picked at flanker, the old best players vs best team argument. That said he's hardly the only English flanker with some stilted ideas of how to go about supporting play on attack.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 6620
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Sun Dec 03, 2023 10:21 am
Ovals wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2023 8:41 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Sat Dec 02, 2023 6:58 pm Lawes led a ferocious Saints defensive effort. Sarries were crap
Lawes was immense - really going to miss him in an England shirt - tough to find a replacement close to his quality.

Cracking game though and well deserved win for the Saints - they are head and shoulders improved from last season.
Tend to feel for England he's one of those you'd select for the individual but maybe not select for the team if he's being picked at flanker, the old best players vs best team argument. That said he's hardly the only English flanker with some stilted ideas of how to go about supporting play on attack.
Eh?
You've not watched him recently then?
Post Reply