https://www.theguardian.com/politics/li ... nife-crimeNicola Sturgeon regarded Boris Johnson as 'a fucking clown' because of his handling of Covid, inquiry learns
Nicola Sturgeon called Boris Johnson “a fucking clown” in a private message when he announced a further Covid lockdown on 31 October 2020, the inquiry has heard.
The Scottish Politics Thread
-
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
Sturgeon just saying what the entire country was thinking. And she's not particularly duty-bound to be diplomatic in private messages.
About time someone put it on the record in this inquiryinactionman wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2024 12:07 pm Sturgeon just saying what the entire country was thinking. And she's not particularly duty-bound to be diplomatic in private messages.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/li ... nife-crimeNicola Sturgeon regarded Boris Johnson as 'a fucking clown' because of his handling of Covid, inquiry learns
Nicola Sturgeon called Boris Johnson “a fucking clown” in a private message when he announced a further Covid lockdown on 31 October 2020, the inquiry has heard.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I liked how the BBC reported it at lunchtime, breathlessly reporting on foul language and rudeness. Two problems:inactionman wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2024 12:07 pm Sturgeon just saying what the entire country was thinking. And she's not particularly duty-bound to be diplomatic in private messages.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/li ... nife-crimeNicola Sturgeon regarded Boris Johnson as 'a fucking clown' because of his handling of Covid, inquiry learns
Nicola Sturgeon called Boris Johnson “a fucking clown” in a private message when he announced a further Covid lockdown on 31 October 2020, the inquiry has heard.
a) Swearing is a national pastime
b) It's Boris, nae cunt gives a fuck
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Slick wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2024 2:39 pmI liked how the BBC reported it at lunchtime, breathlessly reporting on foul language and rudeness. Two problems:inactionman wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2024 12:07 pm Sturgeon just saying what the entire country was thinking. And she's not particularly duty-bound to be diplomatic in private messages.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/li ... nife-crimeNicola Sturgeon regarded Boris Johnson as 'a fucking clown' because of his handling of Covid, inquiry learns
Nicola Sturgeon called Boris Johnson “a fucking clown” in a private message when he announced a further Covid lockdown on 31 October 2020, the inquiry has heard.
a) Swearing is a national pastime
b) It's Boris, nae cunt gives a fuck
It's going to be brilliant watching Nicola backing up her claim that she did not use WhatsApp to discuss Covid decisions when the last couple of days have undoubtedly proved that she did.
Did you see the end of Humzas questioning? HilariousBlackmac wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2024 6:02 pmSlick wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2024 2:39 pmI liked how the BBC reported it at lunchtime, breathlessly reporting on foul language and rudeness. Two problems:inactionman wrote: ↑Thu Jan 25, 2024 12:07 pm Sturgeon just saying what the entire country was thinking. And she's not particularly duty-bound to be diplomatic in private messages.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/li ... nife-crime
a) Swearing is a national pastime
b) It's Boris, nae cunt gives a fuck
It's going to be brilliant watching Nicola backing up her claim that she did not use WhatsApp to discuss Covid decisions when the last couple of days have undoubtedly proved that she did.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
So Sturgeon basically made all the Covid decisions without a cabinet vote. One being to close schools against expert advice and cabinet consensus. Any dissenters in the cabinet were expected to resign. Her Finance Secretary, one of the most senior politicians in the country, wasn't invited to Gold command meetings and didn't actually know they existed. The same Finance Secretary had no knowledge of any government directive to delete WhatsApp messages and can't understand why there would be one. The Health Secretary, at a time of a global health emergency, was able to find £100 million surplus in the health budget. The most senior epidemiologist in the country believes he wasn't asked for advice because he was a unionist. After the expert criminologist praised the police's response in Scotland because it was less heavy handed, we found out that Humza called the SPF, who drove that response, as a fucking disgrace. Oh, and Sturgeon and Freeman purchased a number of cheap burner phones and unregistered SIM cards at the start of Lockdown and claimed them on their expenses, suggesting they were for government purposes.
Anyone still want to make a case to defend these charlatans.
Anyone still want to make a case to defend these charlatans.
I was expecting all this process to be a bit uncomfortable for Sturgeon and SG with the halo slipping slightly, but this is turning into an absolute national scandal.Blackmac wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 10:03 am So Sturgeon basically made all the Covid decisions without a cabinet vote. One being to close schools against expert advice and cabinet consensus. Any dissenters in the cabinet were expected to resign. Her Finance Secretary, one of the most senior politicians in the country, wasn't invited to Gold command meetings and didn't actually know they existed. The same Finance Secretary had no knowledge of any government directive to delete WhatsApp messages and can't understand why there would be one. The Health Secretary, at a time of a global health emergency, was able to find £100 million surplus in the health budget. The most senior epidemiologist in the country believes he wasn't asked for advice because he was a unionist. After the expert criminologist praised the police's response in Scotland because it was less heavy handed, we found out that Humza called the SPF, who drove that response, as a fucking disgrace. Oh, and Sturgeon and Freeman purchased a number of cheap burner phones and unregistered SIM cards at the start of Lockdown and claimed them on their expenses, suggesting they were for government purposes.
Anyone still want to make a case to defend these charlatans.
It's just the cavalier attitude to everything, as if it was local scout group, from a government that have their hands on £billions of budget and are making life changing decisions for all of us. I know this is focussing on covid, but you have to think everything is run like this which explains why everything is in such a mess. They are a scourge and she is an utter charlatan
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
The ferry fiasco being a case in point, although I think they eventually pinned that one on the disgraced sex pest.Slick wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 10:20 amI was expecting all this process to be a bit uncomfortable for Sturgeon and SG with the halo slipping slightly, but this is turning into an absolute national scandal.Blackmac wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 10:03 am So Sturgeon basically made all the Covid decisions without a cabinet vote. One being to close schools against expert advice and cabinet consensus. Any dissenters in the cabinet were expected to resign. Her Finance Secretary, one of the most senior politicians in the country, wasn't invited to Gold command meetings and didn't actually know they existed. The same Finance Secretary had no knowledge of any government directive to delete WhatsApp messages and can't understand why there would be one. The Health Secretary, at a time of a global health emergency, was able to find £100 million surplus in the health budget. The most senior epidemiologist in the country believes he wasn't asked for advice because he was a unionist. After the expert criminologist praised the police's response in Scotland because it was less heavy handed, we found out that Humza called the SPF, who drove that response, as a fucking disgrace. Oh, and Sturgeon and Freeman purchased a number of cheap burner phones and unregistered SIM cards at the start of Lockdown and claimed them on their expenses, suggesting they were for government purposes.
Anyone still want to make a case to defend these charlatans.
It's just the cavalier attitude to everything, as if it was local scout group, from a government that have their hands on £billions of budget and are making life changing decisions for all of us. I know this is focussing on covid, but you have to think everything is run like this which explains why everything is in such a mess. They are a scourge and she is an utter charlatan
I do feel sorry for her, and Bawheid in Westminster up to a point. Being a leader at an unprecedented time is immensely difficult. That is where me feeling sorry for them begins and ends.
Johnson ultimately was a disgrace and we are finding out that despite their claims otherwise, the SG weren't up to much either. There might not have been PPE corruption but that doesn't absolve the SG from a shoeing if needed. "Aye but Westminster was worse" isn't a defence and a competent Labour party should be trouncing both.
The Humza finding £100m story is wild.
Johnson ultimately was a disgrace and we are finding out that despite their claims otherwise, the SG weren't up to much either. There might not have been PPE corruption but that doesn't absolve the SG from a shoeing if needed. "Aye but Westminster was worse" isn't a defence and a competent Labour party should be trouncing both.
The Humza finding £100m story is wild.
I'm actually the same, for just about all politicians who had to deal with an unprecedented situation. You can bet opposition parties were thanking fuck it wasn't them, however the level of arrogance and disregard that were are now seeing is astonishing and what makes it worse is that Sturgeon and her cult were so bloody self righteous about it.Big D wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 11:25 am I do feel sorry for her, and Bawheid in Westminster up to a point. Being a leader at an unprecedented time is immensely difficult. That is where me feeling sorry for them begins and ends.
Johnson ultimately was a disgrace and we are finding out that despite their claims otherwise, the SG weren't up to much either. There might not have been PPE corruption but that doesn't absolve the SG from a shoeing if needed. "Aye but Westminster was worse" isn't a defence and a competent Labour party should be trouncing both.
The Humza finding £100m story is wild.
He has found away to get politicians of both rosette colours to actually answer questions. That alone deserves an award of some sort.
He has just destroyed her over the Gold Command meetings and the Kate Forbes situation. It's absolutely car crash viewing watching her trying to downplay the significance of the meetings, downright lying and prevaricating about why Forbes wasn't involved.
I liked when she tried to change “deleted” to “did not retain” and he reduced her to a gibbering mess
FYIW, also agree with the above that this was an unprecedented situation with incredible pressure so I do have a large degree of sympathy. But this stuff is obviously wrong and they obviously knew this and decided, well after the event, to lie and deceive
FYIW, also agree with the above that this was an unprecedented situation with incredible pressure so I do have a large degree of sympathy. But this stuff is obviously wrong and they obviously knew this and decided, well after the event, to lie and deceive
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Spends the first half of the day constantly deflecting that all relevant decision making would be accurately recorded in the cabinet minutes. Now stammering her way through why many crucial decisions are not minuted anywhere in cabinet minutes.
I've spent many a day, in fact once a whole week, jousting with advocates of varying standards in court. I always found it quite enjoyable but you rarely came out feeling you got a win and pretty battered and bruised. This guy is special, the style, composure and patience is so impressive. People are getting their trousers pulled down and spanked in the subtlest of ways.
I see Aamer Anwar has just accused them of deleting messages because of Operation Branchform. That's a hefty move.
He was a disgraceful appointment in the first place but he has clearly seen the writing on the wall and is turning on his SNP pals.
He was a disgraceful appointment in the first place but he has clearly seen the writing on the wall and is turning on his SNP pals.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5963
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
There’s a real, real art to cross examination. Most I come across are bruisers which works to an extent, but by far the best slice people open whilst having the tone and pace of someone remarking on the weather. Jason Beer at the Post Office enquiry is great for this.Blackmac wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 2:45 pmI've spent many a day, in fact once a whole week, jousting with advocates of varying standards in court. I always found it quite enjoyable but you rarely came out feeling you got a win and pretty battered and bruised. This guy is special, the style, composure and patience is so impressive. People are getting their trousers pulled down and spanked in the subtlest of ways.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Yeah, many are just arrogant bullies who almost portray a contempt for the witnesses they are examining. Donald Findlay is a perfect example who has no understanding that his behaviour actually alienates juries.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 4:13 pmThere’s a real, real art to cross examination. Most I come across are bruisers which works to an extent, but by far the best slice people open whilst having the tone and pace of someone remarking on the weather. Jason Beer at the Post Office enquiry is great for this.Blackmac wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 2:45 pmI've spent many a day, in fact once a whole week, jousting with advocates of varying standards in court. I always found it quite enjoyable but you rarely came out feeling you got a win and pretty battered and bruised. This guy is special, the style, composure and patience is so impressive. People are getting their trousers pulled down and spanked in the subtlest of ways.
Aamer Anwar was never SNP. Take it from someone who had run ins with him at university in Glasgow.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I'm afraid the laugh is on you mate. On his own website he says he joined the SNP in 2015 to support the cause of Independence and when he was offered a candidacy to run as an SNP MP which he eventually declined.
He is a well known and very close associate of Murrell, Sturgeon and Yousaf. It's probably a bandwagon he couldn't resist jumping on.
Well, that's news to me! He and Sturgeon were very much not on the same page when they were at Glasgow Uni, from what I remember.!Blackmac wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 8:29 pmI'm afraid the laugh is on you mate. On his own website he says he joined the SNP in 2015 to support the cause of Independence and when he was offered a candidacy to run as an SNP MP which he eventually declined.
He is a well known and very close associate of Murrell, Sturgeon and Yousaf. It's probably a bandwagon he couldn't resist jumping on.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
As I said, passing bandwagon. I actually dealt with him a couple of times and found him a far more likeable individual and far more agreeable than his public persona suggests. I remember setting myself up for a right barney with him and being incredibly surprised by how accommodating he was.Biffer wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 8:40 pmWell, that's news to me! He and Sturgeon were very much not on the same page when they were at Glasgow Uni, from what I remember.!Blackmac wrote: ↑Wed Jan 31, 2024 8:29 pmI'm afraid the laugh is on you mate. On his own website he says he joined the SNP in 2015 to support the cause of Independence and when he was offered a candidacy to run as an SNP MP which he eventually declined.
He is a well known and very close associate of Murrell, Sturgeon and Yousaf. It's probably a bandwagon he couldn't resist jumping on.
It's quite clear he sees the wheels coming off that bandwagon now and is looking for the exit.
I'd be surprised if digital forensics can't be used to retrieve deleted WhatsApp messages.
Anyway, as much as I'd like to lambast those in government for deleting messages, or those in opposition for that matter, I can actually see the point about security on phones and laptops - of course I don't believe that is why they were deleted, but I think they should be scrubbed because a phone can be hacked or stolen or lost.
Anyway, as much as I'd like to lambast those in government for deleting messages, or those in opposition for that matter, I can actually see the point about security on phones and laptops - of course I don't believe that is why they were deleted, but I think they should be scrubbed because a phone can be hacked or stolen or lost.
Jack is an absolute twat of a man. He’s also a liar as I’ve been in a meeting when another member of government received a WhatsApp message from him discussing policy
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
-
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
They shouldn't use whatsapp.Tichtheid wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2024 9:30 pm I'd be surprised if digital forensics can't be used to retrieve deleted WhatsApp messages.
Anyway, as much as I'd like to lambast those in government for deleting messages, or those in opposition for that matter, I can actually see the point about security on phones and laptops - of course I don't believe that is why they were deleted, but I think they should be scrubbed because a phone can be hacked or stolen or lost.
It started life as a way for people to send edgy pictures and messages to mates and not be busted. It seems to have been deployed in government in exactly that same way.
When I retired it couldn't be done and there was no expectation that that was going to ever change. It's got incredibly sophisticated encryption.Tichtheid wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2024 9:30 pm I'd be surprised if digital forensics can't be used to retrieve deleted WhatsApp messages.
Anyway, as much as I'd like to lambast those in government for deleting messages, or those in opposition for that matter, I can actually see the point about security on phones and laptops - of course I don't believe that is why they were deleted, but I think they should be scrubbed because a phone can be hacked or stolen or lost.
What i've been astonished about is that so many of them seem to be using personal mobiles for official business. However that casts a bit of shade on Sturgeon's claim that the burner phones were used by staff who suddenly needed to work from home, which was a very weak excuse.inactionman wrote: ↑Fri Feb 02, 2024 9:42 amThey shouldn't use whatsapp.Tichtheid wrote: ↑Thu Feb 01, 2024 9:30 pm I'd be surprised if digital forensics can't be used to retrieve deleted WhatsApp messages.
Anyway, as much as I'd like to lambast those in government for deleting messages, or those in opposition for that matter, I can actually see the point about security on phones and laptops - of course I don't believe that is why they were deleted, but I think they should be scrubbed because a phone can be hacked or stolen or lost.
It started life as a way for people to send edgy pictures and messages to mates and not be busted. It seems to have been deployed in government in exactly that same way.