So, coronavirus...
We're holding on in Cheshire. The clock is ticking until whole of the North is in the hands of the Lannisters
Exactly. It;s a bit like saying there's no second wave because we don;t have the exponential growth of early March. Seeing how we have social distancing, facemasks, rule of 6, sanitisation, and at least some form of track and trace, it would be extremely disturbing if we had that sort of growth rate. It would imply that NONE OF IT WORKED
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
50,000 a day was mathematically impossible. It was a scare tactic. Nothing more nothing less.Saint wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 7:43 amExactly. It;s a bit like saying there's no second wave because we don;t have the exponential growth of early March. Seeing how we have social distancing, facemasks, rule of 6, sanitisation, and at least some form of track and trace, it would be extremely disturbing if we had that sort of growth rate. It would imply that NONE OF IT WORKED
Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:08 am
50,000 a day was mathematically impossible. It was a scare tactic. Nothing more nothing less.
Mathematically impossible?
You're going to have to show your working on that.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
The 50,000 positive tests by the 15th of October was impossible.
The curve they demonstrated wasn’t feasible, as we have now demonstrated. Vallance and Whitty must have known that.
Third visit to gym last night - managed 25 min cycle and 40 mins of weights whilst wearing surgical mask each time and I didn't fall down dead! In fact no discernible difference whatsoever. Gym is well ventilated and has excellent distancing and cleaning processes in place i.e. clean equipment before and after use. Everyone following the rules but as a 61 year old with mild asthma why not wear a mask? Most don't wear one but a few older ones of us do - no comments or even strange looks from anyone just everyone going about their business.
From figures I have seen it looks like we (Scotland) are right on track for a second peak of cases around end of December time just as the modellers said. Interim lock down will slow the numbers and NHS demand down a good bit hopefully but there will still be significant pressure on ICU and acute beds well into Jan and Feb. Central belt already under pressure with existing covid19 designated beds full in some places - St Johns, Livingston - and the most looking to expand covid19 bed and ICU capacity at the expense of routine care. Stay safe.
Also see the Spector app/Kings college study providing even more evidence about the longer term effects of covid19 and says we need to focus not just on excess deaths but also need to consider the health and economic impact of the longer term impact of covid19. Just as well folk were worrying about it now rather than waiting until later?
I see that the dodgy 'bra wummin from Glasgow' Michelle Mone and hubby's business mate Mr Page - is getting in on the crooked PPE contract game via her Tory contacts. Sets up shell company and gets multi million contract to supply PPE via sub contractors a month after setting the company up. £122m to supply 25m gowns. Will probably clear a bigger profit than Burnham was looking for whole of Manchester.
And finally US study of excess deaths suggests that the US has c290,000 excess deaths due to covid19 and its impact - way to go Tango Twat!
I am not even going to mention Brexit and impact on supply chains at same time as all this is happening, I will however be making sure I have sufficient supply of drugs and certain products in run up to new year.
So it is all going well then! Just as well the Blonde Bumblecunt has it all under control and the messaging is clear and concise. Good luck everyone.
From figures I have seen it looks like we (Scotland) are right on track for a second peak of cases around end of December time just as the modellers said. Interim lock down will slow the numbers and NHS demand down a good bit hopefully but there will still be significant pressure on ICU and acute beds well into Jan and Feb. Central belt already under pressure with existing covid19 designated beds full in some places - St Johns, Livingston - and the most looking to expand covid19 bed and ICU capacity at the expense of routine care. Stay safe.
Also see the Spector app/Kings college study providing even more evidence about the longer term effects of covid19 and says we need to focus not just on excess deaths but also need to consider the health and economic impact of the longer term impact of covid19. Just as well folk were worrying about it now rather than waiting until later?
I see that the dodgy 'bra wummin from Glasgow' Michelle Mone and hubby's business mate Mr Page - is getting in on the crooked PPE contract game via her Tory contacts. Sets up shell company and gets multi million contract to supply PPE via sub contractors a month after setting the company up. £122m to supply 25m gowns. Will probably clear a bigger profit than Burnham was looking for whole of Manchester.
And finally US study of excess deaths suggests that the US has c290,000 excess deaths due to covid19 and its impact - way to go Tango Twat!
I am not even going to mention Brexit and impact on supply chains at same time as all this is happening, I will however be making sure I have sufficient supply of drugs and certain products in run up to new year.
So it is all going well then! Just as well the Blonde Bumblecunt has it all under control and the messaging is clear and concise. Good luck everyone.
He won't. He'll just repeat it, as if that makes it true.Tichtheid wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:25 amBimbowomxn wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:08 am
50,000 a day was mathematically impossible. It was a scare tactic. Nothing more nothing less.
Mathematically impossible?
You're going to have to show your working on that.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
You’ve seen the graph right? And how it compares?Biffer wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:39 amHe won't. He'll just repeat it, as if that makes it true.Tichtheid wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:25 amBimbowomxn wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:08 am
50,000 a day was mathematically impossible. It was a scare tactic. Nothing more nothing less.
Mathematically impossible?
You're going to have to show your working on that.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Saint wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 7:43 amExactly. It;s a bit like saying there's no second wave because we don;t have the exponential growth of early March. Seeing how we have social distancing, facemasks, rule of 6, sanitisation, and at least some form of track and trace, it would be extremely disturbing if we had that sort of growth rate. It would imply that NONE OF IT WORKED
Where was locked down tighter during the supposed rise?
Singapore, October 20
Researchers in Singapore have developed a breath test to detect Covid-19 within a minute. The authorities are working on a roadmap for the third phase of easing of safety measures in the country.
A person would have to blow into a disposable mouthpiece connected to a “high-precision breath sampler”, according to the National University of Singapore researchers. The test, which detects Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in a person’s breath, achieved more than 90 per cent accuracy in a clinical trial involving 180 patients.
The exhaled breath is then collected and fed into a mass spectrometer for measurement. A machine learning software subsequently analyses the VOC profile and generates the result in less than a minute. — PTI
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Mr Bungle wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:50 amSingapore, October 20
Researchers in Singapore have developed a breath test to detect Covid-19 within a minute. The authorities are working on a roadmap for the third phase of easing of safety measures in the country.
A person would have to blow into a disposable mouthpiece connected to a “high-precision breath sampler”, according to the National University of Singapore researchers. The test, which detects Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in a person’s breath, achieved more than 90 per cent accuracy in a clinical trial involving 180 patients.
The exhaled breath is then collected and fed into a mass spectrometer for measurement. A machine learning software subsequently analyses the VOC profile and generates the result in less than a minute. — PTI
Let’s hope all positives are confirmed with a second test.
Interesting, although 90% accuracy probably won't be enough to get borders reopenedMr Bungle wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:50 amSingapore, October 20
Researchers in Singapore have developed a breath test to detect Covid-19 within a minute. The authorities are working on a roadmap for the third phase of easing of safety measures in the country.
A person would have to blow into a disposable mouthpiece connected to a “high-precision breath sampler”, according to the National University of Singapore researchers. The test, which detects Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in a person’s breath, achieved more than 90 per cent accuracy in a clinical trial involving 180 patients.
The exhaled breath is then collected and fed into a mass spectrometer for measurement. A machine learning software subsequently analyses the VOC profile and generates the result in less than a minute. — PTI
You just need a handy Mass Spec instrument at every station. Please don't confuse Boris with thisSaint wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:53 amInteresting, although 90% accuracy probably won't be enough to get borders reopenedMr Bungle wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:50 amSingapore, October 20
Researchers in Singapore have developed a breath test to detect Covid-19 within a minute. The authorities are working on a roadmap for the third phase of easing of safety measures in the country.
A person would have to blow into a disposable mouthpiece connected to a “high-precision breath sampler”, according to the National University of Singapore researchers. The test, which detects Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) in a person’s breath, achieved more than 90 per cent accuracy in a clinical trial involving 180 patients.
The exhaled breath is then collected and fed into a mass spectrometer for measurement. A machine learning software subsequently analyses the VOC profile and generates the result in less than a minute. — PTI
Why bother with him - he's an utter moron.Biffer wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:39 amHe won't. He'll just repeat it, as if that makes it true.Tichtheid wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:25 amBimbowomxn wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:08 am
50,000 a day was mathematically impossible. It was a scare tactic. Nothing more nothing less.
Mathematically impossible?
You're going to have to show your working on that.
Locked down more tightly during the second rise than early March? Anywhere with a lockdown surely - didn’t your first lockdowns only start in late March?Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:45 amSaint wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 7:43 amExactly. It;s a bit like saying there's no second wave because we don;t have the exponential growth of early March. Seeing how we have social distancing, facemasks, rule of 6, sanitisation, and at least some form of track and trace, it would be extremely disturbing if we had that sort of growth rate. It would imply that NONE OF IT WORKED
Where was locked down tighter during the supposed rise?
Show us the graph and explain how it is mathematically impossible to reach 50 000 cases per day.
I read a 205 year old report that the British were victorious at Waterloo, is it still valid??Tichtheid wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:28 amBimbowomxn wrote: ↑Tue Oct 20, 2020 11:21 am
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/4/e006577
Laboratory tests showed the penetration of particles through the cloth masks to be very high (97%) compared with medical masks (44%) (used in trial) and 3M 9320 N95 (<0.01%), 3M Vflex 9105 N95 (0.1%).
You really need to read the updates and the responses to that five year old article before posting it as any kind of proof again.
Yep, it was the British. The Prussians, Hanoverians and Dutch had nothing to do with it.Openside wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:24 amI read a 205 year old report that the British were victorious at Waterloo, is it still valid??
The battle that ended war in Europe?Openside wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:24 amI read a 205 year old report that the British were victorious at Waterloo, is it still valid??
The "soft" lockdown (WFH if possible pubs stayed open etc was 16th March. Hard lockdown was 23rd March - stay at home, pubs closed, etc. Deaths peaked around 3 weeks later and started properly falling a week after that. So, if Tier 3 is going to be sufficient then it's going to be mid November to peak and a tail off towards Christmas.Jb1981 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:04 amLocked down more tightly during the second rise than early March? Anywhere with a lockdown surely - didn’t your first lockdowns only start in late March?Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:45 amSaint wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 7:43 am
Exactly. It;s a bit like saying there's no second wave because we don;t have the exponential growth of early March. Seeing how we have social distancing, facemasks, rule of 6, sanitisation, and at least some form of track and trace, it would be extremely disturbing if we had that sort of growth rate. It would imply that NONE OF IT WORKED
Where was locked down tighter during the supposed rise?
Surely the evidence points (admittedly through a rather average Track and Trace App) that pubs, etc are not where people catch Covid. Even hundreds wandering around town at midnight OUTSIDE isn't the issue.Saint wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:52 am
The "soft" lockdown (WFH if possible pubs stayed open etc was 16th March. Hard lockdown was 23rd March - stay at home, pubs closed, etc. Deaths peaked around 3 weeks later and started properly falling a week after that. So, if Tier 3 is going to be sufficient then it's going to be mid November to peak and a tail off towards Christmas.
It's at home mixing with friends and family. Tier 3 isn't going to change that.
Number dropped sharply in April because everyone was worried about Covid and did as they were asked regarding isolating and saving the NHS. This time 1/2 the country don't give a shit.
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
Yep, it is when using Excel 2003!Tichtheid wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:25 amMathematically impossible?Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:08 am 50,000 a day was mathematically impossible. It was a scare tactic. Nothing more nothing less.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
I think it depends how people treat Tier 3. If it;s a short sharp reminder to them that they need to distance, take hygiene seriously etc even in their own homes then it will work. To a point I agree that half the country don't give a shit - which hopefully this will shock them into giving a shitSandstorm wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 10:42 amSurely the evidence points (admittedly through a rather average Track and Trace App) that pubs, etc are not where people catch Covid. Even hundreds wandering around town at midnight OUTSIDE isn't the issue.Saint wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:52 am
The "soft" lockdown (WFH if possible pubs stayed open etc was 16th March. Hard lockdown was 23rd March - stay at home, pubs closed, etc. Deaths peaked around 3 weeks later and started properly falling a week after that. So, if Tier 3 is going to be sufficient then it's going to be mid November to peak and a tail off towards Christmas.
It's at home mixing with friends and family. Tier 3 isn't going to change that.
Number dropped sharply in April because everyone was worried about Covid and did as they were asked regarding isolating and saving the NHS. This time 1/2 the country don't give a shit.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8222
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
The critical factor is time.Sandstorm wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 10:42 amSurely the evidence points (admittedly through a rather average Track and Trace App) that pubs, etc are not where people catch Covid. Even hundreds wandering around town at midnight OUTSIDE isn't the issue.Saint wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 9:52 am
The "soft" lockdown (WFH if possible pubs stayed open etc was 16th March. Hard lockdown was 23rd March - stay at home, pubs closed, etc. Deaths peaked around 3 weeks later and started properly falling a week after that. So, if Tier 3 is going to be sufficient then it's going to be mid November to peak and a tail off towards Christmas.
It's at home mixing with friends and family. Tier 3 isn't going to change that.
Number dropped sharply in April because everyone was worried about Covid and did as they were asked regarding isolating and saving the NHS. This time 1/2 the country don't give a shit.
In a pub, you probably aren't going to be 15 minutes with anyone, other than the people you're sat around the table with; in the chippie afterward, it'd only be the people either side of you in queue etc.
The problem is if it's staff that are infectious; then they're going to be potentially moving around passing it onto other staff, & customers; but if they are following good practises, that risk is reduced significantly.
Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 10:54 amYep, it is when using Excel 2003!Tichtheid wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:25 amMathematically impossible?Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:08 am 50,000 a day was mathematically impossible. It was a scare tactic. Nothing more nothing less.
Good point, well made.
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8222
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
We fought on both sides; so we both won & lost that day
Eh?Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 8:29 am
The 50,000 positive tests by the 15th of October was impossible.
The curve they demonstrated wasn’t feasible, as we have now demonstrated. Vallance and Whitty must have known that.
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
"Impossible" has now morphed to "not feasible" "we"
The link
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54234084
The Graph
The Math
Base cases 15-Sep 3,105
after 1 week 6,210
after 2 week 12,420
after 3 week 24,840
after 4 week 49,680
for scenario "If cases double every week"
The link
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54234084
The Graph
The Math
Base cases 15-Sep 3,105
after 1 week 6,210
after 2 week 12,420
after 3 week 24,840
after 4 week 49,680
for scenario "If cases double every week"
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- Insane_Homer
- Posts: 5389
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 3:14 pm
- Location: Leafy Surrey
for 3,105 to reach the 17,234 as per above the weekly reproduction factor was ~1.535 per week as opposed to the do nothing, doubling, worst case scenario of 2.
“Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true.”
- Hal Jordan
- Posts: 4154
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 12:48 pm
- Location: Sector 2814
I see some cunt Tory MP's response to the suggestion that we give food to hungry kids via an extension to the free school meals into the holiday is, "Children have been going hungry under a Labour Government for years" and then some bullshit about Universal Credit.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 1:53 pm "Impossible" has now morphed to "not feasible" "we"
The link
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54234084
The Graph
The Math
Base cases 15-Sep 3,105
after 1 week 6,210
after 2 week 12,420
after 3 week 24,840
after 4 week 49,680
for scenario "If cases double every week"
What would the R need to be on the 15 Sep for this to be possible. ?
Impossible
Why the 15th September? The report you’ve produced is already a week in without doubling. IE impossible.
-
- Posts: 1731
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 2:49 pm
Hal Jordan wrote: ↑Wed Oct 21, 2020 3:19 pm I see some cunt Tory MP's response to the suggestion that we give food to hungry kids via an extension to the free school meals into the holiday is, "Children have been going hungry under a Labour Government for years" and then some bullshit about Universal Credit.
It’s a parents job to feed their children.