We liked it too, my wife wants to buy the books series , Interesting article, it shows that the writer understood physic and astronomyBiffer wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2024 12:14 pmI will watch it at some point. I read the first two books as I'm a bit of a sci fi guy, but the issue I had with them is, well a bit science nerdy. Normally for Big space opera type sci fi you can legit push the boundaries of physics and what we know, and then hypothesise stuff that might happen on top of it. But in the Three Body problem it seemed to me there was some stuff that was just flat wrong, contrary to known stuff. For example, warp speed, wormhole travel etc all are bullshit but hypothesise on known aspects of space time, that it can curve, that if we could create negative energy we'd be able to create highly curved bubbles of space time etc. It stretches the boundaries of known science without just saying 'fuck'em' and throwing it all out for something excessively handwavy. And yes I'm sure there are other examples of stuff that breaks physics completely, but this one jarred with me for some reason.
https://www.vox.com/culture/24108638/3- ... real-is-it