Page 270 of 375

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sat May 29, 2021 9:19 pm
by Dinsdale Piranha
Biffer wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 8:41 pm
Dinsdale Piranha wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 7:07 pm
TheNatalShark wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 6:44 pm

Yes was mildly surprised given the backlog in London, can only guess it's presumed better to plough ahead without them for now. Hopefully they come sooner than later.

See the anti lockdown/passport & proplaguer lot have had another trundle today.
London has a younger population than most of the UK, combine that with a few vaccine hesitant communities and that mostly accounts for the difference.
Really? That accounts for London being 14% behind the rest of the country?
Pretty much.

Most of the areas with the lowest vaccine takeup rates are in London - the reasons are diverse but 'religious-socio-economic' mostly covers it. That is probably about 10% and the average age in London being 5 years younger than nationally accounts for the rest.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sat May 29, 2021 9:47 pm
by Slick
“Vaccine hesitant communities”

“Religious-socio-economic”

Are we not allowed to say Muslim?

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sat May 29, 2021 10:02 pm
by Tichtheid
Slick wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 9:47 pm “Vaccine hesitant communities”

“Religious-socio-economic”

Are we not allowed to say Muslim?


The people I saw marching though Brighton last week, intimidating people and shouting through loud hailers at bystanders in masks, were not Muslims.

You're going to ask me how I know they were not Muslims, the marchers were 100% white English from what I could see, the demographic looked very similar to the EDL marches I've seen coming through here in recent years, and before that NF.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sat May 29, 2021 10:10 pm
by shaggy
Slick wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 9:47 pm “Vaccine hesitant communities”

“Religious-socio-economic”

Are we not allowed to say Muslim?
Eastern European’s are not all Muslim.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sat May 29, 2021 10:19 pm
by Sandstorm
shaggy wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 10:10 pm
Slick wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 9:47 pm “Vaccine hesitant communities”

“Religious-socio-economic”

Are we not allowed to say Muslim?
Eastern European’s are not all Muslim.
Neither are Sikhs

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sat May 29, 2021 10:31 pm
by Biffer
Dinsdale Piranha wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 9:19 pm
Biffer wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 8:41 pm
Dinsdale Piranha wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 7:07 pm
London has a younger population than most of the UK, combine that with a few vaccine hesitant communities and that mostly accounts for the difference.
Really? That accounts for London being 14% behind the rest of the country?
Pretty much.

Most of the areas with the lowest vaccine takeup rates are in London - the reasons are diverse but 'religious-socio-economic' mostly covers it. That is probably about 10% and the average age in London being 5 years younger than nationally accounts for the rest.
BuT iT’s ThE mUsLiMs InNiT

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sat May 29, 2021 10:41 pm
by Slick
Every single report I can see on “vaccine hesitancy” says by far the largest groups are from the BAME communities.

You all know this

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sat May 29, 2021 10:44 pm
by Slick
Tichtheid wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 10:02 pm
Slick wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 9:47 pm “Vaccine hesitant communities”

“Religious-socio-economic”

Are we not allowed to say Muslim?


The people I saw marching though Brighton last week, intimidating people and shouting through loud hailers at bystanders in masks, were not Muslims.

You're going to ask me how I know they were not Muslims, the marchers were 100% white English from what I could see, the demographic looked very similar to the EDL marches I've seen coming through here in recent years, and before that NF.
The conversation is about London.

I also saw an anti vax march in Edinburgh where 100% were white. But again, that’s not London

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sat May 29, 2021 11:02 pm
by Happyhooker
Rinkals wrote: Fri May 28, 2021 9:21 pm
Happyhooker wrote: Fri May 28, 2021 10:52 am
Rinkals wrote: Fri May 28, 2021 8:05 am

Good on them.

However, 'at cost' in the UK is probably significantly more expensive than it is in India or South Africa.
That's not "making it unaffordable "
It really depends on your definition of 'affordable'.

The minimum wage in South Africa is R21 an hour, which is about a quid.

I'd like to see the average Brit live on that.
The important bit that I questioned in your sentence is "making it".

They are not making it unaffordable. It's unaffordable for other, economic reasons. There are also programs afoot to vaccinate elsewhere where governments are picking up the tab. Your position seems, erm, odd

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 2:34 am
by TheNatalShark
Slick wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 10:41 pm Every single report I can see on “vaccine hesitancy” says by far the largest groups are from the BAME communities.

You all know this
But you've commented "Are we not allowed to say Muslim?" The lowest uptake rates are amongst African and Afro-Carribbean people.

You're not dumb, and I'm willing to bet you know damn well that lower uptake rates exist outside of Muslim groups and their demographics within London.

Your comment and subsequent attempt at reasoning is extremely out of place in that context.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 2:40 am
by TheNatalShark
Happyhooker wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 11:02 pm The important bit that I questioned in your sentence is "making it".

They are not making it unaffordable. It's unaffordable for other, economic reasons. There are also programs afoot to vaccinate elsewhere where governments are picking up the tab. Your position seems, erm, odd
Between direct cash contributions, discounts from the manufacturers and above all contribution of excess orders by Western countries I'm confident in saying that African countries will by and large not pay anything towards vaccine procurement this year.

Those countries that are left out of pocket will probably be those that took initiative to order Sinovac/Sinopharm.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 6:27 am
by Calculon
TheNatalShark wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 2:40 am
Happyhooker wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 11:02 pm The important bit that I questioned in your sentence is "making it".

They are not making it unaffordable. It's unaffordable for other, economic reasons. There are also programs afoot to vaccinate elsewhere where governments are picking up the tab. Your position seems, erm, odd
Between direct cash contributions, discounts from the manufacturers and above all contribution of excess orders by Western countries I'm confident in saying that African countries will by and large not pay anything towards vaccine procurement this year.

Those countries that are left out of pocket will probably be those that took initiative to order Sinovac/Sinopharm.
Which African countries are going to be left out of pocket because they ordered the Chinese vaccine?

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 6:29 am
by Rinkals


It doesn't really make sense to let the virus incubate resistant strains outside of the richer nations.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 6:49 am
by Calculon
The reason south africa has only managed to administer 1.18 dose of vaccine per hundred people in the total population is largely down to its utterly incompetent vaccine rollout strategy. Morocco has managed nearly 40 doses, even zimbabwe has managed 6.57

https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 6:51 am
by Lemoentjie
He's right. It's grotesque. The USA is offering lotteries of $1m to have actual children vaccinated, meanwhile the rest of the world suffers.

Having said that, any excuse will be used to cover for ANC incompetence

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 7:24 am
by Slick
TheNatalShark wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 2:34 am
Slick wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 10:41 pm Every single report I can see on “vaccine hesitancy” says by far the largest groups are from the BAME communities.

You all know this
But you've commented "Are we not allowed to say Muslim?" The lowest uptake rates are amongst African and Afro-Carribbean people.

You're not dumb, and I'm willing to bet you know damn well that lower uptake rates exist outside of Muslim groups and their demographics within London.

Your comment and subsequent attempt at reasoning is extremely out of place in that context.
Well a significant proportion of those African people are also Muslim and the next 2 significant groups are Pakistani and Bangladeshi, so I don’t think it’s extremely out of place.

It was however a very poor post after a day drinking in the sun with not enough thought behind it

The point I was trying to make is that white people who don’t take the vaccine are all EDL supporting racists who deserve everything they get. But by far the highest proportion of people not taking it are “vaccine hesitant” and we are tip toeing around it, which I don’t think is good for anyone, it’s about actual life of death.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 7:39 am
by TheNatalShark
Calculon wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 6:27 am Which African countries are going to be left out of pocket because they ordered the Chinese vaccine?
Those that ordered and paid for them that won't receive effective reimbursement from donations that are tapered to not include them. Eg some funds and instruments (eg Covax) are restricted to vaccines approved by WHO, and only Sinopharm has been added in May, with Sinovac due.

So if they ordered and paid for out with these funding pools and instruments, like Morocco, they will be out of pocket Vs doses they wait for and get materially for free. Once the vaccines are eligible for the pools and instruments, as Sinopharm is now, they'll likely fall into the same bucket - albeit the Sinopharm and Sinovac jabs are significantly more expensive (where data is available) than the 'western' vaccines, so I won't attribute a comment of 'likely materially free' to them.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 8:26 am
by Calculon
TheNatalShark wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 7:39 am
Calculon wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 6:27 am Which African countries are going to be left out of pocket because they ordered the Chinese vaccine?
Those that ordered and paid for them that won't receive effective reimbursement from donations that are tapered to not include them. Eg some funds and instruments (eg Covax) are restricted to vaccines approved by WHO, and only Sinopharm has been added in May, with Sinovac due.

So if they ordered and paid for out with these funding pools and instruments, like Morocco, they will be out of pocket Vs doses they wait for and get materially for free. Once the vaccines are eligible for the pools and instruments, as Sinopharm is now, they'll likely fall into the same bucket - albeit the Sinopharm and Sinovac jabs are significantly more expensive (where data is available) than the 'western' vaccines, so I won't attribute a comment of 'likely materially free' to them.
So Morocco are out of pocket but not south africa that bought the pfizer and J&J?

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 8:42 am
by TheNatalShark
Calculon wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 8:26 am So Morocco are out of pocket but not south africa that bought the pfizer and J&J?
By the time South Africa has jabbed most of its pop, assuming done so with J&J, Pfizer and excess from Europe+NA (Novavax/Moderna/CureVac/Valneva/Sanofi&GSK/etc...) then yes I would say Morocco will be out of pocket for non-funded deliveries (given the prevalence in wide rollout already) whilst South Africa will be materially reliant on funded and donated deliveries. SA's 'buying' element will at the end of the day be effectively (re)funded by Western countries. I reasonably expect that to apply to any other African country that hasn't yet procured material amounts outside of the funded resources.

I don't think I can type it any clearer than that. 'Wait' for free stuff, means you get free stuff. Pay for stuff you won't get refunded for and you will have paid for stuff.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 8:47 am
by sockwithaticket
Rinkals wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 6:29 am

It doesn't really make sense to let the virus incubate resistant strains outside of the richer nations.
Nor does it make sense to leave the domestic vaccination job unfinished. It's asbsurd the lengths to which some governments are having to resort to reach the vaccince refusers and skeptics, but it's also apparently necessary to complete their objective, unless they want to resort to apprehending and forcing people to take it.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 8:50 am
by Sandstorm
sockwithaticket wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 8:47 am
Rinkals wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 6:29 am

It doesn't really make sense to let the virus incubate resistant strains outside of the richer nations.
Nor does it make sense to leave the domestic vaccination job unfinished. It's asbsurd the lengths to which some governments are having to resort to reach the vaccince refusers and skeptics, but it's also apparently necessary to complete their objective, unless they want to resort to apprehending and forcing people to take it.
Financial penalties are available

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 9:32 am
by Flockwitt
Sandstorm wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 8:50 am
sockwithaticket wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 8:47 am
Rinkals wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 6:29 am

It doesn't really make sense to let the virus incubate resistant strains outside of the richer nations.
Nor does it make sense to leave the domestic vaccination job unfinished. It's asbsurd the lengths to which some governments are having to resort to reach the vaccince refusers and skeptics, but it's also apparently necessary to complete their objective, unless they want to resort to apprehending and forcing people to take it.
Financial penalties are available
Shirley after a point respective governments can also make social penalties a thing. Passing legislation to allow companies to refuse hire, to allow transport to refuse carriage, to allow sports groups to refuse participation, without vaccination proof? Plenty of ways to put the squeeze on after playing nice first and giving everyone every opportunity.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 11:30 am
by Calculon
TheNatalShark wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 8:42 am
Calculon wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 8:26 am So Morocco are out of pocket but not south africa that bought the pfizer and J&J?
By the time South Africa has jabbed most of its pop, assuming done so with J&J, Pfizer and excess from Europe+NA (Novavax/Moderna/CureVac/Valneva/Sanofi&GSK/etc...) then yes I would say Morocco will be out of pocket for non-funded deliveries (given the prevalence in wide rollout already) whilst South Africa will be materially reliant on funded and donated deliveries. SA's 'buying' element will at the end of the day be effectively (re)funded by Western countries. I reasonably expect that to apply to any other African country that hasn't yet procured material amounts outside of the funded resources.

I don't think I can type it any clearer than that. 'Wait' for free stuff, means you get free stuff. Pay for stuff you won't get refunded for and you will have paid for stuff.
Just seems strange how the South african government was making such a big deal about how they couldn't afford the vaccine, how they negotiated lower prices on the vaccine they bought, and how they managed to get their money back when reselling the AZ vaccine - if the money is all going to be refunded anyway. My understanding is also that South africa, as a middle income country, ended up paying COVAX more for the vaccine than they would have if they bought it directly from the manufacturers. At least this was widely reported in the media here.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 12:48 pm
by Openside
Biffer wrote: Thu May 27, 2021 2:07 pm
Openside wrote: Thu May 27, 2021 10:01 am
Biffer wrote: Wed May 26, 2021 8:35 am

Not what you said.
Well thats what I meant - Suck it up!!
A vague admission that you were wrong, finally.
Nope just pandering to your fixation.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 12:51 pm
by Openside
Slick wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 10:41 pm Every single report I can see on “vaccine hesitancy” says by far the largest groups are from the BAME communities.

You all know this
Of course they do but can't pass up the opportunity to polish their virtue signalling skills.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 4:28 pm
by Calculon
Slick wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 7:24 am
TheNatalShark wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 2:34 am
Slick wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 10:41 pm Every single report I can see on “vaccine hesitancy” says by far the largest groups are from the BAME communities.

You all know this
But you've commented "Are we not allowed to say Muslim?" The lowest uptake rates are amongst African and Afro-Carribbean people.

You're not dumb, and I'm willing to bet you know damn well that lower uptake rates exist outside of Muslim groups and their demographics within London.

Your comment and subsequent attempt at reasoning is extremely out of place in that context.
Well a significant proportion of those African people are also Muslim and the next 2 significant groups are Pakistani and Bangladeshi, so I don’t think it’s extremely out of place.

It was however a very poor post after a day drinking in the sun with not enough thought behind it

The point I was trying to make is that white people who don’t take the vaccine are all EDL supporting racists who deserve everything they get. But by far the highest proportion of people not taking it are “vaccine hesitant” and we are tip toeing around it, which I don’t think is good for anyone, it’s about actual life of death.
Is vaccine hesitancy related to their religion? Genuine questions as I've heard some of the less enlightened imams saying not to take the vaccine but there doesn't appear to be much reluctance amongst SA Muslims to take the vaccine. In fact, I think the greatest reluctance is amongst Afrikaners :oops:

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 7:26 pm
by Enzedder
Slick wrote: Sat May 29, 2021 10:41 pm Every single report I can see on “vaccine hesitancy” says by far the largest groups are from the BAME communities.

You all know this
Over here they are Female WASPs generally

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 8:44 pm
by ohno
Rinkals wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 6:29 am

It doesn't really make sense to let the virus incubate resistant strains outside of the richer nations.
Are South Africa willing to use the Oxford-AZ vaccine yet? If yes then he has a very good point, if no then just another hypocrite.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Sun May 30, 2021 9:59 pm
by Sandstorm
ohno wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 8:44 pm
Rinkals wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 6:29 am

It doesn't really make sense to let the virus incubate resistant strains outside of the richer nations.
Are South Africa willing to use the Oxford-AZ vaccine yet? If yes then he has a very good point, if no then just another hypocrite.
You think SA President had any knowledge over what his Health Minister did with their last batch of vaccines. Or any control over that circus they call the ANC?

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 6:55 am
by Rinkals
ohno wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 8:44 pm
Rinkals wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 6:29 am

It doesn't really make sense to let the virus incubate resistant strains outside of the richer nations.
Are South Africa willing to use the Oxford-AZ vaccine yet? If yes then he has a very good point, if no then just another hypocrite.
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326 ... 105180-050

From his address to the Nation last night, he suggested that the Pfizer vaccine was being administered, but that the J&J vaccine was the preferred option being a single dose and being less volatile in rural areas without capable refrigeration facilities.

However, he mentioned that the J&J vaccine was being held up by certification issues in the United States. I'm not sure what these are, though.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 8:12 am
by robmatic
Calculon wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 4:28 pm
Slick wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 7:24 am
TheNatalShark wrote: Sun May 30, 2021 2:34 am

But you've commented "Are we not allowed to say Muslim?" The lowest uptake rates are amongst African and Afro-Carribbean people.

You're not dumb, and I'm willing to bet you know damn well that lower uptake rates exist outside of Muslim groups and their demographics within London.

Your comment and subsequent attempt at reasoning is extremely out of place in that context.
Well a significant proportion of those African people are also Muslim and the next 2 significant groups are Pakistani and Bangladeshi, so I don’t think it’s extremely out of place.

It was however a very poor post after a day drinking in the sun with not enough thought behind it

The point I was trying to make is that white people who don’t take the vaccine are all EDL supporting racists who deserve everything they get. But by far the highest proportion of people not taking it are “vaccine hesitant” and we are tip toeing around it, which I don’t think is good for anyone, it’s about actual life of death.
Is vaccine hesitancy related to their religion? Genuine questions as I've heard some of the less enlightened imams saying not to take the vaccine but there doesn't appear to be much reluctance amongst SA Muslims to take the vaccine. In fact, I think the greatest reluctance is amongst Afrikaners :oops:
There is some debate among pious Muslims about whether it is acceptable to be vaccinated during the month of Ramadan (which was April-May this year) because it might break the daytime fasting rules due to liquid entering the body.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 8:58 am
by tabascoboy
Local vaccination centre open today despite the Bank Holiday

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 11:51 am
by tabascoboy
Covid-19: UK in early stages of third wave - scientist

There are signs the UK is in the early stages of a third wave of coronavirus infections, a scientist advising the government has said.

Prof Ravi Gupta, from the University of Cambridge, said although new cases were "relatively low" the Indian variant had fuelled "exponential growth". He said ending Covid restrictions in England on 21 June should be postponed.

Environment Secretary George Eustice said the government could not rule out a delay to the planned lockdown easing.

On Sunday, the UK reported more than 3,000 new Covid infections for a fifth day in a row.

Prior to this, the UK had not surpassed that number since 12 April.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-57304515

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 12:11 pm
by dpedin
tabascoboy wrote: Mon May 31, 2021 11:51 am
Covid-19: UK in early stages of third wave - scientist

There are signs the UK is in the early stages of a third wave of coronavirus infections, a scientist advising the government has said.

Prof Ravi Gupta, from the University of Cambridge, said although new cases were "relatively low" the Indian variant had fuelled "exponential growth". He said ending Covid restrictions in England on 21 June should be postponed.

Environment Secretary George Eustice said the government could not rule out a delay to the planned lockdown easing.

On Sunday, the UK reported more than 3,000 new Covid infections for a fifth day in a row.

Prior to this, the UK had not surpassed that number since 12 April.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-57304515
They have known this was a possibility for some weeks now. Modelling has been done and some of the scenarios show a worrying 3rd wave - I posted on this about a week or two ago. It looks like the scientists are now getting worried they will not be listened to hence going public with their concerns. The UK Gov has been trailing the need to extend lock down but obviously don't want to do it given the Blonde Bumblecunt's promises. They also don't want to have to try and explain why they delayed on India travel restrictions and why their late call on the border has allowed the new more transmissible variant being imported. I see France is restricting travel from the UK because of Indian variant. All entirely predictable and avoidable!

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 1:47 pm
by Biffer
He's going to pile on and then pull the carpet out from underneath people on the 20th,similar to the farce around Christmas.

Pretty sure Scotland will delay the additional opening up scheduled for the 7th across most of the country.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 1:52 pm
by Raggs
Biffer wrote: Mon May 31, 2021 1:47 pm He's going to pile on and then pull the carpet out from underneath people on the 20th,similar to the farce around Christmas.

Pretty sure Scotland will delay the additional opening up scheduled for the 7th across most of the country.
Got a friend in Glasgow who's losing his mind over the fact they've been in indefinite lockdown, but still having massive football events.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 1:59 pm
by SaintK
Biffer wrote: Mon May 31, 2021 1:47 pm He's going to pile on and then pull the carpet out from underneath people on the 20th,similar to the farce around Christmas.

Pretty sure Scotland will delay the additional opening up scheduled for the 7th across most of the country.
...........or maybe slightly before.
The shambles of a decision in not putting India on the red list immediately and letting 20k+ people in untracked and untraced in that period just beacause the blonde slug was still hoping that his high profile visit to India would still go ahead will cost us dear.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 2:27 pm
by Dinsdale Piranha
SaintK wrote: Mon May 31, 2021 1:59 pm
Biffer wrote: Mon May 31, 2021 1:47 pm He's going to pile on and then pull the carpet out from underneath people on the 20th,similar to the farce around Christmas.

Pretty sure Scotland will delay the additional opening up scheduled for the 7th across most of the country.
...........or maybe slightly before.
The shambles of a decision in not putting India on the red list immediately and letting 20k+ people in untracked and untraced in that period just beacause the blonde slug was still hoping that his high profile visit to India would still go ahead will cost us dear.
Almost 7% positive tests on people arriving from India in the weeks before the red list. It's a fine way to kickstart a new wave.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Mon May 31, 2021 9:08 pm
by fishfoodie
Not surprising, & I imagine; if all countries are equally honest, the final death toll for this, "flu", will be horrific.
The Beeb wrote: Peru has more than doubled its Covid death toll following a review, making it the country with the world's highest death rate per capita, according to Johns Hopkins University data.

The official death toll now sits at more than 180,000, up from 69,342.

Prime Minister Violeta Bermudez told reporters that the number was raised on the advice of Peruvian and international experts.

This was in line with so-called excess deaths figures.

Excess deaths are a measure of how many more people are dying than would be expected based on the previous few years.

"We think it is our duty to make public this updated information," Ms Bermudez said.

Re: So, coronavirus...

Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2021 5:18 am
by Blackmac
Dinsdale Piranha wrote: Mon May 31, 2021 2:27 pm
SaintK wrote: Mon May 31, 2021 1:59 pm
Biffer wrote: Mon May 31, 2021 1:47 pm He's going to pile on and then pull the carpet out from underneath people on the 20th,similar to the farce around Christmas.

Pretty sure Scotland will delay the additional opening up scheduled for the 7th across most of the country.
...........or maybe slightly before.
The shambles of a decision in not putting India on the red list immediately and letting 20k+ people in untracked and untraced in that period just beacause the blonde slug was still hoping that his high profile visit to India would still go ahead will cost us dear.
Almost 7% positive tests on people arriving from India in the weeks before the red list. It's a fine way to kickstart a new wave.
Coupled with the fact that the Asian community have already claimed that they were disproportionately affected by the financial aspects of Covid as most are self employed or small business owners. Expecting them to voluntarily self isolate was just bonkers.