2023 Six Nations

Where goats go to escape
sockwithaticket
Posts: 8663
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am

Slick wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:08 pm
sockwithaticket wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 7:41 pm Not having any of that. No 10 looks particularly good when their pack is collectively skullfucked like that and yet he was a rare source of bright moments today. Plenty of occasions where he got ball on the back foot and put a forward back onto the front foot with his footwork and pass selection. There's only so much a 10 can do when the forwards can't/won't support the breakdown adequately and those outside him keep dropping or knocking the ball on in contact.
Sorry, no, that’s mad. He was pretty awful
You were wrong about Aki yesterday and you're wrong about Smith today.
Deveron Boy
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2020 5:51 pm

JM2K6 wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:07 pm
Deveron Boy wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:05 pm As I am following bored convention and don’t want to invade/comment on England Rugby thread; can the bellend that posted there after Italy game ‘’ be interesting to see how we go against the big teams’ just update us on his thoughts? 😁😁😁 England are miles away from big 4 down with Aus, Scot, Argie and wales in div 2 but there is a proportion of their fan base that refuses to accept that…
Ireland and France are quite clearly the big teams in this competition tbf.
Agree completely but it’s the fans that still place Eng in that group that trigger us celts!
TheFrog
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:29 am

JM2K6 wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:07 pm
Deveron Boy wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:05 pm As I am following bored convention and don’t want to invade/comment on England Rugby thread; can the bellend that posted there after Italy game ‘’ be interesting to see how we go against the big teams’ just update us on his thoughts? 😁😁😁 England are miles away from big 4 down with Aus, Scot, Argie and wales in div 2 but there is a proportion of their fan base that refuses to accept that…
Ireland and France are quite clearly the big teams in this competition tbf.
I still think Ireland are ahead of France. It took France a massive effort to beat Ireland at home last year, yet Ireland were comfortable this year and the score highlighted that.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9797
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Let them have their moment. Clinging to moments of good in an otherwise poor display isn't going to convince anyone who doesn't rate him and nor should it. It's up to Smith to prove them wrong and he'll get chances under pressure when the team hasn't fallen apart from the start to prove them wrong or right.

Yes, singling him out is weird but it's hardly a surprise and that's the price paid for players like that with the hype that comes along with him.
TheFrog
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:29 am

sockwithaticket wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:12 pm
Slick wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:08 pm
sockwithaticket wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 7:41 pm Not having any of that. No 10 looks particularly good when their pack is collectively skullfucked like that and yet he was a rare source of bright moments today. Plenty of occasions where he got ball on the back foot and put a forward back onto the front foot with his footwork and pass selection. There's only so much a 10 can do when the forwards can't/won't support the breakdown adequately and those outside him keep dropping or knocking the ball on in contact.
Sorry, no, that’s mad. He was pretty awful
You were wrong about Aki yesterday and you're wrong about Smith today.
Do you think Smith was any good? I thought he was really poor. Granted, he played behind a beaten pack but even his kicking of hand was terrible.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9797
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Deveron Boy wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:13 pm
JM2K6 wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:07 pm
Deveron Boy wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:05 pm As I am following bored convention and don’t want to invade/comment on England Rugby thread; can the bellend that posted there after Italy game ‘’ be interesting to see how we go against the big teams’ just update us on his thoughts? 😁😁😁 England are miles away from big 4 down with Aus, Scot, Argie and wales in div 2 but there is a proportion of their fan base that refuses to accept that…
Ireland and France are quite clearly the big teams in this competition tbf.
Agree completely but it’s the fans that still place Eng in that group that trigger us celts!
Oh, I see. There's nothing in the quotes you've given us that suggested England were being put on the same level as those sides, though. It's not like we haven't just had the worst losing run for a very long time.
sockwithaticket
Posts: 8663
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am

TheFrog wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:15 pm
sockwithaticket wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:12 pm
Slick wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:08 pm

Sorry, no, that’s mad. He was pretty awful
You were wrong about Aki yesterday and you're wrong about Smith today.
Do you think Smith was any good? I thought he was really poor. Granted, he played behind a beaten pack but even his kicking of hand was terrible.
No I don't think he was good. No one in that England performance was good, but in admidst all that rubbish he was one of the better performers (tallest midget, least smelly shit, etc.), so it's weird to single him out. It smacks of people who already don't like him because he's young, hyped and has floppy hair confirming their own bias.
sockwithaticket
Posts: 8663
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am

JM2K6 wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:15 pm Let them have their moment. Clinging to moments of good in an otherwise poor display isn't going to convince anyone who doesn't rate him and nor should it. It's up to Smith to prove them wrong and he'll get chances under pressure when the team hasn't fallen apart from the start to prove them wrong or right.

Yes, singling him out is weird but it's hardly a surprise and that's the price paid for players like that with the hype that comes along with him.
True, I should log off and go drown my sorrows in pizza.
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

So tomorrow becomes really important then.

From a Scotland fan point of view, it's god to be in big games this late in the tournament.

Let's fuck them up.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
TheFrog
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:29 am

sockwithaticket wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:20 pm
TheFrog wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:15 pm
sockwithaticket wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:12 pm

You were wrong about Aki yesterday and you're wrong about Smith today.
Do you think Smith was any good? I thought he was really poor. Granted, he played behind a beaten pack but even his kicking of hand was terrible.
No I don't think he was good. No one in that England performance was good, but in admidst all that rubbish he was one of the better performers (tallest midget, least smelly shit, etc.), so it's weird to single him out. It smacks of people who already don't like him because he's young, hyped and has floppy hair confirming their own bias.
I see. Tend to agree. A bit like Torque and Ntamack.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5961
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

Deveron Boy wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:13 pm
JM2K6 wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:07 pm
Deveron Boy wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:05 pm As I am following bored convention and don’t want to invade/comment on England Rugby thread; can the bellend that posted there after Italy game ‘’ be interesting to see how we go against the big teams’ just update us on his thoughts? 😁😁😁 England are miles away from big 4 down with Aus, Scot, Argie and wales in div 2 but there is a proportion of their fan base that refuses to accept that…
Ireland and France are quite clearly the big teams in this competition tbf.
Agree completely but it’s the fans that still place Eng in that group that trigger us celts!
‘Lets see how we go against the big boys’ seems a fair comment given we plastered Italy and have never lost to them, and France and Ireland are the best two teams in the world. We found out today how we go against them. No one English has been bracketing us in the top 4 for some time, sorry you’re bullshitting if you pretend otherwise. Just accept that this is all in your head, your idea of England fans is not the reality and everyone knows it right now.
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 11155
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

TheFrog wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:15 pm Do you think Smith was any good? I thought he was really poor. Granted, he played behind a beaten pack but even his kicking of hand was terrible.
Smith isn't picked for his kicking game. He was probably the only Eng player who looked an occasional threat ball in hand.

It's strange seeing people blame a FH playing behind a humiliated pack and a 9 who had a shocker too when some of those same people will be defending a clueless FH playing behind a dominant pack and the best 9 in the world...........
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 11155
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

TheFrog wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:34 pm
sockwithaticket wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:20 pm
TheFrog wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:15 pm

Do you think Smith was any good? I thought he was really poor. Granted, he played behind a beaten pack but even his kicking of hand was terrible.
No I don't think he was good. No one in that England performance was good, but in admidst all that rubbish he was one of the better performers (tallest midget, least smelly shit, etc.), so it's weird to single him out. It smacks of people who already don't like him because he's young, hyped and has floppy hair confirming their own bias.
I see. Tend to agree. A bit like Torque and Ntamack.
Rubbish. I don't like Ntamack because he is sh*t. Simple as.
TheFrog
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:29 am

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:46 pm
TheFrog wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:15 pm Do you think Smith was any good? I thought he was really poor. Granted, he played behind a beaten pack but even his kicking of hand was terrible.
Smith isn't picked for his kicking game. He was probably the only Eng player who looked an occasional threat ball in hand.

It's strange seeing people blame a FH playing behind a humiliated pack and a 9 who had a shocker too when some of those same people will be defending a clueless FH playing behind a dominant pack and the best 9 in the world...........
Then Borthwick is an idiot, because Smith was required to kick a lot. And he didn't do that well.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8223
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

TheFrog wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:49 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:46 pm
TheFrog wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:15 pm Do you think Smith was any good? I thought he was really poor. Granted, he played behind a beaten pack but even his kicking of hand was terrible.
Smith isn't picked for his kicking game. He was probably the only Eng player who looked an occasional threat ball in hand.

It's strange seeing people blame a FH playing behind a humiliated pack and a 9 who had a shocker too when some of those same people will be defending a clueless FH playing behind a dominant pack and the best 9 in the world...........
Then Borthwick is an idiot, because Smith was required to kick a lot. And he didn't do that well.
He needed to kick a lot, because that was the worst performance I can remember seeing from an English pack !

You don't really expect the spectacular from English forwards, just a solid, reliable platform. JvP had a shocker, no doubt, & Smith standing outside got slow ball, & a rampaging French team, that was running thru gain line, while half his forwards were still dragging their arses off the floor.

The performance started with the pack being several levels below dog shit; & that's the most urgent issue for England, with only a week to pick the players up & dust them off.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9797
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Smith can kick very well and he didn't do so today. He's not a one dimensional fly half who doesn't have that ability in his locker. He's not George Ford with the boot, but I distinctly remember several performances where Ford booted good front foot ball away poorly and England have lost eminently winnable games so there's that. Obviously Smith's point of difference is the threat he poses at the gain line and we only saw glimpses of that. He made a couple of decent breaks and the Steward try came when he kickstarted a move with a good bit of footwork and deception before putting a runner through the gap he'd just created, but that's very slim pickings considering he also dropped the ball twice, chipped through to no one a few times, and missed touch with a penalty. Had so many other England players not produced much worse displays then it would matter more - as it is, England were behind the 8 ball from the off and losing every single contest in every area of the pitch.
TheFrog
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:29 am

And only 4 years ago, England trounced France 44-8...
Slick
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

sockwithaticket wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:12 pm
Slick wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 8:08 pm
sockwithaticket wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 7:41 pm Not having any of that. No 10 looks particularly good when their pack is collectively skullfucked like that and yet he was a rare source of bright moments today. Plenty of occasions where he got ball on the back foot and put a forward back onto the front foot with his footwork and pass selection. There's only so much a 10 can do when the forwards can't/won't support the breakdown adequately and those outside him keep dropping or knocking the ball on in contact.
Sorry, no, that’s mad. He was pretty awful
You were wrong about Aki yesterday and you're wrong about Smith today.
Very strange post
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5961
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

TheFrog wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 9:11 pm And only 4 years ago, England trounced France 44-8...
Yes that game crossed my mind as well. Last 6N of a world cup cycle, one team that had been building coherently vs one that was a mess ends in a rout where one side was totally dominant from minute 1...
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
TheFrog
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:29 am

Paddington Bear wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 9:32 pm
TheFrog wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 9:11 pm And only 4 years ago, England trounced France 44-8...
Yes that game crossed my mind as well. Last 6N of a world cup cycle, one team that had been building coherently vs one that was a mess ends in a rout where one side was totally dominant from minute 1...
And that was under Eddie Jones.
User avatar
Paddington Bear
Posts: 5961
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:29 pm
Location: Hertfordshire

TheFrog wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 9:34 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 9:32 pm
TheFrog wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 9:11 pm And only 4 years ago, England trounced France 44-8...
Yes that game crossed my mind as well. Last 6N of a world cup cycle, one team that had been building coherently vs one that was a mess ends in a rout where one side was totally dominant from minute 1...
And that was under Eddie Jones.
Eddie's was a two act play. I loved the first act but he didn't need to return to the stage after it...
Old men forget: yet all shall be forgot, But he'll remember with advantages, What feats he did that day
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 9400
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

TheFrog
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:29 am

Paddington Bear wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 9:35 pm
TheFrog wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 9:34 pm
Paddington Bear wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 9:32 pm

Yes that game crossed my mind as well. Last 6N of a world cup cycle, one team that had been building coherently vs one that was a mess ends in a rout where one side was totally dominant from minute 1...
And that was under Eddie Jones.
Eddie's was a two act play. I loved the first act but he didn't need to return to the stage after it...
I also truly believe that the 2015 crop were an exceptional one, and that Lancaster was unlucky. That crop finished blooming under Eddie Jones and then faded away.
TheFrog
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:29 am

Tichtheid wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:30 pm
That's an angry man.
TheFrog
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:29 am

What is funny though is that a few weeks ago, there were talks of France having peaked too early and things looking compromised for the world cup. And now France are favorite again.



I prefer to take away that we have ended 18 years of English invincibility at Twickenham against France, and won by the largest score in history. Two nice landmarks for this French team. Galthie was crying during the interview. Mind you, he played in 1991...
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8223
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

TheFrog wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 11:11 pm What is funny though is that a few weeks ago, there were talks of France having peaked too early and things looking compromised for the world cup. And now France are favorite again.



I prefer to take away that we have ended 18 years of English invincibility at Twickenham against France, and won by the largest score in history. Two nice landmarks for this French team. Galthie was crying during the interview. Mind you, he played in 1991...
Not by anyone with two brain cells to rub together.

There were multiples more comments saying that the loss was exactly what they needed to bring them back to earth & use it as a learning moment.
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 9400
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

I think there was also talk, not necessarily here, on the French players being tired, but that they wouldn't be in September.
TheFrog
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2020 3:29 am

Tichtheid wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 11:30 pm I think there was also talk, not necessarily here, on the French players being tired, but that they wouldn't be in September.
Actually, the way France prepared this game was to give a week off to the core players of the squad, before bringing them back together for this week of work.
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

TheFrog wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:59 pm
Tichtheid wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:30 pm
That's an angry man.
Justifiably so imo.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
C69
Posts: 3336
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:42 pm

Biffer wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2023 5:42 am
TheFrog wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:59 pm
Tichtheid wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:30 pm
That's an angry man.
Justifiably so imo.
Pathetic really. FFS Italy should have beat that Welsh team. They are a settled group of players v a trial team of kids and experimental combos.
Smattered with some old heads who are past it.

If you can't beat this appalling rabble then it's a sad situation.
robmatic
Posts: 2094
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

Tichtheid wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:30 pm
I think he's not wrong. Yes, Italy should definitely have kept the heid better but I have no idea how Wales got away with no yellow cards in that game.
User avatar
C69
Posts: 3336
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:42 pm

robmatic wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2023 9:33 am
Tichtheid wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:30 pm
I think he's not wrong. Yes, Italy should definitely have kept the heid better but I have no idea how Wales got away with no yellow cards in that game.
Who specifically should have had a yellow?
robmatic
Posts: 2094
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

C69 wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2023 10:07 am
robmatic wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2023 9:33 am
Tichtheid wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:30 pm
I think he's not wrong. Yes, Italy should definitely have kept the heid better but I have no idea how Wales got away with no yellow cards in that game.
Who specifically should have had a yellow?
Repeated infringements usually get your team a yellow, especially in your own 22.
User avatar
C69
Posts: 3336
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:42 pm

robmatic wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2023 10:15 am
C69 wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2023 10:07 am
robmatic wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2023 9:33 am

I think he's not wrong. Yes, Italy should definitely have kept the heid better but I have no idea how Wales got away with no yellow cards in that game.
Who specifically should have had a yellow?
Repeated infringements usually get your team a yellow, especially in your own 22.
I am not disagreeing with you just asking for specifics.
Do you have any? I can see the debate about the Owen Williams pen try but I haven't seen concrete evidence the ref was wrong.
Crowley was a very angry man and rightly so.
Losing to basically an experimental rag tag of a cobbled together unsettled rabble should be his man concren not blaming everything on the officials.
sockwithaticket
Posts: 8663
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am

C69 wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2023 10:07 am
robmatic wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2023 9:33 am
Tichtheid wrote: Sat Mar 11, 2023 10:30 pm
I think he's not wrong. Yes, Italy should definitely have kept the heid better but I have no idea how Wales got away with no yellow cards in that game.
Who specifically should have had a yellow?
Other than repeat infringements that robmatic has mentioned, specific incidents people could point to would be:
- Owen Williams stopping Brex from an offside position. Not entirely clear cut, but the case can be made. Certainly the ref's dismissal on the basis of no ruck having formed was just plain wrong. It doesn't need to be a ruck for there to be an offside line.
- Liam Williams take out in the air that was waved off as a fair contest. He was in no more realistic a position to challenge for the ball than Bruno was for his yellow)
dpedin
Posts: 2975
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

Anyone else think the conditioning of the English forwards just looked awful? They looked well off the pace and lacked any dynamism and power in open play. When you compare the body shapes of their pack with the French, Scottish and Irish packs they look to be carrying a bit of ballast and blowing out of their arses after a phase or two. Scotland and France kept the ball in play, went through multiple phases and knew that gaps in defences would open up as the English pack were so slow in getting up to challenge for the ball or to the defensive line. They also really struggled to make yards when carrying the ball and the leg drives were very poor, they tended to flop over the ball instead of staying on feet and driving and rarely got over the gain line. It made a hard day even harder for VP and Smith who rarely got good fast ball from go forward play, although VP would have wasted it anyway. Mitchell did a bit better when he came on but my blind Granny would have done better tbf.

Borthwick seems to think bringing a traditional English game plan - kicking for position, depending on your huge pack to bully the opposition into mistakes and only playing rugby in oppo 22 - that he used in the Premiership will work at international level. He is now realising that it won't, the world has moved on and the best teams are now are just as big if not bigger, play a far more dynamic, mobile multi phase game keeping the ball in play for longer and happy to keep the ball in hand and go wide if required to find gaps in defences. He is going to struggle getting his team to adapt to the pace of the game, the need for fitness and dynamism in the pack and the mentality and skill levels for a fast game across the whole team.

The Irish pack is going to have a field day next week and won't be as wasteful as the French were yesterday!
User avatar
C69
Posts: 3336
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:42 pm

sockwithaticket wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2023 10:22 am
C69 wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2023 10:07 am
robmatic wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2023 9:33 am

I think he's not wrong. Yes, Italy should definitely have kept the heid better but I have no idea how Wales got away with no yellow cards in that game.
Who specifically should have had a yellow?
Other than repeat infringements that robmatic has mentioned, specific incidents people could point to would be:
- Owen Williams stopping Brex from an offside position. Not entirely clear cut, but the case can be made. Certainly the ref's dismissal on the basis of no ruck having formed was just plain wrong. It doesn't need to be a ruck for there to be an offside line.
- Liam Williams take out in the air that was waved off as a fair contest. He was in no more realistic a position to challenge for the ball than Bruno was for his yellow)
Owen Williams is a debatable one for sure, not to sure if Liam William is even in the same ball park as a strike to the neck which caused a player to leave the field. That for me was appalling and a clear red. if Sanjay had been given a yellow then fair enough.
But to allow a forarm to the throat to be only a yellow was a blatant disregard for player safety.

Italy should have had a red.


That said not beating that Wales team showed that Italy are still awfull. Wales are at least using the 6N to try combos rotate players and are not taking the competition too seriously. Especially given the splits in camp and strike issue.
dpedin
Posts: 2975
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

sockwithaticket wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2023 10:22 am
C69 wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2023 10:07 am
robmatic wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2023 9:33 am

I think he's not wrong. Yes, Italy should definitely have kept the heid better but I have no idea how Wales got away with no yellow cards in that game.
Who specifically should have had a yellow?
Other than repeat infringements that robmatic has mentioned, specific incidents people could point to would be:
- Owen Williams stopping Brex from an offside position. Not entirely clear cut, but the case can be made. Certainly the ref's dismissal on the basis of no ruck having formed was just plain wrong. It doesn't need to be a ruck for there to be an offside line.
- Liam Williams take out in the air that was waved off as a fair contest. He was in no more realistic a position to challenge for the ball than Bruno was for his yellow)
During the match me and son were regularly calling out Welsh pack for foul play at the breakdown, hands in ruck, coming in from side, killing the ball, etc - almost all of which went unpunished. The Brex try should have been a penalty try defo. Williams was defo a YC if Bruno was too. Welsh did their usual and won by pushing rules hard and playing ref well, they barely deserved the win and Italy must have butchered 2-3 dead cert tries, a couple by passing inside having made line break instead of feeding wingers wider out. Italy will be kicking themselves, Welsh will be breathing a huge sigh of relief for winning a game they barely deserved to win.

Italy v Scotland could be a feast of running rugby and I fancy the Italians to score some points but Scotland to score more!
User avatar
C69
Posts: 3336
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:42 pm

Let's be honest Italy should have won that game but...
"Our execution wasn't good enough, and we let ourselves down in that area, which is something we need to look at," said Crowley.
sockwithaticket
Posts: 8663
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am

C69 wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2023 10:29 am
sockwithaticket wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2023 10:22 am
C69 wrote: Sun Mar 12, 2023 10:07 am

Who specifically should have had a yellow?
Other than repeat infringements that robmatic has mentioned, specific incidents people could point to would be:
- Owen Williams stopping Brex from an offside position. Not entirely clear cut, but the case can be made. Certainly the ref's dismissal on the basis of no ruck having formed was just plain wrong. It doesn't need to be a ruck for there to be an offside line.
- Liam Williams take out in the air that was waved off as a fair contest. He was in no more realistic a position to challenge for the ball than Bruno was for his yellow)
Owen Williams is a debatable one for sure, not to sure if Liam William is even in the same ball park as a strike to the neck which caused a player to leave the field. That for me was appalling and a clear red. if Sanjay had been given a yellow then fair enough.
But to allow a forarm to the throat to be only a yellow was a blatant disregard for player safety.

Italy should have had a red.


That said not beating that Wales team showed that Italy are still awfull. Wales are at least using the 6N to try combos rotate players and are not taking the competition too seriously. Especially given the splits in camp and strike issue.
I think it was Cannone who got the yellow for the forearm, Bruno was for a bad challenge in the air when Italy put up a crossfield kick which is where it's comparable to Williams.

If the officials are convinced the contact point was chest first and it rides up then I can see why they gave yellow. Goodness knows we've seen more than enough apparently straightforward head contacts where officials mitigate because there's simultaneous shoulder contact and some wibble about force mitigation/low danger as a result, so it's not especially surprising. Like those head contact calls it's clear that, despite the rhetoric, player safety isn't at the forefront of these decisions. I was more on their side during the game in thinking it was a yellow because it wasn't as clear cut awful as the recent Tuilagi red for a similar offence (but higher initial contact point), but then I remember Demetri Catrakilis who suffered a horrific throat injury that kept him out for 6 months and left him needing to work with a speech therapist long after apparent recovery. There was also a Worcester player who was out for longer with a similar injury.

There's definitely been a turning point over the last couple of seasons where players are going for a forearm smash rather than a stiff arm fend and most of them get away with it by keeping it just close enough to the body more through luck than judgement. Probably needs a directive from World Rugby to stamp it.

I'm not sure it's accurate to say Wales aren't taking this tournment seriously, but Italy are definitely not as good as everyone wants them to be. A bit like Japan in that respect.
Post Reply