The best new and returning TV series thread

Where goats go to escape
User avatar
Guy Smiley
Posts: 6018
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm

EnergiseR2 wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 9:44 pm So if a fireman thinks entering the burning building he couls get a bit on the smokey side he doesn't. It's something to.hide behind and facts are very few people would be OK with emergency services standing back while people are dying.
I've spent years working in a reasonably high risk industry, underground mining. Risk is managed through various means... there's a saying in the Australian mining game that only aviation is more heavily regulated.

A big part of that risk management is the duty of care you are required to observe...that being that you do not expose yourself and others to (potential) harm as a result of your actions.

The first impulse is to rush in and help. If someone has managed to electrocute themselves and you run in and grab them, you're fucked as well. Then you've created two problems when there was one. The same goes for any accident / incident occurrence... it's not about something to hide behind, that's just offensive ignorance. Trained personnel assess risk as a matter of course... there's no point in exposing more people to the risk of harm before a plan and / or necessary equipment can be organised.

Of course, if Paddy Knowitall wants to rush on in and be a hero, by all means... step aside and let him go.
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 10887
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

Three Pines on a Prime. Canadian cop show with Alfred Molina (Doc Oc) in lead. Slower burner, but really good.
Blackmac
Posts: 3231
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 4:04 pm

EnergiseR2 wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 9:44 pm So if a fireman thinks entering the burning building he couls get a bit on the smokey side he doesn't. It's something to.hide behind and facts are very few people would be OK with emergency services standing back while people are dying.
They are not, and generally emergency personnel on the ground are willing to risk everything, but the Manchester Arena bombing is a prime example of how it has taken a grip on senior ranks. As Guy pointed out, it's not a case of fear or a culture of something to hide behind but a fairly sensible philosophy that can have dire consequences if they fail to adhere to it and there is a negative outcome.
Blackmac
Posts: 3231
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 4:04 pm

Guy Smiley wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 10:22 pm
EnergiseR2 wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 9:44 pm So if a fireman thinks entering the burning building he couls get a bit on the smokey side he doesn't. It's something to.hide behind and facts are very few people would be OK with emergency services standing back while people are dying.
I've spent years working in a reasonably high risk industry, underground mining. Risk is managed through various means... there's a saying in the Australian mining game that only aviation is more heavily regulated.

A big part of that risk management is the duty of care you are required to observe...that being that you do not expose yourself and others to (potential) harm as a result of your actions.

The first impulse is to rush in and help. If someone has managed to electrocute themselves and you run in and grab them, you're fucked as well. Then you've created two problems when there was one. The same goes for any accident / incident occurrence... it's not about something to hide behind, that's just offensive ignorance. Trained personnel assess risk as a matter of course... there's no point in exposing more people to the risk of harm before a plan and / or necessary equipment can be organised.

Of course, if Paddy Knowitall wants to rush on in and be a hero, by all means... step aside and let him go.

It's an extremely sensible philosophy but I think the recriminating nature of society has pushed the scale too far and led to over cautiousness. I've been involved in many situations where the level of response has been ridiculously careful and it is extremely difficult for Paddy Knowitall to comprehend. It is undoubtedly a case of damned if you do, damned if you don't, especially with the emergency services.
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 9401
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

Blackmac wrote: Fri Dec 30, 2022 12:23 am
Guy Smiley wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 10:22 pm
EnergiseR2 wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 9:44 pm So if a fireman thinks entering the burning building he couls get a bit on the smokey side he doesn't. It's something to.hide behind and facts are very few people would be OK with emergency services standing back while people are dying.
I've spent years working in a reasonably high risk industry, underground mining. Risk is managed through various means... there's a saying in the Australian mining game that only aviation is more heavily regulated.

A big part of that risk management is the duty of care you are required to observe...that being that you do not expose yourself and others to (potential) harm as a result of your actions.

The first impulse is to rush in and help. If someone has managed to electrocute themselves and you run in and grab them, you're fucked as well. Then you've created two problems when there was one. The same goes for any accident / incident occurrence... it's not about something to hide behind, that's just offensive ignorance. Trained personnel assess risk as a matter of course... there's no point in exposing more people to the risk of harm before a plan and / or necessary equipment can be organised.

Of course, if Paddy Knowitall wants to rush on in and be a hero, by all means... step aside and let him go.

It's an extremely sensible philosophy but I think the recriminating nature of society has pushed the scale too far and led to over cautiousness. I've been involved in many situations where the level of response has been ridiculously careful and it is extremely difficult for Paddy Knowitall to comprehend. It is undoubtedly a case of damned if you do, damned if you don't, especially with the emergency services.

People take the piss out of Health and Safety, but the fact is that I worked on a very large building site where there was a poster at the front gate detailing the number of days since the last accident on site, including fatalities.
The H&S at work Act has saved many lives, when I did my City & Guilds Sparks course it was all about safety, and the first rule was pretty much "don't create two casualties and put someone else in danger"

I have mates who work in dangerous industries, from offshore rope access to BMC Guides, including guiding on the British Antarctic Survey. I also know RNLI volunteers on the boats. Things have changed over the years, overall it's for the better.


BTW, on films rather than TV, the new Batman is okay. The Dumbledore thing lasted ten minutes, it's for the Ceebeebies audience, I think.
weegie01
Posts: 1003
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:34 pm

Sandstorm wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 10:37 pm Three Pines on a Prime. Canadian cop show with Alfred Molina (Doc Oc) in lead. Slower burner, but really good.
I have watched them all and was disappointed there were so few episodes at the end.
GogLais
Posts: 2472
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2020 7:06 pm
Location: Wirral/Cilgwri

Guy Smiley wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 10:22 pm
EnergiseR2 wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 9:44 pm So if a fireman thinks entering the burning building he couls get a bit on the smokey side he doesn't. It's something to.hide behind and facts are very few people would be OK with emergency services standing back while people are dying.
I've spent years working in a reasonably high risk industry, underground mining. Risk is managed through various means... there's a saying in the Australian mining game that only aviation is more heavily regulated.

A big part of that risk management is the duty of care you are required to observe...that being that you do not expose yourself and others to (potential) harm as a result of your actions.

The first impulse is to rush in and help. If someone has managed to electrocute themselves and you run in and grab them, you're fucked as well. Then you've created two problems when there was one. The same goes for any accident / incident occurrence... it's not about something to hide behind, that's just offensive ignorance. Trained personnel assess risk as a matter of course... there's no point in exposing more people to the risk of harm before a plan and / or necessary equipment can be organised.

Of course, if Paddy Knowitall wants to rush on in and be a hero, by all means... step aside and let him go.
I've heard of several confined spaces cases of multiple deaths e.g. farm silos where people have dived in to help. Human nature really, not to watch someone die and do nothing about it.
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4196
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

GogLais wrote: Sat Dec 31, 2022 10:04 pm
Guy Smiley wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 10:22 pm
EnergiseR2 wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 9:44 pm So if a fireman thinks entering the burning building he couls get a bit on the smokey side he doesn't. It's something to.hide behind and facts are very few people would be OK with emergency services standing back while people are dying.
I've spent years working in a reasonably high risk industry, underground mining. Risk is managed through various means... there's a saying in the Australian mining game that only aviation is more heavily regulated.

A big part of that risk management is the duty of care you are required to observe...that being that you do not expose yourself and others to (potential) harm as a result of your actions.

The first impulse is to rush in and help. If someone has managed to electrocute themselves and you run in and grab them, you're fucked as well. Then you've created two problems when there was one. The same goes for any accident / incident occurrence... it's not about something to hide behind, that's just offensive ignorance. Trained personnel assess risk as a matter of course... there's no point in exposing more people to the risk of harm before a plan and / or necessary equipment can be organised.

Of course, if Paddy Knowitall wants to rush on in and be a hero, by all means... step aside and let him go.
I've heard of several confined spaces cases of multiple deaths e.g. farm silos where people have dived in to help. Human nature really, not to watch someone die and do nothing about it.
The Spence family tragedy in Ulster is a case in point on that.
yermum
Posts: 546
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2020 3:15 pm

I have had a spy drama holiday break.

Slow horses, Litvenenko, Etc

Got me thinking that Putin fella might be a bad egg.

Thanks for the slow horses recommendation this place though slow does come up with the goods
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8223
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

GogLais wrote: Sat Dec 31, 2022 10:04 pm
Guy Smiley wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 10:22 pm
EnergiseR2 wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 9:44 pm So if a fireman thinks entering the burning building he couls get a bit on the smokey side he doesn't. It's something to.hide behind and facts are very few people would be OK with emergency services standing back while people are dying.
I've spent years working in a reasonably high risk industry, underground mining. Risk is managed through various means... there's a saying in the Australian mining game that only aviation is more heavily regulated.

A big part of that risk management is the duty of care you are required to observe...that being that you do not expose yourself and others to (potential) harm as a result of your actions.

The first impulse is to rush in and help. If someone has managed to electrocute themselves and you run in and grab them, you're fucked as well. Then you've created two problems when there was one. The same goes for any accident / incident occurrence... it's not about something to hide behind, that's just offensive ignorance. Trained personnel assess risk as a matter of course... there's no point in exposing more people to the risk of harm before a plan and / or necessary equipment can be organised.

Of course, if Paddy Knowitall wants to rush on in and be a hero, by all means... step aside and let him go.
I've heard of several confined spaces cases of multiple deaths e.g. farm silos where people have dived in to help. Human nature really, not to watch someone die and do nothing about it.
Yeah; I remember one at the company I worked at, where two people went into a tank being commissioned, ignoring the confined spaces rules, & discovered the tank was being purged with Nitrogen. They went down immediately, & another person saw this, & rushed in; & also went down; at which point common sense broke out, & everyone had to wait for the ERT to arrive with BA, to retrieve the bodies.

In the twenty years I was at the company, Nitrogen was most dangerous gas, but everyone was afraid of the exotic ones.
weegie01
Posts: 1003
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 10:34 pm

fishfoodie wrote: Sun Jan 01, 2023 2:12 pmYeah; I remember one at the company I worked at, where two people went into a tank being commissioned, ignoring the confined spaces rules, & discovered the tank was being purged with Nitrogen. They went down immediately, & another person saw this, & rushed in; & also went down; at which point common sense broke out, & everyone had to wait for the ERT to arrive with BA, to retrieve the bodies.

In the twenty years I was at the company, Nitrogen was most dangerous gas, but everyone was afraid of the exotic ones.
Remember the Nevin Spence incident?

His brother went into a slurry pit after a dog, he was overcome. Nevin went in after his brother and he was overcome. Then the father went in after his sons and he died as well. I am pretty sure the sister nearly died as well.

Edit
I have just Googled it to jog my memory. The sister got one out, and was overcome rescuing a second, but pulled out. Afterwards the sister was asked if she understood the risks, to which she replied "Yes, but when it comes to the love of your family..."
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4196
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

fishfoodie wrote: Sun Jan 01, 2023 2:12 pm
GogLais wrote: Sat Dec 31, 2022 10:04 pm
Guy Smiley wrote: Thu Dec 29, 2022 10:22 pm

I've spent years working in a reasonably high risk industry, underground mining. Risk is managed through various means... there's a saying in the Australian mining game that only aviation is more heavily regulated.

A big part of that risk management is the duty of care you are required to observe...that being that you do not expose yourself and others to (potential) harm as a result of your actions.

The first impulse is to rush in and help. If someone has managed to electrocute themselves and you run in and grab them, you're fucked as well. Then you've created two problems when there was one. The same goes for any accident / incident occurrence... it's not about something to hide behind, that's just offensive ignorance. Trained personnel assess risk as a matter of course... there's no point in exposing more people to the risk of harm before a plan and / or necessary equipment can be organised.

Of course, if Paddy Knowitall wants to rush on in and be a hero, by all means... step aside and let him go.
I've heard of several confined spaces cases of multiple deaths e.g. farm silos where people have dived in to help. Human nature really, not to watch someone die and do nothing about it.
Yeah; I remember one at the company I worked at, where two people went into a tank being commissioned, ignoring the confined spaces rules, & discovered the tank was being purged with Nitrogen. They went down immediately, & another person saw this, & rushed in; & also went down; at which point common sense broke out, & everyone had to wait for the ERT to arrive with BA, to retrieve the bodies.

In the twenty years I was at the company, Nitrogen was most dangerous gas, but everyone was afraid of the exotic ones.
Leixlip?
Thing with nitrogen is that you're gone before you know there's a problem.

CO2 in breweries is another big hazard. Guinness regularly close the tunnels under James Street because of CO2.
CO2 is a horrible way to go. You know you're being suffocated.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8223
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Uncle fester wrote: Sun Jan 01, 2023 4:23 pm
fishfoodie wrote: Sun Jan 01, 2023 2:12 pm
GogLais wrote: Sat Dec 31, 2022 10:04 pm

I've heard of several confined spaces cases of multiple deaths e.g. farm silos where people have dived in to help. Human nature really, not to watch someone die and do nothing about it.
Yeah; I remember one at the company I worked at, where two people went into a tank being commissioned, ignoring the confined spaces rules, & discovered the tank was being purged with Nitrogen. They went down immediately, & another person saw this, & rushed in; & also went down; at which point common sense broke out, & everyone had to wait for the ERT to arrive with BA, to retrieve the bodies.

In the twenty years I was at the company, Nitrogen was most dangerous gas, but everyone was afraid of the exotic ones.
Leixlip?
Thing with nitrogen is that you're gone before you know there's a problem.

CO2 in breweries is another big hazard. Guinness regularly close the tunnels under James Street because of CO2.
CO2 is a horrible way to go. You know you're being suffocated.
Yep
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4196
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

You're a bit older than I thought you were. I look after a good chunk of the nitrogen at the site these days.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8223
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Uncle fester wrote: Sun Jan 01, 2023 7:23 pm You're a bit older than I thought you were. I look after a good chunk of the nitrogen at the site these days.
You work for *** ?

When I started there Air Products were running the Air plant, & Gas pad, & they used to send tankers of excess Nitrogen, & sell it to Guinness.

I used to chat a good bit with them, because I was in the ERT when I worked in Manufacturing, & we'd drill together, & they'd give us tours of the parts of the plant they ran, so we'd know our way around if things went pear shaped. I was there for Fab 10 startup, straight out of DIT
Last edited by fishfoodie on Sun Jan 01, 2023 10:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Grandpa
Posts: 2266
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2020 2:23 pm
Location: Kiwi abroad

yermum wrote: Sun Jan 01, 2023 1:16 pm I have had a spy drama holiday break.

Slow horses, Litvenenko, Etc

Got me thinking that Putin fella might be a bad egg.

Thanks for the slow horses recommendation this place though slow does come up with the goods
I loved Slow Horses as well. Gary Oldman at his farting, darting best!

Apparently... Under the Banner of Heaven is worth a watch too. So that's on my to do list.
User avatar
BnM
Posts: 977
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 2:40 pm

Blood Origin wasn't as bad as the reviews on IMDB made out. Only 4 eps so not a lot to lose.

Liam Hemsworth in Witcher - not seeing it.
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4196
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

BnM wrote: Mon Jan 02, 2023 5:01 pm Blood Origin wasn't as bad as the reviews on IMDB made out. Only 4 eps so not a lot to lose.

Liam Hemsworth in Witcher - not seeing it.
The fanboi cribbing about anything to do with the series is something to behold. Suppose it's quite coincidental that the series creator is female.
User avatar
Guy Smiley
Posts: 6018
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm

BnM wrote: Mon Jan 02, 2023 5:01 pm Blood Origin wasn't as bad as the reviews on IMDB made out. Only 4 eps so not a lot to lose.

Liam Hemsworth in Witcher - not seeing it.
I'm not a die hard fan of it all but I did watch the first... I thought it was awful. Poor acting, clumsy and wooden while the story didn't quite hold itself up. Hardly the end of the world, though. Some of the settings were stunning, I'm guessing some of it was shot in Iceland?
User avatar
BnM
Posts: 977
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 2:40 pm

I thought he was good in Amazon's rings of power but as chip on shoulder scheming mage he was very poor, depth of a puddle. Be interesting to see next season of Witcher, they must have chosen Hemsworth for a reason.
User avatar
BnM
Posts: 977
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 2:40 pm

Guy Smiley wrote: Mon Jan 02, 2023 6:13 pm
BnM wrote: Mon Jan 02, 2023 5:01 pm Blood Origin wasn't as bad as the reviews on IMDB made out. Only 4 eps so not a lot to lose.

Liam Hemsworth in Witcher - not seeing it.
I'm not a die hard fan of it all but I did watch the first... I thought it was awful. Poor acting, clumsy and wooden while the story didn't quite hold itself up. Hardly the end of the world, though. Some of the settings were stunning, I'm guessing some of it was shot in Iceland?
I'd give it a 5.5/10.
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4196
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

Guy Smiley wrote: Mon Jan 02, 2023 6:13 pm
BnM wrote: Mon Jan 02, 2023 5:01 pm Blood Origin wasn't as bad as the reviews on IMDB made out. Only 4 eps so not a lot to lose.

Liam Hemsworth in Witcher - not seeing it.
I'm not a die hard fan of it all but I did watch the first... I thought it was awful. Poor acting, clumsy and wooden while the story didn't quite hold itself up. Hardly the end of the world, though. Some of the settings were stunning, I'm guessing some of it was shot in Iceland?
The time jumping in the first series didn't really work but it was promising enough to merit watching second season which was a good bit better.

If you go in expecting GOT or a recreation of the books, you're going to be disappointed but its an okay show in it's own right.
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4196
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

Staying on fantasy series, watched House Of The Dragon over Xmas. It's not bad but the set piece to finish episode 9 is GOT season 8 level "shit plot but look at the action" crap.
User avatar
BnM
Posts: 977
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 2:40 pm

I liked the Witcher.

Only watched the first few episodes of HOD. Will watch the rest but tbh Season 8 killed it all for me. Sounds a bit dramatic but...don't care enough now to bother much.
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4196
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

EnergiseR2 wrote: Mon Jan 02, 2023 10:10 pm
Uncle fester wrote: Mon Jan 02, 2023 7:46 pm Staying on fantasy series, watched House Of The Dragon over Xmas. It's not bad but the set piece to finish episode 9 is GOT season 8 level "shit plot but look at the action" crap.
Did you think. I thought it was good. Not amazing or anything but good stuff
The bit I referred to was an unpleasant flashback. Was enjoying it otherwise. Matt Smith is great fun.
User avatar
mat the expat
Posts: 1458
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 11:12 pm

Just binged all 3 series of Mr Mercedes

I could just watch Brendan Gleeson read a cornflake box - fantastic swearing all the way through!

Shame it got cancelled
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4196
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

EnergiseR2 wrote: Mon Jan 02, 2023 10:29 pm Yeah he's very good in it. Can't remember the flashback :oops:
Spoiler
Show
Older aunt who could have ended the war in one fell swoop but decided to leave them all alive because reasons.
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4196
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

sockwithaticket wrote: Wed Dec 28, 2022 3:03 pm
Uncle fester wrote: Mon Dec 19, 2022 11:47 am
Bullet wrote: Mon Dec 19, 2022 11:33 am Gave up on 1899 after 20 minutes before but wife wanted to watch so started again and really enjoying it now.
Still 2 episodes to go, don't know if trying too hard but it's starting to loose a bit.
Was good up to about episode 6. Once they moved off the ship, it flags. Shame because I loved Dark but the creators need to move on a bit.

Emily Beecham is a total fox.
Image
Agreed on both counts.
And it's cancelled.
User avatar
Grandpa
Posts: 2266
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2020 2:23 pm
Location: Kiwi abroad

Uncle fester wrote: Mon Jan 02, 2023 7:46 pm Staying on fantasy series, watched House Of The Dragon over Xmas. It's not bad but the set piece to finish episode 9 is GOT season 8 level "shit plot but look at the action" crap.
Don't do what I did and start watching GOT again... you then realise how poor HOD is in comparison... it's like a dumbed down version in terms of script and budget...
yermum
Posts: 546
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2020 3:15 pm

Shame they never made a final series of GOT would be great to see the story brought to a satisfying conclusion
User avatar
BnM
Posts: 977
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 2:40 pm

They cancelled 1899 ffs.
Jock42
Posts: 2444
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:01 pm

Thats saved me 3 or 4 hours then.
User avatar
Uncle fester
Posts: 4196
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm

yermum wrote: Tue Jan 03, 2023 3:26 pm Shame they never made a final series of GOT would be great to see the story brought to a satisfying conclusion
True but at least we got six great seasons. GRRM will be finished the books soon and we'll get to see how it was meant to pan out.
User avatar
lemonhead
Posts: 568
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:11 pm

Uncle fester wrote: Tue Jan 03, 2023 8:23 am
sockwithaticket wrote: Wed Dec 28, 2022 3:03 pm
Uncle fester wrote: Mon Dec 19, 2022 11:47 am

Was good up to about episode 6. Once they moved off the ship, it flags. Shame because I loved Dark but the creators need to move on a bit.

Emily Beecham is a total fox.
Image
Agreed on both counts.
And it's cancelled.
Can understand why. Got progressively sillier and not very satisfying payoff. Will check out their previous series tho

Just finished up HOTD and quite pleasantly surprised. Expectations weren't high due to lack of GRRM source material but some clangers aside, very watchable and Considine was excellent.
User avatar
Grandpa
Posts: 2266
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2020 2:23 pm
Location: Kiwi abroad

EnergiseR2 wrote: Wed Jan 04, 2023 12:16 pm Frasier on its way back and its going to be savaged. As a massive fan, watching it now, bet it will crash and burn. As it is I find it hard to suspend disbelief knowing that Granmer is a Trump supporting twat but I just about manage to pretend. The Frasier of old was an empathetic core surrounded by a bit of me me me. There is no way we can square that circle now we know Grammer is a total twat. Am surprised Paramount can't see that.
Hated him in Cheers... liked his onscreen wife Lilith though...
User avatar
Grandpa
Posts: 2266
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2020 2:23 pm
Location: Kiwi abroad

EnergiseR2 wrote: Wed Jan 04, 2023 12:38 pm
Grandpa wrote: Wed Jan 04, 2023 12:26 pm
EnergiseR2 wrote: Wed Jan 04, 2023 12:16 pm Frasier on its way back and its going to be savaged. As a massive fan, watching it now, bet it will crash and burn. As it is I find it hard to suspend disbelief knowing that Granmer is a Trump supporting twat but I just about manage to pretend. The Frasier of old was an empathetic core surrounded by a bit of me me me. There is no way we can square that circle now we know Grammer is a total twat. Am surprised Paramount can't see that.
Hated him in Cheers... liked his onscreen wife Lilith though...
It had lots of strong characters. Niles is great as is Lilith in her cameos. People love Daphne, I was less on that train. To be fair Grammer was also very good but no different to James Woods turning up in something now, knowing they are complete fuscking idiots makes it too hard to watch them. Don't get me wrong I can handle a conservative actor just not a Trump supporting one
I must have spotted he was an idiot before he even knew himself.. :lol:

Agree on James Woods also... another actor I never warmed to.
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6474
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

They were talking about this as a movie for years, but nothing seemed to be coming from it. Didn't know it was now done as a TV show...not that I can watch it but hope it does the story justice



User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 10887
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

The Menu. Weird, annoying and depressing.

I shall be recommending it to people I don’t like.
Biffer
Posts: 9142
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Admission time.

One of my secret pleasures is Call The Midwife.

I think its great.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
tabascoboy
Posts: 6474
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:22 am
Location: 曇りの街

tabascoboy wrote: Sun Jan 15, 2023 9:47 pm They were talking about this as a movie for years, but nothing seemed to be coming from it. Didn't know it was now done as a TV show...not that I can watch it but hope it does the story justice

Reaction to the first episode seems pretty positive - well mostly (reflects my own first time game experience :lol: )

Post Reply