What did we learn about the AB's this year?
Tony Brown has been talking up Peter Umaga-Jensen's brother, Thomas, who apparently had come into Highlanders pre-season weighing in as the heaviest midfielder in the country. Perhaps he's the solution to fill that "Nonu-sized" void we've been searching for?
https://www.rugbypass.com/news/tony-bro ... ing-stars/
Marking his comeback from a long-term shoulder injury with an impactful display for Otago in the Mitre 10 Cup last month, Brown said the 22-year-old is in top physical condition and could join his twin Peter in contending for the All Blacks.
“He’s turned himself into a bit of a beast,” Brown said of Umaga-Jensen.
“I think he’s weighing in at 113kg and running as quick as a winger, and he’s looking really good in the gym, and obviously only played 20 minutes the other day for Otago, but I think he’s going to have a massive 2021.
“If he can make that centre spot his own, he’s going to be pushing on All Blacks selection, I’m sure.”
Peter 's 13, so he probably wouldn't be competing with his brother anyways.
Browns says it will be Thomas at 12, Paea at 13 for the Highlanders midfield.
I'd love to this 113kg frame of Thomas utilized at 12 for the AB's with any of Goodhue/ALB/PUJ/Reiko at 13.
Last edited by wet-socks on Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:50 am, edited 2 times in total.
Perhaps you hit it on the head, Goodhue couldn't make 13 for Crusaders becuase seems Razor thought that Ennor was better than him there, and if I remember even when Ennor was injured didn't someone else play 13 for Crusaders? If so it would seem not only AB selectors think he a 12? I always though ALB was a 12 (not sure if that was because that's where I first saw hin play) but as said have preferred him at 13 to Goodhue, mainly for pace and I though Goodhue was best 12 in super rugby this year.Ted. wrote: ↑Tue Dec 22, 2020 11:23 pmGoodhue is a centre. ALB can play both positions but is more adept at 12. If Goodhue lacks pace for centre, which I don't necessarily agree with, then he should not be in the team. And if that is the reason he's been shoehorned into 12, then it is a more fuckwitted selection than I thought.Dan54 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 22, 2020 6:35 pmI used to agree, but actually think the other way works better as I think Goodhue may lack pace for 13, so could be suited to one 12. I thought during Super Aotearoa Goodhue was the best 12 on show, Laumape had one real good game, but generally I rated Goodhue better.
Mind you I always thought that Conrad Smith wasn't all that fast for a 13 either, but made up for it with his brain and knowing where to be so well. And maybe I judge them all on the prince of centres in NZ Bruce Robertson and probably shouldn't do that.
As an aside, when will Braydon Ennor be back in the mix? He certainly doesn't lack for pace.
Would be interested to see that , but isn't Umaga-Jensen usually a 12? Ennor is fast becoming a Kahui, seemingly pretty good at getting injured, would love to see him have a full year to see how good he is. Hope he is over the injury run (same as Will Jordan)
It's early days for this Thomas kid for people to be saying he's an AB starter, though good on Tony Brown for motivating his players by hyping them up in the media.wet-socks wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:47 amPeter 's 13, so he probably wouldn't be competing with his brother anyways.
Browns says it will be Thomas at 12, Paea at 13 for the Highlanders midfield.
I'd love to this 113kg frame of Thomas utilized at 12 for the AB's with any of Goodhue/ALB/PUJ/Reiko at 13.
His twin, though has shown some of the barnstorming qualities that could make him a regular AB midfielder. I think he has just a dimension or two more than Laumape, as well.
I thought Ennor was more of a 13? Sorry if I have that wrong.
You do realise how unhealthy it is to show the whole bored that I obviously fill your thoughts so often don't you?Carter's Choice wrote: ↑Tue Dec 22, 2020 10:23 pm Fast forward to today and I doubt even a NZR stooge like Dan54 would say that the All Black coaching team is comprised of our most talented coaches, or that the best captain in NZ is captaining the All Blacks.
Yep he is, that's why I wondered about Umaga-Jensen at 12 thought he was also a 13.FujiKiwi wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:54 amI thought Ennor was more of a 13? Sorry if I have that wrong.
113kg (Thomas) 12, 102kg (Peter) 13. Our big, barnstorming All Black's midfield sortedFujiKiwi wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:53 amIt's early days for this Thomas kid for people to be saying he's an AB starter, though good on Tony Brown for motivating his players by hyping them up in the media.wet-socks wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:47 amPeter 's 13, so he probably wouldn't be competing with his brother anyways.
Browns says it will be Thomas at 12, Paea at 13 for the Highlanders midfield.
I'd love to this 113kg frame of Thomas utilized at 12 for the AB's with any of Goodhue/ALB/PUJ/Reiko at 13.
His twin, though has shown some of the barnstorming qualities that could make him a regular AB midfielder. I think he has just a dimension or two more than Laumape, as well.
Yep makes you think how well Umaga went moving in from the wing, you almost forget that is where he started AB career.
This kind of move almost always fails. Nonu and Umaga were exceptions because they were selected out of their best positions in the first place.
EDIT: What's more, there's no bloody need for this at this stage. We have more than enough potentially great wingers and midfielders if we just use them right. Part of which is selecting them in their correct positions.
- Carter's Choice
- Posts: 1504
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:44 pm
- Location: QueeNZland
It doesn't matter which midfield duo we use, if they aren't given years to develop as a combination then it will be destined for failure. Nonu and Smith took years to reach their potential. Ian Foster is obsessed with rotation and having options, so he has never let a combination settle.
-
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:28 am
Hopefully he is young enough that he recovers from his injury while keeping his pace. Think he will only be available for crusaders for the trans tasman part of super next year. Could be 2022 before he is back to his bestTed. wrote: ↑Tue Dec 22, 2020 11:23 pmGoodhue is a centre. ALB can play both positions but is more adept at 12. If Goodhue lacks pace for centre, which I don't necessarily agree with, then he should not be in the team. And if that is the reason he's been shoehorned into 12, then it is a more fuckwitted selection than I thought.Dan54 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 22, 2020 6:35 pmI used to agree, but actually think the other way works better as I think Goodhue may lack pace for 13, so could be suited to one 12. I thought during Super Aotearoa Goodhue was the best 12 on show, Laumape had one real good game, but generally I rated Goodhue better.
Mind you I always thought that Conrad Smith wasn't all that fast for a 13 either, but made up for it with his brain and knowing where to be so well. And maybe I judge them all on the prince of centres in NZ Bruce Robertson and probably shouldn't do that.
As an aside, when will Braydon Ennor be back in the mix? He certainly doesn't lack for pace.
-
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2020 12:15 am
Completely agree. If that's the case, why not learn from our greatest centre pairings - Nonu/Smith, Little/Bunce - and other longstanding international pairings like D'Arcy/O'Driscoll for Leinster, de Villiers/Fourie for the Stormers ect and pick a franchise combination to really allow them to gel?Carter's Choice wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 1:45 am It doesn't matter which midfield duo we use, if they aren't given years to develop as a combination then it will be destined for failure. Nonu and Smith took years to reach their potential. Ian Foster is obsessed with rotation and having options, so he has never let a combination settle.
Also allows ALB back to the bench where I'd argue he's played most of his best AB rugby.
10. Mo'unga
12. Goodhue
13. Ennor
22. ALB
Not a lot of X factor or much point of difference in that starting combo tbf, other than Ennor's pace.mrbrownstone wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:22 amCompletely agree. If that's the case, why not learn from our greatest centre pairings - Nonu/Smith, Little/Bunce - and other longstanding international pairings like D'Arcy/O'Driscoll for Leinster, de Villiers/Fourie for the Stormers ect and pick a franchise combination to really allow them to gel?Carter's Choice wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 1:45 am It doesn't matter which midfield duo we use, if they aren't given years to develop as a combination then it will be destined for failure. Nonu and Smith took years to reach their potential. Ian Foster is obsessed with rotation and having options, so he has never let a combination settle.
Also allows ALB back to the bench where I'd argue he's played most of his best AB rugby.
10. Mo'unga
12. Goodhue
13. Ennor
22. ALB
I'm inclined to believe we need to have one bigger guy to fill the Nonu/SBW role in the starting midfield.
The heaviest mid-fielders/outside backs (hybrids) in NZ currently are:
Thomas Umaga-Jenson (113kg), Caleb Clarke (108kg) &
Leicester Fainga'anuku (109kg).
I sense immense midfield potential in all three of them.
-
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2020 12:15 am
Leicester Fainga'anuku is an interesting prospect, particularly if he spends some time in the midfield for the Crusaders with Ennor injured.wet-socks wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:43 amNot a lot of X factor or much point of difference in that starting combo tbf, other than Ennor's pace.mrbrownstone wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 2:22 amCompletely agree. If that's the case, why not learn from our greatest centre pairings - Nonu/Smith, Little/Bunce - and other longstanding international pairings like D'Arcy/O'Driscoll for Leinster, de Villiers/Fourie for the Stormers ect and pick a franchise combination to really allow them to gel?Carter's Choice wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 1:45 am It doesn't matter which midfield duo we use, if they aren't given years to develop as a combination then it will be destined for failure. Nonu and Smith took years to reach their potential. Ian Foster is obsessed with rotation and having options, so he has never let a combination settle.
Also allows ALB back to the bench where I'd argue he's played most of his best AB rugby.
10. Mo'unga
12. Goodhue
13. Ennor
22. ALB
I'm inclined to believe we need to have one bigger guy to fill the Nonu/SBW role in the starting midfield.
The heaviest mid-fielders/outside backs (hybrids) in NZ currently are:
Thomas Umaga-Jenson (113kg), Caleb Clarke (108kg) &
Leicester Fainga'anuku (109kg).
I sense immense midfield potential in all three of them.
Can't agree that midfield lacks X Factor though. Goodhue is hardly a small man and Ennor is electric at his best.
- Carter's Choice
- Posts: 1504
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:44 pm
- Location: QueeNZland
With respect, I think Ennor has the most x factor of any of our realistic centre options. Even more than Reiko, who has done some very flashy things as a winger, but whose appearances at centre have generally been characterised by glaring errors and dying with the ball when he should have passed earlier.
- Guy Smiley
- Posts: 6014
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:52 pm
Fucksake, where do you go to dream this shit up?Dan54 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:49 amPerhaps you hit it on the head, Goodhue couldn't make 13 for Crusaders becuase seems Razor thought that Ennor was better than him there, and if I remember even when Ennor was injured didn't someone else play 13 for Crusaders? If so it would seem not only AB selectors think he a 12? I always though ALB was a 12 (not sure if that was because that's where I first saw hin play) but as said have preferred him at 13 to Goodhue, mainly for pace and I though Goodhue was best 12 in super rugby this year.Ted. wrote: ↑Tue Dec 22, 2020 11:23 pmGoodhue is a centre. ALB can play both positions but is more adept at 12. If Goodhue lacks pace for centre, which I don't necessarily agree with, then he should not be in the team. And if that is the reason he's been shoehorned into 12, then it is a more fuckwitted selection than I thought.Dan54 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 22, 2020 6:35 pm
I used to agree, but actually think the other way works better as I think Goodhue may lack pace for 13, so could be suited to one 12. I thought during Super Aotearoa Goodhue was the best 12 on show, Laumape had one real good game, but generally I rated Goodhue better.
Mind you I always thought that Conrad Smith wasn't all that fast for a 13 either, but made up for it with his brain and knowing where to be so well. And maybe I judge them all on the prince of centres in NZ Bruce Robertson and probably shouldn't do that.
As an aside, when will Braydon Ennor be back in the mix? He certainly doesn't lack for pace.
Goodhue was played at 12 because they had no one else to cover it and felt he could manage it. Ennor had managed 13 and can play outside from there. Moving Goodhue in worked well enough as he’s good enough to play both midfield spots... but 13 is his best position. Ennor did a good job at 13. Both players could be viewed as being developed in those spots by Razor I guess.
When it comes to the ABs, Fozzie and co seem to he decided that if Razor can play Goodhue at 12 they’d better do the same despite that putting both midfielders into the spot they’re second best at.
-
- Posts: 384
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:28 am
We learned that the selectors feel there is such a lack of depth that they will shoe horn who they think the best players are no matter the position.
- Jimmy Smallsteps
- Posts: 914
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:24 pm
- Location: Auckland
We're slow learners. Every time we go too far away from a powerful forward game we get our ass handed to us.
Our backs are good, but not good enough to win the game on their own.
Our backs are good, but not good enough to win the game on their own.
Amen, Poms beat us because our forwards got beat up, and backs as always are secondary>Jimmy Smallsteps wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 5:44 am We're slow learners. Every time we go too far away from a powerful forward game we get our ass handed to us.
Our backs are good, but not good enough to win the game on their own.
You reckon? Havili is a pretty bloody good 12, I can't remember if he was injured at start of season. So regardless Razor figured that Ennor was a better 13 obviously, otherwise he wouldn't of played him there surely he would of played him on wing and Goodhue at 13! And after Ennor got injured who played 13? Did Razor tell you why he played him at 12 or are you guessing?Shanky’s mate wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 4:35 amFucksake, where do you go to dream this shit up?Dan54 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 12:49 amPerhaps you hit it on the head, Goodhue couldn't make 13 for Crusaders becuase seems Razor thought that Ennor was better than him there, and if I remember even when Ennor was injured didn't someone else play 13 for Crusaders? If so it would seem not only AB selectors think he a 12? I always though ALB was a 12 (not sure if that was because that's where I first saw hin play) but as said have preferred him at 13 to Goodhue, mainly for pace and I though Goodhue was best 12 in super rugby this year.Ted. wrote: ↑Tue Dec 22, 2020 11:23 pm
Goodhue is a centre. ALB can play both positions but is more adept at 12. If Goodhue lacks pace for centre, which I don't necessarily agree with, then he should not be in the team. And if that is the reason he's been shoehorned into 12, then it is a more fuckwitted selection than I thought.
As an aside, when will Braydon Ennor be back in the mix? He certainly doesn't lack for pace.
Goodhue was played at 12 because they had no one else to cover it and felt he could manage it. Ennor had managed 13 and can play outside from there. Moving Goodhue in worked well enough as he’s good enough to play both midfield spots... but 13 is his best position. Ennor did a good job at 13. Both players could be viewed as being developed in those spots by Razor I guess.
When it comes to the ABs, Fozzie and co seem to he decided that if Razor can play Goodhue at 12 they’d better do the same despite that putting both midfielders into the spot they’re second best at.
And ALB played 13 for Chiefs didn't he? So the Super coaches as well as AB coaches are playing these fellas out of position?
Geez and Dutchie was playing Savea at 8 too, hell is noone played in their best position?
I think Tony Brown definitely had some electric moments, but I hardly see him as a solution to our present midfield woes.
Speaking last year before Goodhue played 12 (due to Crotty being on AB rest), Robertson said:Dan54 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 6:09 am
You reckon? Havili is a pretty bloody good 12, I can't remember if he was injured at start of season. So regardless Razor figured that Ennor was a better 13 obviously, otherwise he wouldn't of played him there surely he would of played him on wing and Goodhue at 13! And after Ennor got injured who played 13? Did Razor tell you why he played him at 12 or are you guessing?
And ALB played 13 for Chiefs didn't he? So the Super coaches as well as AB coaches are playing these fellas out of position?
Geez and Dutchie was playing Savea at 8 too, hell is noone played in their best position?
That sounds like, a year ago at least, that Robertson saw centre as Goodhue’s best position (a “great” centre) but that for the team, he could do well at 12."It's a great opportunity for Jack to play 12. Great centres can also play well at 12."
Agreed. Nonu wasn't a wing anyway. He was only played there on occasion to get him on the field. It held back his development IMO.
We are in the first year of the RWC cycle. I’d be disappointed if the coach settled on a midfield and didn’t give other players a go. If we fail to settle on a new combination next year then there is cause for concern. 2022 is when I’d get really worried.Carter's Choice wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 1:45 am It doesn't matter which midfield duo we use, if they aren't given years to develop as a combination then it will be destined for failure. Nonu and Smith took years to reach their potential. Ian Foster is obsessed with rotation and having options, so he has never let a combination settle.
- Jimmy Smallsteps
- Posts: 914
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:24 pm
- Location: Auckland
On the strength (or lack thereof) of the last four years I'd say that's exactly how it will play out.Wild Beef wrote: ↑Thu Dec 24, 2020 6:53 amWe are in the first year of the RWC cycle. I’d be disappointed if the coach settled on a midfield and didn’t give other players a go. If we fail to settle on a new combination next year then there is cause for concern. 2022 is when I’d get really worried.Carter's Choice wrote: ↑Wed Dec 23, 2020 1:45 am It doesn't matter which midfield duo we use, if they aren't given years to develop as a combination then it will be destined for failure. Nonu and Smith took years to reach their potential. Ian Foster is obsessed with rotation and having options, so he has never let a combination settle.
- Jimmy Smallsteps
- Posts: 914
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:24 pm
- Location: Auckland
I see Beauden Barrett continues to agitate for a return to playing first five.
Playing this out through the media is starting to piss me off.
How about you actually fuckin' take the opportunity to play well when starting there for the All Blacks, Beauden?
I'm not sure starring at 10 for a club side in Japan is going to do wonders for your selection prospects.
Playing this out through the media is starting to piss me off.
How about you actually fuckin' take the opportunity to play well when starting there for the All Blacks, Beauden?
I'm not sure starring at 10 for a club side in Japan is going to do wonders for your selection prospects.
Beauden Barrett may be on a break from New Zealand rugby but it will still be very much on his mind while he plays in Japan this year.
Barrett spoke at a media conference in Japan yesterday after joining Top League club Suntory Sungoliath for his rugby sabbatical.
While impressing local media with some Japanese, Barrett also attempted to catch All Blacks coach Ian Foster’s attention with some other comments, saying he still has his eyes on playing at first-five for New Zealand.
During last year’s unique rugby season, Barrett spent most of his time at fullback for both the Blues and All Blacks with Crusaders playmaker Richie Mo’unga instead handed the black No.10 jersey late in the year.
Barrett said he hopes to spend time at first-five in Japan to put his case forward to Foster and the selectors.
"I have got a little bit of work to do in terms of slotting back into that role (first-five)," Barrett said.
"I think one would expect me to play a little more at number 10 and that is certainly something I am aspiring to do back in New Zealand for the All Blacks."
Barrett’s move to Tokyo sees him join multiple high-profile Kiwis in the competition including TJ Perenara, Brodie Retallick, Kieran Read and Ben Smith.
There was the option to take his sabbatical in France as well – where the 2023 Rugby World Cup will be held – but Barrett chose Japan with the global tournament in mind.
"It isn't Japan versus France at all. It was about 2023," Barrett said.
"I am really happy about the decision that I made."