Page 88 of 375
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 7:39 pm
by Enzedder
Openside wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 11:29 pm
Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 4:32 pm
Cases: +23,012
Deaths: +174
That makes 1099 deaths for the past 6 days.
so what? people die if not from this, something else...
Let them eat cake eh?
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 8:57 pm
by Ymx
What’s NZs medium/long term plan here? Assuming a viable or economic vaccine doesn’t fall in to their laps.
It can’t be great for the tourism industry.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:01 pm
by Dan54
Ymx wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 8:57 pm
What’s NZs medium/long term plan here? Assuming a viable or economic vaccine doesn’t fall in to their laps.
It can’t be great for the tourism industry.
True it not great for Tourism, and guess the virus isn't very bloody good for Health system if it runs rampart, so..................
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:03 pm
by Dan54
Openside wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 11:29 pm
Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 4:32 pm
Cases: +23,012
Deaths: +174
That makes 1099 deaths for the past 6 days.
so what? people die if not from this, something else...
That's the same as people who smoke saying stuff it I could get killed by a car crossing the road, but you still look left and right to try and avoid dying if you don't have too!
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:07 pm
by Ymx
Dan54 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:03 pm
Openside wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 11:29 pm
Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 4:32 pm
Cases: +23,012
Deaths: +174
That makes 1099 deaths for the past 6 days.
so what? people die if not from this, something else...
That's the same as people who smoke saying stuff it I could get killed by a car crossing the road, but you still look left and right to try and avoid dying if you don't have too!
If we are doing this ...
That’s the same as saying I might get killed on the road, so the government should lock down and stop vehicles using it.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:11 pm
by Ted.
Dan54 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:01 pm
Ymx wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 8:57 pm
What’s NZs medium/long term plan here? Assuming a viable or economic vaccine doesn’t fall in to their laps.
It can’t be great for the tourism industry.
True it not great for Tourism, and guess the virus isn't very bloody good for Health system if it runs rampart, so..................
Who'd have thought, but nor is that scenario especially good for tourism.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:15 pm
by Jb1981
Ymx wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:07 pm
Dan54 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:03 pm
Openside wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 11:29 pm
so what? people die if not from this, something else...
That's the same as people who smoke saying stuff it I could get killed by a car crossing the road, but you still look left and right to try and avoid dying if you don't have too!
If we are doing this ...
That’s the same as saying I might get killed on the road, so the government should lock down and stop vehicles using it.
More like asking for safety measures to be put in place like pedestrian crossings or reduced speed limits / traffic lights etc in problem areas.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:31 pm
by Tichtheid
Jb1981 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:15 pm
Ymx wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:07 pm
Dan54 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:03 pm
That's the same as people who smoke saying stuff it I could get killed by a car crossing the road, but you still look left and right to try and avoid dying if you don't have too!
If we are doing this ...
That’s the same as saying I might get killed on the road, so the government should lock down and stop vehicles using it.
More like asking for safety measures to be put in place like pedestrian crossings or reduced speed limits / traffic lights etc in problem areas.
As a tangent...
There was a guy on the radio a wee while back from the transplant services, he said that improvements in car safety, better breaking systems, better suspension/steering, but most of all, people being made to wear seatbelts has led to a shortage of organs being available for transplants.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 10:10 pm
by Opensides Butler
I volunteer Sir as a donor.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 10:44 pm
by Ymx
Jb1981 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:15 pm
Ymx wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:07 pm
Dan54 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:03 pm
That's the same as people who smoke saying stuff it I could get killed by a car crossing the road, but you still look left and right to try and avoid dying if you don't have too!
If we are doing this ...
That’s the same as saying I might get killed on the road, so the government should lock down and stop vehicles using it.
More like asking for safety measures to be put in place like pedestrian crossings or reduced speed limits / traffic lights etc in problem areas.
We are on bad road condition restrictions at the moment.
It’s not like a free for all, and going the wrong way on a roundabout ...
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Sun Oct 25, 2020 11:11 pm
by fishfoodie
Tichtheid wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:31 pm
Jb1981 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:15 pm
Ymx wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:07 pm
If we are doing this ...
That’s the same as saying I might get killed on the road, so the government should lock down and stop vehicles using it.
More like asking for safety measures to be put in place like pedestrian crossings or reduced speed limits / traffic lights etc in problem areas.
As a tangent...
There was a guy on the radio a wee while back from the transplant services, he said that improvements in car safety, better breaking systems, better suspension/steering, but most of all, people being made to wear seatbelts has led to a shortage of organs being available for transplants.
In the US there are a few States with; "No Helmet Laws", for motorcycles. ER doctors with their usual macabre sense of humor refer to those who decide to not wear helmets as, "Donorcycles", or just "Donors".
Government traffic safety mandates are typically designed to reduce the harmful externalities of risky behaviors. We consider whether motorcycle helmet laws also reduce a beneficial externality by decreasing the pool of viable organ donors. Our central estimates show that organ donations resulting from fatal motor vehicle accidents increase by 10 percent when states repeal helmet laws. Two characteristics of this association suggest that it is causal: first, nearly all of it is concentrated among men, who account for over 90 percent of all motorcyclist deaths, and second, helmet mandates are unrelated to organ donations due to circumstances other than motor vehicle accidents. Our estimates imply that every death of a helmetless motorcyclist prevents or delays as many as 0.33 deaths among individuals on organ transplant waiting lists.
If only Covid didn't fuck up organs before dispatching the donor; countries could significantly reduce their organ waiting lists; & increase the national IQ; because the same fuckwit mentality that decides wearing a helmet, as wearing a mask; will provide a ready supply of organ donors.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:30 am
by Muttonbird
Ted. wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:11 pm
Dan54 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:01 pm
Ymx wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 8:57 pm
What’s NZs medium/long term plan here? Assuming a viable or economic vaccine doesn’t fall in to their laps.
It can’t be great for the tourism industry.
True it not great for Tourism, and guess the virus isn't very bloody good for Health system if it runs rampart, so..................
Who'd have thought, but nor is that scenario especially good for tourism.
Plus the the effect on the tourism industry is somewhat mitigated by all that lovely, lovely cash staying onshore instead of heading off. Several billion dollars didn't get spent overseas this year.
Critics like Madelene Grant and others say wealthy countries not travelling affects the worlds poor. She says we should put our own poor at risk so Vietnamese basket weavers can stay afloat. I say Madelene Grant is an idiot and that charity begins at home.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:39 am
by Hong Kong
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 5:53 am
by Tilly Orifice
Muttonbird wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:30 am
Ted. wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:11 pm
Dan54 wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:01 pm
True it not great for Tourism, and guess the virus isn't very bloody good for Health system if it runs rampart, so..................
Who'd have thought, but nor is that scenario especially good for tourism.
Plus the the effect on the tourism industry is somewhat mitigated by all that lovely, lovely cash staying onshore instead of heading off. Several billion dollars didn't get spent overseas this year.
Critics like Madelene Grant and others say wealthy countries not travelling affects the worlds poor. She says we should put our own poor at risk so Vietnamese basket weavers can stay afloat. I say Madelene Grant is an idiot and that charity begins at home.
Vietnamese basket weavers?
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:05 am
by Green light echo
This. About 1000 times over.
Spot on mate
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:18 am
by Jb1981
Tilly Orifice wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 5:53 am
Muttonbird wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:30 am
Ted. wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:11 pm
Who'd have thought, but nor is that scenario especially good for tourism.
Plus the the effect on the tourism industry is somewhat mitigated by all that lovely, lovely cash staying onshore instead of heading off. Several billion dollars didn't get spent overseas this year.
Critics like Madelene Grant and others say wealthy countries not travelling affects the worlds poor. She says we should put our own poor at risk so Vietnamese basket weavers can stay afloat. I say Madelene Grant is an idiot and that charity begins at home.
Vietnamese basket weavers?
No one ever thinks about the Vietnamese basket weavers.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 6:57 am
by MungoMan
Tilly Orifice wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 5:53 am
Muttonbird wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:30 am
Ted. wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 9:11 pm
Who'd have thought, but nor is that scenario especially good for tourism.
Plus the the effect on the tourism industry is somewhat mitigated by all that lovely, lovely cash staying onshore instead of heading off. Several billion dollars didn't get spent overseas this year.
Critics like Madelene Grant and others say wealthy countries not travelling affects the worlds poor. She says we should put our own poor at risk so Vietnamese basket weavers can stay afloat. I say Madelene Grant is an idiot and that charity begins at home.
Vietnamese basket weavers?
The people who make these, and they stay afloat just fine. Not sure what NZ is doing in terms of practical assistance, tho'.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 8:11 am
by Hong Kong
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 8:38 am
by eldanielfire
That last line just about says it all about the mental mistake of anti-maskers.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 8:57 am
by Biffer
Ymx wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 8:57 pm
What’s NZs medium/long term plan here? Assuming a viable or economic vaccine doesn’t fall in to their laps.
It can’t be great for the tourism industry.
Long term, the pandemic will subside, one way or another. That’s what happens with pandemics. Look up pictures of cities in the 1920s. You see crowded streets, people going about their lives. 1918 pandemic was 2 or 3 years, 1890 pandemic 4 or 5. A vaccine or other treatments will shorten it and get rid of the long tail (also it will provide a baseline for future Coronaviruses jumping species). This is a year or two of restrictions on our lives, that’s all.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:25 am
by Bimbowomxn
Choice and freedom are not important.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:53 am
by Bimbowomxn
This is a year or two of restrictions on our lives, that’s all.
Dear lord. I can only guess you’re not too old.
I’ll go tell my 74 year old FiL that don’t worry you’ll be 77 before you go to the cinema again , but that’s ok.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:16 am
by Calculon
The absolute horror, having to watch a film at home instead of the movie theatre
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:31 am
by Bimbowomxn
Calculon wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:16 am
The absolute horror, having to watch a film at home instead of the movie theatre
Or see his grandsons, life long friends , the car club etc etc.
The dismissal of this on people’s lives especially those with limited time isn’t a surprise I spose.
It’s only 2 years!
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:35 am
by Calculon
Some people, including me, have had to make real sacrifices, but for other selfish people not being able to go to the cinema is too much of an imposition, ffs
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:38 am
by Bimbowomxn
Calculon wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 10:35 am
Some people, including me, have had to make real sacrifices, but for other selfish people not being able to go to the cinema is too much of an imposition, ffs
It was an example of many things a 74 year old with limited time ...
“ including me”
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:02 am
by Insane_Homer
Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:53 am
I’ll go tell my 74 year old FiL that don’t worry you’ll be 77 before you go to the cinema again , but that’s ok.
Yep, he can go to the cinema now and risk being dead by Christmas. What movie, out currently, is that good it's worth risking dying for?
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:06 am
by Paddington Bear
My Grannie, well into her 90s, finally had the fall we've been anticipating for years over the weekend.
Wakes up in hospital, everyone in masks, unable to understand why none of us have visited her (she isn't processing the restrictions). Bloody grim stuff - you would like to think six months into a crisis we'd have worked out a way people could get one visitor in these sorts of circumstances.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:16 am
by Bimbowomxn
Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:02 am
Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:53 am
I’ll go tell my 74 year old FiL that don’t worry you’ll be 77 before you go to the cinema again , but that’s ok.
Yep, he can go to the cinema now and risk being dead by Christmas. What movie, out currently, is that good it's worth risking dying for?
Here’s that broad and subtle thinking again.
Even after I explained this was just an example.....
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:51 am
by Sandstorm
Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:02 am
Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:53 am
I’ll go tell my 74 year old FiL that don’t worry you’ll be 77 before you go to the cinema again , but that’s ok.
Yep, he can go to the cinema now and risk being dead by Christmas. What movie, out currently, is that good it's worth risking dying for?
There's a new Tom Clancy out today: Russian Internet Bots - Op Centre
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:53 am
by fishfoodie
Sandstorm wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:51 am
Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:02 am
Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:53 am
I’ll go tell my 74 year old FiL that don’t worry you’ll be 77 before you go to the cinema again , but that’s ok.
Yep, he can go to the cinema now and risk being dead by Christmas. What movie, out currently, is that good it's worth risking dying for?
There's a new Tom Clancy out today: Russian Internet Bots - Op Centre
Is that the one where the Russian bot tries to bore everyone to death with his endless braindead drivel ?
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:54 am
by Sandstorm
fishfoodie wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:53 am
Is that the one where the Russian bot tries to bore everyone to death with his endless braindead drivel ?
Pensioners are apparently desperate to see it.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:59 am
by Rinkals
Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:53 am
This is a year or two of restrictions on our lives, that’s all.
Dear lord. I can only guess you’re not too old.
I’ll go tell my 74 year old FiL that don’t worry you’ll be 77 before you go to the cinema again , but that’s ok.
Buy him a Netflix subscription, you tight-arse.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:06 pm
by Openside
Enzedder wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 7:39 pm
Openside wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 11:29 pm
Insane_Homer wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 4:32 pm
Cases: +23,012
Deaths: +174
That makes 1099 deaths for the past 6 days.
so what? people die if not from this, something else...
Let them eat cake eh?
Hardly, but we are going to have to learn to live with this virus there is no point in wringing our hands. Neither is there any point in trashing the economy to delay the deaths of a few octogenarians (ask them all the ones I know agree). Lockdowns seemingly are not the answer so where do we go from here? The whole lockdown thing is to prevent the over running of the NHS which didn't happen the first time I don't think its going to happen this time.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:17 pm
by Bimbowomxn
Rinkals wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:59 am
Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:53 am
This is a year or two of restrictions on our lives, that’s all.
Dear lord. I can only guess you’re not too old.
I’ll go tell my 74 year old FiL that don’t worry you’ll be 77 before you go to the cinema again , but that’s ok.
Buy him a Netflix subscription, you tight-arse.
It was an “example” ......
You and the other Saffas unable to understand the most basic form of narrative tools.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:28 pm
by frodder
Meanwhile in Wales you can now buy non essential items again but only if they're essential it would appear. You may have to prove that your non essential essentials are essential however
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:38 pm
by Northern Lights
frodder wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:28 pm
Meanwhile in Wales you can now buy non essential items again but only if they're essential it would appear. You may have to prove that your non essential essentials are essential however
What's the mood music like in Wales with this "circuit breaker", are people on the whole supportive or do they think the Welsh assembly have done too far?
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:40 pm
by sockwithaticket
Openside wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:06 pm
Enzedder wrote: ↑Sun Oct 25, 2020 7:39 pm
Openside wrote: ↑Sat Oct 24, 2020 11:29 pm
so what? people die if not from this, something else...
Let them eat cake eh?
Hardly, but we are going to have to learn to live with this virus there is no point in wringing our hands. Neither is there any point in trashing the economy to delay the deaths of a few octogenarians (ask them all the ones I know agree). Lockdowns seemingly are not the answer so where do we go from here?
The whole lockdown thing is to prevent the over running of the NHS which didn't happen the first time I don't think its going to happen this time.
Imagine how much worse it would have been without measures? The point of restrictions isn't that everything ends up perfect, but to minimise damage.
And for what must be the millionth time, it's not just octogenarians dying and survival can be accompanied by any combination of permanent lung scarring, breathing difficulties and general weakness/low energy. There are perfectly ordinary people who were discharged from hospital months ago still really struggling with things like walking around for a prolonged period of time because of the toll this thing takes on those unfortunate enough to get it bad. While there are factors more likely to suffer a severe case, there are enough people apparently absent those factors to make anyone concerned
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:51 pm
by Rinkals
Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 12:17 pm
Rinkals wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:59 am
Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:53 am
Dear lord. I can only guess you’re not too old.
I’ll go tell my 74 year old FiL that don’t worry you’ll be 77 before you go to the cinema again , but that’s ok.
Buy him a Netflix subscription, you tight-arse.
It was an “example” ......
You and the other Saffas unable to understand the most basic form of narrative tools.
It's a little joke.
I'm trying to inject a little humour here by suggesting that you are tight.
Oh, never mind...
In any case, the "example" you offer is weak. I'm not that much younger than your FIL, but I certainly don't feel that I have only a few years left.
Mind you, I don't have you as a SIL, so perhaps it's inevitable that he might be depressed.
Re: So, coronavirus...
Posted: Mon Oct 26, 2020 1:01 pm
by Hal Jordan
Rinkals wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 11:59 am
Bimbowomxn wrote: ↑Mon Oct 26, 2020 9:53 am
This is a year or two of restrictions on our lives, that’s all.
Dear lord. I can only guess you’re not too old.
I’ll go tell my 74 year old FiL that don’t worry you’ll be 77 before you go to the cinema again , but that’s ok.
Buy him a Netflix subscription, you tight-arse.
Don’t worry, the market will provide.