So, coronavirus...
TBF, they stopped that fairly rapidly when the dinner party guest list started getting smaller.Happyhooker wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 11:13 pmwell apart from your elderly neighbours and their dinner parties.........Slick wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 12:36 pmHaven't seen anything like that, but I know quite a few mates up here are starting to break the rules in small ways - 2 couples inside, a couple meeting up to watch the rugby etc.Bullet wrote: ↑Tue Apr 06, 2021 11:49 am Not sure if this thread is the right place for a question but does anyone else have neighbours that have ignored lockdown and will have to deal with them when lifted?
There was 14 (from 4 households) at party in their front garden Saturday and I've realised that I don't need that level of selfish in my life.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Highlighted on the radio this morning that it's more difficult to find representative sample groups for trials in this country given everyone over 50 has been vaccinated.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 1180
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm
The dumb, stupid and dirty Europeans have forced the UK to recommend under 30s get offered a vaccine other than our glorious Astrazeneca vaccine.
Aren't they stupid these dumb dirty Europeans. Fu.cking Von dumb Lieden
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56665517
Aren't they stupid these dumb dirty Europeans. Fu.cking Von dumb Lieden
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56665517
Just being a little skeptical here, but could that not also be a step towards trying to ensure people continue getting vaccinated? Offering an alternative is a long way from not allowing AZ to be given. PR more than anything no?TheNatalShark wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:20 pm The dumb, stupid and dirty Europeans have forced the UK to recommend under 30s get offered a vaccine other than our glorious Astrazeneca vaccine.
Aren't they stupid these dumb dirty Europeans. Fu.cking Von dumb Lieden
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56665517
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Realistically no AZ was going to be offered to U30s for a while anyway. Lots of 2nd doses to be delivered first.Raggs wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:28 pmJust being a little skeptical here, but could that not also be a step towards trying to ensure people continue getting vaccinated? Offering an alternative is a long way from not allowing AZ to be given. PR more than anything no?TheNatalShark wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:20 pm The dumb, stupid and dirty Europeans have forced the UK to recommend under 30s get offered a vaccine other than our glorious Astrazeneca vaccine.
Aren't they stupid these dumb dirty Europeans. Fu.cking Von dumb Lieden
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56665517
Yeah, I can see a lot of under 30s getting Novavax-ed when that starts to come on stream.Saint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:36 pmRealistically no AZ was going to be offered to U30s for a while anyway. Lots of 2nd doses to be delivered first.Raggs wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:28 pmJust being a little skeptical here, but could that not also be a step towards trying to ensure people continue getting vaccinated? Offering an alternative is a long way from not allowing AZ to be given. PR more than anything no?TheNatalShark wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:20 pm The dumb, stupid and dirty Europeans have forced the UK to recommend under 30s get offered a vaccine other than our glorious Astrazeneca vaccine.
Aren't they stupid these dumb dirty Europeans. Fu.cking Von dumb Lieden
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56665517
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Also true. I still suspect this is a PR campaign. Don't write it off because that causes more fear, but help keep those having second thoughts coming in for jabs.Saint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:36 pmRealistically no AZ was going to be offered to U30s for a while anyway. Lots of 2nd doses to be delivered first.Raggs wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:28 pmJust being a little skeptical here, but could that not also be a step towards trying to ensure people continue getting vaccinated? Offering an alternative is a long way from not allowing AZ to be given. PR more than anything no?TheNatalShark wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:20 pm The dumb, stupid and dirty Europeans have forced the UK to recommend under 30s get offered a vaccine other than our glorious Astrazeneca vaccine.
Aren't they stupid these dumb dirty Europeans. Fu.cking Von dumb Lieden
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56665517
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
EMA still recommending that it should continue to be used for all groups, but that blood clots should also now be listed as a very rare side effect.Raggs wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:28 pmJust being a little skeptical here, but could that not also be a step towards trying to ensure people continue getting vaccinated? Offering an alternative is a long way from not allowing AZ to be given. PR more than anything no?TheNatalShark wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:20 pm The dumb, stupid and dirty Europeans have forced the UK to recommend under 30s get offered a vaccine other than our glorious Astrazeneca vaccine.
Aren't they stupid these dumb dirty Europeans. Fu.cking Von dumb Lieden
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56665517
MHRA saying the same with a proviso for the under 30'sLobby wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:42 pmEMA still recommending that it should continue to be used for all groups, but that blood clots should also now be listed as a very rare side effect.Raggs wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:28 pmJust being a little skeptical here, but could that not also be a step towards trying to ensure people continue getting vaccinated? Offering an alternative is a long way from not allowing AZ to be given. PR more than anything no?TheNatalShark wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:20 pm The dumb, stupid and dirty Europeans have forced the UK to recommend under 30s get offered a vaccine other than our glorious Astrazeneca vaccine.
Aren't they stupid these dumb dirty Europeans. Fu.cking Von dumb Lieden
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56665517
People should get the AZ vaccine according to schedule, he says.
But he says people aged 18 to 29 who do not have an underlying health condition that puts them at greater risk from Covid should be offered an alternative to the AZ vaccine if one is available.
Should be offered an alternative, rather than should be given? I know it seems petty, but it's exactly the sort of wording that is important. If there was a genuine fear it would be "given".SaintK wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:50 pmMHRA saying the same with a proviso for the under 30'sPeople should get the AZ vaccine according to schedule, he says.
But he says people aged 18 to 29 who do not have an underlying health condition that puts them at greater risk from Covid should be offered an alternative to the AZ vaccine if one is available.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
They said 'offered'.Raggs wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:53 pmShould be offered an alternative, rather than should be given? I know it seems petty, but it's exactly the sort of wording that is important. If there was a genuine fear it would be "given".SaintK wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:50 pmMHRA saying the same with a proviso for the under 30'sPeople should get the AZ vaccine according to schedule, he says.
But he says people aged 18 to 29 who do not have an underlying health condition that puts them at greater risk from Covid should be offered an alternative to the AZ vaccine if one is available.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Yes. Offered. Offered is very different from Given. Offered means a choice. Given when available, means there's a clear concern, and not given AZ, would mean there's actually some worrying evidence.
Both MHRA and EMA are saying the same thing. There's not really anything to be properly concerned about. MHRA are putting in place a PR campaign to try and ensure those people who were on the fence, come in for their vaccinations, and we don't end up with a situation like some countries, where seemingly half their population is pro-plague.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
We still don't know if it really does. The numbers are so tiny that it's tough to really tell. It's why EMA and MHRA still say it's fine for everyone.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
-
- Posts: 1180
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm
No, any discussion around reviews or investigations of AZ is stupidity and purely politically motivated by "the EU" due to Anglophobia and to cover for their procurement failures. Any public announcements by out of touch and stupid regulators only serves to erode public confidence. There is no nuance, only demonstrable stupidity by the Euros. We don't even have to leave this thread for our own perceptions of it.Raggs wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:28 pmJust being a little skeptical here, but could that not also be a step towards trying to ensure people continue getting vaccinated? Offering an alternative is a long way from not allowing AZ to be given. PR more than anything no?TheNatalShark wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:20 pm The dumb, stupid and dirty Europeans have forced the UK to recommend under 30s get offered a vaccine other than our glorious Astrazeneca vaccine.
Aren't they stupid these dumb dirty Europeans. Fu.cking Von dumb Lieden
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56665517
Whilst I'm disappointed this may make my own getting of a jab (28) a tiny bit more complicated or delayed, I'm very grateful for both our scientists and those across the ponds for doing work to promote the safety of drugs and vaccines - and aren't just dismissing raised concerns as 'stupid', 'ignoring data', 'no evidence', 'no good reason'.
Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Mar 14, 2021 2:26 pmWhat is going on here? Political cover for delivery delays?
You'll be reassured no doubt by the fact that both the EMA and the MHRA have decreed that it's perfectly safe then, and that there's still not enough evidence to suggest that there's any identifiable risk factors (such as age/sex) to suggest that a group could be more vulnerable.
So yes, countries continuing to ignore the medical advice from their own bloody agencies, in terms of not halting or restricting usage of the AZ vaccine, are being bloody stupid. EMA has continuously said that such restrictions should not be in place.
So yes, countries continuing to ignore the medical advice from their own bloody agencies, in terms of not halting or restricting usage of the AZ vaccine, are being bloody stupid. EMA has continuously said that such restrictions should not be in place.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
-
- Posts: 1180
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm
That is categorically not true though. It is an outright lie that national regulators in Europe did not provide advice to their governments regarding pauses to investigate.Raggs wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 6:44 pm You'll be reassured no doubt by the fact that both the EMA and the MHRA have decreed that it's perfectly safe then, and that there's still not enough evidence to suggest that there's any identifiable risk factors (such as age/sex) to suggest that a group could be more vulnerable.
So yes, countries continuing to ignore the medical advice from their own bloody agencies, in terms of not halting or restricting usage of the AZ vaccine, are being bloody stupid. EMA has continuously said that such restrictions should not be in place.
The closest it got to it was when Italian and French reps publicly announced they would await the EMA's further comment, and thereafter still recommended to governments about age group restrictions on their own basis.
It is an outright and demonstrable lie, evidenced by national regulators own press releases.
Unless the national regulators are under big bad Ursula's thumb.
TheNatalShark wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 6:56 pmThat is categorically not true though. It is an outright lie that national regulators in Europe did not provide advice to their governments regarding pauses to investigate.Raggs wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 6:44 pm You'll be reassured no doubt by the fact that both the EMA and the MHRA have decreed that it's perfectly safe then, and that there's still not enough evidence to suggest that there's any identifiable risk factors (such as age/sex) to suggest that a group could be more vulnerable.
So yes, countries continuing to ignore the medical advice from their own bloody agencies, in terms of not halting or restricting usage of the AZ vaccine, are being bloody stupid. EMA has continuously said that such restrictions should not be in place.
The closest it got to it was when Italian and French reps publicly announced they would await the EMA's further comment, and thereafter still recommended to governments about age group restrictions on their own basis.
It is an outright and demonstrable lie, evidenced by national regulators own press releases.
Unless the national regulators are under big bad Ursula's thumb.
https://www.irishnews.com/news/northern ... y-2256950/
And today, they've once again said that it's safe.The director general of Italy's medicines authority, Nicola Magrini, told Italian daily newspaper la Repubblica that the decision by some European countries to suspend the rollout was a "political one".
"We got to the point of a suspension because several European countries, including Germany and France, preferred to interrupt vaccinations... to put them on hold in order to carry out checks. The choice is a political one," he said, adding that the vaccine was safe.
The WHO, the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the EMA have all said there is no evidence the jab causes the problems.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
-
- Posts: 1180
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm
An outright lie and demonstrably false - here is the press release from the Paul Ehrlich InstitutRaggs wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 7:01 pm
https://www.irishnews.com/news/northern ... y-2256950/
And today, they've once again said that it's safe.The director general of Italy's medicines authority, Nicola Magrini, told Italian daily newspaper la Repubblica that the decision by some European countries to suspend the rollout was a "political one".
"We got to the point of a suspension because several European countries, including Germany and France, preferred to interrupt vaccinations... to put them on hold in order to carry out checks. The choice is a political one," he said, adding that the vaccine was safe.
The WHO, the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the EMA have all said there is no evidence the jab causes the problems.
https://www.pei.de/SharedDocs/FAQs/EN/c ... ended.html
Go ahead, tell me they lied and the decision was a political one.
I'm not sure why you feel the need to keep restating that it is safe.
Fine, the german's advised for the pause, the italians stated it was political, and the european health agency consistently stated it was safe, and still do.TheNatalShark wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 7:10 pmAn outright lie and demonstrably false - here is the press release from the Paul Ehrlich InstitutRaggs wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 7:01 pm
https://www.irishnews.com/news/northern ... y-2256950/
And today, they've once again said that it's safe.The director general of Italy's medicines authority, Nicola Magrini, told Italian daily newspaper la Repubblica that the decision by some European countries to suspend the rollout was a "political one".
"We got to the point of a suspension because several European countries, including Germany and France, preferred to interrupt vaccinations... to put them on hold in order to carry out checks. The choice is a political one," he said, adding that the vaccine was safe.
The WHO, the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the EMA have all said there is no evidence the jab causes the problems.
https://www.pei.de/SharedDocs/FAQs/EN/c ... ended.html
Go ahead, tell me they lied and the decision was a political one.
I'm not sure why you feel the need to keep restating that it is safe.
I feel the need to keep saying that, because otherwise people may start to believe that it's been found to not be safe, and I don't want that to happen, because it's important for me that as many people as possible get vaccinated.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
-
- Posts: 1180
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm
The Italian comment is grossly, grossly misstated as being plainly "political" - Draghi did not pitch up and pressure for an Italian pause. It was a 'political' decision by their own authorities to review in unison with other regulators - not simply a top down one on the regulator. Here is the actual interview where the situation is fully described.Raggs wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 7:15 pm Fine, the german's advised for the pause, the italians stated it was political, and the european health agency consistently stated it was safe, and still do.
I feel the need to keep saying that, because otherwise people may start to believe that it's been found to not be safe, and I don't want that to happen, because it's important for me that as many people as possible get vaccinated.
https://www.repubblica.it/cronaca/2021/ ... 292405820/
"The precautionary stop arises from constant discussions with the Minister of Health and other countries, and matured after the meeting at the EMA. The option had already been discussed a week ago, but it was preferred to act by simply withdrawing the stocks. . We are now convinced that a comprehensive review of all data and a more detailed analysis is better. "
And by continuously insisting that pauses were made for political reasoning and not scientific ones, and that the national regulators of these countries are 'stupid' does not exactly render a reader to believe that they are being well looked after by the "stupid" decisions of their regulators.
EU's constant bleating about UK not exporting vaccines may be incorrect.
"The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age can reveal Australia’s early rollout has been propped up by 717,000 doses manufactured in the UK rather than from factories in Europe as widely believed.
The first 300,000 UK-made doses landed at Sydney Airport on February 28 – one month after the European Commission introduced new curbs limiting the export of vaccines produced on the continent.
Another large batch arrived on an Emirates passenger plane in March, well after Italy and the European Commission formally blocked an application by AstraZeneca to ship 250,000 doses to Australia."
https://www.theage.com.au/world/europe/ ... 57hcl.html
"The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age can reveal Australia’s early rollout has been propped up by 717,000 doses manufactured in the UK rather than from factories in Europe as widely believed.
The first 300,000 UK-made doses landed at Sydney Airport on February 28 – one month after the European Commission introduced new curbs limiting the export of vaccines produced on the continent.
Another large batch arrived on an Emirates passenger plane in March, well after Italy and the European Commission formally blocked an application by AstraZeneca to ship 250,000 doses to Australia."
https://www.theage.com.au/world/europe/ ... 57hcl.html
Just to point out Brits are European tooTheNatalShark wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:20 pm The dumb, stupid and dirty Europeans have forced the UK to recommend under 30s get offered a vaccine other than our glorious Astrazeneca vaccine.
Aren't they stupid these dumb dirty Europeans. Fu.cking Von dumb Lieden
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56665517
Ursula will go ballistic. They should have gone to the EU (in her mind)Glaston wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 8:48 pm EU's constant bleating about UK not exporting vaccines may be incorrect.
"The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age can reveal Australia’s early rollout has been propped up by 717,000 doses manufactured in the UK rather than from factories in Europe as widely believed.
The first 300,000 UK-made doses landed at Sydney Airport on February 28 – one month after the European Commission introduced new curbs limiting the export of vaccines produced on the continent.
Another large batch arrived on an Emirates passenger plane in March, well after Italy and the European Commission formally blocked an application by AstraZeneca to ship 250,000 doses to Australia."
https://www.theage.com.au/world/europe/ ... 57hcl.html
I thought the whole point of Brexit is that they aren't?Glaston wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 8:54 pmJust to point out Brits are European tooTheNatalShark wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:20 pm The dumb, stupid and dirty Europeans have forced the UK to recommend under 30s get offered a vaccine other than our glorious Astrazeneca vaccine.
Aren't they stupid these dumb dirty Europeans. Fu.cking Von dumb Lieden
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56665517
She has definitely been a disastrous appointment.Saint wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 8:59 pmUrsula will go ballistic. They should have gone to the EU (in her mind)Glaston wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 8:48 pm EU's constant bleating about UK not exporting vaccines may be incorrect.
"The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age can reveal Australia’s early rollout has been propped up by 717,000 doses manufactured in the UK rather than from factories in Europe as widely believed.
The first 300,000 UK-made doses landed at Sydney Airport on February 28 – one month after the European Commission introduced new curbs limiting the export of vaccines produced on the continent.
Another large batch arrived on an Emirates passenger plane in March, well after Italy and the European Commission formally blocked an application by AstraZeneca to ship 250,000 doses to Australia."
https://www.theage.com.au/world/europe/ ... 57hcl.html
It's all very well wanting diversity in governance, but a modicum of competence is also needed.
Europe is a Geographical identity. The UK left the European Union which is a political/trading identity.Rinkals wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 7:47 amI thought the whole point of Brexit is that they aren't?Glaston wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 8:54 pmJust to point out Brits are European tooTheNatalShark wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:20 pm The dumb, stupid and dirty Europeans have forced the UK to recommend under 30s get offered a vaccine other than our glorious Astrazeneca vaccine.
Aren't they stupid these dumb dirty Europeans. Fu.cking Von dumb Lieden
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-56665517
I suppose I'm making the point that the Brits themselves (or 52% of them*) don't regard themselves as European.
*probably a lot less now, considering the impact of the pandemic on that demographic
-
- Posts: 1180
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm
Excellent to read, gives me hope similar arrangements were made for harder hit regions and Covax, and bodes well for UK gov's dependability to allow company freedom on any potential future pandemics.Glaston wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 8:48 pm EU's constant bleating about UK not exporting vaccines may be incorrect.
"The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age can reveal Australia’s early rollout has been propped up by 717,000 doses manufactured in the UK rather than from factories in Europe as widely believed.
The first 300,000 UK-made doses landed at Sydney Airport on February 28 – one month after the European Commission introduced new curbs limiting the export of vaccines produced on the continent.
Another large batch arrived on an Emirates passenger plane in March, well after Italy and the European Commission formally blocked an application by AstraZeneca to ship 250,000 doses to Australia."
https://www.theage.com.au/world/europe/ ... 57hcl.html
-
- Posts: 1180
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm
We aren't European. Europeans are a homogeneous group of people living under a single political bloc which behaves in a uniform fashion. Any attempted distinction between the people, national governments or bodies and the EU is pretty much meaningless.
Of course we're European - we live in the continent that is Europe. Just as Canadians are North American. Not all countries in Europe are part of the EU -TheNatalShark wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 8:14 amWe aren't European. Europeans are a homogeneous group of people living under a single political bloc which behaves in a uniform fashion. Any attempted distinction between the people, national governments or bodies and the EU is pretty much meaningless.
Albania*
Andorra
Armenia
Azerbaijan
Belarus
Bosnia and Herzegovina**
Georgia
Iceland
Kosovo**
Liechtenstein
Moldova
Monaco
Montenegro*
North Macedonia*
Norway
Russia
San Marino
Serbia*
Switzerland
Turkey*
Ukraine
United Kingdom (left EU on January 31, 2020)
Vatican City
* Countries that are in the process of integrating the EU legislation into national law.
** Potential candidate countries that do not yet fulfil the requirements for EU membership.
-
- Posts: 1180
- Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2020 4:35 pm
Okay, in future I will italicise my sarcasm. Apologies for confusion and thank you for engaging in good faith.