B&I Lions 2025 Official Thread
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6648
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Discussion was ‘hate campaign’, as you know is coming for the man, rather than the justified question as to whether he should be on the tour
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Oh, don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying we’ve never had dodgy picks on a Lions tour. The 1993 tour is a case in point (Wright, yes, but also Burnell, Cronin and Andy Reed). But I don’t think we’ve had one since 2001. The closest I can find was Allan Dell in 2019, and he was an injury replacement on a tour famous for having some dubious players called up as cover. And in 2021, the only Scot selected who didn’t end up with at least one Test cap was Zander Fagerson, and I doubt anyone would argue he wasn’t picked on merit.Yeeb wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 11:09 amA mate cmon, get the tiny wee violin out , Scotland have has just as much dross as England Billy36 style test no hopers picked , as anyone else.Yr Alban wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 10:44 amIt’s odd all right, but it’s exactly - EXACTLY- what happened with Hogg on the last tour. In the eyes of some, a Scotland player simply isn’t allowed to be the best in his position. There was a hate campaign against Hogg as well. It didn’t work at first, but probably did eventually when he was dropped for the third Test. (Edit - I’m talking solely about Hogg as a player here. It goes without saying, in the light of subsequent events, that he is an awful person).Slick wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 9:17 am I'm still not getting the seeming English journos problem with Russell. They are at it again this morning trying every possible combination to suggest he shouldn't be there.
I've heard quite often that he hasn't beaten Ireland. True, but his record against Australia is better than England and he has basically had the entire England team as his bitches for years. It's all very odd.
Similarly - and I’ll get shit for this, but hey ho - I expect that the only Scotland players picked in the squad today will be the ones who everyone expects to be in or around the Test 23. Scotland don’t get fringe or squad players selected. It’s a hangover from the 3 or 4 tours when we had hardly anyone good enough to tour. Either you make it impossible for the manager to leave you out, or they will.
This sounds bitter, but it isn’t really. I’ve come to accept it. The players who really deserved to tour last time did, and it will mostly be the same this time. And the tour is mostly about the Tests now. The role of the dirt trackers is much less than it used to be.
Teapot Peter wright top of the pyramid for lions joirneymanship.
This tour should really be one of scotlands largest contingent ever. Agree totally that dirtrackers role has diminished since 97, because the modern era just has much shorter tours as it’s all about the £€$
I just think that a Scotland player has to be enough of a standout to be in obvious Test contention in order to get picked. This is why I doubt Jamie Ritchie will be picked this time, and I rate Darcy Graham’s chances at no better than 50:50. But I’m not asking for sympathy. I was angry when players who really should have been picked weren’t (Chris Paterson the worst one wronged, but Jason White was only an injury replacement too). That didn’t happen last time and I don’t think it will this time either. I can live with that.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5505
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
13:45
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Utterly ridiculous. We can all then blame SextonSlick wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 11:47 amThe Times as well.Paddington Bear wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 11:44 am Telegraph believes Faz will be touring - as SaintK says if you want to see a hate campaign follow that on social media in an hour or so
I'm all revved up.
To be fair, that would be a ludicrous decision.
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4918
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Can't agree with that. Hogg had the chance to nail the position down and was rightfully dropped for the last test. He was an experienced senior player at that stage but his performances didn't back that up.Yr Alban wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 10:44 amIt’s odd all right, but it’s exactly - EXACTLY- what happened with Hogg on the last tour. In the eyes of some, a Scotland player simply isn’t allowed to be the best in his position. There was a hate campaign against Hogg as well. It didn’t work at first, but probably did eventually when he was dropped for the third Test. (Edit - I’m talking solely about Hogg as a player here. It goes without saying, in the light of subsequent events, that he is an awful person).Slick wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 9:17 am I'm still not getting the seeming English journos problem with Russell. They are at it again this morning trying every possible combination to suggest he shouldn't be there.
I've heard quite often that he hasn't beaten Ireland. True, but his record against Australia is better than England and he has basically had the entire England team as his bitches for years. It's all very odd.
Similarly - and I’ll get shit for this, but hey ho - I expect that the only Scotland players picked in the squad today will be the ones who everyone expects to be in or around the Test 23. Scotland don’t get fringe or squad players selected. It’s a hangover from the 3 or 4 tours when we had hardly anyone good enough to tour. Either you make it impossible for the manager to leave you out, or they will.
This sounds bitter, but it isn’t really. I’ve come to accept it. The players who really deserved to tour last time did, and it will mostly be the same this time. And the tour is mostly about the Tests now. The role of the dirt trackers is much less than it used to be.
Think we can all agree that's just shittyPaddington Bear wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 11:50 am Discussion was ‘hate campaign’, as you know is coming for the man, rather than the justified question as to whether he should be on the tour
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Happy to direct my online hate at Sexton, but quite like FarrelSaintK wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 11:53 amUtterly ridiculous. We can all then blame SextonSlick wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 11:47 amThe Times as well.Paddington Bear wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 11:44 am Telegraph believes Faz will be touring - as SaintK says if you want to see a hate campaign follow that on social media in an hour or so
I'm all revved up.
To be fair, that would be a ludicrous decision.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
We all going to be pro our own country , recent crazy omission from our side was Jonny May who was a victim of st the time anti English bias as aside from from crap scrummaging, had been the form winger with some lethal tries even in some pretty crap England performances (those two solos against France for example).Yr Alban wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 11:51 amOh, don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying we’ve never had dodgy picks on a Lions tour. The 1993 tour is a case in point (Wright, yes, but also Burnell, Cronin and Andy Reed). But I don’t think we’ve had one since 2001. The closest I can find was Allan Dell in 2019, and he was an injury replacement on a tour famous for having some dubious players called up as cover. And in 2021, the only Scot selected who didn’t end up with at least one Test cap was Zander Fagerson, and I doubt anyone would argue he wasn’t picked on merit.Yeeb wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 11:09 amA mate cmon, get the tiny wee violin out , Scotland have has just as much dross as England Billy36 style test no hopers picked , as anyone else.Yr Alban wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 10:44 am
It’s odd all right, but it’s exactly - EXACTLY- what happened with Hogg on the last tour. In the eyes of some, a Scotland player simply isn’t allowed to be the best in his position. There was a hate campaign against Hogg as well. It didn’t work at first, but probably did eventually when he was dropped for the third Test. (Edit - I’m talking solely about Hogg as a player here. It goes without saying, in the light of subsequent events, that he is an awful person).
Similarly - and I’ll get shit for this, but hey ho - I expect that the only Scotland players picked in the squad today will be the ones who everyone expects to be in or around the Test 23. Scotland don’t get fringe or squad players selected. It’s a hangover from the 3 or 4 tours when we had hardly anyone good enough to tour. Either you make it impossible for the manager to leave you out, or they will.
This sounds bitter, but it isn’t really. I’ve come to accept it. The players who really deserved to tour last time did, and it will mostly be the same this time. And the tour is mostly about the Tests now. The role of the dirt trackers is much less than it used to be.
Teapot Peter wright top of the pyramid for lions joirneymanship.
This tour should really be one of scotlands largest contingent ever. Agree totally that dirtrackers role has diminished since 97, because the modern era just has much shorter tours as it’s all about the £€$
I just think that a Scotland player has to be enough of a standout to be in obvious Test contention in order to get picked. This is why I doubt Jamie Ritchie will be picked this time, and I rate Darcy Graham’s chances at no better than 50:50. But I’m not asking for sympathy. I was angry when players who really should have been picked weren’t (Chris Paterson the worst one wronged, but Jason White was only an injury replacement too). That didn’t happen last time and I don’t think it will this time either. I can live with that.
But I just don’t see your ‘if they ain’t test quality they ain’t picked full stop’ thing, it may be just as you such Scotland has had 2 decades of mostly utter shit. Test teams can and do change, not just because of injury, I’d have more faith in your jocks tbh as at times recently they have been excellent.
O FarrelPunter15 wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 12:04 pm There will be a lot of marginal calls, and ones where Papa Faz just has a different view to Borthers etc., but what selection would truly make you go. 'What the actual fuck?'
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
No bias here, Jonny May was not very good.Yeeb wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 11:59 amWe all going to be pro our own country , recent crazy omission from our side was Jonny May who was a victim of st the time anti English bias as aside from from crap scrummaging, had been the form winger with some lethal tries even in some pretty crap England performances (those two solos against France for example).Yr Alban wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 11:51 amOh, don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying we’ve never had dodgy picks on a Lions tour. The 1993 tour is a case in point (Wright, yes, but also Burnell, Cronin and Andy Reed). But I don’t think we’ve had one since 2001. The closest I can find was Allan Dell in 2019, and he was an injury replacement on a tour famous for having some dubious players called up as cover. And in 2021, the only Scot selected who didn’t end up with at least one Test cap was Zander Fagerson, and I doubt anyone would argue he wasn’t picked on merit.Yeeb wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 11:09 am
A mate cmon, get the tiny wee violin out , Scotland have has just as much dross as England Billy36 style test no hopers picked , as anyone else.
Teapot Peter wright top of the pyramid for lions joirneymanship.
This tour should really be one of scotlands largest contingent ever. Agree totally that dirtrackers role has diminished since 97, because the modern era just has much shorter tours as it’s all about the £€$
I just think that a Scotland player has to be enough of a standout to be in obvious Test contention in order to get picked. This is why I doubt Jamie Ritchie will be picked this time, and I rate Darcy Graham’s chances at no better than 50:50. But I’m not asking for sympathy. I was angry when players who really should have been picked weren’t (Chris Paterson the worst one wronged, but Jason White was only an injury replacement too). That didn’t happen last time and I don’t think it will this time either. I can live with that.
But I just don’t see your ‘if they ain’t test quality they ain’t picked full stop’ thing, it may be just as you such Scotland has had 2 decades of mostly utter shit. Test teams can and do change, not just because of injury, I’d have more faith in your jocks tbh as at times recently they have been excellent.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 6648
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Yep. I’m a big admirer of the guy but can’t see how he tours. Hope his wife etc avoid social mediaSlick wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 11:56 amThink we can all agree that's just shittyPaddington Bear wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 11:50 am Discussion was ‘hate campaign’, as you know is coming for the man, rather than the justified question as to whether he should be on the tour
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
A Welshman in the Tight 5 groupPunter15 wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 12:04 pm There will be a lot of marginal calls, and ones where Papa Faz just has a different view to Borthers etc., but what selection would truly make you go. 'What the actual fuck?'
Well, I’m not going to argue with you. I don’t recall it that way though. My recollection was that Hogg was made responsible for a bad team performance in the second Test as a whole. Don’t recall anything in particular he did wrong.To be fair, the game the Lions played didn’t play to his strengths as a player (it was the same for Duhan - I don’t recall him ever getting to run at a defence from broken play)Uncle fester wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 11:55 amCan't agree with that. Hogg had the chance to nail the position down and was rightfully dropped for the last test. He was an experienced senior player at that stage but his performances didn't back that up.Yr Alban wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 10:44 amIt’s odd all right, but it’s exactly - EXACTLY- what happened with Hogg on the last tour. In the eyes of some, a Scotland player simply isn’t allowed to be the best in his position. There was a hate campaign against Hogg as well. It didn’t work at first, but probably did eventually when he was dropped for the third Test. (Edit - I’m talking solely about Hogg as a player here. It goes without saying, in the light of subsequent events, that he is an awful person).Slick wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 9:17 am I'm still not getting the seeming English journos problem with Russell. They are at it again this morning trying every possible combination to suggest he shouldn't be there.
I've heard quite often that he hasn't beaten Ireland. True, but his record against Australia is better than England and he has basically had the entire England team as his bitches for years. It's all very odd.
Similarly - and I’ll get shit for this, but hey ho - I expect that the only Scotland players picked in the squad today will be the ones who everyone expects to be in or around the Test 23. Scotland don’t get fringe or squad players selected. It’s a hangover from the 3 or 4 tours when we had hardly anyone good enough to tour. Either you make it impossible for the manager to leave you out, or they will.
This sounds bitter, but it isn’t really. I’ve come to accept it. The players who really deserved to tour last time did, and it will mostly be the same this time. And the tour is mostly about the Tests now. The role of the dirt trackers is much less than it used to be.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
It wasn’t Watson the pundits wanted him dropped for though - it was Liam Williams. The justification that was aired frequently was Hogg’s fielding of high balls. If memory serves (and it might not here, to be fair) Williams then played the third test and promptly dropped more high balls than Hogg had.sockwithaticket wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 11:44 amI suspect what you might have viewed as a hate campaign was mostly people not agreeing that he was definitively the best option. Not a hard position to take when Anthony Watson was also on tour.Yr Alban wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 10:44 amIt’s odd all right, but it’s exactly - EXACTLY- what happened with Hogg on the last tour. In the eyes of some, a Scotland player simply isn’t allowed to be the best in his position. There was a hate campaign against Hogg as well. It didn’t work at first, but probably did eventually when he was dropped for the third Test. (Edit - I’m talking solely about Hogg as a player here. It goes without saying, in the light of subsequent events, that he is an awful person).Slick wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 9:17 am I'm still not getting the seeming English journos problem with Russell. They are at it again this morning trying every possible combination to suggest he shouldn't be there.
I've heard quite often that he hasn't beaten Ireland. True, but his record against Australia is better than England and he has basically had the entire England team as his bitches for years. It's all very odd.
Similarly - and I’ll get shit for this, but hey ho - I expect that the only Scotland players picked in the squad today will be the ones who everyone expects to be in or around the Test 23. Scotland don’t get fringe or squad players selected. It’s a hangover from the 3 or 4 tours when we had hardly anyone good enough to tour. Either you make it impossible for the manager to leave you out, or they will.
This sounds bitter, but it isn’t really. I’ve come to accept it. The players who really deserved to tour last time did, and it will mostly be the same this time. And the tour is mostly about the Tests now. The role of the dirt trackers is much less than it used to be.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
Pffft, he was a better wing than Seymour & nowell & Daly who went in 2017 and now worse than any of the 2021 ones. Recall a thread where emojies avatars things were made of possible lions players and his one was Maaaaaaaaaayyyy because he was blurred he was so fast. Take off your Mcewans tinted glasses with your Celtic drossSlick wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 12:21 pmNo bias here, Jonny May was not very good.Yeeb wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 11:59 amWe all going to be pro our own country , recent crazy omission from our side was Jonny May who was a victim of st the time anti English bias as aside from from crap scrummaging, had been the form winger with some lethal tries even in some pretty crap England performances (those two solos against France for example).Yr Alban wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 11:51 am
Oh, don’t get me wrong. I’m not saying we’ve never had dodgy picks on a Lions tour. The 1993 tour is a case in point (Wright, yes, but also Burnell, Cronin and Andy Reed). But I don’t think we’ve had one since 2001. The closest I can find was Allan Dell in 2019, and he was an injury replacement on a tour famous for having some dubious players called up as cover. And in 2021, the only Scot selected who didn’t end up with at least one Test cap was Zander Fagerson, and I doubt anyone would argue he wasn’t picked on merit.
I just think that a Scotland player has to be enough of a standout to be in obvious Test contention in order to get picked. This is why I doubt Jamie Ritchie will be picked this time, and I rate Darcy Graham’s chances at no better than 50:50. But I’m not asking for sympathy. I was angry when players who really should have been picked weren’t (Chris Paterson the worst one wronged, but Jason White was only an injury replacement too). That didn’t happen last time and I don’t think it will this time either. I can live with that.
But I just don’t see your ‘if they ain’t test quality they ain’t picked full stop’ thing, it may be just as you such Scotland has had 2 decades of mostly utter shit. Test teams can and do change, not just because of injury, I’d have more faith in your jocks tbh as at times recently they have been excellent.
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4574
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
Gatland picking a bunch of Welsh nobodies as injury replacements was pretty terrible.
ThisHal Jordan wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 12:37 pm Gatland picking a bunch of Welsh nobodies as injury replacements was pretty terrible.
- clydecloggie
- Posts: 1282
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:31 am
Ah, the Qatar Airways Lions and a mural commissioned by Howden. It really is beyond shameless.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5505
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Farking get on with it already!
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
He’d better take it out to play. Or at least tape it heavily. I’ve seen what happens if you don’t (both ear and nipple rings) and it’s… messy.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
- clydecloggie
- Posts: 1282
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:31 am
A phone call with no signal and a Captains' dinner in a dark dodgy conference centre room. So far this is the rugby version of Spinal Tap.
clydecloggie wrote: Thu May 08, 2025 1:22 pm A phone call with no signal and a Captains' dinner in a dark dodgy conference centre room. So far this is the rugby version of Spinal Tap.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5505
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Scott Cummings got a bit of a subdued reception...
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
-
- Posts: 2090
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 9:53 am
Good stuff, Lions fans know the chant
Schooooooooooooooooooo.
Schooooooooooooooooooo.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5505
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
JBP black eye 

“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
-
- Posts: 2090
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2020 9:53 am
Just as bloody well Finn Russell is in, it would have been mental to leave him out.