I have no idea, but only the really stupid people believed that bus and 350m saved a week thing.Slick wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 2:11 pmWasn't that part of the leave deal, that EU funding would be replaced by our own UK funding from all the cash we would save?Yeeb wrote: ↑Wed Nov 25, 2020 1:12 pm Depends of course what ‘benefits’ are being talked about by Ursula: any subsidies or grants or infrastructure building, of course the uk should not benefit from these. (I found it particularly amusing that Cornwall voted to leave, realised they wouldn’t get all their EU subsidies any more , and then say the uk govt must replace all this funding !)
Freedom of movement - ditto for most people too, at least for working and living.
But if she means benefits like quotas and tariffs and the whole ability to trade thing, then that’s probably too far to make a meaningful agreement so WTO and hard border in Ireland it is then. There is an element of indirect free rider benefits , similar to say how all of the Eu benefited from the military protection and gdp spend that US and (much lower) uk put in for decades.
Maybe at the top level funding would be replaced, but exactly replacing like with like (such as Eu regional development grants) is an extremely stupid assumption to make.
My beef wasn’t really at the voters there, but there was someone actually quite senior or an MP who just expected a like for like replacement - utterly bonkers.