June 2019 - last game for England U20
Feb 2021 - first game for Scotland
https://www.itsrugby.co.uk/player-inter ... 42035.html
All I said about it was that the hypothetical situation where a player is picked up by Saracens and progresses to international level is actually a positive, not a negative. So my opinion is even if Saracens are actively doing that, it's a good thing, not a bad thing. And I find it odd that people would think otherwise!Kawazaki wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 8:38 amJM2K6 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 8:32 amYup, exactly. And I'm with you that this argument cropping up every 6 months is incredibly tedious. It shouldn't happen because people should be bright enough to realise that every country has done something that could reasonably be described as poaching, every country obeys the eligibility laws, and ultimately none of this is worth the energy people put into getting angry about it / defending their own line in the sand. It's a recipe for shitfights based on nothing but piss and vinegar.
Just so we're clear - Saracens are not developing partnership clubs in T2 and T3 countries to develop future England internationals.
It's a ridiculous strawman and I've got no idea why you think it's relevant let alone reply to it!
Tichtheid wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 8:40 am
June 2019 - last game for England U20
Feb 2021 - first game for Scotland
https://www.itsrugby.co.uk/player-inter ... 42035.html
Probably not too different to Martin Johnson thenTichtheid wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 8:40 am
June 2019 - last game for England U20
Feb 2021 - first game for Scotland
https://www.itsrugby.co.uk/player-inter ... 42035.html
JM2K6 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 8:44 amAll I said about it was that the hypothetical situation where a player is picked up by Saracens and progresses to international level is actually a positive, not a negative. So my opinion is even if Saracens are actively doing that, it's a good thing, not a bad thing. And I find it odd that people would think otherwise!Kawazaki wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 8:38 amJM2K6 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 8:32 am
Yup, exactly. And I'm with you that this argument cropping up every 6 months is incredibly tedious. It shouldn't happen because people should be bright enough to realise that every country has done something that could reasonably be described as poaching, every country obeys the eligibility laws, and ultimately none of this is worth the energy people put into getting angry about it / defending their own line in the sand. It's a recipe for shitfights based on nothing but piss and vinegar.
Just so we're clear - Saracens are not developing partnership clubs in T2 and T3 countries to develop future England internationals.
It's a ridiculous strawman and I've got no idea why you think it's relevant let alone reply to it!
PornDog wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 8:39 am Good insights JM
I guess when you get down to it, my main two objections are -
1 The cynical way that the IRFU exploited the residency rule, actively setting up structures (the 4+1 rule) to promote signing of player with an eye on them qualifying through residency. It doesn't reflect on my opinion of those players themselves, but it was some cynical bullshit that really left a sour taste in my mouth. Thankfully that's gone now
2 As you say, the preferential bias often times given to 'foreign' players over domestic ones. You gave some good examples from an English perspective, thankfully I can't really think of of any Irish ones off the top of my head (though Brian Smith and Dion O'Cuinneagain would probably fall into that category in times past), but the whole Edinbokke thing can't be good for the long term development of Scottish rugby
Thing is, 1) was just the IRFU making an existing process (overseas players coming to Ireland and playing rugby with an eye on qualifying for Ireland selection) a more organised and targeted thing. I understand the distaste (my own feelings on this have changed over the years) but ultimately I don't think you saw a sea change in the makeup of Irish rugby. We're talking a handful of players and Ireland were no more or less poachy as a result. The fact that there was some thought behind it is probably a positive, because it logically means that players were being targeted in positions where there was the greatest need.PornDog wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 8:39 am Good insights JM
I guess when you get down to it, my main two objections are -
1 The cynical way that the IRFU exploited the residency rule, actively setting up structures (the 4+1 rule) to promote signing of player with an eye on them qualifying through residency. It doesn't reflect on my opinion of those players themselves, but it was some cynical bullshit that really left a sour taste in my mouth. Thankfully that's gone now
2 As you say, the preferential bias often times given to 'foreign' players over domestic ones. You gave some good examples from an English perspective, thankfully I can't really think of of any Irish ones off the top of my head (though Brian Smith and Dion O'Cuinneagain would probably fall into that category in times past), but the whole Edinbokke thing can't be good for the long term development of Scottish rugby
robmatic wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 9:18 am I think the project player thing in Scottish rugby is pretty much finished now with the 5 year eligibility rule, but I never had much of a problem with it. Those players have arguably proved to be less mercenary than some of the ancestry qualified players who nobody complains about as much.
Even Tim Visser has ended up living in Edinburgh after his retirement and still seems to follow Edinburgh as a fan, and I always thought he was the most cynical of poaches.
To change subject slightly to a potential problem for Irish/Leinster rugby, and that is big English and French clubs offering professional contracts to Irish U19s straight out of school. In the last year or so Leinster have seen Karl Martin go to Montpelier, and Lucas Berti-Newman to Bristol. Both were in the Leinster system, but not under a professional contract.
What was stopping Leinster from giving them contracts?Camroc2 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:02 amTo change subject slightly to a potential problem for Irish/Leinster rugby, and that is big English and French clubs offering professional contracts to Irish U19s straight out of school. In the last year or so Leinster have seen Karl Martin go to Montpelier, and Lucas Berti-Newman to Bristol. Both were in the Leinster system, but not under a professional contract.
Is pro rugby going to go the way of pro soccer, where young men simply become commodities to be traded ?
Camroc2 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:02 amTo change subject slightly to a potential problem for Irish/Leinster rugby, and that is big English and French clubs offering professional contracts to Irish U19s straight out of school. In the last year or so Leinster have seen Karl Martin go to Montpelier, and Lucas Berti-Newman to Bristol. Both were in the Leinster system, but not under a professional contract.
Is pro rugby going to go the way of pro soccer, where young men simply become commodities to be traded ?
It's not gone, it's just now you'd more think about targeting bringing players over at a younger age. The change will have wrought some protections for the international game, and also driven some sourcing/poaching activities which are less desirable in terms of uprooting still younger persons, though even then the idea of aspiration and opportunity isn't without meritPornDog wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 8:39 am Good insights JM
I guess when you get down to it, my main two objections are -
1 The cynical way that the IRFU exploited the residency rule, actively setting up structures (the 4+1 rule) to promote signing of player with an eye on them qualifying through residency. It doesn't reflect on my opinion of those players themselves, but it was some cynical bullshit that really left a sour taste in my mouth. Thankfully that's gone now
What would the alternative be? That those young players be considered the property of the club/franchise, and then even if they don't play senior rugby they still receive renumeration, or even just taken out back and shot if deemed surplus to requirements?Camroc2 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:02 amTo change subject slightly to a potential problem for Irish/Leinster rugby, and that is big English and French clubs offering professional contracts to Irish U19s straight out of school. In the last year or so Leinster have seen Karl Martin go to Montpelier, and Lucas Berti-Newman to Bristol. Both were in the Leinster system, but not under a professional contract.
Is pro rugby going to go the way of pro soccer, where young men simply become commodities to be traded ?
Players on 800k?Kawazaki wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:07 amCamroc2 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:02 amTo change subject slightly to a potential problem for Irish/Leinster rugby, and that is big English and French clubs offering professional contracts to Irish U19s straight out of school. In the last year or so Leinster have seen Karl Martin go to Montpelier, and Lucas Berti-Newman to Bristol. Both were in the Leinster system, but not under a professional contract.
Is pro rugby going to go the way of pro soccer, where young men simply become commodities to be traded ?
It depends. There's been quite a few boasts from Leinster fans that they have 'academy kids' on €10k a year who are already good enough to step in and play URC league games while the players on €800k get a rest before HEC matches.
Nothing bar money. Leinster don't pay sub academy players, and academy players get € 10k - € 12 k pa. It's how our system works. and is able to work. And of course, if there is no contract, there is no obligation. But I don't like the idea of agents outside schoolgates whispering sweet nothings into schoolboy players ears. Perhaps it was always going to happen with professionalism.JM2K6 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:07 amWhat was stopping Leinster from giving them contracts?Camroc2 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:02 amTo change subject slightly to a potential problem for Irish/Leinster rugby, and that is big English and French clubs offering professional contracts to Irish U19s straight out of school. In the last year or so Leinster have seen Karl Martin go to Montpelier, and Lucas Berti-Newman to Bristol. Both were in the Leinster system, but not under a professional contract.
Is pro rugby going to go the way of pro soccer, where young men simply become commodities to be traded ?
CM11 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:20 amPlayers on 800k?Kawazaki wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:07 amCamroc2 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:02 am
To change subject slightly to a potential problem for Irish/Leinster rugby, and that is big English and French clubs offering professional contracts to Irish U19s straight out of school. In the last year or so Leinster have seen Karl Martin go to Montpelier, and Lucas Berti-Newman to Bristol. Both were in the Leinster system, but not under a professional contract.
Is pro rugby going to go the way of pro soccer, where young men simply become commodities to be traded ?
It depends. There's been quite a few boasts from Leinster fans that they have 'academy kids' on €10k a year who are already good enough to step in and play URC league games while the players on €800k get a rest before HEC matches.
Our academy are on about that, less I thought actually but plus benefits.
We'll always miss the odd one but I'm not too worried about the situation currently.
We don't even offer full academy spots out of school anymore let alone full contracts. While we regularly bump players up before they finish the academy programme, it would usually be after year one at the earliest. It generally leads to a squad which we're more sure about as we've gotten to see the players perform before potentially wasting money on them.JM2K6 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:07 amWhat was stopping Leinster from giving them contracts?Camroc2 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:02 amTo change subject slightly to a potential problem for Irish/Leinster rugby, and that is big English and French clubs offering professional contracts to Irish U19s straight out of school. In the last year or so Leinster have seen Karl Martin go to Montpelier, and Lucas Berti-Newman to Bristol. Both were in the Leinster system, but not under a professional contract.
Is pro rugby going to go the way of pro soccer, where young men simply become commodities to be traded ?
hard to defend a system which wants to pay people less than €6 per hour and even wants loyalty in return for pocket money.Camroc2 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:21 amNothing bar money. Leinster don't pay sub academy players, and academy players get € 10k - € 12 k pa. It's how our system works. and is able to work. And of course, if there is no contract, there is no obligation. But I don't like the idea of agents outside schoolgates whispering sweet nothings into schoolboy players ears. Perhaps it was always going to happen with professionalism.JM2K6 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:07 amWhat was stopping Leinster from giving them contracts?Camroc2 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:02 am
To change subject slightly to a potential problem for Irish/Leinster rugby, and that is big English and French clubs offering professional contracts to Irish U19s straight out of school. In the last year or so Leinster have seen Karl Martin go to Montpelier, and Lucas Berti-Newman to Bristol. Both were in the Leinster system, but not under a professional contract.
Is pro rugby going to go the way of pro soccer, where young men simply become commodities to be traded ?
Most academy players would be doing a degree too and wouldn't be expected to train as fully as the main squad. They also get benefits on top of their academy contract. I imagine there's also a match fee for any games they play.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:47 amhard to defend a system which wants to pay people less than €6 per hour and even wants loyalty in return for pocket money.Camroc2 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:21 amNothing bar money. Leinster don't pay sub academy players, and academy players get € 10k - € 12 k pa. It's how our system works. and is able to work. And of course, if there is no contract, there is no obligation. But I don't like the idea of agents outside schoolgates whispering sweet nothings into schoolboy players ears. Perhaps it was always going to happen with professionalism.
And this goes both ways. Some players will end up representing other countries particularly within the home nations. The Irfu are certainly not above it themselves (example below). Talented players will be missed by youth systems. Some player's develop later.JM2K6 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:07 amWhat was stopping Leinster from giving them contracts?Camroc2 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:02 amTo change subject slightly to a potential problem for Irish/Leinster rugby, and that is big English and French clubs offering professional contracts to Irish U19s straight out of school. In the last year or so Leinster have seen Karl Martin go to Montpelier, and Lucas Berti-Newman to Bristol. Both were in the Leinster system, but not under a professional contract.
Is pro rugby going to go the way of pro soccer, where young men simply become commodities to be traded ?
Dan Kelly’s rugby career has not alone been driven by talent but also several serendipitous moments where his ability to change direction off the pitch was every bit as telling as his footwork on it.
The 20-year-old centre is expected to line out at inside centre for the Leicester Tigers in their Champions Cup quarter-final against Leinster at Welford Road on Saturday evening. In a parallel universe the Manchester-born player could well be wearing the blue of Leinster.
It is just two years ago since the teenage Kelly was a popular and central figure in an Ireland team that won their first three matches in the Under-20 Six Nations Championship before the remainder of the tournament and indeed that year’s Junior World Championship was wiped out due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
Kelly, who qualified through his Irish born grandparents, formed a destructive centre partnership with Haydn Hyde, a Londoner who also came through the Exiles IQ system and is now back with Harlequins. Kelly was a year young in 2020 so was eligible again last year. Richie Murphy had taken over the Ireland 20s from Noel McNamara and initial prognosis was that the young centre would be available.
Kelly had been offered a place in the Irish academy system at provincial level but had turned it down on the basis that he wanted to finish his studies at Loughborough University. He was approached by and agreed to sign for the Leicester Tigers, then under Geordan Murphy’s direction, and there is no doubt that there would have been pressure to switch national allegiance, not necessarily from the former Irish fullback and director of rugby at the Tigers but from the club.
Kelly started playing rugby at six in Rochdale before moving to Kirkham Grammar School for his sixth form education. He explained previously in an interview: “I was looking to go to college and Kirkham was such a great place. I was around good coaching and talented people.
“It just kicked me on a bit further. Kirkham was massive education-wise and rugby wise.” He also played with Sale Sharks but the club declined to give him an academy contract.
He went to Loughborough University on a scholarship and there came under the rugby tutelage of the director of rugby Gerard Mullen whom Noel McNamara had coached at Clongowes; Mullen recommended Kelly. Having been a standout player in the 2020 Six Nations, the centre looked set to play an important role with Ireland when the 2021 tournament was played in early summer in Cardiff.
Murphy, who succeeded McNamara as Ireland U-20 coach, had remained in regular contact with Kelly. Indeed, the player had been on several Zoom calls relating to Irish team prep. “We were keen that he would come over here and join the Irish system, but he wanted to finish degree first and then got the opportunity with Tigers,” Murphy said.
Kelly never made it to any training sessions and on the day that Ireland announced their squad for the Under-20 Six Nations, Kelly was named by England head coach Eddie Jones as part of an extended squad for summer internationals.
While there was disappointment that Ireland had lost a talented young player, there was also an understanding as to why he made the decision. Murphy said at the time: “It’s obviously disappointing. Dan is a loss. He was in our system last year. He obviously went back to Leicester and is in college over there. His life is around that area. Within the conversations that the IRFU have had with him, Dan has been very good.
“He really enjoyed his time with us, but he feels that he needs to go in a different direction. We respect his decision, and we move on from it.” Kelly made his senior England debut against Canada at Twickenham last summer.
Kelly has made 42 appearances for the Tigers to date - he has scored three tries and a conversion - and has been acknowledged as a defensive leader for the team despite his tender years. He’s not too shabby going forward either, strong in the carry and with good footwork. It will be interesting to benchmark his development on Saturday.
On the other issue only time will tell whether his switch of national allegiance was the right move
CM11 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:59 amMost academy players would be doing a degree too and wouldn't be expected to train as fully as the main squad. They also get benefits on top of their academy contract. I imagine there's also a match fee for any games they play.Rhubarb & Custard wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:47 amhard to defend a system which wants to pay people less than €6 per hour and even wants loyalty in return for pocket money.Camroc2 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:21 am
Nothing bar money. Leinster don't pay sub academy players, and academy players get € 10k - € 12 k pa. It's how our system works. and is able to work. And of course, if there is no contract, there is no obligation. But I don't like the idea of agents outside schoolgates whispering sweet nothings into schoolboy players ears. Perhaps it was always going to happen with professionalism.
Cheers. I can't remember what academy players are paid but a lot more of them are being promoted to full contracts at the moment due to the salary cap changes. Berti-Newman is EQP so was always going to be involved in a tug of war if he was any good - this time Leinster lost out because another team rated him highly enough to give him a proper contract. C'est la vie, it's a business decision and the player could've gone either way.Camroc2 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:21 amNothing bar money. Leinster don't pay sub academy players, and academy players get € 10k - € 12 k pa. It's how our system works. and is able to work. And of course, if there is no contract, there is no obligation. But I don't like the idea of agents outside schoolgates whispering sweet nothings into schoolboy players ears. Perhaps it was always going to happen with professionalism.JM2K6 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:07 amWhat was stopping Leinster from giving them contracts?Camroc2 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:02 am
To change subject slightly to a potential problem for Irish/Leinster rugby, and that is big English and French clubs offering professional contracts to Irish U19s straight out of school. In the last year or so Leinster have seen Karl Martin go to Montpelier, and Lucas Berti-Newman to Bristol. Both were in the Leinster system, but not under a professional contract.
Is pro rugby going to go the way of pro soccer, where young men simply become commodities to be traded ?
Your imagination is not a reliable source.Kawazaki wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 10:22 am
So you pay lads less than they'd earn working part-time in McDonald's and you're surprised they're looking elsewhere?
And yes, Sexton is easily on €800k.
Mahoney wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 11:22 am I suspect what people really want is a sense that the player is playing for the international side they supported as a child. There's no way to make a window into people's souls of course, so there's no way to prove it, but it's when people strongly suspect this is not the case, and that a player is primarily motivated by the opportunity to play at a higher level and/or the money, that they start throwing the p word around.
Does this include external top-ups? IIRC you guys have deals with third parties to add extras on? Or am I mixing that up with something else entirely...PornDog wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 11:52 amYour imagination is not a reliable source.
Sexton's on less now than when he signed back from Racing for €650k, which as you well know Toga, caused you've been told enough times, includes his pay for playing for Ireland.
Murray's the highest paid Irish player on €700k, again including his Irish pay.
Are the salaries public information?PornDog wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 11:58 am Yes, that would include the amount Denis O'Brien was thought to be contributing to Sexton and what JP is though to give towards Murray. It wouldn't include Sextons earning from promoting Centre, where the ads may well feature a rugby ball, but no Leinster/IRFU kit
It's not as simple as just a £5m cap.TheFrog wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 12:06 pm Looking at these salaries, how can English clubs be competitive with a $5m cap when you need at least 33 players under contract to have a squand with enough depth to last through the whole season?
Does that mean that English players salaries will melt under the sun, or that half of the squad will be made of youths contracts? (Which could do wonders for English rugby at international level).
In France, clubs are suffering an inflation of the JIFF salaries (JIFF are players who came through a French rugby academy - this is way France found to work around European laws to impose quotas protecting home grown players). So an average French player is more expensive than a good foreign player.
Ah. Guesswork. :-)PornDog wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 12:07 pm No - the Sefton one was wildly reported at the time though.
Murray's one I got myself - the local Limerick newspaper had am article up for about 2 hours in the wake of his contract announcement before taking it down. I'd imagine that was a good indicator of its accuracy.
JM2K6 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 12:05 pmAre the salaries public information?PornDog wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 11:58 am Yes, that would include the amount Denis O'Brien was thought to be contributing to Sexton and what JP is though to give towards Murray. It wouldn't include Sextons earning from promoting Centre, where the ads may well feature a rugby ball, but no Leinster/IRFU kit
I see, thank you for the clarification. Still, seems tight compared to the French cap.JM2K6 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 12:08 pmIt's not as simple as just a £5m cap.TheFrog wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 12:06 pm Looking at these salaries, how can English clubs be competitive with a $5m cap when you need at least 33 players under contract to have a squand with enough depth to last through the whole season?
Does that mean that English players salaries will melt under the sun, or that half of the squad will be made of youths contracts? (Which could do wonders for English rugby at international level).
In France, clubs are suffering an inflation of the JIFF salaries (JIFF are players who came through a French rugby academy - this is way France found to work around European laws to impose quotas protecting home grown players). So an average French player is more expensive than a good foreign player.
Home Grown Player Credits totalling £600,000 (up to £50,000 per player) – designed to incentivise clubs to retain home grown talent;
EPS/International Player Credits up to £80,000 per player capped at £400,000 – to cover player absence during international periods;
Injured Player Credits totalling £400,000 – to allow replacement players to cover for long term injuries;
Two Excluded Players – their entire salary is excluded from the salary cap;
Unlimited education fund for players.
It is however a big step down from this season's £6.4m with uncapped EPS credits.
Yes, it is. But the sport in this country loses an amazing amount of money - we don't have the French advantages.TheFrog wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 12:13 pmI see, thank you for the clarification. Still, seems tight compared to the French cap.JM2K6 wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 12:08 pmIt's not as simple as just a £5m cap.TheFrog wrote: ↑Tue May 17, 2022 12:06 pm Looking at these salaries, how can English clubs be competitive with a $5m cap when you need at least 33 players under contract to have a squand with enough depth to last through the whole season?
Does that mean that English players salaries will melt under the sun, or that half of the squad will be made of youths contracts? (Which could do wonders for English rugby at international level).
In France, clubs are suffering an inflation of the JIFF salaries (JIFF are players who came through a French rugby academy - this is way France found to work around European laws to impose quotas protecting home grown players). So an average French player is more expensive than a good foreign player.
Home Grown Player Credits totalling £600,000 (up to £50,000 per player) – designed to incentivise clubs to retain home grown talent;
EPS/International Player Credits up to £80,000 per player capped at £400,000 – to cover player absence during international periods;
Injured Player Credits totalling £400,000 – to allow replacement players to cover for long term injuries;
Two Excluded Players – their entire salary is excluded from the salary cap;
Unlimited education fund for players.
It is however a big step down from this season's £6.4m with uncapped EPS credits.