Re: 2024/2025 Not Heineken Cup
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2025 5:00 pm
Not been Dupont's finest game.
By some way. Huge error count.
By some way. Huge error count.
Same dealer maybe?
Harsh especially as Chiefs player was twisting and had his legs bentTorquemada 1420 wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 5:01 pm How TF is that a red card?
Following on from the earlier discussion, another example of total inconsistencies in officiating.
Well given Dayglo's famously excellent investment history; maybe he has shares in Slade Inc ?
That's not our full side whereas Toulouse had their full team. By the same token South Africans struggle with the cold so no excuses. If you consider the likes of Eben, Grant, Andre Esterhuizen, Fassi missing that's a lot of class. And I am not saying they would have won but it would have made a huge difference. But that's the way the cookie crumbles.laurent wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 5:21 pm Toulouse really could not handle the humidity.
Sharks are D2 level
Toulouse would murder a full strength Sharks in European playing conditions.Sards wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 5:19 pm Not the destruction I expected but definitely not a good game by Jordan and Hooker. Too many mistakes. Toulouse will be wondering if they would be able to beat a full strength Sharks. Thought Klinghorn was superb. Du Pont was meh but still better than Jayden. Well I guess we are out of the Championship Cup. Hopefully Eben can grace the Sharks with a match or 2. Now we can focus on the URC
Weather has been a bit rough lately
Hardly mattering at the moment, beating the clock so far.ASMO wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 5:48 pm thats twice now Freeman show his lack of top end winger pace, 2 tries a winger with pace would have scored, he ended up cutting inside.
We had our weakest team for home and you couldn't " murder " us . With a full strength team. I think you believe far too much in the hypeTorquemada 1420 wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 5:31 pmToulouse would murder a full strength Sharks in European playing conditions.Sards wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 5:19 pm Not the destruction I expected but definitely not a good game by Jordan and Hooker. Too many mistakes. Toulouse will be wondering if they would be able to beat a full strength Sharks. Thought Klinghorn was superb. Du Pont was meh but still better than Jayden. Well I guess we are out of the Championship Cup. Hopefully Eben can grace the Sharks with a match or 2. Now we can focus on the URC
Which team would you bet your mortgage on? i know where my money would be goingSards wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 5:51 pmWe had our weakest team for home and you couldn't " murder " us . With a full strength team. I think you believe far too much in the hypeTorquemada 1420 wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 5:31 pmToulouse would murder a full strength Sharks in European playing conditions.Sards wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 5:19 pm Not the destruction I expected but definitely not a good game by Jordan and Hooker. Too many mistakes. Toulouse will be wondering if they would be able to beat a full strength Sharks. Thought Klinghorn was superb. Du Pont was meh but still better than Jayden. Well I guess we are out of the Championship Cup. Hopefully Eben can grace the Sharks with a match or 2. Now we can focus on the URC
You spent 3/4 game camped in your own 22. The only thing stopping a cricket score were a generous Pearce and ST's poor handling in the humidity.Sards wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 5:51 pmWe had our weakest team for home and you couldn't " murder " us . With a full strength team. I think you believe far too much in the hypeTorquemada 1420 wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 5:31 pmToulouse would murder a full strength Sharks in European playing conditions.Sards wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 5:19 pm Not the destruction I expected but definitely not a good game by Jordan and Hooker. Too many mistakes. Toulouse will be wondering if they would be able to beat a full strength Sharks. Thought Klinghorn was superb. Du Pont was meh but still better than Jayden. Well I guess we are out of the Championship Cup. Hopefully Eben can grace the Sharks with a match or 2. Now we can focus on the URC
Who does?fishfoodie wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 6:03 pm I haven't heard a Munster crowd as into a match as this for many a year.
.... I don't think they like Sarries ?![]()
ehhhh ....... their mothers ?Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 6:04 pmWho does?fishfoodie wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 6:03 pm I haven't heard a Munster crowd as into a match as this for many a year.
.... I don't think they like Sarries ?![]()
Doubtful.fishfoodie wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 6:07 pmehhhh ....... their mothers ?Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 6:04 pmWho does?fishfoodie wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 6:03 pm I haven't heard a Munster crowd as into a match as this for many a year.
.... I don't think they like Sarries ?![]()
Vile club. Their carry on in Watford has not been forgotten.fishfoodie wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 6:03 pm I haven't heard a Munster crowd as into a match as this for many a year.
.... I don't think they like Sarries ?![]()
If Saints keep the pace high, they should move away from StadeOxbow wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 6:28 pm Stade don't really offer much apart from a bit of bosh but somehow they're right back in it. This is a Saints 2nd/3rd team mind, I reckon a first choice 15 would have been out of sight by now.
Hopefullyduke wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 6:30 pmIf Saints keep the pace high, they should move away from StadeOxbow wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 6:28 pm Stade don't really offer much apart from a bit of bosh but somehow they're right back in it. This is a Saints 2nd/3rd team mind, I reckon a first choice 15 would have been out of sight by now.
Not exactly a Paris 1st team either. Both Paris clubs are a total shambles at the moment though.Oxbow wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2025 6:28 pm Stade don't really offer much apart from a bit of bosh but somehow they're right back in it. This is a Saints 2nd/3rd team mind, I reckon a first choice 15 would have been out of sight by now.