NPR

Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 1:32 pm

SaintK wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 1:15 pm

Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 1:05 pm Nasty piece from a bitter jock who fails to mention the SNP open support for Hitler. These are the people some will side with over innuendo and sins of the father.


Knowing who the scum are is getting more difficult.

What?

Don’t worry they were a right wing party at the time.

Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 12:02 pm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coats_Group#Controversy

https://caltonjock.com/2015/04/02/itali ... ound-reve/

But Nick found a legal way around the reforms so that all of the employees of Coats-Paton would be exempt from the benefits of the legislation.

This was a time of sweatshops in the textile industries and Nick helped deny rights to his employees.

A study of the timeline of Coats-Patons factories opening globally reveals a hard-line capitalist approach.

When, in developing countries, they were faced with challenges to their mode of operation the company simply “upped sticks” and transferred their power looms to more receptive countries taking full advantage of weaker legal systems and lower wages.

Following a number of mergers, the company is now known as Coats PLC.

It operates sites (together with other multinationals) in many countries worldwide, including India, Peru, Columbia, Ecuador, Brazil, the Philippines, Venezuela, Pakistan, and Turkey.

In the 1970’s World Trading Authorities applied pressure intent on bringing to an end the shoddy business practices of Coats-Paton and other multinationals which were revealed to be tantamount to slavery.

Random1 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 3:12 pm

Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 12:02 pm

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coats_Group#Controversy

https://caltonjock.com/2015/04/02/itali ... ound-reve/

But Nick found a legal way around the reforms so that all of the employees of Coats-Paton would be exempt from the benefits of the legislation.

This was a time of sweatshops in the textile industries and Nick helped deny rights to his employees.

A study of the timeline of Coats-Patons factories opening globally reveals a hard-line capitalist approach.

When, in developing countries, they were faced with challenges to their mode of operation the company simply “upped sticks” and transferred their power looms to more receptive countries taking full advantage of weaker legal systems and lower wages.

Following a number of mergers, the company is now known as Coats PLC.

It operates sites (together with other multinationals) in many countries worldwide, including India, Peru, Columbia, Ecuador, Brazil, the Philippines, Venezuela, Pakistan, and Turkey.

In the 1970’s World Trading Authorities applied pressure intent on bringing to an end the shoddy business practices of Coats-Paton and other multinationals which were revealed to be tantamount to slavery.

Is she a Tory?

Moreso than someone like Andrew neill?

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 5:41 pm Ah come on, Laura was Cummings' mouthpiece for months on end and frequently sacrificed her own credibility in her rush to get the govt's viewpoint out there (and defend it at the same time).

However what her dad did is completely immaterial. Criticism of Tory Laura should be about her own actions - christ knows she's done enough.

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 5:41 pm Ah come on, Laura was Cummings' mouthpiece for months on end and frequently sacrificed her own credibility in her rush to get the govt's viewpoint out there (and defend it at the same time).

However what her dad did is completely immaterial. Criticism of Tory Laura should be about her own actions - christ knows she's done enough.

Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 5:44 pm

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 5:41 pm Ah come on, Laura was Cummings' mouthpiece for months on end and frequently sacrificed her own credibility in her rush to get the govt's viewpoint out there (and defend it at the same time).

However what her dad did is completely immaterial. Criticism of Tory Laura should be about her own actions - christ knows she's done enough.

Imagine how other people feel about the other 50 MSM reporters who shrill for the left.

I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 6:46 pm

Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 5:44 pm

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 5:41 pm Ah come on, Laura was Cummings' mouthpiece for months on end and frequently sacrificed her own credibility in her rush to get the govt's viewpoint out there (and defend it at the same time).

However what her dad did is completely immaterial. Criticism of Tory Laura should be about her own actions - christ knows she's done enough.

Imagine how other people feel about the other 50 MSM reporters who shrill for the left.

Name them.

Random1 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 6:26 pm

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 5:41 pm Ah come on, Laura was Cummings' mouthpiece for months on end and frequently sacrificed her own credibility in her rush to get the govt's viewpoint out there (and defend it at the same time).

However what her dad did is completely immaterial. Criticism of Tory Laura should be about her own actions - christ knows she's done enough.

She’s a reporter reporting things.

I’ve always found her reasonably neutral.

C69 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 6:54 pm

I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 6:46 pm

Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 5:44 pm


Imagine how other people feel about the other 50 MSM reporters who shrill for the left.

Name them.

I can't think of many left wing MSM reporters.

Some may support Labour but actually left wing?

Paul foot was certainly, there are trendy wankers like Owen Jones but he is a pastiche tbh.

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 7:41 pm

C69 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 6:54 pm

I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 6:46 pm

Name them.

I can't think of many left wing MSM reporters.

Some may support Labour but actually left wing?

Paul foot was certainly, there are trendy wankers like Owen Jones but he is a pastiche tbh.

It's utterly inane to pretend that British media isn't dominated by the right wing. Fuck me - we have the Telegraph, the Times, the Mail, the Sun, the Express, the Spectator, plus places like Spiked. Our news media is dominated by the right wing.

C69 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 7:47 pm

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 7:41 pm

C69 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 6:54 pm

I can't think of many left wing MSM reporters.

Some may support Labour but actually left wing?

Paul foot was certainly, there are trendy wankers like Owen Jones but he is a pastiche tbh.

It's utterly inane to pretend that British media isn't dominated by the right wing. Fuck me - we have the Telegraph, the Times, the Mail, the Sun, the Express, the Spectator, plus places like Spiked. Our news media is dominated by the right wing.

Isn't brillo on the board of the group that owns the Spectator?

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 7:41 pm

C69 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 6:54 pm

I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 6:46 pm

Name them.

I can't think of many left wing MSM reporters.

Some may support Labour but actually left wing?

Paul foot was certainly, there are trendy wankers like Owen Jones but he is a pastiche tbh.

It's utterly inane to pretend that British media isn't dominated by the right wing. Fuck me - we have the Telegraph, the Times, the Mail, the Sun, the Express, the Spectator, plus places like Spiked. Our news media is dominated by the right wing.

Lobby wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 8:39 pm

C69 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 7:47 pm

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 7:41 pm

It's utterly inane to pretend that British media isn't dominated by the right wing. Fuck me - we have the Telegraph, the Times, the Mail, the Sun, the Express, the Spectator, plus places like Spiked. Our news media is dominated by the right wing.

Isn't brillo on the board of the group that owns the Spectator?

Brillo is Chairman of the Spectator.

Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 8:43 pm

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 7:41 pm

C69 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 6:54 pm

I can't think of many left wing MSM reporters.

Some may support Labour but actually left wing?

Paul foot was certainly, there are trendy wankers like Owen Jones but he is a pastiche tbh.

It's utterly inane to pretend that British media isn't dominated by the right wing. Fuck me - we have the Telegraph, the Times, the Mail, the Sun, the Express, the Spectator, plus places like Spiked. Our news media is dominated by the right wing.

It’s utterly dishonest to argue that most Broadcast news presents a left , centre/left editorial position. The broadcast news media is dominated by the left.

I also laugh at the Labour supporting journalists aren’t actually left wing.

Newspapers are a diminishing force.

For every “spiked” (actually contains some very left wing writers) there’s a Canary , Novo media ....

For every Spectator there’s the New statesman.....

The idea of this dominance of right is for the birds.

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 7:40 pm

Random1 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 6:26 pm

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 5:41 pm Ah come on, Laura was Cummings' mouthpiece for months on end and frequently sacrificed her own credibility in her rush to get the govt's viewpoint out there (and defend it at the same time).

However what her dad did is completely immaterial. Criticism of Tory Laura should be about her own actions - christ knows she's done enough.

She’s a reporter reporting things.

I’ve always found her reasonably neutral.

A reporter who consistently parrots unnamed "downing street sources" in order to get the Tory line out there without it having to be justified or defended by anyone in particular is essentially a propaganda mouthpiece.

Telling people during the voting process that early reports looked bad for Labour was a massive fuckup, too.

I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:01 pm

Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 8:43 pm

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 7:41 pm

It's utterly inane to pretend that British media isn't dominated by the right wing. Fuck me - we have the Telegraph, the Times, the Mail, the Sun, the Express, the Spectator, plus places like Spiked. Our news media is dominated by the right wing.

It’s utterly dishonest to argue that most Broadcast news presents a left , centre/left editorial position. The broadcast news media is dominated by the left.

I also laugh at the Labour supporting journalists aren’t actually left wing.

Newspapers are a diminishing force.

For every “spiked” (actually contains some very left wing writers) there’s a Canary , Novo media ....

For every Spectator there’s the New statesman.....

The idea of this dominance of right is for the birds.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.indepe ... html%3famp

For the birds indeed.

Random1 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:38 pm

I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:01 pm

Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 8:43 pm



It’s utterly dishonest to argue that most Broadcast news presents a left , centre/left editorial position. The broadcast news media is dominated by the left.

I also laugh at the Labour supporting journalists aren’t actually left wing.

Newspapers are a diminishing force.

For every “spiked” (actually contains some very left wing writers) there’s a Canary , Novo media ....

For every Spectator there’s the New statesman.....

The idea of this dominance of right is for the birds.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.indepe ... html%3famp

For the birds indeed.

Hmmmmm - not sure that’s a particularly meaningful bit of work.

It’s a survey of public perception on stories. The public are asked if they think stories are too right or too left wing.

Hardly scientific.

I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:51 pm

Random1 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:38 pm

I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:01 pm

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.indepe ... html%3famp

For the birds indeed.

Hmmmmm - not sure that’s a particularly meaningful bit of work.

It’s a survey of public perception on stories. The public are asked if they think stories are too right or too left wing.

Hardly scientific.

Okay can go through bimbos points which were rancidly unserious anyway. Paper circulation is falling - but the most red papers Sun, Mail are both radibly right wing. The mail's website is one of the most read in the country and the most of any newspaper. Newspapers still set the agendas. So there is that.

Oh the sun owned by Murdoch who also owns the times, the mail and telegraph owned by non Dom right wing billionaires too.

The Spectator has the new statesmen as a rival. Okay, fair point. What he omits is the spectator has double the circulation. The current Chancellor was best man at Number 10s press secretary and the speccy's PolEds wedding. Andrew Neil their chairman was the BBC's flagship political heavyweight now setting up Fox News. Oh, and their former editor is in number 10.

Spiked is evened out by Novara as contraversial talkshow guests. The Canary is a sewer.

Channel 4 news perhaps is left wing. But to say the broadcast media as a whole is left wing is just nonsense too. The BBC's agenda is set by the papers which are leaning right. Their PolEds are usually Tories - Mr Neil's background discussed. Nick Robinson was president of his universities Tory society. ITV I don't know and Sky is against owned by Mr Murdoch so let's get real there.

Random1 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 12:44 am I get all of your points, and I don’t particularly disagree with the thrust of what you’re saying, but I’d make two points of my own;

1- Perspective on what’s left and right is subjective. I consider myself to be a centrist but I dare say you may think I’m on the right. Bimbo may think I’m a lefty.

The bbc to me is left of centre.

C4 is proper left.

I don’t think this set of conservatives are particularly right wing. But again, that may mean I’m actually on the right rather than centre

2- the definitions of right and left feel really misunderstood. Especially now the have the culture war stuff in the mix too.

All that, leads to a lot of people trying to compartmentalise others - I think it’s clear we’re in the age of ad hominem debate. It’s no longer about the policy or the action. It’s about the individuals doing it; Kuinsberg is a classic example. Stop analysing her. Analyse what she’s saying about the policy she’s talking about. One at a time.

Social media is undermining debate itself, as it makes playing the man, not the ball, easy.

Too easy.

I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:01 pm

Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 8:43 pm

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 7:41 pm

It's utterly inane to pretend that British media isn't dominated by the right wing. Fuck me - we have the Telegraph, the Times, the Mail, the Sun, the Express, the Spectator, plus places like Spiked. Our news media is dominated by the right wing.

It’s utterly dishonest to argue that most Broadcast news presents a left , centre/left editorial position. The broadcast news media is dominated by the left.

I also laugh at the Labour supporting journalists aren’t actually left wing.

Newspapers are a diminishing force.

For every “spiked” (actually contains some very left wing writers) there’s a Canary , Novo media ....

For every Spectator there’s the New statesman.....

The idea of this dominance of right is for the birds.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.indepe ... html%3famp

For the birds indeed.

I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:51 pm

Random1 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:38 pm

I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:01 pm

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.indepe ... html%3famp

For the birds indeed.

Hmmmmm - not sure that’s a particularly meaningful bit of work.

It’s a survey of public perception on stories. The public are asked if they think stories are too right or too left wing.

Hardly scientific.

Okay can go through bimbos points which were rancidly unserious anyway. Paper circulation is falling - but the most red papers Sun, Mail are both radibly right wing. The mail's website is one of the most read in the country and the most of any newspaper. Newspapers still set the agendas. So there is that.

Oh the sun owned by Murdoch who also owns the times, the mail and telegraph owned by non Dom right wing billionaires too.

The Spectator has the new statesmen as a rival. Okay, fair point. What he omits is the spectator has double the circulation. The current Chancellor was best man at Number 10s press secretary and the speccy's PolEds wedding. Andrew Neil their chairman was the BBC's flagship political heavyweight now setting up Fox News. Oh, and their former editor is in number 10.

Spiked is evened out by Novara as contraversial talkshow guests. The Canary is a sewer.

Channel 4 news perhaps is left wing. But to say the broadcast media as a whole is left wing is just nonsense too. The BBC's agenda is set by the papers which are leaning right. Their PolEds are usually Tories - Mr Neil's background discussed. Nick Robinson was president of his universities Tory society. ITV I don't know and Sky is against owned by Mr Murdoch so let's get real there.

Rinkals wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 7:16 am

Random1 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 12:44 am I get all of your points, and I don’t particularly disagree with the thrust of what you’re saying, but I’d make two points of my own;

1- Perspective on what’s left and right is subjective. I consider myself to be a centrist but I dare say you may think I’m on the right. Bimbo may think I’m a lefty.

The bbc to me is left of centre.

C4 is proper left.

I don’t think this set of conservatives are particularly right wing. But again, that may mean I’m actually on the right rather than centre

2- the definitions of right and left feel really misunderstood. Especially now the have the culture war stuff in the mix too.

All that, leads to a lot of people trying to compartmentalise others - I think it’s clear we’re in the age of ad hominem debate. It’s no longer about the policy or the action. It’s about the individuals doing it; Kuinsberg is a classic example. Stop analysing her. Analyse what she’s saying about the policy she’s talking about. One at a time.

Social media is undermining debate itself, as it makes playing the man, not the ball, easy.

Too easy.

I was under the impression that you and Bimbo were one and the same.

Your posts are too closely aligned to his for any other conclusion.

Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 8:31 am

I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:51 pm

Random1 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:38 pm

Hmmmmm - not sure that’s a particularly meaningful bit of work.

It’s a survey of public perception on stories. The public are asked if they think stories are too right or too left wing.

Hardly scientific.

Okay can go through bimbos points which were rancidly unserious anyway. Paper circulation is falling - but the most red papers Sun, Mail are both radibly right wing. The mail's website is one of the most read in the country and the most of any newspaper. Newspapers still set the agendas. So there is that.

Oh the sun owned by Murdoch who also owns the times, the mail and telegraph owned by non Dom right wing billionaires too.

The Spectator has the new statesmen as a rival. Okay, fair point. What he omits is the spectator has double the circulation. The current Chancellor was best man at Number 10s press secretary and the speccy's PolEds wedding. Andrew Neil their chairman was the BBC's flagship political heavyweight now setting up Fox News. Oh, and their former editor is in number 10.

Spiked is evened out by Novara as contraversial talkshow guests. The Canary is a sewer.

Channel 4 news perhaps is left wing. But to say the broadcast media as a whole is left wing is just nonsense too. The BBC's agenda is set by the papers which are leaning right. Their PolEds are usually Tories - Mr Neil's background discussed. Nick Robinson was president of his universities Tory society. ITV I don't know and Sky is against owned by Mr Murdoch so let's get real there.

Publications reflect there readers and viva versa, you’re just confused that there actually conservatives out there.

Erm Sky is owned by Comcast not Murdoch.

I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:51 pm

Random1 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:38 pm

I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:01 pm

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.indepe ... html%3famp

For the birds indeed.

Hmmmmm - not sure that’s a particularly meaningful bit of work.

It’s a survey of public perception on stories. The public are asked if they think stories are too right or too left wing.

Hardly scientific.

Okay can go through bimbos points which were rancidly unserious anyway. Paper circulation is falling - but the most red papers Sun, Mail are both radibly right wing. The mail's website is one of the most read in the country and the most of any newspaper. Newspapers still set the agendas. So there is that.

Oh the sun owned by Murdoch who also owns the times, the mail and telegraph owned by non Dom right wing billionaires too.

The Spectator has the new statesmen as a rival. Okay, fair point. What he omits is the spectator has double the circulation. The current Chancellor was best man at Number 10s press secretary and the speccy's PolEds wedding. Andrew Neil their chairman was the BBC's flagship political heavyweight now setting up Fox News. Oh, and their former editor is in number 10.

Spiked is evened out by Novara as contraversial talkshow guests. The Canary is a sewer.

Channel 4 news perhaps is left wing. But to say the broadcast media as a whole is left wing is just nonsense too. The BBC's agenda is set by the papers which are leaning right. Their PolEds are usually Tories - Mr Neil's background discussed. Nick Robinson was president of his universities Tory society. ITV I don't know and Sky is against owned by Mr Murdoch so let's get real there.

Random1 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 11:29 pm

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 7:40 pm

Random1 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 20, 2020 6:26 pm

She’s a reporter reporting things.

I’ve always found her reasonably neutral.

A reporter who consistently parrots unnamed "downing street sources" in order to get the Tory line out there without it having to be justified or defended by anyone in particular is essentially a propaganda mouthpiece.

Telling people during the voting process that early reports looked bad for Labour was a massive fuckup, too.

But that’s her job, to get the info out. She is a reporter rather than a classic Fox News talking head.

The decisions on running the country are made by government, and so it’s hardly surprising she’ll be spending her time hunting info and reporting what government sources have told her.

On your second point about the early view on mail votes - absolutely agree. Stupid gossipy thing to say and the bbc should have thrown the book. Plus the government should have said something.

Slippery slope shit like that can set precedent and then we end up with trump.

Random1 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 9:42 am

Rinkals wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 7:16 am

Random1 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 12:44 am I get all of your points, and I don’t particularly disagree with the thrust of what you’re saying, but I’d make two points of my own;

1- Perspective on what’s left and right is subjective. I consider myself to be a centrist but I dare say you may think I’m on the right. Bimbo may think I’m a lefty.

The bbc to me is left of centre.

C4 is proper left.

I don’t think this set of conservatives are particularly right wing. But again, that may mean I’m actually on the right rather than centre

2- the definitions of right and left feel really misunderstood. Especially now the have the culture war stuff in the mix too.

All that, leads to a lot of people trying to compartmentalise others - I think it’s clear we’re in the age of ad hominem debate. It’s no longer about the policy or the action. It’s about the individuals doing it; Kuinsberg is a classic example. Stop analysing her. Analyse what she’s saying about the policy she’s talking about. One at a time.

Social media is undermining debate itself, as it makes playing the man, not the ball, easy.

Too easy.

I was under the impression that you and Bimbo were one and the same.

Your posts are too closely aligned to his for any other conclusion.

Ha! I’m not a multi.

I don’t think I’m as righty as bimbo!

I like neeps wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 9:43 am Not even true, as Britain is a right wing country is stands to reason the press is mostly right wing too. Very chicken and egg on who sets who's opinion but they go together.

My point is to suggest the press in the UK is majorly left wing is just an insane opinion to have. It - like the UK electorate - is mostly right wing.

I like neeps wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 9:43 am Not even true, as Britain is a right wing country is stands to reason the press is mostly right wing too. Very chicken and egg on who sets who's opinion but they go together.

My point is to suggest the press in the UK is majorly left wing is just an insane opinion to have. It - like the UK electorate - is mostly right wing.

frodder wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 10:59 am LBC is as left wing as you can get. On Saturday they were out and out pro SNP/Welsh Labour. They spent hours slating BoJo.

Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 11:14 am

frodder wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 10:59 am LBC is as left wing as you can get. On Saturday they were out and out pro SNP/Welsh Labour. They spent hours slating BoJo.

With talk radio being their opposite.


However Obingo is one of the worlds biggest cunts.

frodder wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 10:59 am LBC is as left wing as you can get. On Saturday they were out and out pro SNP/Welsh Labour. They spent hours slating BoJo.

Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 11:11 am

Random1 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 9:42 am

Rinkals wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 7:16 am
I was under the impression that you and Bimbo were one and the same.

Your posts are too closely aligned to his for any other conclusion.

Ha! I’m not a multi.

I don’t think I’m as righty as bimbo!

I’m not right wing. It’s a constant misrepresentation that some here cling on to so they don’t have to address any points made.

Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 11:11 am

Random1 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 9:42 am

Rinkals wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 7:16 am
I was under the impression that you and Bimbo were one and the same.

Your posts are too closely aligned to his for any other conclusion.

Ha! I’m not a multi.

I don’t think I’m as righty as bimbo!

I’m not right wing. It’s a constant misrepresentation that some here cling on to so they don’t have to address any points made.

JM2K6 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 21, 2020 11:21 am I forgot about Hately-Brewer. Genuinely vile.

Surely all you right wingers must be happy with so many prominent people repeating your views on tv, radio, and in the papers? Why be so unhappy about the much smaller proportion of left wingers?