The Official Cricket Thread

Where goats go to escape
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

Maharaj gets Fakker.

Not before he'd scored his ton, though.

Maharaj seems to be risking missing out on his leather coat here.
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

Maharaj gets a third, nicely stumped.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

249/5 - Pakistan letting the good work up front slip now.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

decent over. 1 6 . 6 6 6

Hasan with 32 from 11 :clap:

320/7

That seems a bit light, should've been over 350, but it's more than enough - this batting lineup won't get close. I reckon we'll be 260 all out.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:35 am decent over. 1 6 . 6 6 6

Hasan with 32 from 11 :clap:

320/7

That seems a bit light, should've been over 350.
On cricinfo the Pakistan supporters seem to think 300 is plenty enough.

I suspect they're right.
Big Nipper
Posts: 845
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:08 am

Rinkals wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:39 am
Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:35 am decent over. 1 6 . 6 6 6

Hasan with 32 from 11 :clap:

320/7

That seems a bit light, should've been over 350.
On cricinfo the Pakistan supporters seem to think 300 is plenty enough.

I suspect they're right.
Well what a surprise that you would back the opposition
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9800
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Big Nipper wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 12:20 pm
Rinkals wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:39 am
Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:35 am decent over. 1 6 . 6 6 6

Hasan with 32 from 11 :clap:

320/7

That seems a bit light, should've been over 350.
On cricinfo the Pakistan supporters seem to think 300 is plenty enough.

I suspect they're right.
Well what a surprise that you would back the opposition
Give him more credit than that. It's a good double-play; if Pakistan lose, he gets to accuse those fans of arrogance. If they win, he gets to slate South Africa. It's a win-win for ol'Miseryguts.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

Good start this! :thumbup:

I was expecting 20/3 at this stage
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

Awful Pakistan fielding keeping SA in this one....
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

JM2K6 wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 12:46 pm
Big Nipper wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 12:20 pm
Rinkals wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 11:39 am

On cricinfo the Pakistan supporters seem to think 300 is plenty enough.

I suspect they're right.
Well what a surprise that you would back the opposition
Give him more credit than that. It's a good double-play; if Pakistan lose, he gets to accuse those fans of arrogance. If they win, he gets to slate South Africa. It's a win-win for ol'Miseryguts.
I think Nipper is closer to the mark than you are.

I was referring to this quote on cricinfo:
Ahmad: "Pak needs to reassess the target. The way bowl is turning anything above 300 will do. just need to see through Maharaj last 2 overs."
With the loss of the senior players to the IPL, (and the loss of v d Dussen through injury) our batting is looking decidedly green.

Mind you, I don't think I have been 'backing the opposition'. IH has been a lot more negative than I.

Quite impressed with Janneman Malan, though. Good fifty from him.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

Rinkals wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 1:45 pm IH has been a lot more negative than I.
I'm playing the mockers FFS! This isn't my first rodeo. Manage expectations. Expect shit, be pleasantly surprised when we're within spitting distance of a win before actually fucking it up!

That should cover it.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

Bavuma suffering with thigh strain, not looking good
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

Choking on the spin
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

2 in one over, game over red rover.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 1:48 pm
Rinkals wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 1:45 pm IH has been a lot more negative than I.
I'm playing the mockers FFS! This isn't my first rodeo. Manage expectations. Expect shit, be pleasantly surprised when we're within spitting distance of a win before actually fucking it up!

That should cover it.
Yes.

I agree.

I tend to do that as well.

It stings when I get accused of supporting the other side though.

Indeed, my praise of Malan has probably contributed to the fall of his wicket.

Not sure about Verreynne, but Klaasen is no mug against spin.
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

Rinkals wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:10 pm Klaasen is no mug against spin.
Yours. Muppet
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

Sandstorm wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:20 pm
Rinkals wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:10 pm Klaasen is no mug against spin.
Yours. Muppet
Yup, killed him dead!
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

going well enough, but we're going to have too much to do in the last 5 overs.

South Africa need 95 runs in 54 balls. RRR: 10.55
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

Sandstorm wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:20 pm
Rinkals wrote: Wed Apr 07, 2021 2:10 pm Klaasen is no mug against spin.
Yours. Muppet
Sorry.

Nipper was giving me such a hard time for not supporting the team that I felt compelled to reach for some positives.

In all seriousness, though, that was a horrible display from the Saffers.

Phehluckwayo, who I normally like and who is supposed to be an allrounder, was playing like a genuine number eleven and swinging himself off his feet every ball but rarely connecting.

Verreynne can obviously play, but he doesn't appear to have two braincells to rub together. When he tried to lap the free hit off Hassan Ali and missed was a bit face-palm moment.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5961
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Championship season underway with snow in the air.

Live streams of all games available for free, quality is pretty good. Remarkable common sense from English cricket


https://www.ecb.co.uk/county-championsh ... ntre/22585
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

188 for six in the allotted twenty overs.

Twenty runs short of where we should have been.
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

Lose again. Hendricks is officially the dumbest player to ever turn out for the Proteas.
Rinkals
Posts: 2101
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:37 pm

Sandstorm wrote: Sat Apr 10, 2021 4:08 pm Lose again. Hendricks is officially the dumbest player to ever turn out for the Proteas.
Actually he and Shamsi were the only two bowlers to register under ten and were the only ones, apart from Williams' in the twentieth, to take wickets.

I thought Williams bowled well, but Magala, who Pommie Mbangwa was bigging up as the next best thing, was rubbish.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5961
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Take this with as much salt as you please, but by all account Alex Hales has failed another drugs test and is looking at a hefty ban
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6474
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

You know the county cricket season has begun, when snow stops play...
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9800
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Paddington Bear wrote: Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:53 pm Take this with as much salt as you please, but by all account Alex Hales has failed another drugs test and is looking at a hefty ban
I know a couple of people who hold some bizarre grudge against Morgan for ditching Hales. Seemed like a sensible move to me. Guy can't be trusted.
Ovals
Posts: 1491
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:52 pm

JM2K6 wrote: Sun Apr 11, 2021 8:50 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:53 pm Take this with as much salt as you please, but by all account Alex Hales has failed another drugs test and is looking at a hefty ban
I know a couple of people who hold some bizarre grudge against Morgan for ditching Hales. Seemed like a sensible move to me. Guy can't be trusted.
I don't have a grudge against Morgan - but I do think that Hales should have the right to a proper process in determining the sanction for his misdemeanours - it shouldn't just come down to the opinion of one person when the ECB has it's own disciplinary processes. If his crime is worthy of a ban from the England team for 1, 2 or more years; then that should be the sanction decided on by the ECB, not just by the captain of the white ball team.

If Hales was also a test player, you could have the ridiculous situation where he'd be free to play test cricket for us, but be, effectively, banned from T20I/ODI cricket.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9800
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Ovals wrote: Mon Apr 12, 2021 9:09 am
JM2K6 wrote: Sun Apr 11, 2021 8:50 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:53 pm Take this with as much salt as you please, but by all account Alex Hales has failed another drugs test and is looking at a hefty ban
I know a couple of people who hold some bizarre grudge against Morgan for ditching Hales. Seemed like a sensible move to me. Guy can't be trusted.
I don't have a grudge against Morgan - but I do think that Hales should have the right to a proper process in determining the sanction for his misdemeanours - it shouldn't just come down to the opinion of one person when the ECB has it's own disciplinary processes. If his crime is worthy of a ban from the England team for 1, 2 or more years; then that should be the sanction decided on by the ECB, not just by the captain of the white ball team.

If Hales was also a test player, you could have the ridiculous situation where he'd be free to play test cricket for us, but be, effectively, banned from T20I/ODI cricket.
No-one has the right to play international cricket, though. It's not just that he's a cokehead, it's that the captain thinks he cannot be trusted because of how he fucked them over last time and lied about his actions. I think it's perfectly reasonable for an apparently toxic player to be excluded. Morgan does have a lot of power and in return he's provided massive success.

I realise my view on the KP situation is the complete opposite here, though I do think there's a big difference between a player being scapegoated for the failures of the team & captain and what's happened with Hales.

A lesser example would be someone like Cipriani. But I'm not sure there's an easy comparison to make with other sports, as a cricket captain has far more say in selection and tactics.
Big D
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:55 am

Paddington Bear wrote: Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:53 pm Take this with as much salt as you please, but by all account Alex Hales has failed another drugs test and is looking at a hefty ban
If that is true it is a bit of a sad story* IMO. He has a real talent for white ball cricket and he has wasted it. I just hope is agent/,management team have been offering the appropriate support rather than leaching off his T20 earnings.

*of course entirely his own fault.
Ovals
Posts: 1491
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:52 pm

JM2K6 wrote: Mon Apr 12, 2021 9:16 am
Ovals wrote: Mon Apr 12, 2021 9:09 am
JM2K6 wrote: Sun Apr 11, 2021 8:50 pm

I know a couple of people who hold some bizarre grudge against Morgan for ditching Hales. Seemed like a sensible move to me. Guy can't be trusted.
I don't have a grudge against Morgan - but I do think that Hales should have the right to a proper process in determining the sanction for his misdemeanours - it shouldn't just come down to the opinion of one person when the ECB has it's own disciplinary processes. If his crime is worthy of a ban from the England team for 1, 2 or more years; then that should be the sanction decided on by the ECB, not just by the captain of the white ball team.

If Hales was also a test player, you could have the ridiculous situation where he'd be free to play test cricket for us, but be, effectively, banned from T20I/ODI cricket.
No-one has the right to play international cricket, though. It's not just that he's a cokehead, it's that the captain thinks he cannot be trusted because of how he fucked them over last time and lied about his actions. I think it's perfectly reasonable for an apparently toxic player to be excluded. Morgan does have a lot of power and in return he's provided massive success.

I realise my view on the KP situation is the complete opposite here, though I do think there's a big difference between a player being scapegoated for the failures of the team & captain and what's happened with Hales.

A lesser example would be someone like Cipriani. But I'm not sure there's an easy comparison to make with other sports, as a cricket captain has far more say in selection and tactics.
I don't have any problem with Hales being sanctioned for what he has done, even if that sanction is deemed to be a life ban from the England team - I just don't think that one guy should have such total power to impose sanctions far beyond what the ECB have agreed to. It won't be for much longer though. I can't see Morgs going on past the T20 WC. His recent form would have seen him dropped were he not the skipper - probably for Hales :lol:
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5961
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Ovals wrote: Mon Apr 12, 2021 9:09 am
JM2K6 wrote: Sun Apr 11, 2021 8:50 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:53 pm Take this with as much salt as you please, but by all account Alex Hales has failed another drugs test and is looking at a hefty ban
I know a couple of people who hold some bizarre grudge against Morgan for ditching Hales. Seemed like a sensible move to me. Guy can't be trusted.
I don't have a grudge against Morgan - but I do think that Hales should have the right to a proper process in determining the sanction for his misdemeanours - it shouldn't just come down to the opinion of one person when the ECB has it's own disciplinary processes. If his crime is worthy of a ban from the England team for 1, 2 or more years; then that should be the sanction decided on by the ECB, not just by the captain of the white ball team.

If Hales was also a test player, you could have the ridiculous situation where he'd be free to play test cricket for us, but be, effectively, banned from T20I/ODI cricket.
A captain has a right to (within reason) select his squad. Morgan clearly has no respect for Hales.

Fwiw Hales is clearly an exceptionally talented player, but I largely agree with Morgan on this. I cannot pretend to respect a bloke who had a chance to win a home world cup and traded it in for gear on a night out in Nottingham.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9800
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Ovals wrote: Mon Apr 12, 2021 9:41 am
JM2K6 wrote: Mon Apr 12, 2021 9:16 am
Ovals wrote: Mon Apr 12, 2021 9:09 am

I don't have a grudge against Morgan - but I do think that Hales should have the right to a proper process in determining the sanction for his misdemeanours - it shouldn't just come down to the opinion of one person when the ECB has it's own disciplinary processes. If his crime is worthy of a ban from the England team for 1, 2 or more years; then that should be the sanction decided on by the ECB, not just by the captain of the white ball team.

If Hales was also a test player, you could have the ridiculous situation where he'd be free to play test cricket for us, but be, effectively, banned from T20I/ODI cricket.
No-one has the right to play international cricket, though. It's not just that he's a cokehead, it's that the captain thinks he cannot be trusted because of how he fucked them over last time and lied about his actions. I think it's perfectly reasonable for an apparently toxic player to be excluded. Morgan does have a lot of power and in return he's provided massive success.

I realise my view on the KP situation is the complete opposite here, though I do think there's a big difference between a player being scapegoated for the failures of the team & captain and what's happened with Hales.

A lesser example would be someone like Cipriani. But I'm not sure there's an easy comparison to make with other sports, as a cricket captain has far more say in selection and tactics.
I don't have any problem with Hales being sanctioned for what he has done, even if that sanction is deemed to be a life ban from the England team - I just don't think that one guy should have such total power to impose sanctions far beyond what the ECB have agreed to. It won't be for much longer though. I can't see Morgs going on past the T20 WC. His recent form would have seen him dropped were he not the skipper - probably for Hales :lol:
His form's definitely not been drop-worthy. One poor series for an established player doesn't worry anyone, really. Late last year he was still doing excellent things with the bat, and he's a phenomenal captain. Happily we're past the days where a short drop in form sees you ditched.

I just don't see the captain making a selection decision against someone as being "sanctioned". Hales only has himself to blame. Especially as Morgan was happy for rumours to start about Hales being given another chance if he could hold it together this year.

I've found a good comparison, though: Dean Richards. Deano is never going to get the England job, because of Bloodgate. Everyone knows that, even though it's not been publicly stated and it's not part of his official punishment. Now, plenty of people think he's served his time and deserves to be treated with a clean slate. I can't imagine they'd think the same if he was a recidivist, though.
Big D
Posts: 3927
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 11:55 am

Well that was pretty shady by Hampshire yesterday. The wicket keeper had to have known what he did. Pretty poor.

For those who haven't seen it, the keeper "stumps" the batsman with his left hand while the ball is in his right hand no where near the stumps.
User avatar
SaintK
Posts: 6620
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:49 am
Location: Over there somewhere

Paddington Bear wrote: Sun Apr 11, 2021 7:53 pm Take this with as much salt as you please, but by all account Alex Hales has failed another drugs test and is looking at a hefty ban
He obviously needs help more than another lengthy period in exile
User avatar
handyman
Posts: 3145
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:23 pm

Pakistan win the toss and bat.

South Africa: 1 Janneman Malan, 2 Aiden Markram, 3 Pite van Biljon, 4 Wihan Lubbe, 5 Heinrich Klaasen (capt & wk), 6 Andile Phehlukwayo, 7 George Linde, 8 Beuran Hendricks, 9 Lizaad Williams, 10 Tabraiz Shamsi, 11 Sisanda Magala

Pakistan: 1 Sharjeel Khan, 2 Mohammad Rizwan (wk), 3 Babar Azam (capt), 4 Haider Ali, 5 Mohammad Hafeez, 6 Mohammad Nawaz, 7 Faheem Ashraf, 8 Hasan Ali, 9 Shaheen Afridi, 10 Mohammad Hasnain, 11 Usman Qadir
Springboks, Stormers and WP supporter.
User avatar
handyman
Posts: 3145
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:23 pm

Wicket first ball, Linde the bowler, Rizwan the batsman. 0/1 after 0.1 overs.
Springboks, Stormers and WP supporter.
User avatar
handyman
Posts: 3145
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:23 pm

16/2 after 3.5 overs, Linde with both wickets.
Springboks, Stormers and WP supporter.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

65/2 after 10
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

72/3 after 11. Linde with his 3rd
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
Ovals
Posts: 1491
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:52 pm

JM2K6 wrote: Mon Apr 12, 2021 10:15 am
Ovals wrote: Mon Apr 12, 2021 9:41 am
JM2K6 wrote: Mon Apr 12, 2021 9:16 am

No-one has the right to play international cricket, though. It's not just that he's a cokehead, it's that the captain thinks he cannot be trusted because of how he fucked them over last time and lied about his actions. I think it's perfectly reasonable for an apparently toxic player to be excluded. Morgan does have a lot of power and in return he's provided massive success.

I realise my view on the KP situation is the complete opposite here, though I do think there's a big difference between a player being scapegoated for the failures of the team & captain and what's happened with Hales.

A lesser example would be someone like Cipriani. But I'm not sure there's an easy comparison to make with other sports, as a cricket captain has far more say in selection and tactics.
I don't have any problem with Hales being sanctioned for what he has done, even if that sanction is deemed to be a life ban from the England team - I just don't think that one guy should have such total power to impose sanctions far beyond what the ECB have agreed to. It won't be for much longer though. I can't see Morgs going on past the T20 WC. His recent form would have seen him dropped were he not the skipper - probably for Hales :lol:
His form's definitely not been drop-worthy. One poor series for an established player doesn't worry anyone, really. Late last year he was still doing excellent things with the bat, and he's a phenomenal captain. Happily we're past the days where a short drop in form sees you ditched.

I just don't see the captain making a selection decision against someone as being "sanctioned". Hales only has himself to blame. Especially as Morgan was happy for rumours to start about Hales being given another chance if he could hold it together this year.

I've found a good comparison, though: Dean Richards. Deano is never going to get the England job, because of Bloodgate. Everyone knows that, even though it's not been publicly stated and it's not part of his official punishment. Now, plenty of people think he's served his time and deserves to be treated with a clean slate. I can't imagine they'd think the same if he was a recidivist, though.
We'll have to agree to disagree - I don't think the skipper should have an absolute veto over the selection of a player - there's been plenty of test sides where the skipper hasn't even been on ethe selection committee.

As for his form - there'd certainly be questions asked if he wasn't skipper - top score of 28 in his last 10 white ball matches - knocking on a bit now, dodgy back, and not producing the goods - with some very good white ball players snapping at his heels. He'll be gone before the end of this year - academic until then though.
Post Reply