So, coronavirus...

Where goats go to escape
User avatar
Jb1981
Posts: 1179
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:00 pm

50,000 cases a day was worse case if nothing was done, wasn’t it? Something was done so pointing to it as a failed prediction seems disingenuous. Was there another prediction re. 50,000 cases a day?
User avatar
frodder
Posts: 628
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:57 pm
Location: Leafy Cheshire (West)

Parts of South Yorkshire going into Tier 3 as well
User avatar
C69
Posts: 3336
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:42 pm

frodder wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 6:43 am Parts of South Yorkshire going into Tier 3 as well
Fake news, scaremongering, masks don't work.
No second surge etc etc


Fuck the North
User avatar
frodder
Posts: 628
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:57 pm
Location: Leafy Cheshire (West)

C69 wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 6:55 am
frodder wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 6:43 am Parts of South Yorkshire going into Tier 3 as well
Fake news, scaremongering, masks don't work.
No second surge etc etc


Fuck the North
We're holding on in Cheshire. The clock is ticking until whole of the North is in the hands of the Lannisters
Bimbowomxn
Posts: 1731
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm

C69 wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 6:55 am
frodder wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 6:43 am Parts of South Yorkshire going into Tier 3 as well
Fake news, scaremongering, masks don't work.
No second surge etc etc


Fuck the North


* stamps feet.
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

C69 wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 6:55 am
frodder wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 6:43 am Parts of South Yorkshire going into Tier 3 as well
Fake news, scaremongering, masks don't work.
No second surge etc etc


Fuck the North
*organises house party for 16 friends to hug it out
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

Jb1981 wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 6:28 am 50,000 cases a day was worse case if nothing was done, wasn’t it? Something was done so pointing to it as a failed prediction seems disingenuous. Was there another prediction re. 50,000 cases a day?
Exactly. It;s a bit like saying there's no second wave because we don;t have the exponential growth of early March. Seeing how we have social distancing, facemasks, rule of 6, sanitisation, and at least some form of track and trace, it would be extremely disturbing if we had that sort of growth rate. It would imply that NONE OF IT WORKED
Bimbowomxn
Posts: 1731
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm

Saint wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 7:43 am
Jb1981 wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 6:28 am 50,000 cases a day was worse case if nothing was done, wasn’t it? Something was done so pointing to it as a failed prediction seems disingenuous. Was there another prediction re. 50,000 cases a day?
Exactly. It;s a bit like saying there's no second wave because we don;t have the exponential growth of early March. Seeing how we have social distancing, facemasks, rule of 6, sanitisation, and at least some form of track and trace, it would be extremely disturbing if we had that sort of growth rate. It would imply that NONE OF IT WORKED
50,000 a day was mathematically impossible. It was a scare tactic. Nothing more nothing less.
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 9400
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

Bimbowomxn wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:08 am
50,000 a day was mathematically impossible. It was a scare tactic. Nothing more nothing less.

Mathematically impossible?

You're going to have to show your working on that.
Slick
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

50,000 a day was mathematically impossible. It was a scare tactic. Nothing more nothing less
Eh?
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
Bimbowomxn
Posts: 1731
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm

Slick wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:26 am
50,000 a day was mathematically impossible. It was a scare tactic. Nothing more nothing less
Eh?


The 50,000 positive tests by the 15th of October was impossible.

The curve they demonstrated wasn’t feasible, as we have now demonstrated. Vallance and Whitty must have known that.
dpedin
Posts: 2975
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2020 8:35 am

Third visit to gym last night - managed 25 min cycle and 40 mins of weights whilst wearing surgical mask each time and I didn't fall down dead! In fact no discernible difference whatsoever. Gym is well ventilated and has excellent distancing and cleaning processes in place i.e. clean equipment before and after use. Everyone following the rules but as a 61 year old with mild asthma why not wear a mask? Most don't wear one but a few older ones of us do - no comments or even strange looks from anyone just everyone going about their business.

From figures I have seen it looks like we (Scotland) are right on track for a second peak of cases around end of December time just as the modellers said. Interim lock down will slow the numbers and NHS demand down a good bit hopefully but there will still be significant pressure on ICU and acute beds well into Jan and Feb. Central belt already under pressure with existing covid19 designated beds full in some places - St Johns, Livingston - and the most looking to expand covid19 bed and ICU capacity at the expense of routine care. Stay safe.

Also see the Spector app/Kings college study providing even more evidence about the longer term effects of covid19 and says we need to focus not just on excess deaths but also need to consider the health and economic impact of the longer term impact of covid19. Just as well folk were worrying about it now rather than waiting until later?

I see that the dodgy 'bra wummin from Glasgow' Michelle Mone and hubby's business mate Mr Page - is getting in on the crooked PPE contract game via her Tory contacts. Sets up shell company and gets multi million contract to supply PPE via sub contractors a month after setting the company up. £122m to supply 25m gowns. Will probably clear a bigger profit than Burnham was looking for whole of Manchester.

And finally US study of excess deaths suggests that the US has c290,000 excess deaths due to covid19 and its impact - way to go Tango Twat!

I am not even going to mention Brexit and impact on supply chains at same time as all this is happening, I will however be making sure I have sufficient supply of drugs and certain products in run up to new year.

So it is all going well then! Just as well the Blonde Bumblecunt has it all under control and the messaging is clear and concise. Good luck everyone.
Biffer
Posts: 9141
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:43 pm

Tichtheid wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:25 am
Bimbowomxn wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:08 am
50,000 a day was mathematically impossible. It was a scare tactic. Nothing more nothing less.

Mathematically impossible?

You're going to have to show your working on that.
He won't. He'll just repeat it, as if that makes it true.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
Bimbowomxn
Posts: 1731
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm

Biffer wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:39 am
Tichtheid wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:25 am
Bimbowomxn wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:08 am
50,000 a day was mathematically impossible. It was a scare tactic. Nothing more nothing less.

Mathematically impossible?

You're going to have to show your working on that.
He won't. He'll just repeat it, as if that makes it true.
You’ve seen the graph right? And how it compares?
Bimbowomxn
Posts: 1731
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm

Saint wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 7:43 am
Jb1981 wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 6:28 am 50,000 cases a day was worse case if nothing was done, wasn’t it? Something was done so pointing to it as a failed prediction seems disingenuous. Was there another prediction re. 50,000 cases a day?
Exactly. It;s a bit like saying there's no second wave because we don;t have the exponential growth of early March. Seeing how we have social distancing, facemasks, rule of 6, sanitisation, and at least some form of track and trace, it would be extremely disturbing if we had that sort of growth rate. It would imply that NONE OF IT WORKED


Where was locked down tighter during the supposed rise?
User avatar
Mr Bungle
Posts: 744
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 6:14 pm

Singapore, October 20

Researchers in Singapore have developed a breath test to detect Covid-19 within a minute. The authorities are working on a roadmap for the third phase of easing of safety measures in the country.


A person would have to blow into a disposable mouthpiece connected to a “high-precision breath sampler”, according to the National University of Singapore researchers. The test, which detects Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in a person’s breath, achieved more than 90 per cent accuracy in a clinical trial involving 180 patients.

The exhaled breath is then collected and fed into a mass spectrometer for measurement. A machine learning software subsequently analyses the VOC profile and generates the result in less than a minute. — PTI
Bimbowomxn
Posts: 1731
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm

Mr Bungle wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:50 am
Singapore, October 20

Researchers in Singapore have developed a breath test to detect Covid-19 within a minute. The authorities are working on a roadmap for the third phase of easing of safety measures in the country.


A person would have to blow into a disposable mouthpiece connected to a “high-precision breath sampler”, according to the National University of Singapore researchers. The test, which detects Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in a person’s breath, achieved more than 90 per cent accuracy in a clinical trial involving 180 patients.

The exhaled breath is then collected and fed into a mass spectrometer for measurement. A machine learning software subsequently analyses the VOC profile and generates the result in less than a minute. — PTI


Let’s hope all positives are confirmed with a second test.
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

Mr Bungle wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:50 am
Singapore, October 20

Researchers in Singapore have developed a breath test to detect Covid-19 within a minute. The authorities are working on a roadmap for the third phase of easing of safety measures in the country.


A person would have to blow into a disposable mouthpiece connected to a “high-precision breath sampler”, according to the National University of Singapore researchers. The test, which detects Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in a person’s breath, achieved more than 90 per cent accuracy in a clinical trial involving 180 patients.

The exhaled breath is then collected and fed into a mass spectrometer for measurement. A machine learning software subsequently analyses the VOC profile and generates the result in less than a minute. — PTI
Interesting, although 90% accuracy probably won't be enough to get borders reopened
User avatar
frodder
Posts: 628
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:57 pm
Location: Leafy Cheshire (West)

Saint wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:53 am
Mr Bungle wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:50 am
Singapore, October 20

Researchers in Singapore have developed a breath test to detect Covid-19 within a minute. The authorities are working on a roadmap for the third phase of easing of safety measures in the country.


A person would have to blow into a disposable mouthpiece connected to a “high-precision breath sampler”, according to the National University of Singapore researchers. The test, which detects Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in a person’s breath, achieved more than 90 per cent accuracy in a clinical trial involving 180 patients.

The exhaled breath is then collected and fed into a mass spectrometer for measurement. A machine learning software subsequently analyses the VOC profile and generates the result in less than a minute. — PTI
Interesting, although 90% accuracy probably won't be enough to get borders reopened
You just need a handy Mass Spec instrument at every station. Please don't confuse Boris with this
Ovals
Posts: 1491
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 9:52 pm

Biffer wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:39 am
Tichtheid wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:25 am
Bimbowomxn wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:08 am
50,000 a day was mathematically impossible. It was a scare tactic. Nothing more nothing less.

Mathematically impossible?

You're going to have to show your working on that.
He won't. He'll just repeat it, as if that makes it true.
Why bother with him - he's an utter moron.
User avatar
Jb1981
Posts: 1179
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:00 pm

Bimbowomxn wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:45 am
Saint wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 7:43 am
Jb1981 wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 6:28 am 50,000 cases a day was worse case if nothing was done, wasn’t it? Something was done so pointing to it as a failed prediction seems disingenuous. Was there another prediction re. 50,000 cases a day?
Exactly. It;s a bit like saying there's no second wave because we don;t have the exponential growth of early March. Seeing how we have social distancing, facemasks, rule of 6, sanitisation, and at least some form of track and trace, it would be extremely disturbing if we had that sort of growth rate. It would imply that NONE OF IT WORKED


Where was locked down tighter during the supposed rise?
Locked down more tightly during the second rise than early March? Anywhere with a lockdown surely - didn’t your first lockdowns only start in late March?
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 9400
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

Bimbowomxn wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:44 am
Biffer wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:39 am
Tichtheid wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:25 am


Mathematically impossible?

You're going to have to show your working on that.
He won't. He'll just repeat it, as if that makes it true.
You’ve seen the graph right? And how it compares?

Show us the graph and explain how it is mathematically impossible to reach 50 000 cases per day.
User avatar
Openside
Posts: 1713
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:27 pm

Tichtheid wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:28 am
Bimbowomxn wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:21 am
Rinkals wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 10:40 am My mistake: you are there already.

https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577

Laboratory tests showed the penetration of particles through the cloth masks to be very high (97%) compared with medical masks (44%) (used in trial) and 3M 9320 N95 (<0.01%), 3M Vflex 9105 N95 (0.1%).

You really need to read the updates and the responses to that five year old article before posting it as any kind of proof again.
I read a 205 year old report that the British were victorious at Waterloo, is it still valid?? :grin:
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 9400
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

Openside wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:24 am
I read a 205 year old report that the British were victorious at Waterloo, is it still valid?? :grin:


Scotland are reigning champions of the 5N.
User avatar
frodder
Posts: 628
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:57 pm
Location: Leafy Cheshire (West)

Openside wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:24 am
Tichtheid wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:28 am
Bimbowomxn wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:21 am




You really need to read the updates and the responses to that five year old article before posting it as any kind of proof again.
I read a 205 year old report that the British were victorious at Waterloo, is it still valid?? :grin:
Yep, it was the British. The Prussians, Hanoverians and Dutch had nothing to do with it.
robmatic
Posts: 2094
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 7:46 am

Openside wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:24 am
Tichtheid wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:28 am
Bimbowomxn wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:21 am




You really need to read the updates and the responses to that five year old article before posting it as any kind of proof again.
I read a 205 year old report that the British were victorious at Waterloo, is it still valid?? :grin:
The battle that ended war in Europe?
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

Jb1981 wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:04 am
Bimbowomxn wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:45 am
Saint wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 7:43 am

Exactly. It;s a bit like saying there's no second wave because we don;t have the exponential growth of early March. Seeing how we have social distancing, facemasks, rule of 6, sanitisation, and at least some form of track and trace, it would be extremely disturbing if we had that sort of growth rate. It would imply that NONE OF IT WORKED


Where was locked down tighter during the supposed rise?
Locked down more tightly during the second rise than early March? Anywhere with a lockdown surely - didn’t your first lockdowns only start in late March?
The "soft" lockdown (WFH if possible pubs stayed open etc was 16th March. Hard lockdown was 23rd March - stay at home, pubs closed, etc. Deaths peaked around 3 weeks later and started properly falling a week after that. So, if Tier 3 is going to be sufficient then it's going to be mid November to peak and a tail off towards Christmas.
User avatar
Sandstorm
Posts: 10884
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 7:05 pm
Location: England

Saint wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:52 am
The "soft" lockdown (WFH if possible pubs stayed open etc was 16th March. Hard lockdown was 23rd March - stay at home, pubs closed, etc. Deaths peaked around 3 weeks later and started properly falling a week after that. So, if Tier 3 is going to be sufficient then it's going to be mid November to peak and a tail off towards Christmas.
Surely the evidence points (admittedly through a rather average Track and Trace App) that pubs, etc are not where people catch Covid. Even hundreds wandering around town at midnight OUTSIDE isn't the issue.
It's at home mixing with friends and family. Tier 3 isn't going to change that.

Number dropped sharply in April because everyone was worried about Covid and did as they were asked regarding isolating and saving the NHS. This time 1/2 the country don't give a shit.
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

Tichtheid wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:25 am
Bimbowomxn wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:08 am 50,000 a day was mathematically impossible. It was a scare tactic. Nothing more nothing less.
Mathematically impossible?
Yep, it is when using Excel 2003! :lol:
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
Saint
Posts: 2274
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 8:38 am

Sandstorm wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 10:42 am
Saint wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:52 am
The "soft" lockdown (WFH if possible pubs stayed open etc was 16th March. Hard lockdown was 23rd March - stay at home, pubs closed, etc. Deaths peaked around 3 weeks later and started properly falling a week after that. So, if Tier 3 is going to be sufficient then it's going to be mid November to peak and a tail off towards Christmas.
Surely the evidence points (admittedly through a rather average Track and Trace App) that pubs, etc are not where people catch Covid. Even hundreds wandering around town at midnight OUTSIDE isn't the issue.
It's at home mixing with friends and family. Tier 3 isn't going to change that.

Number dropped sharply in April because everyone was worried about Covid and did as they were asked regarding isolating and saving the NHS. This time 1/2 the country don't give a shit.
I think it depends how people treat Tier 3. If it;s a short sharp reminder to them that they need to distance, take hygiene seriously etc even in their own homes then it will work. To a point I agree that half the country don't give a shit - which hopefully this will shock them into giving a shit
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8222
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Sandstorm wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 10:42 am
Saint wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:52 am
The "soft" lockdown (WFH if possible pubs stayed open etc was 16th March. Hard lockdown was 23rd March - stay at home, pubs closed, etc. Deaths peaked around 3 weeks later and started properly falling a week after that. So, if Tier 3 is going to be sufficient then it's going to be mid November to peak and a tail off towards Christmas.
Surely the evidence points (admittedly through a rather average Track and Trace App) that pubs, etc are not where people catch Covid. Even hundreds wandering around town at midnight OUTSIDE isn't the issue.
It's at home mixing with friends and family. Tier 3 isn't going to change that.

Number dropped sharply in April because everyone was worried about Covid and did as they were asked regarding isolating and saving the NHS. This time 1/2 the country don't give a shit.
The critical factor is time.

In a pub, you probably aren't going to be 15 minutes with anyone, other than the people you're sat around the table with; in the chippie afterward, it'd only be the people either side of you in queue etc.

The problem is if it's staff that are infectious; then they're going to be potentially moving around passing it onto other staff, & customers; but if they are following good practises, that risk is reduced significantly.
User avatar
Tichtheid
Posts: 9400
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2020 11:18 am

Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 10:54 am
Tichtheid wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:25 am
Bimbowomxn wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:08 am 50,000 a day was mathematically impossible. It was a scare tactic. Nothing more nothing less.
Mathematically impossible?
Yep, it is when using Excel 2003! :lol:

Good point, well made.
User avatar
Hal Jordan
Posts: 4154
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
Location: Sector 2814

frodder wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:32 am
Openside wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:24 am
Tichtheid wrote: Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:28 am


You really need to read the updates and the responses to that five year old article before posting it as any kind of proof again.
I read a 205 year old report that the British were victorious at Waterloo, is it still valid?? :grin:
Yep, it was the British. The Prussians, Hanoverians and Dutch had nothing to do with it.
The Irish were there, too.
User avatar
fishfoodie
Posts: 8222
Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm

Hal Jordan wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 12:16 pm
frodder wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:32 am
Openside wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:24 am

I read a 205 year old report that the British were victorious at Waterloo, is it still valid?? :grin:
Yep, it was the British. The Prussians, Hanoverians and Dutch had nothing to do with it.
The Irish were there, too.
We fought on both sides; so we both won & lost that day
Slick
Posts: 11913
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:58 pm

Bimbowomxn wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:29 am
Slick wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:26 am
50,000 a day was mathematically impossible. It was a scare tactic. Nothing more nothing less
Eh?


The 50,000 positive tests by the 15th of October was impossible.

The curve they demonstrated wasn’t feasible, as we have now demonstrated. Vallance and Whitty must have known that.
Eh?
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

"Impossible" has now morphed to "not feasible" :lol: "we" :eh:

The link
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54234084

The Graph
Image

The Math
Base cases 15-Sep 3,105
after 1 week 6,210
after 2 week 12,420
after 3 week 24,840
after 4 week 49,680

for scenario "If cases double every week"
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
Insane_Homer
Posts: 5389
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
Location: Leafy Surrey

for 3,105 to reach the 17,234 as per above the weekly reproduction factor was ~1.535 per week as opposed to the do nothing, doubling, worst case scenario of 2.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
User avatar
Hal Jordan
Posts: 4154
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
Location: Sector 2814

I see some cunt Tory MP's response to the suggestion that we give food to hungry kids via an extension to the free school meals into the holiday is, "Children have been going hungry under a Labour Government for years" and then some bullshit about Universal Credit.
Bimbowomxn
Posts: 1731
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm

Insane_Homer wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 1:53 pm "Impossible" has now morphed to "not feasible" :lol: "we" :eh:

The link
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54234084

The Graph
Image

The Math
Base cases 15-Sep 3,105
after 1 week 6,210
after 2 week 12,420
after 3 week 24,840
after 4 week 49,680

for scenario "If cases double every week"

What would the R need to be on the 15 Sep for this to be possible. ?

Impossible

Why the 15th September? The report you’ve produced is already a week in without doubling. IE impossible.
Bimbowomxn
Posts: 1731
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm

Hal Jordan wrote: Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:19 pm I see some cunt Tory MP's response to the suggestion that we give food to hungry kids via an extension to the free school meals into the holiday is, "Children have been going hungry under a Labour Government for years" and then some bullshit about Universal Credit.

It’s a parents job to feed their children.
Post Reply