I’m sure the majority of Scots - those not on rugby forums or social media - willearl the beaver wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 9:13 amWe're playing NZ, a team we've beaten 4 times in history. If we lose we lose, I just don't get the whole supporting NZ over a home nation (outside of England).Biffer wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 8:31 amIt’d be really funny watching the wailing as Ireland failed, yet again, to win a knock out match though.earl the beaver wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 8:17 am
Surely you would prefer to have been beaten by a team that went far in the tournament rather than knowing you'd have had an even bigger hiding in any QF had you won?
If it was Scotland playing NZ in a QF you'd be sure the vast majority of Irish fans would be wanting Scotland to win.
RWCR4 Scotland vs Ireland on 7Oct @ 21h00
All the money you made will never buy back your soul
What a lad. I think they should just give the World Cup to this guy.
So I squares up, casual like.
5. 5 times.earl the beaver wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 9:13 amWe're playing NZ, a team we've beaten 4 times in history. If we lose we lose, I just don't get the whole supporting NZ over a home nation (outside of England).Biffer wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 8:31 amIt’d be really funny watching the wailing as Ireland failed, yet again, to win a knock out match though.earl the beaver wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 8:17 am
Surely you would prefer to have been beaten by a team that went far in the tournament rather than knowing you'd have had an even bigger hiding in any QF had you won?
If it was Scotland playing NZ in a QF you'd be sure the vast majority of Irish fans would be wanting Scotland to win.
I didn't say I'd be supporting them, I just said the reaction would be funny.earl the beaver wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 9:13 amWe're playing NZ, a team we've beaten 4 times in history. If we lose we lose, I just don't get the whole supporting NZ over a home nation (outside of England).Biffer wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 8:31 amIt’d be really funny watching the wailing as Ireland failed, yet again, to win a knock out match though.earl the beaver wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 8:17 am
Surely you would prefer to have been beaten by a team that went far in the tournament rather than knowing you'd have had an even bigger hiding in any QF had you won?
If it was Scotland playing NZ in a QF you'd be sure the vast majority of Irish fans would be wanting Scotland to win.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
I know I am out on a limb on saying I'd kick to the corner but I stand by it for the following reasons:Biffer wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 7:32 pmYep. Got to win before you can win by 8. Or get a try bonus point win.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 6:39 pm True but if that's the case, they were cruising for a bruising. You settle the win first. Margin comes later.
- Only winning the game wasn't enough. A one point win would have been "plucky Scotland" and "Ireland did enough to get through". And the players thinking "aye we won but we're out".
- We had to know we would need between 25-30 points to have a chance. We have only kept them below 19 once in recent years. Given the circumstances, I would have expected the coaches to have looked at it and had a points total in mind we were aiming for and the best way to achieve that.
- We had settled well and were keeping the ball.
- Making it 5-3 and then giving them the ball back on half way (on average) lets them settle even further into the game.
- If the players are that mentally fragile that 3 points would have stopped them capitulating after the second try then we have bigger concerns than turning down three points.
- We have tried the "lets hang in there approach" before. To beat Ireland we had to hit the front and then stay in front, this Ireland team are too good to be constantly chasing them especially knowing we had to win by 8.
We're not going to agree but the over riding thing for me is you have to be in a position to win before you can win by a certain number.Big D wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 11:59 amI know I am out on a limb on saying I'd kick to the corner but I stand by it for the following reasons:Biffer wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 7:32 pmYep. Got to win before you can win by 8. Or get a try bonus point win.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 6:39 pm True but if that's the case, they were cruising for a bruising. You settle the win first. Margin comes later.
- Only winning the game wasn't enough. A one point win would have been "plucky Scotland" and "Ireland did enough to get through". And the players thinking "aye we won but we're out".
- We had to know we would need between 25-30 points to have a chance. We have only kept them below 19 once in recent years. Given the circumstances, I would have expected the coaches to have looked at it and had a points total in mind we were aiming for and the best way to achieve that.
- We had settled well and were keeping the ball.
- Making it 5-3 and then giving them the ball back on half way (on average) lets them settle even further into the game.
- If the players are that mentally fragile that 3 points would have stopped them capitulating after the second try then we have bigger concerns than turning down three points.
- We have tried the "lets hang in there approach" before. To beat Ireland we had to hit the front and then stay in front, this Ireland team are too good to be constantly chasing them especially knowing we had to win by 8.
And are there two g’s in Bugger Off?
-
- Posts: 3584
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2020 9:37 am
I'll be supporting NZ, Ireland's rugby is so boring to watch. If rugby is to keep me as a viewer entertained it's by watching exciting rugby.Biffer wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 11:34 amI didn't say I'd be supporting them, I just said the reaction would be funny.earl the beaver wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 9:13 amWe're playing NZ, a team we've beaten 4 times in history. If we lose we lose, I just don't get the whole supporting NZ over a home nation (outside of England).
If it was Scotland playing NZ in a QF you'd be sure the vast majority of Irish fans would be wanting Scotland to win.
Ireland are very boringly, very world class. Rightfully the best team in the world. But like with SA, I'd rather watch good teams play fun rugby.
Queue the it's fun if you're Irish, I'm sure it is. Enjoy it!
I agree on the second part.Biffer wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 12:04 pmWe're not going to agree but the over riding thing for me is you have to be in a position to win before you can win by a certain number.Big D wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 11:59 amI know I am out on a limb on saying I'd kick to the corner but I stand by it for the following reasons:
- Only winning the game wasn't enough. A one point win would have been "plucky Scotland" and "Ireland did enough to get through". And the players thinking "aye we won but we're out".
- We had to know we would need between 25-30 points to have a chance. We have only kept them below 19 once in recent years. Given the circumstances, I would have expected the coaches to have looked at it and had a points total in mind we were aiming for and the best way to achieve that.
- We had settled well and were keeping the ball.
- Making it 5-3 and then giving them the ball back on half way (on average) lets them settle even further into the game.
- If the players are that mentally fragile that 3 points would have stopped them capitulating after the second try then we have bigger concerns than turning down three points.
- We have tried the "lets hang in there approach" before. To beat Ireland we had to hit the front and then stay in front, this Ireland team are too good to be constantly chasing them especially knowing we had to win by 8.
Even forgoing the +8 point requirement I still don't think we beat specifically this Ireland team by kicking penalties when we have the chance to kick to the corner because they are going to score 20+ against us. The best chance we had of winning was taking chances to score tries. The few times we have beaten them in the last 15 years is when we have hit the front early. Happy to agree to disagree though.
I'm trying to rise above it, like being happy for your c*nty cousin having any success in life. I also think an Ireland v Wales semi will be social media gold.
So I squares up, casual like.
- fishfoodie
- Posts: 8221
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2020 8:25 pm
I doubt the hamsters in the PR server would be up to the task of managing the load for the match thread' we could end up with a bunch of refugees again.
I dunno who'll melt-down harder over here: c69, REFRY or ER.fishfoodie wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 2:18 pmI doubt the hamsters in the PR server would be up to the task of managing the load for the match thread' we could end up with a bunch of refugees again.
That one was on the TMO/AR though(and it was the TMO who called it) as Berry was miles away.Yr Alban wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 6:57 amThere were certainly some dodgy decisions (Keenan clearly being in touch the most annoying). We’d still have lost even if there hadn’t been though.Slick wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 9:12 pm I don’t agree, but quite amusing
https://x.com/smthrscricket/status/1710 ... tSNBueE4mg
This is where I’m at too. I would like to be able to support Ireland, but they aren’t half making it difficult right now. Of course, this may simply be because they are the best team right now, and it’s easier to like a team who aren’t expected to win. I’ve felt the same way about Wales a few times over the years.
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
Yeah. I really do struggle to accept that anyone even vaguely neutral could look at that incident and conclude he wasn’t in touch though. It really isn’t even close.paddyor wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 3:28 pmThat one was on the TMO/AR though(and it was the TMO who called it) as Berry was miles away.Yr Alban wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 6:57 amThere were certainly some dodgy decisions (Keenan clearly being in touch the most annoying). We’d still have lost even if there hadn’t been though.Slick wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 9:12 pm I don’t agree, but quite amusing
https://x.com/smthrscricket/status/1710 ... tSNBueE4mg
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom - for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
Didn't see the Hansen on Turner. THe one Best highlighted for the first try was Beirne IIRC and at worst that was marginal. As long as Beinre is in a position to receive the ball when Sexton plays it(he was a at least a metre onside) he is allowed to continue his run "within reason". You rarely see that given unless they go well beyond the play.Tichtheid wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 7:20 amYr Alban wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 6:57 amThere were certainly some dodgy decisions (Keenan clearly being in touch the most annoying). We’d still have lost even if there hadn’t been though.Slick wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 9:12 pm I don’t agree, but quite amusing
https://x.com/smthrscricket/status/1710 ... tSNBueE4mg
The simple fact is that we should have defended it better, yes we should have been playing off an attacking 50/22 instead of defending, but we didn’t defend nearly as well as Ireland did.
I was much more pissed off with the one that Rory Best pointed out at half time, Price was taken out by Hansen on one side whilst Turner was body checked by (I think) Sheehan on the other, leaving Gilchrist to defend a 15m gap against Ringrose for the first try..
There was an illegal turnover by Porter, hands clearly on the ground which led to a try but again that was a separate piece of play which we should have defended.
Another was Porter again, collapsing like a cheap accordion in the scrum but getting the penalty which led to the fourth try. I’ve watching porter do this for years and he gets away with it, so why would he change anything? Schoeman used to have a way of milking penalties by making the tighthead lose their bind, but refs have cottoned on to it.
I know this sounds like sour grapes, I don’t really care, the top teams do get refereed differently and it’s nothing new, dog knows I’ve seen Scotland, Edinburgh and Glasgow benefit from it whilst playing unfancied opposition at home, it is what it is.
We should have defended better is the bottom line for me in all this, Ireland didn’t give us a sniff until the game was pretty much done.
Again I think that's really on the TMO rather than the ref as he is relying on them for stuff like that. I think the change in how the game is reffed(less drawn out in game TMO analysis) hasn't really sunk in and the refs are getting the blame.
Yup. 10 odd minutes of pressure for zero return? Can't say that doesn't hit lower confidence levels particularly against the number 1 side.Yr Alban wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 6:51 pm100% agree. There have been a bunch of games that have demonstrated this in the RWC - Tonga v Romania today, for example - though generally the margin goes to the stronger team later in the game.Uncle fester wrote: ↑Sun Oct 08, 2023 6:39 pm True but if that's the case, they were cruising for a bruising. You settle the win first. Margin comes later.
I strongly feel that by not taking points when they were on offer, we allowed Ireland to roll right over us.
Well done Ireland.
I really should support them due to family ties.
Fuck it, I don't see them that much anyway. Mon Fiji.
paddyor wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 3:36 pmDidn't see the Hansen on Turner. THe one Best highlighted for the first try was Beirne IIRC and at worst that was marginal. As long as Beinre is in a position to receive the ball when Sexton plays it(he was a at least a metre onside) he is allowed to continue his run "within reason". You rarely see that given unless they go well beyond the play.Tichtheid wrote: ↑Mon Oct 09, 2023 7:20 am
The simple fact is that we should have defended it better, yes we should have been playing off an attacking 50/22 instead of defending, but we didn’t defend nearly as well as Ireland did.
I was much more pissed off with the one that Rory Best pointed out at half time, Price was taken out by Hansen on one side whilst Turner was body checked by (I think) Sheehan on the other, leaving Gilchrist to defend a 15m gap against Ringrose for the first try..
There was an illegal turnover by Porter, hands clearly on the ground which led to a try but again that was a separate piece of play which we should have defended.
Another was Porter again, collapsing like a cheap accordion in the scrum but getting the penalty which led to the fourth try. I’ve watching porter do this for years and he gets away with it, so why would he change anything? Schoeman used to have a way of milking penalties by making the tighthead lose their bind, but refs have cottoned on to it.
I know this sounds like sour grapes, I don’t really care, the top teams do get refereed differently and it’s nothing new, dog knows I’ve seen Scotland, Edinburgh and Glasgow benefit from it whilst playing unfancied opposition at home, it is what it is.
We should have defended better is the bottom line for me in all this, Ireland didn’t give us a sniff until the game was pretty much done.
Again I think that's really on the TMO rather than the ref as he is relying on them for stuff like that. I think the change in how the game is reffed(less drawn out in game TMO analysis) hasn't really sunk in and the refs are getting the blame.
The bit I got wrong was that I thought it was Sheehan on Turner, it was in fact Beirne on Turner, Beirne runs way ahead of Ringrose and knocks Turner over, leaving a big gap for Ringrose to run through. Hansen on Price was the marginal part of the same move and on the second and third viewing I've just seen - he looks okay.
"The way it's officiated now" is a much-used hiding place. I'm not going to comment on this any further, it won't change the result and will only lead to bad feeling.
From the teams that are left I'd be more than happy to see France or Ireland win it.