Page 44 of 98
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2024 2:51 pm
by Calculon
C69 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 2:21 pm
So Israeli's biggest backer is confident that HAMAS used the hospital. Fair enough show the evidence
USA and Israeli intelligence has been way off on the matters for years. Look at the confidence in WMD or the confidence the IDF had when they shot the white Flag waving Israeli hostages.
How the fuck did Israel intelligence allow HAMAS such an infrastructure to be constructed in the first place.
Or how did the Israeli intelligence allow HAMAS to strike with such butchery on Oct 7 when they were warned time and time again about terrorist incursions and build up of HAMAS forces.
I'd take so called intelligence reports from these sources with as much of a pinch of salt as I take HAMAS reports seriously.
Let's see evidence not fabrication, smoke and mirrors and just plain lies and bullshit propaganda.
Raggs has already addressed GS question, so not sure why he brought it up again
viewtopic.php?p=328397&hilit=Shifa#p328397
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2024 3:34 pm
by C69
Calculon wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 2:51 pm
C69 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 2:21 pm
So Israeli's biggest backer is confident that HAMAS used the hospital. Fair enough show the evidence
USA and Israeli intelligence has been way off on the matters for years. Look at the confidence in WMD or the confidence the IDF had when they shot the white Flag waving Israeli hostages.
How the fuck did Israel intelligence allow HAMAS such an infrastructure to be constructed in the first place.
Or how did the Israeli intelligence allow HAMAS to strike with such butchery on Oct 7 when they were warned time and time again about terrorist incursions and build up of HAMAS forces.
I'd take so called intelligence reports from these sources with as much of a pinch of salt as I take HAMAS reports seriously.
Let's see evidence not fabrication, smoke and mirrors and just plain lies and bullshit propaganda.
Raggs has already addressed GS question, so not sure why he brought it up again
viewtopic.php?p=328397&hilit=Shifa#p328397
Bullshit, I addressed your link directly. Raggs post was an opinion not evidence at all.
I have seen claims of this but not the evidence, if the evidence is out there and is strong then it can be corroborated.
Otherwise it's just conjecture. I have not seen the evidence therefore will hold off judgement until there is proof
For the record I believe on the balance of what I have seen that HAMAS used these tunnels for their activities.
Given how extensive they are they are probably under. Loads of types of buildings.
How the fuck did the great intelligence machine of Israel miss this?
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2024 4:50 pm
by Hugo
https://www.yahoo.com/news/israel-secre ... 17093.html
Israel talking to Congo about resettling Gazans there.
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Wed Jan 03, 2024 8:18 pm
by C69
not Ethnic Cleansing or Domicide
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:56 am
by Hugo
C69 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 8:18 pm
not Ethnic Cleansing or Domicide
Yup. Its just so blatant at this point, its way part the point of being proportionate or defensible.
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:22 am
by Calculon
Why do all these Corbyn supporters have such a hard on for Palestine (and Putin)
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 6:38 am
by Guy Smiley
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 8:15 am
by C69
Calculon wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 2:22 am
Why do all these Corbyn supporters have such a hard on for Palestine (and Putin)
No idea tbh, not too sure which Corbyn supporters you are talking about tbh. Lots seem to support Palestine but who the feck supports Putin?
I personally find the support for HAMAS or Putin repugnant and pretty ridiculous.
Feel free to give us details of Corbyn supporters following Putin.
Btw Corbyn is a useless irrelevance tbh.
Why do you have a hard on for him and his fringe.
Is it on Twitter?
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 8:21 pm
by Hugo
He may as well have asked "Why are Corbyn supporters on the right side of history on this one?"
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Thu Jan 04, 2024 8:45 pm
by Ymx
Israel have a duty to its people to completely destroy Hamas. There are also 100 hostages still being kept. Until Hamas is dismantled and those hostages still alive are returned,, it quite rightly has to push on.
This can’t be allowed to happen again.
Sadly, many Palestinians cheered on Hamas for their barbaric rampage.
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2024 12:53 am
by mat the expat
Ymx wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 8:45 pm
Israel have a duty to its people to completely destroy Hamas. There are also 100 hostages still being kept. Until Hamas is dismantled and those hostages still alive are returned,, it quite rightly has to push on.
This can’t be allowed to happen again.
Sadly, many Palestinians cheered on Hamas for their barbaric rampage.
All that will happen is 1000s of new militants will be created by this action.
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2024 7:32 am
by Ymx
mat the expat wrote: ↑Fri Jan 05, 2024 12:53 am
Ymx wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 8:45 pm
Israel have a duty to its people to completely destroy Hamas. There are also 100 hostages still being kept. Until Hamas is dismantled and those hostages still alive are returned,, it quite rightly has to push on.
This can’t be allowed to happen again.
Sadly, many Palestinians cheered on Hamas for their barbaric rampage.
All that will happen is 1000s of new militants will be created by this action.
It’s a bit late for that, the indoctrination happens anyway. The whole indoctrination process needs to be unpicked too.
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2024 9:02 am
by Uncle fester
Calculon wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 1:37 pm
Guy Smiley wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 1:55 pm
Calculon wrote: ↑Sat Dec 30, 2023 1:50 pm
when i said the fake hospital was an obvious fake you referenced alex jones and called me a wingnut, but thanks for that
Speaking of hospitals, the IDF never did find that evidence to support attacking Al Shifa, did they.
Maybe it was just another regrettable mistake.
https://apnews.com/article/hamas-intell ... ed92c4f821
Yet the information released doesn’t fully back some of Israel’s most significant allegations that the hospital served as the central node for activities by Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2024 9:08 am
by Uncle fester
mat the expat wrote: ↑Fri Jan 05, 2024 12:53 am
Ymx wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 8:45 pm
Israel have a duty to its people to completely destroy Hamas. There are also 100 hostages still being kept. Until Hamas is dismantled and those hostages still alive are returned,, it quite rightly has to push on.
This can’t be allowed to happen again.
Sadly, many Palestinians cheered on Hamas for their barbaric rampage.
All that will happen is 1000s of new militants will be created by this action.
And they'll kill more of the hostages themselves thanks to their tactics.
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2024 9:10 am
by Uncle fester
Hugo wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 1:56 am
C69 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 03, 2024 8:18 pm
not Ethnic Cleansing or Domicide
Yup. Its just so blatant at this point, its way part the point of being proportionate or defensible.
Same as "the most moral army takes all steps necessary to avoid civilian casualties".
"Oops, we've just shot some of the hostages thanks to our shoot first, ask questions later policy."
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2024 3:09 am
by mat the expat
Ymx wrote: ↑Fri Jan 05, 2024 7:32 am
mat the expat wrote: ↑Fri Jan 05, 2024 12:53 am
Ymx wrote: ↑Thu Jan 04, 2024 8:45 pm
Israel have a duty to its people to completely destroy Hamas. There are also 100 hostages still being kept. Until Hamas is dismantled and those hostages still alive are returned,, it quite rightly has to push on.
This can’t be allowed to happen again.
Sadly, many Palestinians cheered on Hamas for their barbaric rampage.
All that will happen is 1000s of new militants will be created by this action.
It’s a bit late for that, the indoctrination happens anyway. The whole indoctrination process needs to be unpicked too.
Literally, the point...
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2024 4:00 am
by Gumboot
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2024 8:19 am
by C69
mat the expat wrote: ↑Sun Jan 07, 2024 3:09 am
Ymx wrote: ↑Fri Jan 05, 2024 7:32 am
mat the expat wrote: ↑Fri Jan 05, 2024 12:53 am
All that will happen is 1000s of new militants will be created by this action.
It’s a bit late for that, the indoctrination happens anyway. The whole indoctrination process needs to be unpicked too.
Literally, the point...
Let's be honest this indoctrination starts early on both sides.
But it's just Israel atm that is enacting genocide and ethnic cleansing every day.
Every fucking day hundreds of kids are maimed and bombed and slaughtered.
Let's hope the USA puts a stop to the war or it's going to escalate to the whole area of the ME.
Bibi needs to fuck off and get his arse into jail.
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2024 9:19 am
by Ymx
“It’s only Israel …” are you on crack ?
Palestinians send missiles over to Israel and have been doing so for years. They are run by murderous terrorists. They slaughter Israeli civilians when they can. And do it by hand, not as a byproduct of war.
I’m not sure how you are getting this Palestinians are holier than though.
They were literally cheering in the streets over the Oct 7 attacks on civilians.
They also hung their own in a barbaric public execution where they suspected them colluding with IDF, within the last month.
There is also a reason Israelis were banned from being in Gaza. Because when they did, they get murdered.
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2024 10:56 am
by Calculon
It's no surprise that hatred and mistrust has increased on both sides
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67893122
Likely to see Hamas or it's successor attempt another large scale horrific attack on Israel in the future, cheered on by many Palestinians. No doubt followed by another violent Israeli reaction and the same Palestinians, and their supporters, calling for a ceasefire. Rinse and repeat
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2024 11:02 am
by Gumboot
Calculon wrote: ↑Sun Jan 07, 2024 10:56 am
It's no surprise that hatred and mistrust has increased on both sides
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-67893122
Likely to see Hamas or it's successor attempt another large scale horrific attack on Israel in the future, cheered on by many Palestinians. No doubt followed by another violent Israeli reaction and the same Palestinians, and their supporters, calling for a ceasefire. Rinse and repeat
Yep, attempting to completely destroy Hamas is utter folly.
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2024 11:18 am
by C69
Ymx wrote: ↑Sun Jan 07, 2024 9:19 am
“It’s only Israel …” are you on crack ?
Palestinians send missiles over to Israel and have been doing so for years. They are run by murderous terrorists. They slaughter Israeli civilians when they can. And do it by hand, not as a byproduct of war.
I’m not sure how you are getting this Palestinians are holier than though.
They were literally cheering in the streets over the Oct 7 attacks on civilians.
They also hung their own in a barbaric public execution where they suspected them colluding with IDF, within the last month.
There is also a reason Israelis were banned from being in Gaza. Because when they did, they get murdered.
Not sure who has said “It’s only Israel …” feel free to posta link. Or anyone who thinks that the Palestinians are holier than thou?
Good piece from Haaretz here on the sexualised violence from Hamas and the stigma attached to the attack
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/202 ... a4acf40000
Israel's police investigators are having difficulties finding living victims of or witnesses to sexual assault committed by Hamas on October 7, due to the fact that many of the victims were killed that day, taken hostage or are in a state of psychological distress and unable to testify. They are therefore appealing to the public to encourage anyone with information to contact them and give a statement.
The sheer scale and brutality of the massacre pose challenges to the investigation of the sexual violence, including the specific nature of the acts and the identity of the perpetrators.
- Advertisement -
In the few cases where police have already amassed testimony about the sexual assaults Hamas committed during its massacre in southern Israel, they haven't yet been able to identify the specific victims of the acts to which witnesses have testified.
Hamas' campaign of rape against Israeli women is revealed, testimony after testimony
Israeli women fight to break global silence on Hamas' sexual violence
The ethics of covering Hamas' dehumanizing sexual violence against Israeli women
"We have circumstantial indications that there are victims who are still alive who haven't contacted us yet," said Superintendent Adi Edri, normally an investigator in the unit that handles online sex crimes against minors, who is currently in charge of investigating sexual assault committed during the massacre. "That's why we have turned to the media. We didn't do this lightly."
"If anyone reading this article was sexually assaulted, I'm here for her every step of the way," she added. "Clearly, it takes strength to speak out. I'm happy to listen to her testimony and also provide assistance if needed."
The most direct and detailed testimony received to date about sexual assault during the attack comes from a young woman identified by her first initial, S. Parts of her testimony have been published in the media, and an edited video of her words was screened at the United Nations. An investigative report published by the New York Times last month also included detailed testimony from S.
Superintendent Edri said that S. witnessed the rape and murder of at least two women at the Nova music festival, and also saw people maimed and bodies mutilated.
Superintendent Adi Edri, who is in charge of investigating the sex crimes in the massacre.
The police have investigated her testimony thoroughly and concluded that it is very credible. But investigators haven't yet been able to identify the women who, according to S. and other eyewitnesses, were raped and murdered.
"I have circumstantial evidence, but in the end, it's my duty to find supporting evidence for her story and discover the victims' identities," Edri said. "At this stage, I have no specific bodies."
So far, she added, due to the small number of survivors and their traumatized state, police have taken statements from very few eyewitnesses to sex crimes, though numerous statements have been provided by soldiers and rescue personnel from Zaka (the ultra-Orthodox organization whose members retrieve bodies after terror attacks) and other organizations who were at the scene of the massacre. Police also have documentation of bodies, both male and female, that were found naked and whose sexual organs had been mutilated.
But even though there is ample documentation from the scene of the massacre regarding bodies that appear to have been victims of sexual assault, investigators are still looking for other supporting evidence, Edri said.
"We're looking for more than one witness," she explained, adding that for every locale in southern Israel where Hamas committed its crimes, "we're looking for supporting evidence of what happened there." That supporting evidence would be necessary to potentially bring the perpetrators to justice.
Kibbutz Nir Oz, in October. "It's my duty to to find supporting evidence and discover the victims' identities," Superintendent Edri said.Credit: Olivier Fitoussi
Investigators have visited the Shura military base, where the victims' bodies were taken for identification; examined the photographs taken during the process; and done a lot of cross-referencing to figure out whether crimes were committed, she continued. Asked whether all the bodies taken to Shura were photographed, she replied, "They photographed many of them; I can't promise they photographed them all."
Chaim Otmazgin, the commander of special units in Zaka who helped in the process of identifying the bodies, said he recently gave an additional statement to the police about indications of sexual assault on the bodies he saw. He also showed Haaretz some extremely disturbing pictures, including three photographs of dead women who appear to have bled from their sexual organs, seemingly after being shot there.
Breaking news and the best of Haaretz straight to your inbox
He added that he had felt torn over how to document the bodies at the scene of the massacre. On one hand, he felt he had a duty to photograph them, but on the other, he wanted to preserve the dignity of the dead.
In November, Haaretz reported that the extended period of combat with Hamas terrorists turned crime scenes into battlefields and evidence was thus lost or contaminated. After the fighting ended, the authorities' main priority was not collecting evidence of sexual assault but finding and identifying bodies, sometimes under rocket fire, in order that families could be informed and funerals held.
A helicopter lands at a hospital in Israel in November, carrying hostages released by Hamas. Some of them referred to sexual assult in media interviews, but are yet to testify to police.Credit: Itai Ron
The number of bodies brought to the Shura base was a number so overwhelming that it was no longer possible to perform rape kit testing, which in any case require samples to be taken within 48 hours of the crime.
That led to missing forensic evidence which is making it hard for investigators to determine the precise details of the atrocities committed on October 7 and identify the victims. Similar difficulties are now arising in investigations of sexual assault committed that day. Police are now also waiting for hostages released from Hamas captivity to feel ready to talk to them about sexual violence they experience or witnessed.
Released hostages have yet to give statements to the police, even though some have told the media about sexual assaults that occurred both during the massacre and while Hamas was holding them in the Gaza Strip.
In an interview with Haaretz, for instance, Chen Goldstein-Almog said that some of the hostages she met in Gaza had told her they had been sexually assaulted. Mia Schem told Channel 12 television that one terrorist "starting touching her" during the attack on the Nova festival before kidnapping her.
"If there are indications that sex crimes were committed against the hostages who have returned, we'll collect their statements," Edri said. But to do so, she noted, police need approval from the people assigned by the army to help them readjust after their deeply traumatic experience, and a green light from the psychologists who are treating them.
"The moment they're willing to give statements, we're here," she said.
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2024 12:35 pm
by Uncle fester
Ymx wrote: ↑Sun Jan 07, 2024 9:19 am
And do it by hand, not as a byproduct of war.
Been meaning to talk about this one.
Israel seems to think it has higher moral ground because it's attacks are carried out remotely.
Discuss.
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2024 2:11 pm
by Ymx
Uncle fester wrote: ↑Sun Jan 07, 2024 12:35 pm
Ymx wrote: ↑Sun Jan 07, 2024 9:19 am
And do it by hand, not as a byproduct of war.
Been meaning to talk about this one.
Israel seems to think it has higher moral ground because it's attacks are carried out remotely.
Discuss.
It has not seeked out to target civilians, torture and carve them up with knives. I’d say there’s a big difference between this and bombs causing collateral damage, especially in the context of war crimes.
Do you seriously think Hamas are not worse than the IDF, despite this?
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2024 4:47 pm
by Guy Smiley
Ymx wrote: ↑Sun Jan 07, 2024 2:11 pm
Uncle fester wrote: ↑Sun Jan 07, 2024 12:35 pm
Ymx wrote: ↑Sun Jan 07, 2024 9:19 am
And do it by hand, not as a byproduct of war.
Been meaning to talk about this one.
Israel seems to think it has higher moral ground because it's attacks are carried out remotely.
Discuss.
It has not seeked out to target civilians, torture and carve them up with knives. I’d say there’s a big difference between this and bombs causing collateral damage, especially in the context of war crimes.
Do you seriously think Hamas are not worse than the IDF, despite this?
I read something the other day... Israel have weapons capable of carrying out laser precise strikes and taking out targetted individuals. They've made no secret of that for years. In spite of that, they are dropping thousands of tonnes of bombs and taking out hundreds with them regardless.
That's quite deliberate.
As for indoctrination... again, Israel jails anyone who refuses military service on conscientious grounds. If you don't become a soldier in and for Israel, you're a criminal. Yeah but Hamas... sure. Hamas are cunce, no-one here disputes this. What some of us seem to be more inclined to though, is pointing out that so are those currently directing Israeli policy and tactics. That shouldn't be hard to acknowledge.
As for creating terrorists... Gaza has been a festering mess of spite and hatred for years. Israel knows exactly what it is doing and many of the strategies they have employed have been declared illegal under international law. They're happy to maintain the open air prison nature of Gaza and all of the horrendous ill will that generates. Coupled with the way Israeli settlers routinely treat Palestinians on their own land in the West Bank and it's easy to say Israel has happily created this shitfight and continue it on the hellish downward spiral it is taking, with us along for the ride unwillingly.
Israel, in my view, has clarified that it is a criminal state over recent weeks... and it gets away with that for a multitude of reasons including simple media influence and US favouritism.
So yeah... Hamas are cunce and they have their soulmate in Bibi and his government.
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2024 5:06 pm
by I like neeps
Not just the bombs, the IDF are shooting Palestinians on sight. Proof? Those three Israeli hostages they gunned down despite them holding up white flags, because they thought that they were Palestinians, so did what they do.
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2024 5:32 pm
by Uncle fester
Ymx wrote: ↑Sun Jan 07, 2024 2:11 pm
Uncle fester wrote: ↑Sun Jan 07, 2024 12:35 pm
Ymx wrote: ↑Sun Jan 07, 2024 9:19 am
And do it by hand, not as a byproduct of war.
Been meaning to talk about this one.
Israel seems to think it has higher moral ground because it's attacks are carried out remotely.
Discuss.
It has not seeked out to target civilians, torture and carve them up with knives. I’d say there’s a big difference between this and bombs causing collateral damage, especially in the context of war crimes.
Do you seriously think Hamas are not worse than the IDF, despite this?
The disproportionate scale of the casualties rather puts the lie to the notion that delivering the deaths while not seeing the whites of their victims eyes, makes them somehow on higher moral ground.
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2024 6:52 pm
by Ymx
I will say some of the sniper attacks have lacked targeted precision, however. Which is the one place you should be highly accurate. Not quite as close as knives where you know exactly who you are dealing with.
The fact that Hamas are hiding amongst and underneath civilians is entirely deliberate of course. Using them as human shields and decoys, and wearing civilian clothing. It does add a significant challenge to accurately targeting them.
But suggesting there is some equivalence to what Hamas did on Oct 7 with their torture and mutilations, is pretty sick minded.
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2024 2:35 am
by mat the expat
escalation in Sydney:
https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/tak ... 5evra.html
An explosive device has been planted on a car outside a Sydney home that was flying the Palestinian flag, triggering police to send a bomb disposal robot.
NSW Police were called to a street in Botany following reports of a “suspicious item” on a car bonnet at 2pm on Friday.
Those damn Palestinian supporters - crazy!
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2024 4:46 am
by Gumboot
Top Israeli officials are busily rebranding their ethnic cleansing campaign as "voluntary migration"...
Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich: "What needs to be done in the Gaza Strip is to encourage emigration. If there are 100,000 or 200,000 Arabs in Gaza and not 2 million Arabs, the entire discussion on the day after will be totally different."
Smotrich also argued that the disappearance of most of Gaza’s population would permit Israelis to regenerate the war-torn enclave themselves: “Most of Israeli society will say, ‘Why not, it’s a nice place, let’s make the desert bloom, it doesn’t come at anyone’s expense.’"
...Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir has also described the war as an “opportunity to concentrate on encouraging the migration of the residents of Gaza” and a pretext for annexing territory. “We cannot withdraw from any territory we are in in the Gaza Strip. Not only do I not rule out Jewish settlement there, I believe it is also an important thing,” he said.
...Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is advocating for “voluntary migration,” refusing to specify who will control Gaza after the war, and is conspicuously declining to condemn Ben-Gvir’s and Smotrich’s unapologetically colonial language of setting up new settlements in Gaza.
https://www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnbc-opi ... rcna132378
Not even pretending anymore that they're "strategically targetting" Hamas, or that they actually give a flying fuck about the millions of Palestinian civilians they're bombing and displacing.
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2024 5:33 am
by Guy Smiley
Well look, they’ve shown they can’t be trusted with the gift of land. Time to take it off them and hand control back to the Babylonians. They have historical rights to it, after all.
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2024 7:35 pm
by Hugo
Looking for a silver lining in this conflict and I have to say what has kept my morale up this past week or so has been the South African case that it is bringing to the ICJ.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/ ... id-history
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Mon Jan 08, 2024 7:50 pm
by Ymx
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 12:15 am
by Calculon
Ymx wrote: ↑Mon Jan 08, 2024 7:50 pm
Al Jazeera, owned by the Islamic fundamentalist government of Qatar, who also funds Hamas. They're even more biased that the BBC
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 12:23 am
by Tichtheid
The BBC is regularly found to be one of the most unbiased news sources in the world, along with AP, Reuters etc.
If they report things you don't agree with, it doesn't make them biased, the bias is in the reader. They get a lot of dung thrown at them from the left as well as from the right
edit, although it's true that domestically the BBC news section has had a lot of appointees who are friends or sympathetic to the Tories, and that might well reflect their editorial policy, having said that, Nick Robinson, the guy who was at Oxford with Cameron and Johnson etc, and was in the Tory students association there, in fact I think he led it, he's been getting a bit better at holding this bunch of shits, sorry, current government ministers to account
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 1:04 am
by Calculon
Tichtheid wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 12:23 am
The BBC is regularly found to be one of the most unbiased news sources in the world, along with AP, Reuters etc.
If they report things you don't agree with, it doesn't make them biased, the bias is in the reader. They get a lot of dung thrown at them from the left as well as from the right
edit, although it's true that domestically the BBC news section has had a lot of appointees who are friends or sympathetic to the Tories, and that might well reflect their editorial policy, having said that, Nick Robinson, the guy who was at Oxford with Cameron and Johnson etc, and was in the Tory students association there, in fact I think he led it, he's been getting a bit better at holding this bunch of shits, sorry, current government ministers to account
It’s nothing to do with agreeing with them, everything with them getting it factually wrong, and always on the side of Hamas. Reporting that Israel bombed a hospital with over 500 casualties when it was a Hamas rocket that burned out the hospital’s carpark, falsely reporting that Israel was targeting Arab medics in Al Shifa hospital. Conveniently not reporting when a rocket hit a school in Gaza because it was known to be a Hamas rocket.
As I’ve stated before their coverage of the Covid pandemic in SA was a joke, but I don’t care how they cover the sacks of shits that make up the Tory government, or for that matter their sycophantic coverage of the Royal Family when the queen died. They're still useful as a news ticker though
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 1:09 am
by Tichtheid
Calculon wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 1:04 am
Tichtheid wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 12:23 am
The BBC is regularly found to be one of the most unbiased news sources in the world, along with AP, Reuters etc.
If they report things you don't agree with, it doesn't make them biased, the bias is in the reader. They get a lot of dung thrown at them from the left as well as from the right
edit, although it's true that domestically the BBC news section has had a lot of appointees who are friends or sympathetic to the Tories, and that might well reflect their editorial policy, having said that, Nick Robinson, the guy who was at Oxford with Cameron and Johnson etc, and was in the Tory students association there, in fact I think he led it, he's been getting a bit better at holding this bunch of shits, sorry, current government ministers to account
It’s nothing to do with agreeing with them, everything with them getting it factually wrong, and always on the side of Hamas. Reporting that Israel bombed a hospital with over 500 casualties when it was a Hamas rocket that burned out the hospital’s carpark, falsely reporting that Israel was targeting Arab medics in Al Shifa hospital. Conveniently not reporting when a rocket hit a school in Gaza because it was known to be a Hamas rocket.
As I’ve stated before their coverage of the Covid pandemic in SA was a joke, but I don’t care how they cover the sacks of shits that make up the Tory government, or for that matter their sycophantic coverage of the Royal Family when the queen died. They're still useful as a news ticker though
You've set out your stall, you are akin to a religious fanatic. Zero chance of seeing the other side of the discussion.
I didn't post that to convince you because I know there is no chance of that, I posted it to show that among sensible people the BBC is held to be an unbiased news source.
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 1:30 am
by Calculon
Interesting article on how the left and right swapped positions on Israel
https://www.edwest.co.uk/p/how-the-holy ... -to-divide
I went to the Bring Them Home rally last week with a friend, a British-Israeli. As we queued to get through security, a woman was handing out Union Jacks and asked us in an apologetic way whether we’d like one, explaining that ‘you don’t have to’. We both felt it impolite to refuse but I find flag waving literally too embarrassing, so I just held it awkwardly in its packet by my side, until the flag fell off the pole so I was left walking around with a little stick.
Unlike the quite carnival-like atmosphere of the previous day’s pro-Palestinian event, which I watched out of curiosity, this was very sombre and slightly anxious. It also felt very British, despite the Israeli flags on display. The speakers talked about their love of Britain, their loyalty to the royal family and, in one case, a feeling that they don’t recognise their home when people are able to openly show support for Hamas.
Wrong Side of History is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Type your email...
Subscribe
I went because I felt horror at what happened on October 7, and a discomfort that many people don’t share that same disgust. If a similar mass murder happened in England, and I saw people around the world celebrating it - or, at least, saying that Britain had it coming because of its colonial past - I would be crushed.
But I wasn’t really there because of the Middle East, which feels like an unsolvable problem which Britain can do little to change, but more because it saddens me to think that some of my countrymen don’t feel safe sending their children to school because of their religion.
I suppose the gentiles who attended the rally were more likely to be Tories, and most of the people signing the October Declaration, including me, seem to be. In fact, like almost every issue since the great realignment, attitudes to Israel and Palestine now strongly align along party lines. As Matt Goodwin points out, only one in ten Labour voters now sympathise more with Israel.
Yet it wasn’t always the case — indeed the decline of Tory Arabism is one of the notable trends of recent years, as William Atkinson recently wrote about for ConHome. He cited the example of Crispin Blunt, ‘a man used to ploughing a lonely furrow’, and who is now one of the few pro-Palestinian Tory MPs around.
While Blunt accuses the Government of ‘aiding and abetting war crimes’ by supporting Israel, ‘the pro-Israel tendency amongst Tory MPs is stronger – and the Arabist tendency weaker – than ever before.’
There was a new pro-Palestinian Tory grouping set up this year by Lady Warsi, and also a very small number of Tory MPs with large Muslim populations, like Steve Baker, who seem keen on representing their constituents’ interests. But they are rare, and in contrast Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI) claims around 80 per cent of Tory MPs as supporters.
As Atkinson points out, this pro-Israeli tendency can’t be down to electoral calculations: ‘On the (not unreasonable) assumption that Jewish voters are more sympathetic to Israel and Muslim ones to Palestine,’ Atkinson writes: ‘basic numeracy would see MPs throw in their lots with Britain’s almost four million Muslims over its 300,000 or so Jews. Twenty-six seats had a Muslim population of more than 20 per cent based on the 2011 census. Only one – Finchley and Golders Green – can say the same for Jews.’
It is also historically not the norm. Among Tories, Atkinson writes, ‘Inter-war attitudes ranged from apathy to the Balfour Declaration, to linking Zionism with Bolshevism, to open anti-Semitism. After Israel’s creation, Arabist tendencies remained strong amongst former and future ministers, with Anthony Nutting, Ian Gilmour, and Dennis Walters all helping establish the Council for the Advancement of Arab-British Understanding in 1967.’
Certainly at the time of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War many Tories were hostile to Zionism, bitter over atrocities such as the King David Hotel bombing, and this era even saw an anti-Jewish riot in the-then very Tory Liverpool. Opposing the Israeli independence movement, Transjordan’s Arab legion was led by Lieutenant-Colonel Sir John Bagot Glubb.
In contrast the Guardian supported Israel at its birth, a move related to its religious origins, the paper being founded by Unitarians, a Protestant sect who were vehemently Zionist in the 19th century and had once been persecuted for ‘Judaizing’ by denying the divinity of Christ. Today the Guardian is perhaps the most pro-Palestinian of all major British publication, and even seems to regret its earlier support for Israel.
Some anti-Zionism in the mid-20th century was motivated by casual upper-class anti-Semitism, among people who regarded Jews as upstarts, a view which was only shamed out of the population by the horror of the Holocaust.
But a certain type of Tory had a genuine soft spot for Arab culture. Explorer Richard Burton had political views that would make him mega-cancelled today, yet this hyper-linguist also had a deep love for and fascination with Arab civilization. However, the most famous example was T.E. Lawrence, described by Orwell as ‘perhaps the last right-wing intellectual’.
This wasn’t that unusual, and Aris Roussinos recently quoted Martin Amis’s memoirs where he wrote home from Oxford recalling that ‘I met an incredible reactionary yesterday who supports the Arabs vs. Israel’.
There are still a few Tory Arabists left - aside from Blunt, one might also mention Alan Duncan, Rory Stewart, Desmond Swayne and Nicholas Soames. But they are something of a dying breed, and Michael Gove - a speaker at last Sunday’s demonstration – is more typical of the modern party.
One lesser reason for this decline might just be that Arabic is very hard to learn, and like most modern languages its study is in decline (most of our ambassadors in the Middle East can’t even speak it). Indeed, perhaps the most gifted conservative intellectual in Britain today is Abdal Hakim Murad, born Timothy Winter, who got a double-first in Arabic from Pembroke College.
But the main reasons for this shift have been Americanisation, and more importantly, demography.
Atkinson writes: ‘As is habitual with modern Toryism, it was Margaret Thatcher who most changed the party’s attitude to Israel. Whereas Edward Heath and Alec Douglas-Home had refused to arm Tel Aviv during the Yom Kippur War, the Finchley MP became the first British Prime Minister to visit Israel. She viewed it as Britain’s best Cold War ally in the Middle East. Between sheltering an Austrian Jewish girl as a teenager and serving as Finchley’s MP, Thatcher also retained a lifelong affinity for Jews and Israel.’ In this, like many other ways, Thatcher was making the Tory Party more Atlantic and American.
Yet American conservatives themselves had also also changed their stance on the Middle East considerably. During the last flare-up between Israel and Hamas, I cited an article by Jeet Heer, who pointed out that the American Right was once sympathetic to the Palestinians, and that Regnery would publish books championing Arab Culture, while in 1956 the National Review called Israel ‘the first racist state in modern history’.
The Left and Right swapped sides in part because of the Cold War, although Heer also argued that conservatives admire strength, and that their perception of a weak Jewish state changed following the spectacular victory in the 1967 Six-Day War.
Perhaps; the Left certainly became far more interested in victimhood, and in ideas of decolonisation and racial justice, often displaying a fondness for liberation struggles which were brutally violent and intolerant.
There was also the rise of Christian Zionism, with Evangelicals more Zionist than American Jews, even though Christians accounted for as much as 30% of the Palestinian population at the start of the 20th century, and Arab Christians do not tend to be very pro-Israel. Some conservatives are also motivated by Holocaust guilt, and the idea that the Right in particular has to rid itself of anti-Semitism, which accounts for the rising popularity of the term Judeo-Christian from the 1970s. US Evangelicals tend to be very pro-Jewish generally, although the feeling is not reciprocated. Today the political divide over the Holy Land is now even more pronounced in the US, where Democrat voters have hugely shifted in their sympathies, going from about +35 for Israel to +11 for Palestine in just twenty years.
This shift in progressive opinion on Israel has coincided with the Great Awokening, the radicalisation of viewpoints on issues like race and gender, fuelled by social media and universities. It also partly reflects demographic change among Democrat voters.
I’m not really convinced, as many are, that the academic callousness we’ve seen towards Israeli suffering is motivated by hatred of Jews, and Phillippe Lemoine is probably correct in stating that ‘antisemitism is far more common among right-wing critics of Israel than among left-wing critics of Israel’ — at least among whites.
Leftists who hate Israel are in my view less driven by anti-Semitism as we’ve traditionally understood it and more by postcolonial theory, and it is just unfortunate that the conflict in the Holy Land feels like the closest thing to a colonial struggle left as theory imagines it.
The more that conservatives see Israel as a fellow civilised – ie western – state, the more our opponents view the conflict through the lens of colonialism, which is not really fair. The best argument for Israel’s existence, and one people are largely ignorant of, is not that the Jews once owned the land, or suffered at the hands of genocidal Europeans, neither of which are the fault of the Palestinians. It is that almost as many Jews fled from Arab states as Arabs from the Holy Land; millions of Israelis are Mizrahim and have always lived in the Middle East. Indeed, the largest migration to Israel came not from Poland or Romania but Iraq.
Aside from Ashkenazim, who look visibly European, it is otherwise difficult for a western visitor in Israel to tell Jews from Arabs; if Israel is a colonial state, do these Israelis just ‘go back’ to Baghdad, which a century ago was one-third Jewish? It’s an unreasonable and inhumane thing to suggest that they have no right to statehood and security. (A right to statehood I also support for the Palestinians).
Perhaps, without the emergence of Zionism those Middle Eastern Jewish communities might have continued to enjoy a healthy existence, but history certainly doesn’t suggest it. Conservatives believe the world to be a dangerous place, and so the only way of ensuring one’s survival is a defensible state rather than be dependent on the goodwill of either the majority or a benevolent ruler — something which will never last forever.
The shift is also motivated by what Arnold Kling called the civilisation v barbarism axis. Kling talked of the ‘three-axes model of political communication’ and wrote: ‘A progressive will communicate along the oppressor-oppressed axis, framing issues in terms of the (P) dichotomy. A conservative will communicate along the civilization-barbarism axis, framing issues in terms of the (C) dichotomy. A libertarian will communicate along the liberty-coercion axis, framing issues in terms of the (L) dichotomy.’
On the Holy Land, Kling wrote, ‘Along the conservative civilization-barbarism axis, the focus is on the way that Israeli values align with American values. Conservatives emphasize the nihilism of Palestinian terrorism. To support Israel is to defend civilization. To support the Palestinians is to promote barbarism. Along the progressive oppressor-oppressed axis, the focus is on the political and economic adversities faced by the Palestinians. Progressives see Israeli policy as responsible for much of the Palestinian suffering. To support the Palestinians is to stand up for an oppressed people. To support the current policies of Israel is to back the oppressors.’
These feelings will have been strongly reinforced after October 7. Hamas are absolutely barbaric, and the analogies that sprang to mind were of Bronze Age raids or Comanche attacks in America’s south-west. It’s viscerally horrifying.
Political divides in a two-party system tend to reinforce themselves, so that as soon as one party starts to dominate one voting demographic, its opponents will represent another. Much of the modern Right is also defined in opposition to the Left, rather than having any coherent worldview.
The Tories have therefore also grown more pro-Israel as the Labour Party has increasingly become reliant on Muslim voters in some constituencies, a block that is significant in dozens of seats and which became most pronounced under Jeremy Corbyn’s rule. In the last election British Jews voted overwhelmingly for Boris Johnson’s Conservatives, while Corbyn is much loved by the North African community in his constituency, and one café near me in Finsbury Park is covered with pictures of the man.
Again, this is not historically the norm. George Eaton wrote in the New Statesman that ‘For a sense of the historical complexity of Labour’s relationship with Israel, recall that much of the party’s left was once Zionist. In 1946 the future leader Michael Foot and future New Statesman editor Richard Crossman wrote a pamphlet entitled A Palestine Munich? that accused the Attlee government of betraying Jewish statehood.
‘As late as 1980, Tony Benn wrote in his diary: “I am against the PLO [Palestinian Liberation Organisation] recognition, not because I am anti-Palestinian but because the annihilation of Israel is the PLO objective, and they are associated with terrorism.”’
But the make-up of both parties has changed considerably since, so that for Labour the war in the Holy Land could prove a headache. More than 300 Muslim MPs and councillors have already written to Keir Starmer calling for a ceasefire, and the depth of feelings on the Left – from Muslims and non-Muslims – about the Palestinian question should not be underestimated. And the more that passion expresses itself, the more alienated conservatives are likely to feel by their opponents.
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 1:57 am
by Calculon
Tichtheid wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 1:09 am
Calculon wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 1:04 am
Tichtheid wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 12:23 am
The BBC is regularly found to be one of the most unbiased news sources in the world, along with AP, Reuters etc.
If they report things you don't agree with, it doesn't make them biased, the bias is in the reader. They get a lot of dung thrown at them from the left as well as from the right
edit, although it's true that domestically the BBC news section has had a lot of appointees who are friends or sympathetic to the Tories, and that might well reflect their editorial policy, having said that, Nick Robinson, the guy who was at Oxford with Cameron and Johnson etc, and was in the Tory students association there, in fact I think he led it, he's been getting a bit better at holding this bunch of shits, sorry, current government ministers to account
It’s nothing to do with agreeing with them, everything with them getting it factually wrong, and always on the side of Hamas. Reporting that Israel bombed a hospital with over 500 casualties when it was a Hamas rocket that burned out the hospital’s carpark, falsely reporting that Israel was targeting Arab medics in Al Shifa hospital. Conveniently not reporting when a rocket hit a school in Gaza because it was known to be a Hamas rocket.
As I’ve stated before their coverage of the Covid pandemic in SA was a joke, but I don’t care how they cover the sacks of shits that make up the Tory government, or for that matter their sycophantic coverage of the Royal Family when the queen died. They're still useful as a news ticker though
You've set out your stall, you are akin to a religious fanatic. Zero chance of seeing the other side of the discussion.
I didn't post that to convince you because I know there is no chance of that, I posted it to show that among sensible people the BBC is held to be an unbiased news source.
Sure, because most of my sympathies lies for the other side means I’m not capable of seeing your side. That I’m akin to a religious fanatic, emotional and unbalance, a wingnut, or from the Alex Jones playbook, whatever that is supposed to mean. Any other insults I’ve missed from the posters on “your side”?
Re: Kicking off in Israel
Posted: Tue Jan 09, 2024 2:10 am
by Tichtheid
Calculon wrote: ↑Tue Jan 09, 2024 1:57 am
. Any other insults I’ve missed from the posters on “your side”?
"My" side, - the only course of action I've advocated in this thread is for people to stop shooting and bombing, whoever they are.
You and your fellow travellers seem to want to continue the bloodthirsty path you are all on.