Official Italy v England thread
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8223
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Well deserved score for Italy, & means they out scored England 3 tries to 2 !
Which says a great deal about England attack.
Which says a great deal about England attack.
- Margin__Walker
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am
It's going to be a long 6N. Unlucky Italy
Saw a bit from Underhill, not going to do ruck marks, but without doing them, I'm always reluctant to pick out forwards.
Daly, please can he be gone, so many better options, or equal and younger options.
Didn't see a huge amount from Dingwall, which may not be too much of a bad thing.
Daly, please can he be gone, so many better options, or equal and younger options.
Didn't see a huge amount from Dingwall, which may not be too much of a bad thing.
Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
Not really unlucky, just a bit too shit in the second half
Some good things for Quesada to build on though
Steward did fine, carried well in traffic, put in some huge hits, kicked well and dominated in the air. Daly was poor, Underhill anonymous, Dingwall a revolving door in defence, and Chessum was some way off his usual standard.
ESPN has Dingwall as 9/5 in defence and 3m from 2 carries. A few nice passes though.Raggs wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 4:15 pm Saw a bit from Underhill, not going to do ruck marks, but without doing them, I'm always reluctant to pick out forwards.
Daly, please can he be gone, so many better options, or equal and younger options.
Didn't see a huge amount from Dingwall, which may not be too much of a bad thing.
Have to absolutely disagree with you that, watch him for the second and last try, absolutely nowhere.
-
- Posts: 8663
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
You're going over the top again. Steward was a mixed bag, not an empty shirt. Defensively caught out of position a few times, but good under the high ball and with ball in hand.ASMO wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 4:23 pmHave to absolutely disagree with you that, watch him for the second and last try, absolutely nowhere.
Not sure why underhill was selected. Steward is fine if balanced with pace but not with a has been like daly.
Agreed. Freeman looked good. So too roots.
Could really use a heavy carrier somewhere else.
Ultimately though, I feel some empathy for the team that lost their starting fly half and 12, then had an in/out position on 9 too all witching a fortnight of starting their first game.
Stuff that’s manageable when there’s an established team, but must be a right pain in the bumhole if you’re trying to start a new team.
-
- Posts: 8663
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
Giving that is pretty generous. I haven't seen anything to indicate anyone but Ford was intended to be the starting fly half.Random1 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 8:13 pmAgreed. Freeman looked good. So too roots.
Could really use a heavy carrier somewhere else.
Ultimately though, I feel some empathy for the team that lost their starting fly half and 12, then had an in/out position on 9 too all witching a fortnight of starting their first game.
Stuff that’s manageable when there’s an established team, but must be a right pain in the bumhole if you’re trying to start a new team.
Freeman at 13 instead of Slade, Roebuck to the wing would be a net positive for additional carrying in the backs. Feyi-Waboso to wing instead of that useless twat Daly.
-
- Posts: 8663
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
I'm reluctant to bin players off after 1 cap. Freeman himself didn't have the most auspicious first couple of caps, some players just need a little run to get them up to speed.
Slade might have done alright, but I don't think he's a good partner for Dingwall. Slade needs a carrier inside him, Dingwall needs a carrier or strike runner outside him. If we're set on using him it would probably help bed him in having a clubmate outside who he's played in a parnetship with.
Slade might have done alright, but I don't think he's a good partner for Dingwall. Slade needs a carrier inside him, Dingwall needs a carrier or strike runner outside him. If we're set on using him it would probably help bed him in having a clubmate outside who he's played in a parnetship with.
Does Slade need that? He didn't today - made good yards and was threatening most times he got the ball. Dingwall is only there because of multiple injuries, after allsockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 9:13 pm I'm reluctant to bin players off after 1 cap. Freeman himself didn't have the most auspicious first couple of caps, some players just need a little run to get them up to speed.
Slade might have done alright, but I don't think he's a good partner for Dingwall. Slade needs a carrier inside him, Dingwall needs a carrier or strike runner outside him. If we're set on using him it would probably help bed him in having a clubmate outside who he's played in a parnetship with.
-
- Posts: 8663
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am
He carried about as effectively as he ever has, but if he's going to make a break and not have to take contact, he generally needs someone clearing room for him. He's not quick enough to turn a half break in to a full one or take a gap as clean break on its own like Marchant or Joseph were. Slade's best England games generally came outside Tuilagi.JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 9:22 pmDoes Slade need that? He didn't today - made good yards and was threatening most times he got the ball. Dingwall is only there because of multiple injuries, after allsockwithaticket wrote: ↑Sat Feb 03, 2024 9:13 pm I'm reluctant to bin players off after 1 cap. Freeman himself didn't have the most auspicious first couple of caps, some players just need a little run to get them up to speed.
Slade might have done alright, but I don't think he's a good partner for Dingwall. Slade needs a carrier inside him, Dingwall needs a carrier or strike runner outside him. If we're set on using him it would probably help bed him in having a clubmate outside who he's played in a parnetship with.
We need someone at 12, for now it probably has to Dingwall. There's a reason Exeter never really push Slade there even this season when Devoto was out and Hendrickson moved on.
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
I don't think Slade is a good enough defender at 13 at Trst level. Unlike, say, JJ or Marchant, you never feel he's marshaling his guy, and you never feel he has the pace to cover if it goes tits up.
- Paddington Bear
- Posts: 5961
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
- Location: Hertfordshire
Take on the game:
Italy I think have answered the question of which is the real Italy, 6N or RWC. All most of us have asked of them is for games like that. Their ambition and pace in attack is excellent and their pack competed pretty well.
England? Definitely showed much more ambition in attack. I liked our running lines and some of the moves we were running. It’s all too slow still - Mitchell is at the ruck and it takes us a good few seconds to present it. This surely can be coached out of them.
George showed maturity as captain. At 17-8 in a game you expect to win it’s easy to chase the game and end up giving Italy easy wins in defence. Chipping away at them was exactly the right call.
Freeman was good, Dingwall was not, Roots was an impressive hard bastard worth picking.
Our defensive system still leaves massive gaps on the wing. Papers suggest it’s teething problems of a blitz defence but we’ll see.
Italy I think have answered the question of which is the real Italy, 6N or RWC. All most of us have asked of them is for games like that. Their ambition and pace in attack is excellent and their pack competed pretty well.
England? Definitely showed much more ambition in attack. I liked our running lines and some of the moves we were running. It’s all too slow still - Mitchell is at the ruck and it takes us a good few seconds to present it. This surely can be coached out of them.
George showed maturity as captain. At 17-8 in a game you expect to win it’s easy to chase the game and end up giving Italy easy wins in defence. Chipping away at them was exactly the right call.
Freeman was good, Dingwall was not, Roots was an impressive hard bastard worth picking.
Our defensive system still leaves massive gaps on the wing. Papers suggest it’s teething problems of a blitz defence but we’ll see.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
- Uncle fester
- Posts: 4192
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:42 pm
So yes England were shite but Italy at home can be an awkward proposition, especially in the first game.
Didnt think they were too shite but lots to work onUncle fester wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 10:18 am So yes England were shite but Italy at home can be an awkward proposition, especially in the first game.
-
- Posts: 3065
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:37 am
We got sprung quite a few times, makes you wonder/worry what would have happened had Capuozzo been fit. Italy were prepared to have a go and deservedly made good yards out wide, but it seemed a bit easy to get overlaps.Paddington Bear wrote: ↑Sun Feb 04, 2024 8:43 am Take on the game:
Italy I think have answered the question of which is the real Italy, 6N or RWC. All most of us have asked of them is for games like that. Their ambition and pace in attack is excellent and their pack competed pretty well.
England? Definitely showed much more ambition in attack. I liked our running lines and some of the moves we were running. It’s all too slow still - Mitchell is at the ruck and it takes us a good few seconds to present it. This surely can be coached out of them.
George showed maturity as captain. At 17-8 in a game you expect to win it’s easy to chase the game and end up giving Italy easy wins in defence. Chipping away at them was exactly the right call.
Freeman was good, Dingwall was not, Roots was an impressive hard bastard worth picking.
Our defensive system still leaves massive gaps on the wing. Papers suggest it’s teething problems of a blitz defence but we’ll see.