Let's be honest Rinkals,; you would prefer to believe there was political interference from Boris whatever the case. Nothing posted here will change your view.Rinkals wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 6:27 amhttps://www.edition.cnn.com/world/live- ... 61cc364d44Saint wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:02 amBecause people pay so much attention to experts?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:00 am
I guess a quick perusal of the voices coming out in favour of this would be one way of dispelling this - from medical establishment, to eminent professors, to the SNP etc. Weird to make everything about politics.
It seems that not everyone is convinced that political interference is not the driver behind the rush to approval.“We have the gold standard of a regulatory approach with the FDA. The UK did not do it as carefully and they got a couple of days ahead,” he said. “I don't think that makes much difference. We'll be there. We'll be there very soon.”
So, coronavirus...
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
Or, as one of the leading pharma research nations in the world, we’re capable of doing it pretty quickly.Rinkals wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 6:27 amhttps://www.edition.cnn.com/world/live- ... 61cc364d44Saint wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:02 amBecause people pay so much attention to experts?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:00 am
I guess a quick perusal of the voices coming out in favour of this would be one way of dispelling this - from medical establishment, to eminent professors, to the SNP etc. Weird to make everything about politics.
It seems that not everyone is convinced that political interference is not the driver behind the rush to approval.“We have the gold standard of a regulatory approach with the FDA. The UK did not do it as carefully and they got a couple of days ahead,” he said. “I don't think that makes much difference. We'll be there. We'll be there very soon.”
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Just look at the Daily Mail comments section if you fancy a good laugh/crymat the expat wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 2:47 am I've stumbled on a few Anti-Vaxxer threads on FB news articles over the last few days.....
Jeebus....
- eldanielfire
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:01 pm
Not everyone is convinced Trump didn't have the 2020 election stolen from him or that Vaccinations are actually good and not the government trying to control people or something. But baseless, evidence-less conspiracies made-up just for partisan reasons are a poison on modern political discourse.Rinkals wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 6:27 amhttps://www.edition.cnn.com/world/live- ... 61cc364d44Saint wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:02 amBecause people pay so much attention to experts?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:00 am
I guess a quick perusal of the voices coming out in favour of this would be one way of dispelling this - from medical establishment, to eminent professors, to the SNP etc. Weird to make everything about politics.
It seems that not everyone is convinced that political interference is not the driver behind the rush to approval.“We have the gold standard of a regulatory approach with the FDA. The UK did not do it as carefully and they got a couple of days ahead,” he said. “I don't think that makes much difference. We'll be there. We'll be there very soon.”
However it is a fact the FDA is not the gold standard in regulatory bodies. Look at the US food or drug industries FFS.
Last edited by eldanielfire on Thu Dec 03, 2020 8:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
12th century Cornwall is more Enlightened than some of those people.frodder wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 8:39 amJust look at the Daily Mail comments section if you fancy a good laugh/crymat the expat wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 2:47 am I've stumbled on a few Anti-Vaxxer threads on FB news articles over the last few days.....
Jeebus....
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5963
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Realistically you'd criticise the UK if we took longer than the Americans and the EU just as much as you're criticising us for being probably marginally ahead of them. Whenever anything involves the UK/England you start foaming at the mouth.Rinkals wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 6:27 amhttps://www.edition.cnn.com/world/live- ... 61cc364d44Saint wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:02 amBecause people pay so much attention to experts?Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:00 am
I guess a quick perusal of the voices coming out in favour of this would be one way of dispelling this - from medical establishment, to eminent professors, to the SNP etc. Weird to make everything about politics.
It seems that not everyone is convinced that political interference is not the driver behind the rush to approval.“We have the gold standard of a regulatory approach with the FDA. The UK did not do it as carefully and they got a couple of days ahead,” he said. “I don't think that makes much difference. We'll be there. We'll be there very soon.”
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
eldanielfire wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 8:41 amNot everyone is convinced Trump didn't have the 2020 election stolen from him or that Vaccinations are actually good and not the government trying to control people or something. But baseless, evidence-less conspiracies made-up just for partisan reasons are a poison on modern political discourse.Rinkals wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 6:27 amhttps://www.edition.cnn.com/world/live- ... 61cc364d44
It seems that not everyone is convinced that political interference is not the driver behind the rush to approval.“We have the gold standard of a regulatory approach with the FDA. The UK did not do it as carefully and they got a couple of days ahead,” he said. “I don't think that makes much difference. We'll be there. We'll be there very soon.”
However it is a fact the FDA is not the gold standard in regulatory bodies. Look at the US food or drug industries FFS.
The FDA have a real problem to overcome in the US, which is that every time Donald opened his mouth saying that the vaccine was coming soon, public trust that the vaccine would be safe dropped. So they're looking for ways to re-instil at least some confidence in the general public that if they've approved it it will be safe. In that sense the UK fast-track approval is manna from heaven - "Look at the UK, cutting corners to rush the approval. But don't you worry, we're doing it properly. So when we sign off on it you can know it's safe"
- eldanielfire
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:01 pm
By all accounts I've read the UK hasn't cut corners, just poured more resources at each stage to get it done faster and at EU standards. However the FDA have been poor on many issues long before they dealt with Trump's toxic influence.Saint wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 8:50 ameldanielfire wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 8:41 amNot everyone is convinced Trump didn't have the 2020 election stolen from him or that Vaccinations are actually good and not the government trying to control people or something. But baseless, evidence-less conspiracies made-up just for partisan reasons are a poison on modern political discourse.Rinkals wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 6:27 am
https://www.edition.cnn.com/world/live- ... 61cc364d44
It seems that not everyone is convinced that political interference is not the driver behind the rush to approval.
However it is a fact the FDA is not the gold standard in regulatory bodies. Look at the US food or drug industries FFS.
The FDA have a real problem to overcome in the US, which is that every time Donald opened his mouth saying that the vaccine was coming soon, public trust that the vaccine would be safe dropped. So they're looking for ways to re-instil at least some confidence in the general public that if they've approved it it will be safe. In that sense the UK fast-track approval is manna from heaven - "Look at the UK, cutting corners to rush the approval. But don't you worry, we're doing it properly. So when we sign off on it you can know it's safe"
- eldanielfire
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:01 pm
It does seem to be the issue with the 'backlash' against the UK approving the vaccine. If the UK took longer it would be criticizing for being slower than the EU. Because the UK approved the Vaccine first, the backlash is it's taking credit for Turkish Scientists in Germany, despite Boris crediting international Scientists for the achievement yesterday in his evening briefing.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 8:46 amRealistically you'd criticise the UK if we took longer than the Americans and the EU just as much as you're criticising us for being probably marginally ahead of them. Whenever anything involves the UK/England you start foaming at the mouth.Rinkals wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 6:27 amhttps://www.edition.cnn.com/world/live- ... 61cc364d44
It seems that not everyone is convinced that political interference is not the driver behind the rush to approval.“We have the gold standard of a regulatory approach with the FDA. The UK did not do it as carefully and they got a couple of days ahead,” he said. “I don't think that makes much difference. We'll be there. We'll be there very soon.”
I agree, in particular about the UK doing it right. For once, we appear to have been very pro-active about this stuff - rather than waiting till the ned for the study data and only starting the review process, it's been ongoing rolling reviews with inflight data. So by the time they get to the final data, they've already seen most of it and are happy. There's alos been a "whatever else you;re doing, drop it to do this" policy by the looks of it.eldanielfire wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 9:00 amBy all accounts I've read the UK hasn't cut corners, just poured more resources at each stage to get it done faster and at EU standards. However the FDA have been poor on many issues long before they dealt with Trump's toxic influence.Saint wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 8:50 ameldanielfire wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 8:41 am
Not everyone is convinced Trump didn't have the 2020 election stolen from him or that Vaccinations are actually good and not the government trying to control people or something. But baseless, evidence-less conspiracies made-up just for partisan reasons are a poison on modern political discourse.
However it is a fact the FDA is not the gold standard in regulatory bodies. Look at the US food or drug industries FFS.
The FDA have a real problem to overcome in the US, which is that every time Donald opened his mouth saying that the vaccine was coming soon, public trust that the vaccine would be safe dropped. So they're looking for ways to re-instil at least some confidence in the general public that if they've approved it it will be safe. In that sense the UK fast-track approval is manna from heaven - "Look at the UK, cutting corners to rush the approval. But don't you worry, we're doing it properly. So when we sign off on it you can know it's safe"
Really unusual for us, but I'll take it
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
I could have this wrong, but was the UK the first country in the world to buy the Pfizer vaccine?
First country to pre-order, yesLongshanks wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 9:16 am I could have this wrong, but was the UK the first country in the world to buy the Pfizer vaccine?
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
Gavin Williamson on the radio this morning. An actual child
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
Thanks again Saint. You are the man!Saint wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 9:22 amFirst country to pre-order, yesLongshanks wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 9:16 am I could have this wrong, but was the UK the first country in the world to buy the Pfizer vaccine?
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
I won't believe till I hear it. Which radio?Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 9:22 am Gavin Williamson on the radio this morning. An actual child
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
Longshanks wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 9:26 amI won't believe till I hear it. Which radio?Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 9:22 am Gavin Williamson on the radio this morning. An actual child
There you go. A day after Sharma's leading the charge nonsense.
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6474
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
It's like a 5 year old talking (GW I mean)
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
It is. Probably the worst trait in people is that of thinking they are better than others, openly declaring it takes it to another level. Nothing wrong with praising achievement in your own country, but not running down others. He's an embarrassment.
So far out of his depth that you can't even see him waving any more
- tabascoboy
- Posts: 6474
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
- Location: 曇りの街
It's not that surprising that the MHRA can move quickly on this. There's a good reason that the EMA was based in London - there's a big concentration of academic and medical expertise in the UK, one of the biggest concentrations in the world. And most of it is still there even though the EMA is gone. Easy access to the skills and knowledge you need for the process is going to make the process move more quickly, and provide a very good backbone of what can be looked at in advance. That doesn't mean that other countries couldn't do the same, it just means the UK is well placed to do it quickly, so it should be no surprise that we have.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
GW is a prick , but a German minister also openly said UK procedures were inferior than the EU yesterday, so they’re all at
It:
It:
Typical Tory Brexiteer, if Farage had said this no one would have been surprised.Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 9:29 amLongshanks wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 9:26 amI won't believe till I hear it. Which radio?Margin__Walker wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 9:22 am Gavin Williamson on the radio this morning. An actual child
There you go. A day after Sharma's leading the charge nonsense.
It's pathetic Conservative joingoism yet again.
I know politics is at a low ebb but ffs this right wing tit and his ilk in the government takes the biscuit.
Just watched 50% of the LBC clip, couldn't stomach the other half. Wtf has anyone got to do to get fired from that cabinettabascoboy wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 9:59 amNot waving but drowning in a sea of his own shit
Piss off Mata Hari it seemsfrodder wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 11:19 amJust watched 50% of the LBC clip, couldn't stomach the other half. Wtf has anyone got to do to get fired from that cabinet
As long as he lets her chain him up, speak dirty to him, dig her heels into his arse and throw excrement all over him he will survive. He seems just the sort of chap to actually enjoy that sort of experience?
50%, well done!frodder wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 11:19 amJust watched 50% of the LBC clip, couldn't stomach the other half. Wtf has anyone got to do to get fired from that cabinet
There have been rumours that he will lose his seat in the Cabinet in a New Years reshuffle
Unfortunately as an ex Chief Whip he will know where a lot of bodies are buried and with Johnson's aversion to making decisions he will probably survive one way or another
I'd forgotten how much he sounds like Alan Bennet.SaintK wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 12:02 pm50%, well done!
There have been rumours that he will lose his seat in the Cabinet in a New Years reshuffle
Unfortunately as an ex Chief Whip he will know where a lot of bodies are buried and with Johnson's aversion to making decisions he will probably survive one way or another
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
If only he had 5% of the wit and intelligence of Alan BennetBiffer wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 12:09 pmI'd forgotten how much he sounds like Alan Bennet.SaintK wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 12:02 pm50%, well done!
There have been rumours that he will lose his seat in the Cabinet in a New Years reshuffle
Unfortunately as an ex Chief Whip he will know where a lot of bodies are buried and with Johnson's aversion to making decisions he will probably survive one way or another
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
JVT sounded a bit negative when asked about a day we all could all throw away our masks and ditch the hand sanitizer
"Coronavirus will be with us forever" and the like. He's rolled back a bit from that now, saying Boris was correct to be more positive about how the vaccine will change things. I think JVT is now saying that because of what we have been through we will all be a bit more cautious in the future, with face masks and sanitizer being part of "normal" life. Not sure i completely agree with him though.
"Coronavirus will be with us forever" and the like. He's rolled back a bit from that now, saying Boris was correct to be more positive about how the vaccine will change things. I think JVT is now saying that because of what we have been through we will all be a bit more cautious in the future, with face masks and sanitizer being part of "normal" life. Not sure i completely agree with him though.
I think across Europe/USA I suspect that the hand sanization/hygiene awareness is probably a long term thing that will die off over time (2-3 years). Face masks will be gone as soon as the regulations permitLongshanks wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 12:47 pm JVT sounded a bit negative when asked about a day we all could all throw away our masks and ditch the hand sanitizer
"Coronavirus will be with us forever" and the like. He's rolled back a bit from that now, saying Boris was correct to be more positive about how the vaccine will change things. I think JVT is now saying that because of what we have been through we will all be a bit more cautious in the future, with face masks and sanitizer being part of "normal" life. Not sure i completely agree with him though.
Amen to that bitSaint wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 1:21 pmI think across Europe/USA I suspect that the hand sanization/hygiene awareness is probably a long term thing that will die off over time (2-3 years). Face masks will be gone as soon as the regulations permitLongshanks wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 12:47 pm JVT sounded a bit negative when asked about a day we all could all throw away our masks and ditch the hand sanitizer
"Coronavirus will be with us forever" and the like. He's rolled back a bit from that now, saying Boris was correct to be more positive about how the vaccine will change things. I think JVT is now saying that because of what we have been through we will all be a bit more cautious in the future, with face masks and sanitizer being part of "normal" life. Not sure i completely agree with him though.
- Longshanks
- Posts: 573
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 6:52 pm
And while Coronavirus might be here forever, if the vaccine reduces transmission (which it probably does to an extent) then the virus R rate reduces. If below 1, the virus must die out eventually? Time will tell.
That's how herd immunity works. You get the number of vaccinated people up high enough then the r rate becomes low enough that even the un-vaccinated won't catch it. If you were to assume that the vaccination halts transmission then we hit somewhere around 65-70% vaccination/immunity and it's done (unless it mutates outside of the vaccination envelope). If it reduces transmission then you'll want/need a higher level of immunityLongshanks wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 1:31 pm And while Coronavirus might be here forever, if the vaccine reduces transmission (which it probably does to an extent) then the virus R rate reduces. If below 1, the virus must die out eventually? Time will tell.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Longshanks wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 12:47 pm JVT sounded a bit negative when asked about a day we all could all throw away our masks and ditch the hand sanitizer
"Coronavirus will be with us forever" and the like. He's rolled back a bit from that now, saying Boris was correct to be more positive about how the vaccine will change things. I think JVT is now saying that because of what we have been through we will all be a bit more cautious in the future, with face masks and sanitizer being part of "normal" life. Not sure i completely agree with him though.
JVT doesn’t really grasp humans. public health England have loved the puritanical stuff they’ve been allowed to try and pass as policy.
The swinging 20’s answers the question about will humans party when this is over.
I wouldn’t mind if we became a bit more like some Far East countries where people wear face masks when they have a cold to avoid infecting others, but I agree that widespread use will be out as soon as possible.frodder wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 1:29 pmAmen to that bitSaint wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 1:21 pmI think across Europe/USA I suspect that the hand sanization/hygiene awareness is probably a long term thing that will die off over time (2-3 years). Face masks will be gone as soon as the regulations permitLongshanks wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 12:47 pm JVT sounded a bit negative when asked about a day we all could all throw away our masks and ditch the hand sanitizer
"Coronavirus will be with us forever" and the like. He's rolled back a bit from that now, saying Boris was correct to be more positive about how the vaccine will change things. I think JVT is now saying that because of what we have been through we will all be a bit more cautious in the future, with face masks and sanitizer being part of "normal" life. Not sure i completely agree with him though.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Remember folks it was JVT just a short while ago who claimed masks had no effect on the spread of covid. He’s presented no new science since.
-
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:28 am
Its amazing how quickly people go back to normal.Lobby wrote: ↑Thu Dec 03, 2020 5:15 pmI wouldn’t mind if we became a bit more like some Far East countries where people wear face masks when they have a cold to avoid infecting others, but I agree that widespread use will be out as soon as possible.
Apart from the signing in with the tracer app and the now mandatory masks on public transport the only really lasting thing so far in NZ is finally people stay out of the office when sick
- Northern Lights
- Posts: 524
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:32 am
We will be ditching home working ASAP too and lots of other business people I speak to are of a similar mind.
Tech has been good but not nearly as effective as everyone in the office imho.
Tech has been good but not nearly as effective as everyone in the office imho.