Agree, if I were in the hospitality sector I'd be livid. This was avoidable, it's up there with the care home fiasco.I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Oct 18, 2020 3:34 pmThe blame isn't on the students though. In Oxford this weekend it was "matriculation" which is essentially a pub crawl with gowns on. The university offered a "virtual matriculation" but of course students wanted to go out and about with their new friends and parents wanted to picture their wee dears in robes in Oxford. You could do it virtually in a room on your own but you're missing out and nobody likes to miss out.Slick wrote: ↑Sun Oct 18, 2020 7:24 amIn two minds about this. It seems to me that there are a lot of people not isolating - I’ve said before that students in particular round here appear to be just going about their normal lives but with masks on - so how do we get compliance? But of course folk won’t use the app if they do this.ASMO wrote: ↑Sun Oct 18, 2020 6:35 am And so it begins, nothing guaranteed to make people not participate more than this.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54586897
And they wonder why no one trusts them?
Another step closer to a police state...cunts the lot of them .
Students seem to be a real problem but we seem to be beating about the bush saying this
Who could have predicted students would party, try and squeeze the most of the restricted experience, mingle with anyone and everyone, try to enjoy being 18-21 away from home? Everyone. Who forced them to go to university? The government did to keep the real estate and education bubble afloat and not give universities money as they'd go bust without this farce of incubating and spreading covid in every major university city/town. They're all doing virtual lectures anyway. All this for the monies.
So, coronavirus...
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
Its incredible looking at the statistics from the US; there's no 2nd wave there; they had the initial ramp up of deaths, & then in the early hit States there's a flattening, & then from the 4th of July, it's just a upward ramping of deaths, week after week.
There'll be 250k dead by Election day.
The richest nation on Earth; spending more per head on healthcare, than any other Nation, & this is the result that you get when you have useless cocksuckers in power.
There'll be 250k dead by Election day.
The richest nation on Earth; spending more per head on healthcare, than any other Nation, & this is the result that you get when you have useless cocksuckers in power.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Hong Kong wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 2:42 am sigh. There’s dumb and then there’s orange shitgibbon crony dumb
It’s this type of open minded democratic thought that means the latest science on masks cannot currently be published.
Well done
Publish on Twitter.....Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 7:04 amHong Kong wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 2:42 am sigh. There’s dumb and then there’s orange shitgibbon crony dumb
It’s this type of open minded democratic thought that means the latest science on masks cannot currently be published.
Well done
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Sandstorm wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 7:27 amPublish on Twitter.....Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 7:04 amHong Kong wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 2:42 am sigh. There’s dumb and then there’s orange shitgibbon crony dumb
It’s this type of open minded democratic thought that means the latest science on masks cannot currently be published.
Well done
They’re professional scientists......
No journal will publish it.
It does seem as though Bimbo is suggesting that Science should be subjected to approval on a democratic basis.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 7:27 amPublish on Twitter.....Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 7:04 amHong Kong wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 2:42 am sigh. There’s dumb and then there’s orange shitgibbon crony dumb
It’s this type of open minded democratic thought that means the latest science on masks cannot currently be published.
Well done
All those in favour of masks being ineffectual and counter-productive, say "aye".
Right, that's settled: masks are ineffectual and counter-productive.
Next item: climate change.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Rinkals wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:10 amIt does seem as though Bimbo is suggesting that Science should be subjected to approval on a democratic basis.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 7:27 amPublish on Twitter.....Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 7:04 am
It’s this type of open minded democratic thought that means the latest science on masks cannot currently be published.
Well done
All those in favour of masks being ineffectual and counter-productive, say "aye".
Right, that's settled: masks are ineffectual and counter-productive.
Next item: climate change.
I’m suggesting nothing of the sort, I’m suggesting the Danish study is being avoided for political reasons.
While some of that is undoubtably true, I can't blame the government completely, they have to balance this at every stage.Jockaline wrote: ↑Sun Oct 18, 2020 5:46 pmAgree, if I were in the hospitality sector I'd be livid. This was avoidable, it's up there with the care home fiasco.I like neeps wrote: ↑Sun Oct 18, 2020 3:34 pmThe blame isn't on the students though. In Oxford this weekend it was "matriculation" which is essentially a pub crawl with gowns on. The university offered a "virtual matriculation" but of course students wanted to go out and about with their new friends and parents wanted to picture their wee dears in robes in Oxford. You could do it virtually in a room on your own but you're missing out and nobody likes to miss out.Slick wrote: ↑Sun Oct 18, 2020 7:24 am
In two minds about this. It seems to me that there are a lot of people not isolating - I’ve said before that students in particular round here appear to be just going about their normal lives but with masks on - so how do we get compliance? But of course folk won’t use the app if they do this.
Students seem to be a real problem but we seem to be beating about the bush saying this
Who could have predicted students would party, try and squeeze the most of the restricted experience, mingle with anyone and everyone, try to enjoy being 18-21 away from home? Everyone. Who forced them to go to university? The government did to keep the real estate and education bubble afloat and not give universities money as they'd go bust without this farce of incubating and spreading covid in every major university city/town. They're all doing virtual lectures anyway. All this for the monies.
I'm definitely not saying I wouldn't have been doing the same, I probably would, but the students have to take some responsibily FFS. The choice was don't go at all (uproar uproar) or go and try not to be too much of a dick - they have demonstrably failed. Of course they are going to party, but party in your own areas, don't take it to pubs, don't go out to public places when you are infectious and walk around as if nothing is wrong. There was a balance and the students have taken the piss.
I'd also be furious if I was in the hospitality sector, because of the selfishness and idiocy we have a semi lockdown.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Of course it is! Clowns like you all over the Botnet will jump on the results of this single study and scream that mask wearing isn't necessary. And people out there will use it as just another excuse to go out and behave normally in a very abnormal year.Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:19 am
I’m suggesting nothing of the sort, I’m suggesting the Danish study is being avoided for political reasons.
Wearing a mask down the shops is a part of a large effort to curb Covid and a very small imposition to people. Stop trying to a contrarian for a couple of days and toe the fcuking line. It won't actually rob you of any of your human rights.
No, no Slick! There is no personal responsibility here, it's all 100% the fault of the Govt.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
How dare people “behave normally “.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:40 amOf course it is! Clowns like you all over the Botnet will jump on the results of this single study and scream that mask wearing isn't necessary. And people out there will use it as just another excuse to go out and behave normally in a very abnormal year.Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:19 am
I’m suggesting nothing of the sort, I’m suggesting the Danish study is being avoided for political reasons.
Wearing a mask down the shops is a part of a large effort to curb Covid and a very small imposition to people. Stop trying to a contrarian for a couple of days and toe the fcuking line. It won't actually rob you of any of your human rights.
It’s the latest study by serious scientists....
Wearing a mask to go shopping is to make the scared “feel” better.
That told himBimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:46 amHow dare people “behave normally “.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:40 amOf course it is! Clowns like you all over the Botnet will jump on the results of this single study and scream that mask wearing isn't necessary. And people out there will use it as just another excuse to go out and behave normally in a very abnormal year.Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:19 am
I’m suggesting nothing of the sort, I’m suggesting the Danish study is being avoided for political reasons.
Wearing a mask down the shops is a part of a large effort to curb Covid and a very small imposition to people. Stop trying to a contrarian for a couple of days and toe the fcuking line. It won't actually rob you of any of your human rights.
It’s the latest study by serious scientists....
Wearing a mask to go shopping is to make the scared “feel” better.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
" It’s this type of open minded democratic thought that means the latest science on masks cannot currently be published."Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:19 amRinkals wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:10 amIt does seem as though Bimbo is suggesting that Science should be subjected to approval on a democratic basis.
All those in favour of masks being ineffectual and counter-productive, say "aye".
Right, that's settled: masks are ineffectual and counter-productive.
Next item: climate change.
I’m suggesting nothing of the sort, I’m suggesting the Danish study is being avoided for political reasons.
Let's have a vote on it.
Nature article on face masks, it mentions a Danish studt that is yet to publish its findings
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02801-8
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02801-8
Should be good viewing figures for the Scotland game
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Tichtheid wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:06 am Nature article on face masks, it mentions a Danish studt that is yet to publish its findings
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02801-8
The study that can't find a publisher...
Indeed.Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 12:08 pmTichtheid wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:06 am Nature article on face masks, it mentions a Danish studt that is yet to publish its findings
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02801-8
The study that can't find a publisher...
No support for it from the public.
Democracy strikes again to defeat science!
It's made clear in the article why neither of the two Danish research projects' findings have been published, one is about half way through and the other team isn't ready to publish.
I do wonder why anyone would be arguing against the use of masks though, even if the science was equivocal, and it seems to be stacking up in favour of wearing masks, surely the responsible course of action is to wear one?
The main points for discussion seem to be about the efficacy of some materials used for home-made masks - single layer ones in particular, so the discussion should really about how to get this information across.
I do wonder why anyone would be arguing against the use of masks though, even if the science was equivocal, and it seems to be stacking up in favour of wearing masks, surely the responsible course of action is to wear one?
The main points for discussion seem to be about the efficacy of some materials used for home-made masks - single layer ones in particular, so the discussion should really about how to get this information across.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Rinkals wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 12:22 pmIndeed.Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 12:08 pmTichtheid wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:06 am Nature article on face masks, it mentions a Danish studt that is yet to publish its findings
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02801-8
The study that can't find a publisher...
No support for it from the public.
Democracy strikes again to defeat science!
what? It’s a science study......
There are some people who don't understand scientific process, not too far from here. Some posters would like to see things published immediately, or before the study is finished.Tichtheid wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 12:35 pm It's made clear in the article why neither of the two Danish research projects' findings have been published, one is about half way through and the other team isn't ready to publish.
I do wonder why anyone would be arguing against the use of masks though, even if the science was equivocal, and it seems to be stacking up in favour of wearing masks, surely the responsible course of action is to wear one?
The main points for discussion seem to be about the efficacy of some materials used for home-made masks - single layer ones in particular, so the discussion should really about how to get this information across.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Tichtheid wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 12:35 pm It's made clear in the article why neither of the two Danish research projects' findings have been published, one is about half way through and the other team isn't ready to publish.
I do wonder why anyone would be arguing against the use of masks though, even if the science was equivocal, and it seems to be stacking up in favour of wearing masks, surely the responsible course of action is to wear one?
The main points for discussion seem to be about the efficacy of some materials used for home-made masks - single layer ones in particular, so the discussion should really about how to get this information across.
So the Danish researchers that stated on Twitter they can’t find a publisher are a 3rd Danish study group?
They’re are of course many reasons that masks are a bad idea. None worth discussing with the believers.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
That’d be right on point for comparison.
Mask wearing by the general public was deemed at best inefficient at worse bad for health until about May this year by most western medics and governments.
Vaccines not so much.
29th of January 2020
World Health Organisation statement
https://www.who.int/docs/default-source ... 9-ncov.pdf
World Health Organisation statement
General Advice
Wearing a medical mask is one of the prevention measures to limit spread of certain respiratory diseases, including 2019-nCoV, in affected areas. However, the use of a mask alone is insufficient to provide the adequate level of protection and other equally relevant measures should be adopted. If masks are to be used, this measure must be combined with hand hygiene and other IPC measures to prevent the human-tohuman transmission of 2019-nCov.
https://www.who.int/docs/default-source ... 9-ncov.pdf
There was a good post a few pages ago using a Swiss cheese slice analogy, masks are one layer of protection, used along with social distancing, lock downs, hand hygiene etc, together they provide the best protection we can come up with at this time
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Masks can make those other slices weaker.
Why is everyone so convinced?
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 1:50 pm
Masks can make those other slices weaker.
Why is everyone so convinced?
I can only speak for myself, I'm going by the best available advice at this time, from reading articles in publications such as Nature, BMJ, Scientific American, the evidence is stacking up heavily on one side.
Why don't you have the courage of your convictions and not wear it?Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 1:52 pm
I’m going to wait for the actual science....
I wear a mask though so people like you “feel” better.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Slick wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 2:22 pmWhy don't you have the courage of your convictions and not wear it?Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 19, 2020 1:52 pm
I’m going to wait for the actual science....
I wear a mask though so people like you “feel” better.
My conviction is lower than Sandys fear.