NPR

yermum wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2024 5:39 pm

sockwithaticket wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2024 11:55 am
At the same time, there is also an epidemic of self-diagnosis of conditions like anxiety and ADHD.

an estimated 4% of folk have ADHD.

from the ADHDUK charity site:

Prescriptions information indicates that 8.2% of people who have ADHD are in receipt of ADHD medication. Research suggests between 55% and 62% of individuals who have an ADHD diagnosis are in receipt of ADHD medication. 8.2% have medication therefore suggests an Assessed percentage of around 15% and an undiagnosed percentage of 85%. As it is an extrapolation, we prefer to err on the side of caution and say “Over 80% undiagnosed” and “Over 2 million undiagnosed”.

I have ADHD my kids have ADHD.

The provision for diagnosis and treatment in the country is shocking. The waiting list for NHS CAMHS diagnosis and treatment was 8 years. My kids would be nearly leaving home.

Both now are being treated privatly which has cost a small fortune. But at least now they are getting the help they need.

Please don't buy into the latest push from the right that ADHD doesn't exist and it's just bad parenting. Matthew Parris was spouting off in the times recently. I can see this as the latest front in the war on "woke".

C69 wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2024 5:51 pm

sockwithaticket wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2024 11:57 am

dpedin wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2024 10:41 am

I reckon the Reform Ltd will go all in at the GE and try to win as many votes as possible. They see this as their big big chance to scavenge at the dying corpse of the Tory Party and to transform it into a British version of the Republican Party post the GE defeat. They are desperate for the Tories to lose and lose badly and the only thing in their way of destroying the current tory party is their own ineptitude, narrow base and racist candidates, many of whom are being exposed now on Twitter for being utter cunts. They see a Reform/Conservative Party post GE being led by their winning team of Tice, Blonde Bumblecunt, Farage, JRM, Braverman, Patel, Truss et al and getting all the air time they need on GBabiesNews. There is enough of the right wing nutters, the likes of Clark, Jenkinson, Clark-Smith, Kruger, Longhi et al, the useless army of blackshirts, in the Tory Party to rally around a right wing coup to make it work and who will support whatever they do as they know this would be their only hope of ever getting back into political power. To be fair to them they are playing a long game well and have already hollowed out the Tories into a ramshackle, right wing shell of a Party led by a hopeless incompetent PM supported by a Cabinet filled with nutters and incompetents and who is all ready to shuffle off to US once he has lost the GE. Will the remaining one nation Tories be able to resurrect themselves into any semblance of a political party, will they fight to keep hold of the ghost of the Tory Party - hard to say given the lack of leadership to rally round. They know they have lost the party and they themselves have lost their fight to do anything and I suspect they will just give up and wander back to the shires and live out their lives as landowners or advisors to big businesses.

Reform don't have the resources to get anywhere. They've achieved little of note in the spate of by-elections, I doubt being spread more thinly in a general is going to help them. They can air some of the right's favourites on GBeebies all they like, barely anyone actually watches it.

Reform don't need resources they need to skim off a percentage of disaffected racist reactionary Tories who have no affinity with the Party to feck the Tories especially in the North.
The feeling is thy have abandoned red wall Northern voters.
As referenced by the Tory Mayoral candidate quoting the Tories and joining Reform today.
The red wall Tory voters lent their vote because of Boris Brexit and their hate of Corbyn.
None of the above are a factor now and they will either vote Reform or Labour now
They are fecked

sockwithaticket wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2024 6:39 pm

C69 wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2024 5:51 pm

sockwithaticket wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2024 11:57 am

Reform don't have the resources to get anywhere. They've achieved little of note in the spate of by-elections, I doubt being spread more thinly in a general is going to help them. They can air some of the right's favourites on GBeebies all they like, barely anyone actually watches it.

Reform don't need resources they need to skim off a percentage of disaffected racist reactionary Tories who have no affinity with the Party to feck the Tories especially in the North.
The feeling is thy have abandoned red wall Northern voters.
As referenced by the Tory Mayoral candidate quoting the Tories and joining Reform today.
The red wall Tory voters lent their vote because of Boris Brexit and their hate of Corbyn.
None of the above are a factor now and they will either vote Reform or Labour now
They are fecked

I have no doubt the Tories are fucked (and good riddance), I just think Reform's electoral chances are being distinctly overblown. They receive a disproportionate amount of press coverage relative to their actual electoral threat, much like UKIP did, thanks to the barking right wing press.

Hal Jordan wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2024 10:02 pm Reform exist to bilk money from idiots and push the political discourse ever to the right. Just like UKIP before them.

C69 wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2024 5:51 pm

sockwithaticket wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2024 11:57 am

dpedin wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2024 10:41 am

I reckon the Reform Ltd will go all in at the GE and try to win as many votes as possible. They see this as their big big chance to scavenge at the dying corpse of the Tory Party and to transform it into a British version of the Republican Party post the GE defeat. They are desperate for the Tories to lose and lose badly and the only thing in their way of destroying the current tory party is their own ineptitude, narrow base and racist candidates, many of whom are being exposed now on Twitter for being utter cunts. They see a Reform/Conservative Party post GE being led by their winning team of Tice, Blonde Bumblecunt, Farage, JRM, Braverman, Patel, Truss et al and getting all the air time they need on GBabiesNews. There is enough of the right wing nutters, the likes of Clark, Jenkinson, Clark-Smith, Kruger, Longhi et al, the useless army of blackshirts, in the Tory Party to rally around a right wing coup to make it work and who will support whatever they do as they know this would be their only hope of ever getting back into political power. To be fair to them they are playing a long game well and have already hollowed out the Tories into a ramshackle, right wing shell of a Party led by a hopeless incompetent PM supported by a Cabinet filled with nutters and incompetents and who is all ready to shuffle off to US once he has lost the GE. Will the remaining one nation Tories be able to resurrect themselves into any semblance of a political party, will they fight to keep hold of the ghost of the Tory Party - hard to say given the lack of leadership to rally round. They know they have lost the party and they themselves have lost their fight to do anything and I suspect they will just give up and wander back to the shires and live out their lives as landowners or advisors to big businesses.

Reform don't have the resources to get anywhere. They've achieved little of note in the spate of by-elections, I doubt being spread more thinly in a general is going to help them. They can air some of the right's favourites on GBeebies all they like, barely anyone actually watches it.

Reform don't need resources they need to skim off a percentage of disaffected racist reactionary Tories who have no affinity with the Party to feck the Tories especially in the North.
The feeling is thy have abandoned red wall Northern voters.
As referenced by the Tory Mayoral candidate quoting the Tories and joining Reform today.
The red wall Tory voters lent their vote because of Boris Brexit and their hate of Corbyn.
None of the above are a factor now and they will either vote Reform or Labour now
They are fecked

I like neeps wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 8:44 am

C69 wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2024 5:51 pm

sockwithaticket wrote: Thu Mar 21, 2024 11:57 am

Reform don't have the resources to get anywhere. They've achieved little of note in the spate of by-elections, I doubt being spread more thinly in a general is going to help them. They can air some of the right's favourites on GBeebies all they like, barely anyone actually watches it.

Reform don't need resources they need to skim off a percentage of disaffected racist reactionary Tories who have no affinity with the Party to feck the Tories especially in the North.
The feeling is thy have abandoned red wall Northern voters.
As referenced by the Tory Mayoral candidate quoting the Tories and joining Reform today.
The red wall Tory voters lent their vote because of Boris Brexit and their hate of Corbyn.
None of the above are a factor now and they will either vote Reform or Labour now
They are fecked

Reform have the figureheads of Farage, Anderson and the backing of GB News. Which, yes, is a failing channel. But they're doing enough to influence debate in the mainstream press and conservative party. They're method of change isn't having the resource and machinery of a serious party. It's all media hectoring.

A good example is Farage and Anderson kicking off about the new England football shirt, guess who has joined them ... Keir Starmer. A fringe issue has enough mainstream coverage because of Reform politicians that it's affecting even Labour.

Reform will be fundamental to the next few years of politics sadly. Just like UKIP changed the UK without ever winning seats in parliament. Farage knows you don't need resources or a seat in the house. You just need to get your face on the telly and a very friendly press will do the rest.

tabascoboy wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 10:42 am Why is that those MPs who seem to be credible candidates for senior government are those least likely to ever have a chance at getting a shot at it?

Tim Farron for Home Sec or James Cleverly anyone...?

inactionman wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 10:54 am

tabascoboy wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 10:42 am Why is that those MPs who seem to be credible candidates for senior government are those least likely to ever have a chance at getting a shot at it?

Tim Farron for Home Sec or James Cleverly anyone...?

He looks like a 60s cartoon character but I like him.

Although making the case for decency is tragically quite wasted with this current government.

tabascoboy wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 10:42 am Why is that those MPs who seem to be credible candidates for senior government are those least likely to ever have a chance at getting a shot at it?

Tim Farron for Home Sec or James Cleverly anyone...?

UK sees biggest increase in poverty for 30 years

Hal Jordan wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:41 pm Today's dead cat is a RAGE ABOUT THE FLAG COLOURS BEING CHANGED ON THE NEW ENGLAND FOOTBALL SHIRT!

Condemned by idiots everywhere, including the Tories, Labour and the Lib Dems.

Flagshagging twatriots, the lot of them.

inactionman wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:46 pm

Hal Jordan wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:41 pm Today's dead cat is a RAGE ABOUT THE FLAG COLOURS BEING CHANGED ON THE NEW ENGLAND FOOTBALL SHIRT!

Condemned by idiots everywhere, including the Tories, Labour and the Lib Dems.

Flagshagging twatriots, the lot of them.

It's a very weird old thing, not entirely sure what Nike were aiming at.

I do think they should leave national flags - especially on national team kits - alone though.

I like neeps wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:51 pm

inactionman wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:46 pm

Hal Jordan wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:41 pm Today's dead cat is a RAGE ABOUT THE FLAG COLOURS BEING CHANGED ON THE NEW ENGLAND FOOTBALL SHIRT!

Condemned by idiots everywhere, including the Tories, Labour and the Lib Dems.

Flagshagging twatriots, the lot of them.

It's a very weird old thing, not entirely sure what Nike were aiming at.

I do think they should leave national flags - especially on national team kits - alone though.

sockwithaticket wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 11:02 am

tabascoboy wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 10:42 am Why is that those MPs who seem to be credible candidates for senior government are those least likely to ever have a chance at getting a shot at it?

Tim Farron for Home Sec or James Cleverly anyone...?

inactionman wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:46 pm

Hal Jordan wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:41 pm Today's dead cat is a RAGE ABOUT THE FLAG COLOURS BEING CHANGED ON THE NEW ENGLAND FOOTBALL SHIRT!

Condemned by idiots everywhere, including the Tories, Labour and the Lib Dems.

Flagshagging twatriots, the lot of them.

It's a very weird old thing, not entirely sure what Nike were aiming at.

I do think they should leave national flags - especially on national team kits - alone though.

fishfoodie wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 4:47 pm It'd be nice if you had a Home Secretary for a few years that was focused on fixing the fact that the Justice system is fucked from end to end, rather than just trying to cram more people into it, by criminalizing protest, or just being poor

I mean lets look at the bits that are broken.

- The youth systems designed to stop kids becoming career criminals
- The Police, specifically the Met
- The Courts
- The Prisons
- The Probation systems
& yes, the immigration system that isn't processing immigrants & deciding if they have grounds for getting asylum.

inactionman wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:46 pm

Hal Jordan wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:41 pm Today's dead cat is a RAGE ABOUT THE FLAG COLOURS BEING CHANGED ON THE NEW ENGLAND FOOTBALL SHIRT!

Condemned by idiots everywhere, including the Tories, Labour and the Lib Dems.

Flagshagging twatriots, the lot of them.

It's a very weird old thing, not entirely sure what Nike were aiming at.

I do think they should leave national flags - especially on national team kits - alone though.

Slick wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 5:36 pm

inactionman wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:46 pm

Hal Jordan wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 3:41 pm Today's dead cat is a RAGE ABOUT THE FLAG COLOURS BEING CHANGED ON THE NEW ENGLAND FOOTBALL SHIRT!

Condemned by idiots everywhere, including the Tories, Labour and the Lib Dems.

Flagshagging twatriots, the lot of them.

It's a very weird old thing, not entirely sure what Nike were aiming at.

I do think they should leave national flags - especially on national team kits - alone though.

Agree, pretty silly thing to do and not fair to brand everyone who doesn't like it an idiot.

And Bavarian premier Markus Soeder said the national team always plays in the three stripes of Adidas. "That was as clear as the fact that the ball is round and a game lasts 90 minutes," he said.

"The success story began in 1954 with the unforgettable World Cup victory, which gave our country self-confidence again. That's why it's wrong, a shame and also incomprehensible that this story should end now."

He said [German] football should not be "a pawn in international corporate battles" and that "commerce isn't everything".

inactionman wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:24 pm I'm not sure everyone is furious, some of us are just a bit nonplussed.

It's the national team kit, I just think the national flag - if it's going to be incorporated as an icon - should be unadulterated. It's not really any more complicated than that, and I really couldn't care that much one way or the other. It's just my personal preference.

I am, however, furious that its £125 - one hundred and twenty five quid - and £120 for kids. Just fuck off with that money-grubbing and exploitative pricing. There's just no justification whatsoever.

On a related note Germany are ditching Adidas for Nike come 2027, and many German politicians are not that happy:

And Bavarian premier Markus Soeder said the national team always plays in the three stripes of Adidas. "That was as clear as the fact that the ball is round and a game lasts 90 minutes," he said.

"The success story began in 1954 with the unforgettable World Cup victory, which gave our country self-confidence again. That's why it's wrong, a shame and also incomprehensible that this story should end now."

This bit could apply to pretty much every nation:

He said [German] football should not be "a pawn in international corporate battles" and that "commerce isn't everything".

Amen to that. £125. Utterly scandalous.



etra: link to article about German kit:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-68634777

I like neeps wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:32 pm

inactionman wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:24 pm I'm not sure everyone is furious, some of us are just a bit nonplussed.

It's the national team kit, I just think the national flag - if it's going to be incorporated as an icon - should be unadulterated. It's not really any more complicated than that, and I really couldn't care that much one way or the other. It's just my personal preference.

I am, however, furious that its £125 - one hundred and twenty five quid - and £120 for kids. Just fuck off with that money-grubbing and exploitative pricing. There's just no justification whatsoever.

On a related note Germany are ditching Adidas for Nike come 2027, and many German politicians are not that happy:

And Bavarian premier Markus Soeder said the national team always plays in the three stripes of Adidas. "That was as clear as the fact that the ball is round and a game lasts 90 minutes," he said.

"The success story began in 1954 with the unforgettable World Cup victory, which gave our country self-confidence again. That's why it's wrong, a shame and also incomprehensible that this story should end now."

This bit could apply to pretty much every nation:

He said [German] football should not be "a pawn in international corporate battles" and that "commerce isn't everything".

Amen to that. £125. Utterly scandalous.



etra: link to article about German kit:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-68634777

Germany in the same boat as the UK going through a pretty nasty time economically with the Russian gas taps turned off and their own populists to indulge/placate.

But no, I've now seen the Scotland kit and I too am very upset. I hope Sunak, Starmer, and Davey can also ask Adidas to fix it. It's a very important issue.

inactionman wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:34 pm

I like neeps wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:32 pm

inactionman wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:24 pm I'm not sure everyone is furious, some of us are just a bit nonplussed.

It's the national team kit, I just think the national flag - if it's going to be incorporated as an icon - should be unadulterated. It's not really any more complicated than that, and I really couldn't care that much one way or the other. It's just my personal preference.

I am, however, furious that its £125 - one hundred and twenty five quid - and £120 for kids. Just fuck off with that money-grubbing and exploitative pricing. There's just no justification whatsoever.

On a related note Germany are ditching Adidas for Nike come 2027, and many German politicians are not that happy:



This bit could apply to pretty much every nation:



Amen to that. £125. Utterly scandalous.



etra: link to article about German kit:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-68634777

Germany in the same boat as the UK going through a pretty nasty time economically with the Russian gas taps turned off and their own populists to indulge/placate.

But no, I've now seen the Scotland kit and I too am very upset. I hope Sunak, Starmer, and Davey can also ask Adidas to fix it. It's a very important issue.

You do seem a bit exercised about something.

I like neeps wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:44 pm

inactionman wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:34 pm

I like neeps wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:32 pm

Germany in the same boat as the UK going through a pretty nasty time economically with the Russian gas taps turned off and their own populists to indulge/placate.

But no, I've now seen the Scotland kit and I too am very upset. I hope Sunak, Starmer, and Davey can also ask Adidas to fix it. It's a very important issue.

You do seem a bit exercised about something.

Quite exercised that in the week when the figures on UK poverty increase and having today volunteered for a charity that it's involved in combatting poverty the charlatans we have in politics are talking about a flag. And the English one and not the Scottish flag at that. Yes.

inactionman wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:51 pm

I like neeps wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:44 pm

inactionman wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:34 pm

You do seem a bit exercised about something.

Quite exercised that in the week when the figures on UK poverty increase and having today volunteered for a charity that it's involved in combatting poverty the charlatans we have in politics are talking about a flag. And the English one and not the Scottish flag at that. Yes.

They've hardly convened Cobra over it. It's a few soundbites.


Your final point is a bit puzzling.. MPs can't discuss anything to do with England as it doesn't concern Scottish people. Eh? Is that really what you meant?

Slick wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 9:23 pm

inactionman wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:51 pm

I like neeps wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:44 pm

Quite exercised that in the week when the figures on UK poverty increase and having today volunteered for a charity that it's involved in combatting poverty the charlatans we have in politics are talking about a flag. And the English one and not the Scottish flag at that. Yes.

They've hardly convened Cobra over it. It's a few soundbites.


Your final point is a bit puzzling.. MPs can't discuss anything to do with England as it doesn't concern Scottish people. Eh? Is that really what you meant?

To be perfectly honest, there is a fair bit of irony about a Scotsman telling anyone not to get upset over a flag

Tichtheid wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 10:01 pm

Slick wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 9:23 pm

inactionman wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:51 pm

They've hardly convened Cobra over it. It's a few soundbites.


Your final point is a bit puzzling.. MPs can't discuss anything to do with England as it doesn't concern Scottish people. Eh? Is that really what you meant?

To be perfectly honest, there is a fair bit of irony about a Scotsman telling anyone not to get upset over a flag

Nah, Neeps is talking about poverty and media coverage, not flags

I know of a charity which deals with the people who slip though all of the nets, the government and local council won't help them and they are the absolute last resort for people facing destitution and starvation. They're really up against it because the economy is fucked and everyone (every charity) is chasing an ever-decreasing pot of funding - this is not the big "sexy" charities like Greenpeace or Shelter or donkey sanctuaries (all of which do great work), this is tiny charities which help a tiny number of people who have been turned away by everyone else

Slick wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 10:29 pm

Tichtheid wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 10:01 pm

Slick wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 9:23 pm

To be perfectly honest, there is a fair bit of irony about a Scotsman telling anyone not to get upset over a flag

Nah, Neeps is talking about poverty and media coverage, not flags

I know of a charity which deals with the people who slip though all of the nets, the government and local council won't help them and they are the absolute last resort for people facing destitution and starvation. They're really up against it because the economy is fucked and everyone (every charity) is chasing an ever-decreasing pot of funding - this is not the big "sexy" charities like Greenpeace or Shelter or donkey sanctuaries (all of which do great work), this is tiny charities which help a tiny number of people who have been turned away by everyone else

Weird post

inactionman wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:51 pm

I like neeps wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:44 pm

inactionman wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:34 pm

You do seem a bit exercised about something.

Quite exercised that in the week when the figures on UK poverty increase and having today volunteered for a charity that it's involved in combatting poverty the charlatans we have in politics are talking about a flag. And the English one and not the Scottish flag at that. Yes.

They've hardly convened Cobra over it. It's a few soundbites.


Your final point is a bit puzzling.. MPs can't discuss anything to do with England as it doesn't concern Scottish people. Eh? Is that really what you meant?

Tichtheid wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 11:11 pm

Slick wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 10:29 pm

Tichtheid wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 10:01 pm



Nah, Neeps is talking about poverty and media coverage, not flags

I know of a charity which deals with the people who slip though all of the nets, the government and local council won't help them and they are the absolute last resort for people facing destitution and starvation. They're really up against it because the economy is fucked and everyone (every charity) is chasing an ever-decreasing pot of funding - this is not the big "sexy" charities like Greenpeace or Shelter or donkey sanctuaries (all of which do great work), this is tiny charities which help a tiny number of people who have been turned away by everyone else

Weird post

You'll have to help me out here, what is weird about it?

Slick wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2024 8:09 am

Tichtheid wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 11:11 pm

Slick wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 10:29 pm

Weird post

You'll have to help me out here, what is weird about it?

Well, given he was the very first person to bring up flags, and then answered 3 or 4 posts about flags, I think it’s fair to say he was also talking about flags.

Insane_Homer wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2024 8:12 am lol bollocks.jpg

Tichtheid wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2024 9:13 am

Slick wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2024 8:09 am

Tichtheid wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 11:11 pm



You'll have to help me out here, what is weird about it?

Well, given he was the very first person to bring up flags, and then answered 3 or 4 posts about flags, I think it’s fair to say he was also talking about flags.

I read Neeps’ posts in a different way, I thought he was using flags as an example of the trivial matters that are used to whip up outrage by and from the usual suspects.

There doesn’t seem to be outrage at the conditions some people are forced to exist in.

I honestly have no idea what was ‘woke’ about the embroidery on the collar of the England shirt, I actually thought it looked quite cool.

Edit, I thought the same about that cafe in Edinburgh castle and the name that sparked outrage, it’s trivial bollocks

Biffer wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2024 9:23 am

Tichtheid wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2024 9:13 am

Slick wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2024 8:09 am

Well, given he was the very first person to bring up flags, and then answered 3 or 4 posts about flags, I think it’s fair to say he was also talking about flags.

I read Neeps’ posts in a different way, I thought he was using flags as an example of the trivial matters that are used to whip up outrage by and from the usual suspects.

There doesn’t seem to be outrage at the conditions some people are forced to exist in.

I honestly have no idea what was ‘woke’ about the embroidery on the collar of the England shirt, I actually thought it looked quite cool.

Edit, I thought the same about that cafe in Edinburgh castle and the name that sparked outrage, it’s trivial bollocks

Colours are roughly the same as used by bisexual campaigners.