NPR

Margin__Walker wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2025 2:49 pm I think the majority of people questioning it just want it to be a transparently safe conviction. Something it really doesn't always feel like.

Slick wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2025 3:18 pm

Margin__Walker wrote: Tue Feb 11, 2025 2:49 pm I think the majority of people questioning it just want it to be a transparently safe conviction. Something it really doesn't always feel like.

I think you are being quite generous. There is a huge amount of LOOK AT ME going on, even by people that are meant to be experts.

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Apr 03, 2025 7:06 am Just more for the "NHS is wonderful" cult.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c045pp740vro

You are now in the minority:

https://news.stv.tv/scotland/major-poll ... n-with-nhs

Blackmac wrote: Thu Apr 03, 2025 7:43 am

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Thu Apr 03, 2025 7:06 am Just more for the "NHS is wonderful" cult.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c045pp740vro

You are now in the minority:

https://news.stv.tv/scotland/major-poll ... n-with-nhs

FFS, was one thread not enough. Spam a few more.

According to Jayaram’s testimony, when he walked into a room where Letby was alone with Baby K, he discovered that the infant’s oxygen levels had plummeted because her breathing tube had been dislodged, and that the nurse was standing over the baby’s cot without raising the alarm. “Lucy Letby was stood next to the incubator. She wasn’t looking at me. She didn’t have her hands in the incubator,” he told the court at her retrial.

Yet in an email seen by UnHerd, Jayaram initially suggested that, in fact, Letby had called him for help, and this was why he went to see Baby K. This was exculpatory evidence that could have helped Letby’s defence team, yet her lawyers were not told of its existence before either trial. It was not disclosed to them until late September last year.

.....

On several further occasions, Jayaram repeated the claim that no one had warned him there was a problem before he entered Baby K’s room: in statements to police, in his courtroom evidence at Letby’s trials, and at the public inquiry chaired by Lady Justice Thirlwall, whose report is expected later this year. In one statement in 2018, he said that usually, when a baby’s oxygen level fell, a nurse would “come looking for a doctor to assist”, but Letby “had not called me in”.

.....

Jayaram’s email was not disclosed to the defence before Letby’s trials. In other documents seen by UnHerd, Cheshire Police and the Crown Prosecution Service state that they only became aware of it in August 2024 — one month after Letby had been convicted of attempting to murder Baby K.

However, the documents say it was supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry, but it was not discussed there nor published on its website. We asked the Inquiry whether it received the email before or after Letby’s retrial, but it refused to comment.

It was not until late September that Letby’s former defence team was finally sent the email by Operation Duet, the police inquiry into possible corporate or gross negligence manslaughter at the Chester hospital unit. We understand it will now be added to the dossier submitted by Letby’s lawyer Mark McDonald to the Criminal Cases Review Commission, which is being asked to refer the case back to the Court of Appeal.

Margin__Walker wrote: Sat Apr 12, 2025 7:45 pm This is an absolute shocker re the Baby K conviction.

According to Jayaram’s testimony, when he walked into a room where Letby was alone with Baby K, he discovered that the infant’s oxygen levels had plummeted because her breathing tube had been dislodged, and that the nurse was standing over the baby’s cot without raising the alarm. “Lucy Letby was stood next to the incubator. She wasn’t looking at me. She didn’t have her hands in the incubator,” he told the court at her retrial.

Yet in an email seen by UnHerd, Jayaram initially suggested that, in fact, Letby had called him for help, and this was why he went to see Baby K. This was exculpatory evidence that could have helped Letby’s defence team, yet her lawyers were not told of its existence before either trial. It was not disclosed to them until late September last year.

.....

On several further occasions, Jayaram repeated the claim that no one had warned him there was a problem before he entered Baby K’s room: in statements to police, in his courtroom evidence at Letby’s trials, and at the public inquiry chaired by Lady Justice Thirlwall, whose report is expected later this year. In one statement in 2018, he said that usually, when a baby’s oxygen level fell, a nurse would “come looking for a doctor to assist”, but Letby “had not called me in”.

.....

Jayaram’s email was not disclosed to the defence before Letby’s trials. In other documents seen by UnHerd, Cheshire Police and the Crown Prosecution Service state that they only became aware of it in August 2024 — one month after Letby had been convicted of attempting to murder Baby K.

However, the documents say it was supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry, but it was not discussed there nor published on its website. We asked the Inquiry whether it received the email before or after Letby’s retrial, but it refused to comment.

It was not until late September that Letby’s former defence team was finally sent the email by Operation Duet, the police inquiry into possible corporate or gross negligence manslaughter at the Chester hospital unit. We understand it will now be added to the dossier submitted by Letby’s lawyer Mark McDonald to the Criminal Cases Review Commission, which is being asked to refer the case back to the Court of Appeal.

https://unherd.com/newsroom/hidden-emai ... y-verdict/

“Legitimate criticism can be made of his evidence… although he believed that Letby had deliberately dislodged the endotracheal tube, he said nothing about it at the time, nor for many months thereafter. There was an inconsistency between his evidence and the contemporaneous records.”

Uncle fester wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 12:03 pm Until they come up with a better explanation for the insulin, those particular babies were definitely poisoned.