Official statement from Public Health England:
"Due to a delay in processing England deaths data, the deaths figures for England and UK have not been updated. These will be updated as soon as possible."
So, coronavirus...
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Since we have been in lockdown for a week now surely the vast majority of those cases will have been caught post lockdown? So it begs the question how effective lockdown is as a tool for controlling the spread???
No not really givent that the incubation period is thought to be three to 14 days.
Especially if the symproms are mild initially until you decide to get tested after a few more days say 3 days.
3-5 days is very much the norm 14 days a massive outlier. Even so a jump like that is a bit mystifying.C69 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2020 6:24 pmNo not really givent that the incubation period is thought to be three to 14 days.
Especially if the symproms are mild initially until you decide to get tested after a few more days say 3 days.
That is the median time however it could explain the delay especially given a few days of symptoms before getting testedOpenside wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2020 6:53 pm3-5 days is very much the norm 14 days a massive outlier. Even so a jump like that is a bit mystifying.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
The delay in getting results also says these cases were pre lockdown.
We have introduced a new test of course being mass deployed by the Army which is even less accurate than the PCR test. Also every one positive by the Lateral Flow test then takes a PCR test.
Of course we can’t now prove any of this because the government aren’t releasing the results split by test (which is frightening).
It's why lockdown needs to be at least 4 weeks to be seriously effective. It allows it to likely go through a household and be contained within it.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Lockdowns are terrible things. They're extremely bad for the economy. Wicked wicked lockdowns are the worst thing we could possibly do to fight this virus.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politi ... der-budgetThe Government’s accounts are in much better shape than forecast with the deficit almost half what was predicted.
Treasury has released the Government’s accounts for the three months to September 30, 2020. They show smaller deficits and lower debt than forecast just months ago.
The main reason is that a better economy has more people spending and paying taxes, meaning that there’s more revenue flowing into the Government's coffers.
That better economy also means there are fewer people and businesses needing support, so the Government is spending less.
I was trying to find stats on this. Percentage of cases caught by a member of the household.
Obviously no level of lock down reduces this.
The effect of a new set of restrictions should take effect
- a week after the date of change for inter-house spreading
- though the previous system would likely continue to affect household spreading for a couple of weeks after that.
So it’s really only about 3 weeks after are you looking at full effects of new system, while old system effects taper off.
As example
Weeks
0-1 nothing to do with new change for either inter house or intra house spreading of infections.
1-2 inter house spread attributed to new restrictions. Intra house attributed still to before new restrictions.
2-3 inter house spreading by new constraints. intra house would be a mix from before an after restrictions.
3+ infections could be fully attributed to new restrictions
NZ strategy worked for NZ. Although in absence of a vaccine, NZ strategy would fail in the mid term.Ted. wrote: ↑Thu Nov 12, 2020 8:07 pm Lockdowns are terrible things. They're extremely bad for the economy. Wicked wicked lockdowns are the worst thing we could possibly do to fight this virus.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politi ... der-budgetThe Government’s accounts are in much better shape than forecast with the deficit almost half what was predicted.
Treasury has released the Government’s accounts for the three months to September 30, 2020. They show smaller deficits and lower debt than forecast just months ago.
The main reason is that a better economy has more people spending and paying taxes, meaning that there’s more revenue flowing into the Government's coffers.
That better economy also means there are fewer people and businesses needing support, so the Government is spending less.
There was no squashing this thing in the UK and most other countries.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
#DailyCovidUpdate | 12th November 2020
Cases: +33,470
Deaths: +563
Cases: +33,470
Deaths: +563
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
-
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:28 am
One of the reasons NZ started sending positive cases and their households to quarantine facility, they found that in the first lockdown household ended up having to completely self isolate for over a month in some cases as it went around the household.
I'm saying this to make a point around how cases keep going up even in lockdown, not suggesting that this is a viable strategy for the UK
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54897737
Coronavirus: Safety officials had 'political' pressure to approve PPE
Britain's safety watchdog felt leaned on by the government to make factually incorrect statements about PPE suits bought for NHS staff earlier in the Covid-19 pandemic, the BBC has found.
Emails reveal how the Health and Safety Executive said protective suits, bought by the government in April, had not been tested to the correct standard.
But the emails describe "political" pressure to approve them for use.
The government said all PPE is "quality assured" and only sent out if safe.
Early on in the pandemic, the NHS experienced severe shortages of personal protective equipment, known as PPE. As the country woke up to the lethal threat of Covid-19, there was a scramble to secure gloves, overalls and masks for NHS staff.
The shortage was so drastic that some hospital staff were even pictured at the time wearing bin bags.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Yep. Someone might even wonder why we didn't have it, much.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
What’s the NZ situation/timeline on securing vaccines?
Ie when there will be sufficient deployed to open the borders again.
NZ getting 1.5 million doses of Pfizer, some point in Q1 next year. So that's 750,000 immunised. Nothing else agreed yet AFAIK, and assuming eveyrthing's 90% successful then they're going to need to get somewhere around 3.6 million people immunized. So closed borders for NZ till next Christmas then
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Saint wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 10:12 amNZ getting 1.5 million doses of Pfizer, some point in Q1 next year. So that's 750,000 immunised. Nothing else agreed yet AFAIK, and assuming eveyrthing's 90% successful then they're going to need to get somewhere around 3.6 million people immunized. So closed borders for NZ till next Christmas then
They’ll not worry about their under 40’s. And immunity is found at 60% unless once again CV is a completely different type of virus than any other virus in existence.
IIRC, Pfizer is not the only vaccine supply agreement we have.Saint wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 10:12 amNZ getting 1.5 million doses of Pfizer, some point in Q1 next year. So that's 750,000 immunised. Nothing else agreed yet AFAIK, and assuming eveyrthing's 90% successful then they're going to need to get somewhere around 3.6 million people immunized. So closed borders for NZ till next Christmas then
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Being told ,by Politicians who will be on holidays a couple of weeks at that stage, & who plan on being on holidays when Brexit happens.
Line up all MPs at Westminster and get the worst nurse in London to clumsily give them all their jabs.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 12:12 pmBeing told ,by Politicians who will be on holidays a couple of weeks at that stage, & who plan on being on holidays when Brexit happens.
The articale I found on the Pfizer agreement was in early October and said it was the first, with more to follow. I couldn't see any further releases on the "more to follow", but I only spent a few minutes looking. Even so, given the amount on backorder with most of the others, a purchase in mid to late October would result in a delivery mid to late Q3 next year at earliest, even for a small order. UK orders with all the major players went in mid-SummerTed. wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 10:40 amIIRC, Pfizer is not the only vaccine supply agreement we have.Saint wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 10:12 amNZ getting 1.5 million doses of Pfizer, some point in Q1 next year. So that's 750,000 immunised. Nothing else agreed yet AFAIK, and assuming eveyrthing's 90% successful then they're going to need to get somewhere around 3.6 million people immunized. So closed borders for NZ till next Christmas then
-
- Posts: 8665
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Of course many nurses have already worked far beyond their ordinary patterns throughout this crisis and must be pretty close to complete burnout.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 12:12 pmBeing told ,by Politicians who will be on holidays a couple of weeks at that stage, & who plan on being on holidays when Brexit happens.
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
R rate between 1 and 1.2 in UK. Will the lockdown be lifted on 2 Dec?
All that clapping in the Summer didn't help them? Lazy tarts.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 12:23 pmOf course many nurses have already worked far beyond their ordinary patterns throughout this crisis and must be pretty close to complete burnout.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 12:12 pmBeing told ,by Politicians who will be on holidays a couple of weeks at that stage, & who plan on being on holidays when Brexit happens.
As pointed out, at the moment there's still going to be plenty of household transmission. By 2nd of Dec, hopefully that will have burnt out.Longshanks wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 12:28 pm R rate between 1 and 1.2 in UK. Will the lockdown be lifted on 2 Dec?
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
-
- Posts: 8665
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Shocking isn't it?Sandstorm wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 12:33 pmAll that clapping in the Summer didn't help them? Lazy tarts.sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 12:23 pmOf course many nurses have already worked far beyond their ordinary patterns throughout this crisis and must be pretty close to complete burnout.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 12:12 pm
Being told ,by Politicians who will be on holidays a couple of weeks at that stage, & who plan on being on holidays when Brexit happens.
I don’t think looking at the r rate now shows anything about lockdown fwiwLongshanks wrote: ↑Fri Nov 13, 2020 12:28 pm R rate between 1 and 1.2 in UK. Will the lockdown be lifted on 2 Dec?