Page 265 of 375
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 8:09 am
by Raggs
Raggs wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 10:23 am
From the data released a few days ago:
Age range 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80+
% first dose 67.6% 77.9% 89.8% 95.5% 98.1% 94.6% 97.4% 100%* 94.9%
Not too bad, considering some 50+ are likely still lining up their first dose. Does seem to be a dropping in uptake though, hopefully it's just due to the length of time it's been open, rather than anything else.
Data from the latest week (20th May)
Age range 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75-79 80+
% 1st dose 77.1% 80.7% 90.3% 95.9% 98.4% 94.7% 97.4% 100%* 94.8%
Good to see the lower age ranges still climbing. With the increased transmission variants, we need good coverage, and we seem to be getting it.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 8:12 am
by Paddington Bear
Un Pilier wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 5:29 pm
All things considered, I’m feeling pretty positive right now, though we are nowhere near normal footfall anywhere.
I watched some of the Giro today and was really struck by the overheads of Florence, a city I know well. I have never seen it anywhere near as quiet, even in the early hours of the morning.
Last time I was in Florence the place was absolutely rammed with Chinese tourists (as indeed was the case for most 'touristy' locations over the last few years, and flights as well). So I guess no surprise they're not around.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 8:45 am
by Un Pilier
Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 8:12 am
Un Pilier wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 5:29 pm
All things considered, I’m feeling pretty positive right now, though we are nowhere near normal footfall anywhere.
I watched some of the Giro today and was really struck by the overheads of Florence, a city I know well. I have never seen it anywhere near as quiet, even in the early hours of the morning.
Last time I was in Florence the place was absolutely rammed with Chinese tourists (as indeed was the case for most 'touristy' locations over the last few years, and flights as well). So I guess no surprise they're not around.
Yes, it got to the point it was too busy to enjoy. I have stayed away for the past few years.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 9:09 am
by dpedin
Sandstorm wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 10:08 pm
dpedin wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 8:22 pm
Sandstorm wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 5:15 pm
I’m the same as you. UK is in a great place at last.
The only issue is the more transmissible the variant the higher the % of the pop required to be vaccinated to achieve herd immunity and stop community transmission. If this variant is 50% more transmissible than the Kent one then that increases the figure required for herd immunity from the 80-85% previously thought required. Ive not seen the new % requirement and haven't done the calculation myself yet but it does stretch the target a little bit further away. Also as long as we have community transmission of the new variant then the more cases we will get - only 55% of the UK pop have had at least one jab so there are still c30m folk unvaccinated - and the more hospitalisations and long covid type cases we have and with still a lot of unknowns about the long term effect it is probably prudent not to just let the unvaccinated pop be put at unknown health risks? Even though hospitalisations are much lower in younger age groups it could potentially still be a lot of folk, a small % of a very large number is still likely to be a very large number! The last thing we want is for the NHS, which is now focusing upon the huge backlog of non covid cases to have to deal with lots of admissions of covid cases - the cancers, the cardiac cases etc need to be the priority. Better to be prudent and keep social distancing and masks etc until we reach higher levels of vaccination and cut community transmission to very low levels, it is only a matter a weeks away. Lets just be sensible, we are in a good place it would be a shame to snatch defeat ...
First of all there’s no evidence that any new variant is 50% more transmissible.
Second, you’re ruining my buzz man.
Sorry - I did say 'if this variant is 50% more transmissible' ... the Indian/Johnson-Modi variant is reported by SAGE to possibly be up to 50% more transmissible, it might not be, it might only be 25%?
Measles which is very transmissible, and dangerous for many, needs 95% of pop vaccinated before herd immunity is achieved. Polio 80%. Measles vaccine is 97% effective. However as we have seen vaccination levels fall for measles due to the anti vaccine nutters and also because of travel to countries countries with lower levels of vaccination we have seen a number of outbreaks of measles across the world. Unfortunately MMR rates in UK have fallen to below 95%. If the trend continues then we begin to lose herd immunity and those who for whatever can't take the MMR vaccine become exposed to infection via community transmission through no fault of their own. Vaccination is our pathway out of this omnishambles, we are doing fantastic work, but the last thing we want to do is feck it up on the cusp of escape from covid19 just because we can't be bothered with mask wearing, social distancing or waiting a few more weeks/months before we go abroad!
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 9:15 am
by Saint
dpedin wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 9:09 am
Sandstorm wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 10:08 pm
dpedin wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 8:22 pm
The only issue is the more transmissible the variant the higher the % of the pop required to be vaccinated to achieve herd immunity and stop community transmission. If this variant is 50% more transmissible than the Kent one then that increases the figure required for herd immunity from the 80-85% previously thought required. Ive not seen the new % requirement and haven't done the calculation myself yet but it does stretch the target a little bit further away. Also as long as we have community transmission of the new variant then the more cases we will get - only 55% of the UK pop have had at least one jab so there are still c30m folk unvaccinated - and the more hospitalisations and long covid type cases we have and with still a lot of unknowns about the long term effect it is probably prudent not to just let the unvaccinated pop be put at unknown health risks? Even though hospitalisations are much lower in younger age groups it could potentially still be a lot of folk, a small % of a very large number is still likely to be a very large number! The last thing we want is for the NHS, which is now focusing upon the huge backlog of non covid cases to have to deal with lots of admissions of covid cases - the cancers, the cardiac cases etc need to be the priority. Better to be prudent and keep social distancing and masks etc until we reach higher levels of vaccination and cut community transmission to very low levels, it is only a matter a weeks away. Lets just be sensible, we are in a good place it would be a shame to snatch defeat ...
First of all there’s no evidence that any new variant is 50% more transmissible.
Second, you’re ruining my buzz man.
Sorry - I did say 'if this variant is 50% more transmissible' ... the Indian/Johnson-Modi variant is reported by SAGE to possibly be up to 50% more transmissible, it might not be, it might only be 25%?
Measles which is very transmissible, and dangerous for many, needs 95% of pop vaccinated before herd immunity is achieved. Polio 80%. Measles vaccine is 97% effective. However as we have seen vaccination levels fall for measles due to the anti vaccine nutters and also because of travel to countries countries with lower levels of vaccination we have seen a number of outbreaks of measles across the world. Unfortunately MMR rates in UK have fallen to below 95%. If the trend continues then we begin to lose herd immunity and those who for whatever can't take the MMR vaccine become exposed to infection via community transmission through no fault of their own. Vaccination is our pathway out of this omnishambles, we are doing fantastic work, but the last thing we want to do is feck it up on the cusp of escape from covid19 just because we can't be bothered with mask wearing, social distancing or waiting a few more weeks/months before we go abroad!
The latest indications are that it's spread in the UK appears to be less down to transmissibility and more down to relatively unvaccinated multi-generational homes. Early indications as well are that the vaccines are marginally less effective at preventing symptomatic Covid, but appear to be pretty much the same at prevent serious symptomatic Covid and death.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 9:34 am
by Biffer
Openside wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 5:55 am
Biffer wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 3:29 pm
Openside wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 12:20 pm
Do you know there is this extraordinary thing called conversation with which you can learn all manner of things. For instance I know that 19,000 died before breakfast on the first day of the Somme and I wasn't even there to witness it
But you still had no experience of the Somme. It's your 'in my experience' BS that people are calling out - it's not your experience it's hearsay.
Aah so if was sophistry rather than the validity of my comment. In which case your ‘experience’ only ever counts for you as an individual.
That's what experience is - what you've done and seen. If other people have done and seen it, it isn't your experience. That's not sophistry, it's just language.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 9:38 am
by Biffer
dpedin wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 9:09 am
Sandstorm wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 10:08 pm
dpedin wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 8:22 pm
The only issue is the more transmissible the variant the higher the % of the pop required to be vaccinated to achieve herd immunity and stop community transmission. If this variant is 50% more transmissible than the Kent one then that increases the figure required for herd immunity from the 80-85% previously thought required. Ive not seen the new % requirement and haven't done the calculation myself yet but it does stretch the target a little bit further away. Also as long as we have community transmission of the new variant then the more cases we will get - only 55% of the UK pop have had at least one jab so there are still c30m folk unvaccinated - and the more hospitalisations and long covid type cases we have and with still a lot of unknowns about the long term effect it is probably prudent not to just let the unvaccinated pop be put at unknown health risks? Even though hospitalisations are much lower in younger age groups it could potentially still be a lot of folk, a small % of a very large number is still likely to be a very large number! The last thing we want is for the NHS, which is now focusing upon the huge backlog of non covid cases to have to deal with lots of admissions of covid cases - the cancers, the cardiac cases etc need to be the priority. Better to be prudent and keep social distancing and masks etc until we reach higher levels of vaccination and cut community transmission to very low levels, it is only a matter a weeks away. Lets just be sensible, we are in a good place it would be a shame to snatch defeat ...
First of all there’s no evidence that any new variant is 50% more transmissible.
Second, you’re ruining my buzz man.
Sorry - I did say 'if this variant is 50% more transmissible' ... the Indian/Johnson-Modi variant is reported by SAGE to possibly be up to 50% more transmissible, it might not be, it might only be 25%?
Measles which is very transmissible, and dangerous for many, needs 95% of pop vaccinated before herd immunity is achieved. Polio 80%. Measles vaccine is 97% effective. However as we have seen vaccination levels fall for measles due to the anti vaccine nutters and also because of travel to countries countries with lower levels of vaccination we have seen a number of outbreaks of measles across the world. Unfortunately MMR rates in UK have fallen to below 95%. If the trend continues then we begin to lose herd immunity and those who for whatever can't take the MMR vaccine become exposed to infection via community transmission through no fault of their own. Vaccination is our pathway out of this omnishambles, we are doing fantastic work, but the last thing we want to do is feck it up on the cusp of escape from covid19 just because we can't be bothered with mask wearing, social distancing or waiting a few more weeks/months before we go abroad!
Slight aside - calculating percentage required to be vaccinated for herd immunity is relatively simple - it's 1–1/R0 (that gives you the fraction, obvs). So if R0=3 it's 1-1/3, so two thirds of the population. If r0 =4 it's 1-1/4 so three quarters of the population. Measles has an R number of something like 18, which is why vaccination levels of 95% are needed.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 11:14 am
by dpedin
Biffer wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 9:38 am
dpedin wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 9:09 am
Sandstorm wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 10:08 pm
First of all there’s no evidence that any new variant is 50% more transmissible.
Second, you’re ruining my buzz man.
Sorry - I did say 'if this variant is 50% more transmissible' ... the Indian/Johnson-Modi variant is reported by SAGE to possibly be up to 50% more transmissible, it might not be, it might only be 25%?
Measles which is very transmissible, and dangerous for many, needs 95% of pop vaccinated before herd immunity is achieved. Polio 80%. Measles vaccine is 97% effective. However as we have seen vaccination levels fall for measles due to the anti vaccine nutters and also because of travel to countries countries with lower levels of vaccination we have seen a number of outbreaks of measles across the world. Unfortunately MMR rates in UK have fallen to below 95%. If the trend continues then we begin to lose herd immunity and those who for whatever can't take the MMR vaccine become exposed to infection via community transmission through no fault of their own. Vaccination is our pathway out of this omnishambles, we are doing fantastic work, but the last thing we want to do is feck it up on the cusp of escape from covid19 just because we can't be bothered with mask wearing, social distancing or waiting a few more weeks/months before we go abroad!
Slight aside - calculating percentage required to be vaccinated for herd immunity is relatively simple - it's 1–1/R0 (that gives you the fraction, obvs). So if R0=3 it's 1-1/3, so two thirds of the population. If r0 =4 it's 1-1/4 so three quarters of the population. Measles has an R number of something like 18, which is why vaccination levels of 95% are needed.
Hearing about possibility of 3rd/4th wave of cases in July/August now as a result of relaxations of lock down and spread of Indian variant. It might not happen but those doing modelling are a bit worried. Not clear of impact on hospitalisations and impact on NHS yet. Problem might be that if case numbers go too high we are then back on the travel red list for many countries and EU in particular. Might hold off making final payment for that overseas holiday in August?
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 11:21 am
by Margin__Walker
I just don't see how hospitalisations get back to anything like what we saw in January or put serious strain on the NHS, given the increase in people with antibodies both through vaccination and getting covid in the winter. Especially in vulnerable populations.
Potential for disruption and slower reopening, but nothing like what we've seen
Again based on no expertise whatsoever.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 11:57 am
by Biffer
dpedin wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 11:14 am
Biffer wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 9:38 am
dpedin wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 9:09 am
Sorry - I did say 'if this variant is 50% more transmissible' ... the Indian/Johnson-Modi variant is reported by SAGE to possibly be up to 50% more transmissible, it might not be, it might only be 25%?
Measles which is very transmissible, and dangerous for many, needs 95% of pop vaccinated before herd immunity is achieved. Polio 80%. Measles vaccine is 97% effective. However as we have seen vaccination levels fall for measles due to the anti vaccine nutters and also because of travel to countries countries with lower levels of vaccination we have seen a number of outbreaks of measles across the world. Unfortunately MMR rates in UK have fallen to below 95%. If the trend continues then we begin to lose herd immunity and those who for whatever can't take the MMR vaccine become exposed to infection via community transmission through no fault of their own. Vaccination is our pathway out of this omnishambles, we are doing fantastic work, but the last thing we want to do is feck it up on the cusp of escape from covid19 just because we can't be bothered with mask wearing, social distancing or waiting a few more weeks/months before we go abroad!
Slight aside - calculating percentage required to be vaccinated for herd immunity is relatively simple - it's 1–1/R0 (that gives you the fraction, obvs). So if R0=3 it's 1-1/3, so two thirds of the population. If r0 =4 it's 1-1/4 so three quarters of the population. Measles has an R number of something like 18, which is why vaccination levels of 95% are needed.
Hearing about possibility of 3rd/4th wave of cases in July/August now as a result of relaxations of lock down and spread of Indian variant. It might not happen but those doing modelling are a bit worried. Not clear of impact on hospitalisations and impact on NHS yet. Problem might be that if case numbers go too high we are then back on the travel red list for many countries and EU in particular. Might hold off making final payment for that overseas holiday in August?
I know there was a load of modelling done around an exit wave, and the size of it varied massively depending on the assumptions in the models. There's a lot of chat that we're going to be nearer to the optimistic models given the effectiveness of the vaccines and take up rates.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/scie ... 27881.html
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 12:50 pm
by dpedin
Biffer wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 11:57 am
dpedin wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 11:14 am
Biffer wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 9:38 am
Slight aside - calculating percentage required to be vaccinated for herd immunity is relatively simple - it's 1–1/R0 (that gives you the fraction, obvs). So if R0=3 it's 1-1/3, so two thirds of the population. If r0 =4 it's 1-1/4 so three quarters of the population. Measles has an R number of something like 18, which is why vaccination levels of 95% are needed.
Hearing about possibility of 3rd/4th wave of cases in July/August now as a result of relaxations of lock down and spread of Indian variant. It might not happen but those doing modelling are a bit worried. Not clear of impact on hospitalisations and impact on NHS yet. Problem might be that if case numbers go too high we are then back on the travel red list for many countries and EU in particular. Might hold off making final payment for that overseas holiday in August?
I know there was a load of modelling done around an exit wave, and the size of it varied massively depending on the assumptions in the models. There's a lot of chat that we're going to be nearer to the optimistic models given the effectiveness of the vaccines and take up rates.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/scie ... 27881.html
Hopefully this proves correct, however the impact of the new variant might be the thing that screws things up? Higher transmission rate of new variant might increase number of cases significantly and even though they will be in the 50's or younger there will be an inevitable % who will require hospitalisation, etc.It really has come at just the wrong time and might screw the loosening of the lock down and holidays for a short while? Yet again the Blonde Bumblecunt made a decision, this time with India travel, too late and this might be the result. Would have been easier to piss off Modi for a week or two.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 1:31 pm
by Biffer
dpedin wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 12:50 pm
Biffer wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 11:57 am
dpedin wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 11:14 am
Hearing about possibility of 3rd/4th wave of cases in July/August now as a result of relaxations of lock down and spread of Indian variant. It might not happen but those doing modelling are a bit worried. Not clear of impact on hospitalisations and impact on NHS yet. Problem might be that if case numbers go too high we are then back on the travel red list for many countries and EU in particular. Might hold off making final payment for that overseas holiday in August?
I know there was a load of modelling done around an exit wave, and the size of it varied massively depending on the assumptions in the models. There's a lot of chat that we're going to be nearer to the optimistic models given the effectiveness of the vaccines and take up rates.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/scie ... 27881.html
Hopefully this proves correct, however the impact of the new variant might be the thing that screws things up? Higher transmission rate of new variant might increase number of cases significantly and even though they will be in the 50's or younger there will be an inevitable % who will require hospitalisation, etc.It really has come at just the wrong time and might screw the loosening of the lock down and holidays for a short while? Yet again the Blonde Bumblecunt made a decision, this time with India travel, too late and this might be the result. Would have been easier to piss off Modi for a week or two.
This fella goes through his own model, compares with the Warwick model and explains the effects of variations in different assumptions.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 2:29 pm
by Lemoentjie
dpedin wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 9:09 am
Unfortunately MMR rates in UK have fallen to below 95%. If the trend continues then we begin to lose herd immunity and those who for whatever can't take the MMR vaccine become exposed to infection via community transmission through no fault of their own.
Why are MMR rates in the UK falling?
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 2:37 pm
by Biffer
Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 2:29 pm
dpedin wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 9:09 am
Unfortunately MMR rates in UK have fallen to below 95%. If the trend continues then we begin to lose herd immunity and those who for whatever can't take the MMR vaccine become exposed to infection via community transmission through no fault of their own.
Why are MMR rates in the UK falling?
Arseholes.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 2:55 pm
by dpedin
Biffer wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 2:37 pm
Lemoentjie wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 2:29 pm
dpedin wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 9:09 am
Unfortunately MMR rates in UK have fallen to below 95%. If the trend continues then we begin to lose herd immunity and those who for whatever can't take the MMR vaccine become exposed to infection via community transmission through no fault of their own.
Why are MMR rates in the UK falling?
Arseholes.
Yep!
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 4:01 pm
by Raggs
Pro-plaguers for a more serious response. Basically MMR hasn't been that visible in a while, so people start believing the "It's not so bad" bullshit, which is exactly the same that's being peddled for covid too.
Hopefully this pandemic will help focus peoples minds on what we're trying to avoid.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 4:21 pm
by sockwithaticket
An awful lot of people seem to need to experience negative consequences to learn a lesson, they don't accept someone else's experience or expertise as being sufficient reason to do/not do something.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 4:43 pm
by fishfoodie
sockwithaticket wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 4:21 pm
An awful lot of people seem to need to experience negative consequences to learn a lesson, they don't accept someone else's experience or expertise as being sufficient reason to do/not do something.
I wouldn't mind if this was a case of adults being bitten on the ass, by their own stupidity; but unfortunately, this is a situation where adults are killing, & seriously injuring children; because the adults are fucking idiots !
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 4:58 pm
by Saint
So Heathrow are temporarily setting up T3 as a Red list arrivals terminal, before moving it to T4 later on. They're expecting to sustain that situation for "some time". No word yet on whether the Border Force will be able to supply enough immigration officers to staff this, but it's at least a start
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 6:17 pm
by fishfoodie
Saint wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 4:58 pm
So Heathrow are temporarily setting up T3 as a Red list arrivals terminal, before moving it to T4 later on. They're expecting to sustain that situation for "some time". No word yet on whether the Border Force will be able to supply enough immigration officers to staff this, but it's at least a start
If there was a group I would happily accept permanent social distancing from; it would be the Border Force in Heathrow !
Never mind 2 meters, 2 km is too close.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Fri May 21, 2021 6:51 pm
by Saint
fishfoodie wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 6:17 pm
Saint wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 4:58 pm
So Heathrow are temporarily setting up T3 as a Red list arrivals terminal, before moving it to T4 later on. They're expecting to sustain that situation for "some time". No word yet on whether the Border Force will be able to supply enough immigration officers to staff this, but it's at least a start
If there was a group I would happily accept permanent social distancing from; it would be the Border Force in Heathrow !
Never mind 2 meters, 2 km is too close.
I suspect that if you didn't have Covid before arriving at the T3/T4 immigration hall, you will have it by the time you leave.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sat May 22, 2021 11:11 am
by tabascoboy
Looks like we are going to see a new variant every few weeks or so...
A COVID-19 variant identified in Yorkshire is being investigated by health officials
So far, 49 cases of a new "triple mutant" variation of COVID-19 have been found, mainly in Yorkshire and the Humber. While the variant is being monitored by Public Health England, there is currently no evidence it is more dangerous or more transmissible than the current strains of the novel coronavirus, according to public health officials.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sat May 22, 2021 4:26 pm
by Sandstorm
Saint wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 6:51 pm
fishfoodie wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 6:17 pm
Saint wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 4:58 pm
So Heathrow are temporarily setting up T3 as a Red list arrivals terminal, before moving it to T4 later on. They're expecting to sustain that situation for "some time". No word yet on whether the Border Force will be able to supply enough immigration officers to staff this, but it's at least a start
If there was a group I would happily accept permanent social distancing from; it would be the Border Force in Heathrow !
Never mind 2 meters, 2 km is too close.
I suspect that if you didn't have Covid before arriving at the T3/T4 immigration hall, you will have it by the time you leave.
So don’t get on the plane in Mexico/India/Dubai/Chile in that case.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sat May 22, 2021 4:37 pm
by Saint
Sandstorm wrote: ↑Sat May 22, 2021 4:26 pm
Saint wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 6:51 pm
fishfoodie wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 6:17 pm
If there was a group I would happily accept permanent social distancing from; it would be the Border Force in Heathrow !
Never mind 2 meters, 2 km is too close.
I suspect that if you didn't have Covid before arriving at the T3/T4 immigration hall, you will have it by the time you leave.
So don’t get on the plane in Mexico/India/Dubai/Chile in that case.
No argument from me
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 7:57 am
by Saint
First evidence in on the effectiveness of Pfizer and AZ against the Indian variant.
The bad news is that a single dose appears to be significantly less effective than against the Kent variant. But the good news is that a second dose appears to be almost exactly as effective against the Indian as the Kent.
So getting that second dose will be increasingly important, and the UK gov will need to keep pushing the population to take that dose even if the background Covid level drops to near zero over the summer
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 8:09 am
by tabascoboy
Saint wrote: ↑Sun May 23, 2021 7:57 am
First evidence in on the effectiveness of Pfizer and AZ against the Indian variant.
The bad news is that a single dose appears to be significantly less effective than against the Kent variant. But the good news is that a second dose appears to be almost exactly as effective against the Indian as the Kent.
So getting that second dose will be increasingly important, and the UK gov will need to keep pushing the population to take that dose even if the background Covid level drops to near zero over the summer
Week and half until my second dose, don't think I'll be offered it earlier.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 8:51 am
by Sandstorm
tabascoboy wrote: ↑Sun May 23, 2021 8:09 am
Saint wrote: ↑Sun May 23, 2021 7:57 am
First evidence in on the effectiveness of Pfizer and AZ against the Indian variant.
The bad news is that a single dose appears to be significantly less effective than against the Kent variant. But the good news is that a second dose appears to be almost exactly as effective against the Indian as the Kent.
So getting that second dose will be increasingly important, and the UK gov will need to keep pushing the population to take that dose even if the background Covid level drops to near zero over the summer
Week and half until my second dose, don't think I'll be offered it earlier.
Mine happens on Wednesday. Hopefully my 5G kicks in then and I start to see more lizard people. So far it’s been very disappointing.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 10:03 am
by TheNatalShark
Denmark confirms it will begin distributing non-mRNA stock to private doctors, after instruction from Charles Michel and Merkel
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theloc ... ers/%3famp
In Norway similarly you can opt to get J&J, but not AZ. Macron specifically told them to do this, as Ursula Von Der Leyden was busy being photographed on the phone.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 10:40 am
by Uncle fester
TheNatalShark wrote: ↑Sun May 23, 2021 10:03 am
Denmark confirms it will begin distributing non-mRNA stock to private doctors, after instruction from Charles Michel and Merkel
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.theloc ... ers/%3famp
In Norway similarly you can opt to get J&J, but not AZ. Macron specifically told them to do this, as Ursula Von Der Leyden was busy being photographed on the phone.
I'm confused. What's Macron got to do with Norway and Denmark?
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 12:53 pm
by salanya
Got the first jab - bloody sore arm now.
Second one isn't till August.
Vaccination centre was like a conveyor belt. Not sure whether I'm more annoyed being treated and moved around like cattle, or whether I'm mostly impressed by the numbers they're managing. Bit of both.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 2:19 pm
by dpedin
Biffer wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 1:31 pm
dpedin wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 12:50 pm
Biffer wrote: ↑Fri May 21, 2021 11:57 am
I know there was a load of modelling done around an exit wave, and the size of it varied massively depending on the assumptions in the models. There's a lot of chat that we're going to be nearer to the optimistic models given the effectiveness of the vaccines and take up rates.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/scie ... 27881.html
Hopefully this proves correct, however the impact of the new variant might be the thing that screws things up? Higher transmission rate of new variant might increase number of cases significantly and even though they will be in the 50's or younger there will be an inevitable % who will require hospitalisation, etc.It really has come at just the wrong time and might screw the loosening of the lock down and holidays for a short while? Yet again the Blonde Bumblecunt made a decision, this time with India travel, too late and this might be the result. Would have been easier to piss off Modi for a week or two.
This fella goes through his own model, compares with the Warwick model and explains the effects of variations in different assumptions.
I think the next weeks and couple of months are going to be very interesting! It sounds like it might be a difficult time with lock down easing and more transmissible variant in the community. As above the modelling is very dependant upon the assumptions made but it could go either way. However I am hearing there are some real worries we will see a significant new peak in July. Hopefully we won't see hospitalisations increasing but long covid is a worry. Fingers crossed!
I am due my 2nd jab in 10 days and it takes about 2-3 weeks to become fully effective. I will be wearing mask, following social distancing and avoiding indoor bars and restaurants until end of June. Luckily my golf club has a nice outdoor balcony to have a quiet pint on.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 2:27 pm
by tabascoboy
salanya wrote: ↑Sun May 23, 2021 12:53 pm
Got the first jab - bloody sore arm now.
Second one isn't till August.
Vaccination centre was like a conveyor belt. Not sure whether I'm more annoyed being treated and moved around like cattle, or whether I'm mostly impressed by the numbers they're managing. Bit of both.
This seems to be a common thing with vaccines like flu shots and not just related to COVID from what I have read. It's a sign that the body's immune response is kicking in - which makes me hope that not getting a sore arm afterwards or only a very slight discomfort as I did isn't a sign of a weakened immune system!
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 3:44 pm
by Sandstorm
First actual pint in a pub in 12 months yesterday. Last Sept had a few bottles of Peroni in a restaurant. Then just drinking at home as a couple only.
Went for a long walk, went passed an old scummy pub that has been bought out and “gastro’d” recently. Only about 35% occupancy and was having such fun with wife that we had 2 more drinks and a starter each.
I’ve been ultra-careful, but with 2nd jab next week and plenty of space around our table, I felt good. Got to support local businesses anyway.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 3:51 pm
by Tichtheid
I read today that the breakthrough in mRNA vaccines has led to tests in vaccinations against some cancers, samples are taken from the tumours and a vaccine is tailored for the patient, early signs are promising with some cases resulting in complete recovery where other treatments have failed.
This truly amazing.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 3:57 pm
by Sandstorm
Tichtheid wrote: ↑Sun May 23, 2021 3:51 pm
I read today that the breakthrough in mRNA vaccines has led to tests in vaccinations against some cancers, samples are taken from the tumours and a vaccine is tailored for the patient, early signs are promising with some cases resulting in complete recovery where other treatments have failed.
This truly amazing.
It is. Have a friend in medical research and she reckons if we throw as much money at other diseases as Covid and get as many trials going, we’ll cure all sorts in no time.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 4:01 pm
by Dinsdale Piranha
Tichtheid wrote: ↑Sun May 23, 2021 3:51 pm
I read today that the breakthrough in mRNA vaccines has led to tests in vaccinations against some cancers, samples are taken from the tumours and a vaccine is tailored for the patient, early signs are promising with some cases resulting in complete recovery where other treatments have failed.
This truly amazing.
There's a lot of scope for personalized treatments. I'm aware of some stem cell treatments like that. Take stem cells from people, synthesize more, inject them back in to treat various things. The challenge it to make the process cost effective.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 4:04 pm
by Bullet
Sandstorm wrote: ↑Sun May 23, 2021 3:44 pm
First actual pint in a pub in 12 months yesterday. Last Sept had a few bottles of Peroni in a restaurant. Then just drinking at home as a couple only.
Went for a long walk, went passed an old scummy pub that has been bought out and “gastro’d” recently. Only about 35% occupancy and was having such fun with wife that we had 2 more drinks and a starter each.
I’ve been ultra-careful, but with 2nd jab next week and plenty of space around our table, I felt good. Got to support local businesses anyway.
Had first drinks inside a pub since about September on Friday afternoon, 2nd jab was over 3 weeks ago and 4 pubs were pretty empty to ease us back in.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 4:07 pm
by Sandstorm
Bullet wrote: ↑Sun May 23, 2021 4:04 pm
Sandstorm wrote: ↑Sun May 23, 2021 3:44 pm
First actual pint in a pub in 12 months yesterday. Last Sept had a few bottles of Peroni in a restaurant. Then just drinking at home as a couple only.
Went for a long walk, went passed an old scummy pub that has been bought out and “gastro’d” recently. Only about 35% occupancy and was having such fun with wife that we had 2 more drinks and a starter each.
I’ve been ultra-careful, but with 2nd jab next week and plenty of space around our table, I felt good. Got to support local businesses anyway.
Had first drinks inside a pub since about September on Friday afternoon, 2nd jab was over 3 weeks ago and 4 pubs were pretty empty to ease us back in.
Most pubs are quieter here, especially indoors. However the local Walkabout was apparently rammed on Saturday night with people clearly too young to have a jab yet.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 4:40 pm
by Bullet
Yeah the Weathespoons was busy but we waited and got a booth. On the way out we noticed teenagers were moving chairs about to sit in bigger groups and the manager seemed to be struggling to stop them all
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun May 23, 2021 5:40 pm
by Saint
Over 762K doses delivered yesterday in the UK - 2nd highest daily total so far.
Overall, 57.5% of all initial planned doses have been delivered so far.
And so far, deaths are continuing to fall - 42 over the last 7 days, down 43.2% from the previous week. 2-3 weeks before we might start seeing an impact from the Indian variant if there is to be one