As a tactic to get people to take the vaccine; they should say it adds 4" to a mans cock, & two cups sizes to women.Northern Lights wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 8:12 pmFurry muff. I still get to see how the oldies, NHS staff and OJ’s bartenders trial it out first and see if they grow an extra head or wings or whateverSaint wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 5:05 pmYou can over-read this. This is a technology that's been in development for 10+ years and is proven to work - a number of flu vaccines for recent strains have been tested and developed for instance. But this is the first time it's been used at any sort of scale, so regulators are going to be far more cautious than usualNorthern Lights wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 4:45 pm MIght just be me and I am certainly no anti-vaxer nutbar but given how quickly this vaccine has been developed i dont mind not being in the first 15m people in line to get this, especially reading Saint's posts about this being very cutting edge in terms of vaccine development as well.
Great news on the whole though with fingers crossed a holiday to look forward to next summer.
So, coronavirus...
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
If you refuse to take the vaccine, you shouldn't be allowed in a public hospital.
Why the fuck should people in vulnerable groups, who perhaps can't get the vaccine; have to risk their lives so selfish cunts can get treated in a public hospital.
In the US you used to have to present the vaccination certificates for your kids before they were allowed in the school; I remember my nephew who got the BCG in Ireland, when his parents emigrated, they had to get a letter from the Irish DoH to confirm that the reason he tested positive for TB, was because he'd been vaccinated
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
I have no idea on the process, but if you take it out first thing, it's going to be seriously cold still by 5pmRaggs wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 8:20 pmI was going to say it must survive at warmer temps for at least a time. If you know how many doses you have lined up for the day, you can take them out in the morning, and there's no issue?Saint wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 8:13 pm
There's medical grade transport freezers that guarantee temperature to +/- 0.1 degrees. The first couple of stages of transit are the easy part - we can easily get this to the major hospitals that have the necessary storage capability. Getting it beyond there will be extremely difficult. In theory, it's supposed to be stable for up to 24 hours at higher temps, so subdistribution to pharmacies MIGGT be possible - the trouble being how to handle it, as even while it's warming up it would still be far too cold to handle
District nurses don't typically handle anything much colder than freezing point for instance - pharmacies will have some drugs they store down to -20. But even taking something that's -80 out of a freezer will take specialist handling for hours before you can easily dea with it outside of controlled environments
If you want this done rapidly at scale then you need GPs/pharmacies/community nursing. So this vaccine isn't the "scale" answer. This is the vaccine that protects frontline and at risk while until we get one that has far fewer logistical issues.
As pretty much all the vaccines in development are targeting the same protein, and so far all are producing similar immune responses, it's very likely that we will be seeing a number of easier to handle vaccines for through soon. Pfizer will likely lead the way for initial vaccinations now, but the bulk of the 1st world population will be getting something else. And the 2nd/3rd world probably won't get this at all
Well either that or isolate and toolbags like you will refuse to do that too.Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 9:33 pm
Mmmmm, all medical ethics ...... gone.
Who’d have thought it from you.
Yes, I expect that’s right. I don’t see this as a vaccine for the masses, welcome as it is.Saint wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 10:06 pmIf you want this done rapidly at scale then you need GPs/pharmacies/community nursing. So this vaccine isn't the "scale" answer. This is the vaccine that protects frontline and at risk while until we get one that has far fewer logistical issues.
As pretty much all the vaccines in development are targeting the same protein, and so far all are producing similar immune responses, it's very likely that we will be seeing a number of easier to handle vaccines for through soon. Pfizer will likely lead the way for initial vaccinations now, but the bulk of the 1st world population will be getting something else. And the 2nd/3rd world probably won't get this at all
The UK is pretty rare in the western world for not having ANY mandatory vaccinations.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 10:14 pmWell either that or isolate and toolbags like you will refuse to do that too.Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 9:33 pm
Mmmmm, all medical ethics ...... gone.
Who’d have thought it from you.
Even in the land of liberty a lot of States have a legal requirement to vaccinate schools age children
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
It's hardly beyond the wit of man.Saint wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 10:06 pmIf you want this done rapidly at scale then you need GPs/pharmacies/community nursing. So this vaccine isn't the "scale" answer. This is the vaccine that protects frontline and at risk while until we get one that has far fewer logistical issues.
As pretty much all the vaccines in development are targeting the same protein, and so far all are producing similar immune responses, it's very likely that we will be seeing a number of easier to handle vaccines for through soon. Pfizer will likely lead the way for initial vaccinations now, but the bulk of the 1st world population will be getting something else. And the 2nd/3rd world probably won't get this at all
There are AI guys traveling over a large part of the world; with frozen Bull/Ram spunk in Liquid Nitrogen; & going around farms fertilizing Cows/Ewes.
In the same way that Dyson et al put their design teams to producing Ventilator designs (which thank deity we didn't need), they can surely put together designs for refrigerated storage for, say 500 doses, that is portable, & can be powered by a simple petrol genny
The Dyson ventilator was shite and thank feck we did not need it.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 10:44 pmIt's hardly beyond the wit of man.Saint wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 10:06 pmIf you want this done rapidly at scale then you need GPs/pharmacies/community nursing. So this vaccine isn't the "scale" answer. This is the vaccine that protects frontline and at risk while until we get one that has far fewer logistical issues.
As pretty much all the vaccines in development are targeting the same protein, and so far all are producing similar immune responses, it's very likely that we will be seeing a number of easier to handle vaccines for through soon. Pfizer will likely lead the way for initial vaccinations now, but the bulk of the 1st world population will be getting something else. And the 2nd/3rd world probably won't get this at all
There are AI guys traveling over a large part of the world; with frozen Bull/Ram spunk in Liquid Nitrogen; & going around farms fertilizing Cows/Ewes.
In the same way that Dyson et al put their design teams to producing Ventilator designs (which thank deity we didn't need), they can surely put together designs for refrigerated storage for, say 500 doses, that is portable, & can be powered by a simple petrol genny
The CoVent was a laughing stock tbh looked archaic and probably wasn't anywhere near as good as the vents by Resmed, Philips or Breas.
If anyone has seen the retrofitted UCL/Mercedes cpap 'whisperflow' then yes it was that bad.
Jesus, bimbo, are you Eastern European or something?Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 9:33 pm
Mmmmm, all medical ethics ...... gone.
Who’d have thought it from you.
Most British people understand the concept of humour.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
The Dyson ventilator was shite and thank feck we did not need it.
The CoVent was a laughing stock tbh looked archaic and probably wasn't anywhere near as good as the vents by Resmed, Philips or Breas.
If anyone has seen the retrofitted UCL/Mercedes cpap 'whisperflow' then yes it was that bad.
“We demand emergency breathing equipment “
“No no not them , we demand things that aren’t available “
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
9/11/20
Deaths: 194 - last 7 days 2,385 +530 (+28.6%)
Cases: 21,350 - last 7 days 159,502, +327 (+0.2%)
Apologies for the delay, can't post from home network to here
Deaths: 194 - last 7 days 2,385 +530 (+28.6%)
Cases: 21,350 - last 7 days 159,502, +327 (+0.2%)
Apologies for the delay, can't post from home network to here
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- Northern Lights
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:32 am
This is Compound V and we are going to be unleashing super powered grannies on to the planet and then you will all be sorry and wish you had just let Covid take its natural course.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 8:53 pmAs a tactic to get people to take the vaccine; they should say it adds 4" to a mans cock, & two cups sizes to women.Northern Lights wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 8:12 pmFurry muff. I still get to see how the oldies, NHS staff and OJ’s bartenders trial it out first and see if they grow an extra head or wings or whateverSaint wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 5:05 pm
You can over-read this. This is a technology that's been in development for 10+ years and is proven to work - a number of flu vaccines for recent strains have been tested and developed for instance. But this is the first time it's been used at any sort of scale, so regulators are going to be far more cautious than usual
You think that’s a bad thing?? you are clearly a wrong’unRhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 8:31 pmThat might leave you with only nurses in the pub for company, so you might need to rethink your plan
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
June 2020
Nov 2020Matt Hancock declared "black lives matter" as he spoke about a devastating report which has laid bare the way that BAME communities are much worse affected by coronavirus.
But despite his acknowledgement of the dreadful death toll from covid-19 among these communities, the Health Secretary did not announce any concrete proposals to help protect people affected.
Under pressure to explain why there were no recommendations being announced today, Mr Hancock insisted the government had "already taken action because it’s been clear right from the start."
He explained that the first four deaths of doctors were all people from BAME backgrounds.
He said: “It really struck me there was clearly a disparity and we’ve seen that disparity.”
He added: “Right across the world people are angry about racial injustice - and I get that. Black lives matter”.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5963
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Given that a significant part of the increased risk for BAME communities comes from:
1) being more likely to work in frontline healthcare
2) living in multi-generational households
The policy seems to cover their risk factors reasonably well. AFAIK it isn't genetics causing this - a 20 something from a BAME background living with other 20 somethings isn't high risk
1) being more likely to work in frontline healthcare
2) living in multi-generational households
The policy seems to cover their risk factors reasonably well. AFAIK it isn't genetics causing this - a 20 something from a BAME background living with other 20 somethings isn't high risk
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
So the only sector in which hospital admissions are rising is from care homes. How much will these be affected by the lockdowns?
It appears we’re chasing the wrong target once again and by not prioritising shielding the vulnerable we are creating the problem not solving it.
It appears we’re chasing the wrong target once again and by not prioritising shielding the vulnerable we are creating the problem not solving it.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 8:48 am June 2020Nov 2020Matt Hancock declared "black lives matter" as he spoke about a devastating report which has laid bare the way that BAME communities are much worse affected by coronavirus.
But despite his acknowledgement of the dreadful death toll from covid-19 among these communities, the Health Secretary did not announce any concrete proposals to help protect people affected.
Under pressure to explain why there were no recommendations being announced today, Mr Hancock insisted the government had "already taken action because it’s been clear right from the start."
He explained that the first four deaths of doctors were all people from BAME backgrounds.
He said: “It really struck me there was clearly a disparity and we’ve seen that disparity.”
He added: “Right across the world people are angry about racial injustice - and I get that. Black lives matter”.
And why the fuck would you prioritise teachers.
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
154 infected with Covid found by the mass testing in Liverpool so far. 24k tests.
That's brilliant!
If the contract tracing can step up to the plate, that could really see the R drop in the city and hopefully soon nationwide
But still early days......
That's brilliant!
If the contract tracing can step up to the plate, that could really see the R drop in the city and hopefully soon nationwide
But still early days......
How many hosted house parties in October?Longshanks wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 10:43 am 154 infected with Covid found by the mass testing in Liverpool so far. 24k tests.
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
Fine them all £10k to be on the safe side.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 10:53 amHow many hosted house parties in October?Longshanks wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 10:43 am 154 infected with Covid found by the mass testing in Liverpool so far. 24k tests.
No doubt someone will be along shortly with a completely unscientific statistical analysis about false positives and false negatives.Longshanks wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 10:43 am 154 infected with Covid found by the mass testing in Liverpool so far. 24k tests.
That's brilliant!
If the contract tracing can step up to the plate, that could really see the R drop in the city and hopefully soon nationwide
But still early days......
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Longshanks wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 10:43 am 154 infected with Covid found by the mass testing in Liverpool so far. 24k tests.
That's brilliant!
If the contract tracing can step up to the plate, that could really see the R drop in the city and hopefully soon nationwide
But still early days......
The R in Liverpool has been below 1 for weeks.
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4204
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
Honest question with the vaccine.
Does it need to be given to everybody?
If it's given to high risk groups at first, that alone should slow down the spread of the virus and reduce the R0 rate.
Could the virus already be under control before they get around to vaccinating everybody else?
Does it need to be given to everybody?
If it's given to high risk groups at first, that alone should slow down the spread of the virus and reduce the R0 rate.
Could the virus already be under control before they get around to vaccinating everybody else?
If you're just talking about reducing deaths, then giving it to high risk/elderly first will reduce the death rate. It won't seriously impact r0 as the high risk and elderly aren't driving that number. - and there are still the concerns about Long COVIDUncle fester wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 2:09 pm Honest question with the vaccine.
Does it need to be given to everybody?
If it's given to high risk groups at first, that alone should slow down the spread of the virus and reduce the R0 rate.
Could the virus already be under control before they get around to vaccinating everybody else?
To reach "herd immunity", you need to get to somewhere around 66%-70% immunised, ideally more. Of course by the time we get to the bulk of the population we'll be into next spring, so should be on the downslope again, and we're really talking about preventing a third wave
Think the estimates were 60% coverage. So 90% effectiveness would mean you want around 67% vaccinated. Probably best to aim for 75%. Given the long term effects however, you probably want to be vaccinating everyone since unless it's wiped out ( which is unlikely if it can still survive in animal populations) it's probably the healthier option.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 2:09 pm Honest question with the vaccine.
Does it need to be given to everybody?
If it's given to high risk groups at first, that alone should slow down the spread of the virus and reduce the R0 rate.
Could the virus already be under control before they get around to vaccinating everybody else?
So for life to return to normal 70% uptake i reckon. But make available to 100% for health benefits.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
I'm not anti-vax or fat, old or high risk. But I'm also not keen on having one of 6 brand new vaccines rushed through in 1/10 of the normal time of other previous vaccines.
But I also want to take a holiday to USA next year and don't fancy ending up in a Chicago hospital on 90% oxygen.....what do I do when it (eventually) comes round to having my injection?
But I also want to take a holiday to USA next year and don't fancy ending up in a Chicago hospital on 90% oxygen.....what do I do when it (eventually) comes round to having my injection?
- Northern Lights
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:32 am
Think of the super powers you will get, that's what I'm holding out for, dont go for the first gen stuff it is bound to get better just like the iphone.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 2:26 pm I'm not anti-vax or fat, old or high risk. But I'm also not keen on having one of 6 brand new vaccines rushed through in 1/10 of the normal time of other previous vaccines.
But I also want to take a holiday to USA next year and don't fancy ending up in a Chicago hospital on 90% oxygen.....what do I do when it (eventually) comes round to having my injection?
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
Good. Hopefully this drive it even lower and reduce cases.Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 12:50 pmLongshanks wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 10:43 am 154 infected with Covid found by the mass testing in Liverpool so far. 24k tests.
That's brilliant!
If the contract tracing can step up to the plate, that could really see the R drop in the city and hopefully soon nationwide
But still early days......
The R in Liverpool has been below 1 for weeks.
You say that like it would be a bad thing??Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Mon Nov 09, 2020 8:31 pmThat might leave you with only nurses in the pub for company, so you might need to rethink your plan
Erm how many colours can you identify??
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:11 am
This isn't an anti-vax post- verifiably safe vaccines are great for humanity. But weren't there complications with the Swine Flue vaccine in 2010 or so? A very high incidence in some health issues from the people who took it. That was another rushed vaccine.
Still, as long as those issues are lower than Covid death rate, it should be rolled out anyway.
Still, as long as those issues are lower than Covid death rate, it should be rolled out anyway.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Saint wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 2:22 pmIf you're just talking about reducing deaths, then giving it to high risk/elderly first will reduce the death rate. It won't seriously impact r0 as the high risk and elderly aren't driving that number. - and there are still the concerns about Long COVIDUncle fester wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 2:09 pm Honest question with the vaccine.
Does it need to be given to everybody?
If it's given to high risk groups at first, that alone should slow down the spread of the virus and reduce the R0 rate.
Could the virus already be under control before they get around to vaccinating everybody else?
To reach "herd immunity", you need to get to somewhere around 66%-70% immunised, ideally more. Of course by the time we get to the bulk of the population we'll be into next spring, so should be on the downslope again, and we're really talking about preventing a third wave
A third wave would be very unusual for a Respiratory virus ....
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Raggs wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 2:24 pmThink the estimates were 60% coverage. So 90% effectiveness would mean you want around 67% vaccinated. Probably best to aim for 75%. Given the long term effects however, you probably want to be vaccinating everyone since unless it's wiped out ( which is unlikely if it can still survive in animal populations) it's probably the healthier option.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 2:09 pm Honest question with the vaccine.
Does it need to be given to everybody?
If it's given to high risk groups at first, that alone should slow down the spread of the virus and reduce the R0 rate.
Could the virus already be under control before they get around to vaccinating everybody else?
So for life to return to normal 70% uptake i reckon. But make available to 100% for health benefits.
Or don’t bother with the population that isn’t at any risk from the virus.
Except this one is vascularBimbowomxn wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 2:53 pm
A third wave would be very unusual for a Respiratory virus ....
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
Sandstorm wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 3:00 pmExcept this one is vascularBimbowomxn wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 2:53 pm
A third wave would be very unusual for a Respiratory virus ....
Spanish Flu - four wavesSandstorm wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 3:00 pmExcept this one is vascularBimbowomxn wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 2:53 pm
A third wave would be very unusual for a Respiratory virus ....
Russian Flu (1890s) - five waves
Asian Flu - two waves then shifted into Hong Kong flu with a further two waves.
Bimbo making shit up again.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Swine flu is now just part of the regular yearly mix of flus, so that must have had a few waves too. As has basically every other cold/flu virus out there in theory...Biffer wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 3:44 pmSpanish Flu - four wavesSandstorm wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 3:00 pmExcept this one is vascularBimbowomxn wrote: ↑Tue Nov 10, 2020 2:53 pm
A third wave would be very unusual for a Respiratory virus ....
Russian Flu (1890s) - five waves
Asian Flu - two waves then shifted into Hong Kong flu with a further two waves.
Bimbo making shit up again.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.