Wales v England I

Where goats go to escape
User avatar
PCPhil
Posts: 2422
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:06 am
Location: Where rivers meet

That had a feel of an end of season Barbarians match.......without any of the skills
“It was a pet, not an animal. It had a name, you don't eat things with names, this is horrific!”
User avatar
Margin__Walker
Posts: 2744
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:47 am

salanya wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:37 pm Awful match, 2 shit teams and a bizarre refereeing performance.

This bunker is nonsense, just an excuse for refs to cop out of decisions. The ref had all the angles and didn't call a shoulder to the head as red.
If the right decision is reached more often and the viewers don't have to sit through 5 minutes of deliberations, I really don't see the problem.
User avatar
PCPhil
Posts: 2422
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 10:06 am
Location: Where rivers meet

Margin__Walker wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:39 pm
salanya wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:37 pm Awful match, 2 shit teams and a bizarre refereeing performance.

This bunker is nonsense, just an excuse for refs to cop out of decisions. The ref had all the angles and didn't call a shoulder to the head as red.
If the right decision is reached more often and the viewers don't have to sit through 5 minutes of deliberations, I really don't see the problem.
Agree
“It was a pet, not an animal. It had a name, you don't eat things with names, this is horrific!”
User avatar
ASMO
Posts: 5423
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:08 pm

Done with England, dont care anymore...
I like neeps
Posts: 3585
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am

Farrell must've done the training course to get the week off his ban so many times he may as well be the trainer.
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

PCPhil wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:40 pm
Margin__Walker wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:39 pm
salanya wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:37 pm Awful match, 2 shit teams and a bizarre refereeing performance.

This bunker is nonsense, just an excuse for refs to cop out of decisions. The ref had all the angles and didn't call a shoulder to the head as red.
If the right decision is reached more often and the viewers don't have to sit through 5 minutes of deliberations, I really don't see the problem.
Agree
The correct decision was made. The game just cracked on. The crowd baying influence was not there.

The system worked and works well.
Slick
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

PCPhil wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:40 pm
Margin__Walker wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:39 pm
salanya wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:37 pm Awful match, 2 shit teams and a bizarre refereeing performance.

This bunker is nonsense, just an excuse for refs to cop out of decisions. The ref had all the angles and didn't call a shoulder to the head as red.
If the right decision is reached more often and the viewers don't have to sit through 5 minutes of deliberations, I really don't see the problem.
Agree
Yup. Slightly bizarre thing to be moaning about
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
User avatar
Ymx
Posts: 8557
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:03 pm

Rugby World Cups almost never go to script, but these teams looked like semi final / quarter final fodder.
Slick
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

I like neeps wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:41 pm Farrell must've done the training course to get the week off his ban so many times he may as well be the trainer.
Just seen someone saying you only get one shot at that
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
tc27
Posts: 2532
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

Wales effectively scoring 0 against 12 England players
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8223
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:20 pm
Slick wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:18 pm Did they just say England are playing Ireland next week 😳
Please god Ire put out your 1st team. :grin:
Nah, U20s team ought to be able to do the business, & that way we don't pick up any bans, or lose anyone to injury
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 11155
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

tc27 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:45 pm Wales effectively scoring 0 against 12 England players
Where's J2M? I pointed out to him last week that modern players are so over coached that practically no team has the ability to play what's in front of it. France the same last week.
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 11155
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

Slick wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:44 pm
I like neeps wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:41 pm Farrell must've done the training course to get the week off his ban so many times he may as well be the trainer.
Just seen someone saying you only get one shot at that
They'll find some loophole. Always do.
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

tc27 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:45 pm Wales effectively scoring 0 against 12 England players
Stormers scored nothing in 2nd half against 13 L Irish players back in January. Red cards do funny things to teams.
User avatar
Stranger
Posts: 1255
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 5:55 pm

The shame is that due to the draw there is every chance one of these two will make a WC semi final
sockwithaticket
Posts: 8664
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am

I like neeps wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:41 pm Farrell must've done the training course to get the week off his ban so many times he may as well be the trainer.
It's actually quite a recent thing, it wasn't available for 2 of his previous bans, the most recent of which was 2020, so he did it for the first time this year.
User avatar
salanya
Posts: 707
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:51 pm

Margin__Walker wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:39 pm
salanya wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:37 pm Awful match, 2 shit teams and a bizarre refereeing performance.

This bunker is nonsense, just an excuse for refs to cop out of decisions. The ref had all the angles and didn't call a shoulder to the head as red.
If the right decision is reached more often and the viewers don't have to sit through 5 minutes of deliberations, I really don't see the problem.
The ref still looked at footage for 2 minutes, and then made the wrong call .

My problem isn't the bunker as such, it's how the refs change their decisions on it, only for them to be altered a few minutes later, affecting the game.

In fairness, this was probably not the game of rugby to judge it on. And my frustration was mainly with Farrell and the referee dodging the red card decision.
Over the hills and far away........
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 11155
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

salanya wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:55 pm
In fairness, this was probably not the game of rugby to judge it on. And my frustration was mainly with Farrell and the referee dodging the red card decision.
What irritates me is how the English always talk of it in terms of "Farrell's tackle technique" in an attempt to diminish the simple fact that he's a cheap thug. He's not trying to tackle at all. Kawazaki will be on to defend him with similar washing attempts.
Last edited by Torquemada 1420 on Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9797
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:47 pm
tc27 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:45 pm Wales effectively scoring 0 against 12 England players
Where's J2M? I pointed out to him last week that modern players are so over coached that practically no team has the ability to play what's in front of it. France the same last week.
Hey I wonder if you noticed which two teams I excluded
User avatar
Torquemada 1420
Posts: 11155
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:22 am
Location: Hut 8

JM2K6 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:58 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:47 pm
tc27 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:45 pm Wales effectively scoring 0 against 12 England players
Where's J2M? I pointed out to him last week that modern players are so over coached that practically no team has the ability to play what's in front of it. France the same last week.
Hey I wonder if you noticed which two teams I excluded
Throw in Fra and every team that has had a major man advantage this series has f**ked it up.
tc27
Posts: 2532
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

English rugby journos inevitably all pushing the line its a disaster that Farrel may miss a game. :crazy:
Line6 HXFX
Posts: 1148
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:31 am

Wales will be happy. Earls (angerland number 7) was right, no fucker plays well against Wales.
Wales have two goals during the match....stay close to you up until about sixty...then steal the win.
Opposition must shit themselves when Wales are within a few points of them after 60, and after thinking they have been dominant.

OK it didn't work today..but it was all going to plan nicely.

It would be easier to forgive Farnell, if he didn't do that contact with such fucking anger and hatred in his soul.
Last edited by Line6 HXFX on Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:04 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9797
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:00 pm
JM2K6 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:58 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:47 pm

Where's J2M? I pointed out to him last week that modern players are so over coached that practically no team has the ability to play what's in front of it. France the same last week.
Hey I wonder if you noticed which two teams I excluded
Throw in Fra and every team that has had a major man advantage this series has f**ked it up.
It's never that straightforward but if you are trying to make out that France don't play heads up rugby then I think you might be in the minority.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9797
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

tc27 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:00 pm English rugby journos inevitably all pushing the line its a disaster that Farrel may miss a game. :crazy:
All the preparation has been for Farrell to start at 10 and be England's attack leader, defence leader, and captain. Regardless of your opinion of him, it's a big disruption
User avatar
salanya
Posts: 707
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:51 pm

Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:58 pm
salanya wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:55 pm
In fairness, this was probably not the game of rugby to judge it on. And my frustration was mainly with Farrell and the referee dodging the red card decision.
What irritates me is how the English always talk of it in terms of "Farrell's tackle technique" in an attempt to diminish the simple fact that he's a cheap thug. He's not trying to tackle at all. Kawazaki will be on to defend him with similar washing attempts.
They even said he's not a dirty player, but how many cards/bans do you need to have to earn that description?

I don't think he's a thug, but his reckless defence so often hits players in the head, and he has made little effort to sort this.
No more mitigations in his disciplinary hearings please. (Which might not even harm England)
Over the hills and far away........
tc27
Posts: 2532
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:18 pm

JM2K6 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:04 pm
tc27 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:00 pm English rugby journos inevitably all pushing the line its a disaster that Farrel may miss a game. :crazy:
All the preparation has been for Farrell to start at 10 and be England's attack leader, defence leader, and captain. Regardless of your opinion of him, it's a big disruption
Yes fair point.
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9797
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Yeah, it's hard to argue it's not a cheap shot. It might not be, but there's just no defence.
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

With Farrell’s recent record, he should get at least 12 weeks off. Because it’s Farrell and RWC time, I expect he’ll get 3.

Jokeshop.
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

salanya wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:08 pm
Torquemada 1420 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:58 pm
salanya wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:55 pm
In fairness, this was probably not the game of rugby to judge it on. And my frustration was mainly with Farrell and the referee dodging the red card decision.
What irritates me is how the English always talk of it in terms of "Farrell's tackle technique" in an attempt to diminish the simple fact that he's a cheap thug. He's not trying to tackle at all. Kawazaki will be on to defend him with similar washing attempts.
They even said he's not a dirty player, but how many cards/bans do you need to have to earn that description?

I don't think he's a thug, but his reckless defence so often hits players in the head, and he has made little effort to sort this.
No more mitigations in his disciplinary hearings please. (Which might not even harm England)
I think he's dirty. He's never put any serious work into changing his approach, as is pretty obvious. Not putting work into an area where you need to make I provement is deliberate.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9797
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Sandstorm wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:13 pm With Farrell’s recent record, he should get at least 12 weeks off. Because it’s Farrell and RWC time, I expect he’ll get 3.

Jokeshop.
Don't be silly. When was the last time anyone copped a ban that long for an illegal tackle?'
Rhubarb & Custard
Posts: 2097
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm

JM2K6 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:04 pm
tc27 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:00 pm English rugby journos inevitably all pushing the line its a disaster that Farrel may miss a game. :crazy:
All the preparation has been for Farrell to start at 10 and be England's attack leader, defence leader, and captain. Regardless of your opinion of him, it's a big disruption
You'd have to wonder how much scope there is to cause disruption, it's not like anything looks joined up as things stand

I don't actually know if any of his previous is pertinent. He's likely looking at 3 matches stood down, 4-5 if his previous comes in
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

JM2K6 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:19 pm
Sandstorm wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:13 pm With Farrell’s recent record, he should get at least 12 weeks off. Because it’s Farrell and RWC time, I expect he’ll get 3.

Jokeshop.
Don't be silly. When was the last time anyone copped a ban that long for an illegal tackle?'
I didn’t claim this tackle deserved 12 weeks. I said Farrell deserved 12 for recent, repeated infringement.
Line6 HXFX
Posts: 1148
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2020 9:31 am

You would think if your best mate in the world had contracted Motor Neurons from idiots dishing out dangerous and illegal tackles and impacts precisely like that, Kevin sinfield would simply refuse to work with them.

Am I giving rugby players and coaches too much credit?
User avatar
JM2K6
Posts: 9797
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2020 10:43 am

Sandstorm wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:23 pm
JM2K6 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:19 pm
Sandstorm wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:13 pm With Farrell’s recent record, he should get at least 12 weeks off. Because it’s Farrell and RWC time, I expect he’ll get 3.

Jokeshop.
Don't be silly. When was the last time anyone copped a ban that long for an illegal tackle?'
I didn’t claim this tackle deserved 12 weeks. I said Farrell deserved 12 for recent, repeated infringement.
Yes, I know. There are other recidivists. So, when have you seen it?
sockwithaticket
Posts: 8664
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am

Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:23 pm
JM2K6 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:04 pm
tc27 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:00 pm English rugby journos inevitably all pushing the line its a disaster that Farrel may miss a game. :crazy:
All the preparation has been for Farrell to start at 10 and be England's attack leader, defence leader, and captain. Regardless of your opinion of him, it's a big disruption
You'd have to wonder how much scope there is to cause disruption, it's not like anything looks joined up as things stand

I don't actually know if any of his previous is pertinent. He's likely looking at 3 matches stood down, 4-5 if his previous comes in
His 2020 decapitation of Charlie Atkinson was acknowledged in the judgement for his ban earlier this year and saw the Repeat Offender box on the judgement infographic ticked. That's why he only got two weeks knocked off his 6 weeks for contrition and good conduct at the hearing (:roll: )instead of having the ban halved as seems to be the norm when a player manages to say sorry instead of 'fuck you, I'd do it again'. An extra week was then taken off for the tackle intervention course as it wasn't an option back in 2020.
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

sockwithaticket wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:30 pm
Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:23 pm
JM2K6 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:04 pm

All the preparation has been for Farrell to start at 10 and be England's attack leader, defence leader, and captain. Regardless of your opinion of him, it's a big disruption
You'd have to wonder how much scope there is to cause disruption, it's not like anything looks joined up as things stand

I don't actually know if any of his previous is pertinent. He's likely looking at 3 matches stood down, 4-5 if his previous comes in
His 2020 decapitation of Charlie Atkinson was acknowledged in the judgement for his ban earlier this year and saw the Repeat Offender box on the judgement infographic ticked. That's why he only got two weeks knocked off his 6 weeks for contrition and good conduct at the hearing (:roll: )instead of having the ban halved as seems to be the norm when a player manages to say sorry instead of 'fuck you, I'd do it again'. An extra week was then taken off for the tackle intervention course as it wasn't an option back in 2020.
So he's looking at 5 - they'll knock one off for being nice at the hearing (although Zander has raised the game with the tunnocks tea cakes) and he can't do the training course again so soon.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Rhubarb & Custard
Posts: 2097
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm

sockwithaticket wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:30 pm
Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:23 pm
JM2K6 wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:04 pm

All the preparation has been for Farrell to start at 10 and be England's attack leader, defence leader, and captain. Regardless of your opinion of him, it's a big disruption
You'd have to wonder how much scope there is to cause disruption, it's not like anything looks joined up as things stand

I don't actually know if any of his previous is pertinent. He's likely looking at 3 matches stood down, 4-5 if his previous comes in
His 2020 decapitation of Charlie Atkinson was acknowledged in the judgement for his ban earlier this year and saw the Repeat Offender box on the judgement infographic ticked. That's why he only got two weeks knocked off his 6 weeks for contrition and good conduct at the hearing (:roll: )instead of having the ban halved as seems to be the norm when a player manages to say sorry instead of 'fuck you, I'd do it again'. An extra week was then taken off for the tackle intervention course as it wasn't an option back in 2020.
What was the one earlier this year for? And is the Atkinson one still live as it were?
sockwithaticket
Posts: 8664
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 11:48 am

Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:40 pm
sockwithaticket wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:30 pm
Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:23 pm

You'd have to wonder how much scope there is to cause disruption, it's not like anything looks joined up as things stand

I don't actually know if any of his previous is pertinent. He's likely looking at 3 matches stood down, 4-5 if his previous comes in
His 2020 decapitation of Charlie Atkinson was acknowledged in the judgement for his ban earlier this year and saw the Repeat Offender box on the judgement infographic ticked. That's why he only got two weeks knocked off his 6 weeks for contrition and good conduct at the hearing (:roll: )instead of having the ban halved as seems to be the norm when a player manages to say sorry instead of 'fuck you, I'd do it again'. An extra week was then taken off for the tackle intervention course as it wasn't an option back in 2020.
What was the one earlier this year for? And is the Atkinson one still live as it were?
Shoulder to the jaw


If they considered the Atkinson ban in the judgement earlier this year, I'm not sure why it would be discounted several months on.
Rhubarb & Custard
Posts: 2097
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 4:04 pm

sockwithaticket wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:47 pm
Rhubarb & Custard wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:40 pm
sockwithaticket wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 7:30 pm

His 2020 decapitation of Charlie Atkinson was acknowledged in the judgement for his ban earlier this year and saw the Repeat Offender box on the judgement infographic ticked. That's why he only got two weeks knocked off his 6 weeks for contrition and good conduct at the hearing (:roll: )instead of having the ban halved as seems to be the norm when a player manages to say sorry instead of 'fuck you, I'd do it again'. An extra week was then taken off for the tackle intervention course as it wasn't an option back in 2020.
What was the one earlier this year for? And is the Atkinson one still live as it were?
Shoulder to the jaw


If they considered the Atkinson ban in the judgement earlier this year, I'm not sure why it would be discounted several months on.
They do lapse at some point, I simply forget when. But the shoulder to the jaw is you'd think similar enough it's relevant as previous, so no discount and then can they avoid adding on extras?

Often a mistake to consider there might be consistency in disciplinary hearings of course.
User avatar
TB63
Posts: 4013
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:11 pm
Location: Tinopolis

ASMO wrote: Sat Aug 12, 2023 6:40 pm Done with England, dont care anymore...
Gis a cwtch, brawd...
Post Reply